Introduction

QT interval prolongation has been associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in the general population,1 diabetic patients2 and coronary artery disease.3 An abnormal ventricular repolarization, namely a prolonged QT interval, has been described in hypertensive patients4, 5 and represents a negative prognostic factor in these patients.6, 7 Patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, such as those with primary aldosteronism (PA), have been shown to have a prolonged QTc interval compared with essential hypertension (EH).8

Patients with renal-artery stenosis are at increased risk of cardiovascular events.9 The causes are uncertain and may be related to renal insufficiency, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone and sympathetic nervous system activation and coronary atherosclerosis.10, 11

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the QT interval in patients with renovascular hypertension (RV), before and after endovascular revascularization (balloon renal-artery angioplasty with or without stenting), and in patients with PA, before and after treatment with spironolactone (bilateral adrenal hyperplasia) or adrenalectomy (aldosterone-producing adenoma).

Methods

Patients with RV were recruited according to the following characteristics: consecutive patients referred to our Unit from 2002 to 2009 with hypertension with evidence of a hemodynamically significant renal-artery stenosis at duplex ultrasonography, and recurrent congestive heart failure, progressive renal failure, uncontrolled or refractory hypertension, which indicated a revascularization procedure.12

Patients with PA were recruited according to the following characteristics: consecutive patients referred to our Unit from 2002 to 2009 with an aldosterone to plasma renin activity ratio (aldosterone–renin ratio) >40, together with aldosterone levels >15 ng dl−1,13 underwent further evaluation with a salt loading test (2 l of 0.9% NaCl infused over 4 h).14 Plasma aldosterone levels >5 ng dl−1 at the end of the test were deemed diagnostic for PA. These patients eventually underwent adrenal CT scan with fine cuts and adrenal vein sampling. Sampling was considered successful if the adrenal vein/inferior vena cava gradient was at least 2. Lateralization was diagnosed when the aldosterone/cortisol ratio from the adrenal was at least four times the ratio from the other adrenal gland.13

A total of 60 and 160 hypertensive patients were diagnosed with RV and PA, respectively. After exclusion of patients with arrhythmias, bundle branch blocks, diabetes, obesity (body mass index 30) and those taking antiarrhythmic drugs of any class, 24 patients with RV (14 fibromuscular dysplasia and 10 atherosclerotic renal-artery disease) and 38 patients with PA (29 bilateral adrenal hyperplasia and 9 aldosterone-producing adenoma) were included in the study.

Simultaneous, 12-lead ECGs were recorded by means of a 12-channel ECG (Mac 1200, Marquette Hellige, Freiburg, Germany) at a paper speed of 50 mm s−1, between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. RR and QT intervals were measured with a magnifying ruler on the ECG tracing. QT interval was taken from the beginning of the QRS complex to the end of the downslope of the T wave (crossing of the isoelectric line). When T waves were inverted, the end was taken at the point where the trace returned to the isoelectric line. When U waves were present, the end of the T wave was taken as the nadir between the T and the U wave. If the end of the T wave was not clearly identifiable, the lead was not included in the analysis. Only ECGs with six or more total leads and three or more precordial leads with measurable QT intervals were considered. In each lead, three consecutive beats in the period of minimal RR variation were considered for QT measurement. The mean value of these three intervals was calculated. The QT considered for each subject was the maximum QT measured in any lead. QT intervals were corrected for the previous cardiac cycle length according to Hodges' formula: QTcH (ms)=QT+1.75 (heart rate−60).15 QTcH was considered prolonged when >440 ms, in accordance with the criteria commonly used in the literature.

QT analysis was performed by the same independent operator (M.S.), who was unaware of the clinical data of patients and controls. Twelve randomly chosen ECGs (six RV and six PA) were analysed by the same observer on two different occasions, 1 week apart. Intra-observer variability in QT measurements was evaluated with Bland and Altman's plot method. The mean of the difference for QTcH was 0.38 ms (1.96 s.d.: 1.86), the corresponding 95% confidence intervals ranging from −0.25 to 1.51 ms.

A second observer (V.M.), unaware of the clinical data of the patients, measured QT intervals from 50 randomly chosen ECGs. The inter-observer coefficient of variation for the QT interval, calculated to assess reproducibility, was 3.4%.

