Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Transcribed oxygen saturation vs oximeter recordings in very low birth weight infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 34, pages 130–135 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to compare hand-transcribed oxygen saturation (SpO2) with electronic oximeter data in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI, <1500 g).

Study Design:

Oximeter data were downloaded from birth through 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) for VLBWI before and after interventions to improve neonatal intensive care unit oxygen management. Transcribed SpO2 values were obtained by chart review. Proportions of transcribed and oximetry data in target (85 to 93%), hypoxemic (80 to 84%), and hyperoxemic (⩾98%) ranges before and after intervention were compared.

Result:

There were 30 441 oximetry hours before intervention and 54 538 oximetry hours after intervention. Transcribed SpO2 values correlated strongly with oximeter overall. However, during hours on supplemental oxygen, transcribed values significantly overdocumented target range and underdocumented values 80 to 84 and ⩾98%. This finding varied by respiratory support and PMA, and increased after intervention.

Conclusion:

Transcribed SpO2 values overdocumented target range and underdocumented hyperoxemic and hypoxemic ranges compared with electronic oximeter data. These results support incorporating electronic oximeter data into medical records.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fouzas S, Priftis KN, Anthracopoulos MB . Pulse oximetry in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (4): 740–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Academy of Pediatric and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. American Academy of Pediatric and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007.

  3. Adhami N, Arabi Y, Raees A, Al-Shimemeri A, Ur-Rahman M, Memish ZA . Effect of corticosteroids on adult varicella pneumonia: Cohort study and literature review. Respirology 2006; 11: 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle M, Wong J . Prescribing oxygen therapy. An audit of oxygen prescribing practices on medical wards at North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. N Z Med J 2006; 119: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taheri P, Abbasi E, Abdeyazdan Z, Fathizadeh N . The effects of a designed program on oxygen saturation and heart rate of premature infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care unit of Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan in 2008–2009. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2010; 15: 66–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sink DW, Thomas P, Bober B, Hagadorn JI . Forty Percent Achievement of the Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Target Range 85–93% is Associated with Improved Retinopathy of Prematurity Outcomes. Pediatric Academic Societies: Vancouver, Canada, 2010 E-PAS20104420.502; E-PAS20104420.502.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zar J . Biostatistical Analysis 3rd edn Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR et al. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (21): 1959–1969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stenson BJ, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Darlow BA, Simes J, Juszczak E, Askie L et al. Oxygen saturation and outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (22): 2094–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt B, Whyte RK, Asztalos EV, Moddemann D, Poets C, Rabi Y et al. Effects of targeting higher vs lower arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 309 (20): 2111–2120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Polin RA, Bateman D . Oxygen-saturation targets in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (22): 2141–2142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bancalari E, Claure N . Oxygenation targets and outcomes in premature infants. JAMA 2013; 309 (20): 2161–2162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ottens J, Baker RA, Newland RF, Mazzone A . The future of the perfusion record: automated data collection vs. manual recording. J Extra Corpor Technol 2005; 37 (4): 355–359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed SR, Finer NN . The effect of averaging time on oximetry values in the premature infant. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e115–e121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston E, Boyle B, Juszczak E, King A, Brocklehurst P, Stenson B . Oxygen targeting in preterm infants using the Masimo SET Radical pulse oximeter. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: F429–F433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eastwood GM, O'Connell B, Considine J . Low-flow oxygen therapy in intensive care: an observational study. Austr Crit Care 2011; 24: 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Devitt JH, Rapanos T, Kurrek M, Cohen MM, Shaw M . The anesthetic record: accuracy and complete-ness. Canad J Anaesth 1999; 46 (2): 122–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No external funding was secured for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Fellows Program, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USA

    T L Ruiz

  2. Clinical Trials Unit, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA

    T L Ruiz

  3. Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA

    T L Ruiz, J M Trzaski, D W Sink & J I Hagadorn

  4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA

    J M Trzaski, D W Sink & J I Hagadorn

Authors
  1. T L Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J M Trzaski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D W Sink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J I Hagadorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J I Hagadorn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, T., Trzaski, J., Sink, D. et al. Transcribed oxygen saturation vs oximeter recordings in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 34, 130–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.157

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links