In RV patients, ECG recordings were performed before and after revascularization. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 19 patients (41% without stenting and 59% with stenting). The average time between ECG measurements was 19±25 months. Angioplasty did not result in procedure-related complications or re-stenosis in any of the patients.

In PA patients, ECG recordings were performed before and after treatment with spironolactone (10 patients with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia) or surgery (five patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma). The average time between ECG measurements was 25±25 months.

Results were compared with those of 89 sex- and age-matched controls with EH.

All patients and controls gave their fully-informed consent and the local Ethics Committee approved the study.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 17.0 (IBM Italia, Milano, Italy) and Stata 11 packages (TStat S.r.l., Sulmona (AQ), Italy). Results were expressed as means±s.d. Wilcoxon's test for paired data was used to compare group distributions, and χ2-test was used to test for group differences of proportions. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed using QTcH as dependent variable. Analysis of covariance was performed to verify if the mean difference in QTc duration between secondary and EH patients would remain significant after adjustments for gender, blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, serum potassium and antihypertensive treatment. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General and clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Compared with EH, RV patients had higher blood pressure values, greater prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and a higher number of antihypertensive drugs (P<0.001); PA patients showed higher aldosterone–renin ratio and lower plasma renin activity and potassium levels (P<0.001).

Table 1 General and clinical characteristics of the study population

Results of QTcH and RR intervals are shown in Table 2. Compared with EH, RV and PA patients showed longer QTcH values (P<0.001). The prevalence of QTcH >440 ms was higher in RV (29%) and PA patients (29%) compared with EH controls (4%; P<0.001 among groups). Patients with RV due to fibromuscular dysplasia had a QTcH similar to those with atherosclerotic renal-artery disease (436±28 vs. 432±32 ms, respectively, P=0.78). Patients with PA due to aldosterone-producing adenoma showed a slightly more prolonged QTcH compared with those with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (438±24 vs. 419±21 ms, respectively, P=0.06).

Table 2 Results of QTcH and RR intervals in the study population

Multiple linear regression analysis, using QTcH as dependent variable, was performed in all patients. The following independent factors were entered into the model: age, sex, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, serum potassium, and the use of Ca-channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, α1-blockers and diuretics. The analysis identified sex (β=0.226, P=0.01) and the use of Ca-channel blockers (β=0.335, P=0.001) as independent predictors of QTcH, while age (β=−0.064, P=0.48), systolic blood pressure (β=−0.017, P=0.86), left ventricular hypertrophy (β=0.099, P=0.32), serum potassium (β=−0.067, P=0.47), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (β=0.069, P=0.50), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (β=0.000, P=0.99), α1-blockers (β=0.110, P=0.23) and diuretics (β=0.087, P=0.34) were not significantly related to QTcH length. With the limits of the small subpopulation size, the statistical significance for the above variables was not maintained if multiple linear regression analysis, using QTcH as dependent variable, was performed separately in each subgroup of patients.

Analysis of covariance was performed. After adjustments for sex, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, serum potassium and antihypertensive treatment, the difference in QTcH between subgroups was maintained (P=0.032 for the type of hypertension, RV, PA and EH).

After treatment, QTcH interval was significantly reduced in patients with RV (P=0.02) and PA (P=0.01), as shown in Figure 1. Reductions of QTcH duration were similar in RV and PA patients (−2.8±4.7 and −4.8±5.4% change, respectively; P=0.18); compared with basal values, the prevalence of QTcH >440 ms was reduced to 12% in RV and 0% in PA patients after treatment.

Figure 1
figure 1

Results of QTcH interval before and after treatment. PA, primary aldosteronism; RV, renovascular hypertension.

After treatment, blood pressure was significantly lower in both the groups of patients (RV: before 161±20/93±11 mm Hg, after 138±18/83±7 mm Hg, P<0.005; PA: before 155±19/96±10 mm Hg, after 129±10/80±9 mm Hg, P<0.0001).

Discussion

The present study evaluated the ventricular repolarization in patients with RV hypertension. QT intervals of RV patients were prolonged compared with subjects with EH, and similar to those of subjects with PA. In both RV and PA patients, after specific treatments, QTcH duration shortened and prevalence of prolonged QTcH values fell, together with a decline in blood pressure levels.

RV and PA patients in the present study showed higher blood pressure values and greater prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and an increased number of antihypertensive medications per day, compared with the control group. Such results confirmed a severe hypertensive status with a high cardiovascular risk in RV and PA patients,16 compared with EH.

The evaluation of ventricular repolarization in RV patients has been addressed for the first time in the present study. The only other data available in the literature are those of RV patients used as a control group in a study on myocardial repolarization lability in individuals with high–normal blood pressure.17 In keeping with our results, these authors described an increased QT interval variability index compared with subjects with high–normal blood pressure.

The mechanisms behind the abnormal ventricular repolarization of RV patients are not known. Factors such as hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, and abnormality of intracellular ion currents and couplings may have a role in QT prolongation.18, 19 Data from animal studies show that RV hypertension induces a prolongation of the activation-recovery interval on the epicardium of both ventricles.20 The mechanisms of the repolarization prolongation have been related to angiotensin II and aldosterone. Angiotensin II inhibits potassium currents in cardiac myocytes both directly, through modulation of Kir2.1—Kir2.2 channel subunit expression and inward rectifier potassium (IK1) currents,21 and indirectly, by increasing aldosterone production. Aldosterone has been shown to increase acutely action potential duration in humans.22 Treatment with losartan normalizes ventricular alterations (assessed by ventricular fibrillation threshold, dispersion of effective refractory periods, action potential duration and IK1 current density) in renovascular hypertensive rats.23

QT interval prolongation in PA patients has been demonstrated by our group in a previous study.8 ARR and systolic blood pressure were found to be independent predictors of QTc.

Causes of QT interval prolongation in PA include the depletion of intracellular potassium concentration because of elevated aldosterone levels, the presence of a more advanced hypertensive heart disease, aldosterone-induced myocardial fibrosis and the presence of a chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system.8

The assessment of ventricular repolarization in hypertensive patients is important in terms of prognosis. A prolonged QT interval is a risk factor for ischemic heart disease in hypertensive subjects,6 and in EH with left ventricular hypertrophy QT interval duration is independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, even after effective antihypertensive treatment.4

Multiple linear regression analysis identified the use of Ca-channel blockers as an independent predictor of QTcH length. Both RV and PA patients and EH controls in treatment with Ca-channel blockers showed a longer QTcH interval (data not shown). Nevertheless, none of the Ca-channel blockers employed has been associated with QT prolongation (http://www.qtdrugs.org). In the literature, the use of calcium antagonists is associated with no effect24 or amelioration25 of ventricular repolarization, and the result of the present study may depend on the prescription of such agents in the more severe cases of hypertension.

After specific treatments (renal-artery revascularization in RV, spironolactone in PA with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, or adrenalectomy in PA with aldosterone-producing adenoma), QTc duration shortened and the prevalence of prolonged QTc interval was reduced. The causes of these modifications cannot be addressed within the present study. It is possible that the cardiac benefit of the improved ventricular repolarization may be dependent on the decline in blood pressure levels or the reduction of the activity of the sympathetic nervous system.11

In RV patients, the effects of revascularization on ventricular repolarization had not been addressed before. After adrenalectomy, QT intervals shorten in patients with Conn's adenoma.26 The effect of drug therapy on QT interval in PA had not been studied before, although aldosterone-blockers were shown to improve QT dispersion in patients with heart failure,27 and reduce the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes in severe heart failure28 and after myocardial infarction.29

A limitation of the study was the small number of RV patients. This is due to a selection bias imposed by the strict pharmacological inclusion criteria and the low prevalence of clinically manifested RV hypertension (1–5% of hypertensive patients).11, 30 The strict selection of patients and the short follow-up period may also account for the reduction in blood pressure after angioplasty, a result that is in contrast with those of two large published trials.31, 32

In conclusion, patients with secondary hypertension due to renal-artery stenosis and PA have a prolonged QT interval compared with subjects with EH. Ventricular repolarization improves after specific treatments of the two conditions. Whether QT prolongation worsens the prognosis of these patients has yet to be established.