Sir,
While vitrectomy is typically performed with the patient supine, technical difficulties arise in patients who are unable to lie flat. Modified equipment and patient positioning have been described for cataract surgery.1, 2 However, no position modifications have been described for vitreoretinal surgery. We report a positioning and surgical technique for pars plana vitrectomy in a severely kyphotic patient.
Case report
A 65-year-old male with severe kyphosis and prior cervical vertebral fusion with limited neck extension presented with retained lens fragments after cataract surgery and medically uncontrolled intraocular pressure in the left eye. Ability to position supine was tested in an examination chair (Figures 1a and b). Intra-operatively, the gurney was tilted to a Trendelenburg position (25–45°, head down). The patient’s neck and shoulders were supported with foam pillows and towels that were taped, and the patient’s thighs were supported by pillows. The surgical belt was tightened. A stool was placed under the head of the bed for support, in the event of bed breakage from extreme positioning (Figure 1c). The operating microscope with wide-angle viewing system (OPMI LUMERA 700 and RESIGHT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) was rotated 20° to align with the corneal plane. A temporal surgical approach was used (Figure 1d). Intraocular pressures were 20.5 mm Hg in the right eye and 19.5 mm Hg in the left eye, measured by a pneumatonometer. A mild intravenous anesthetic was administered, followed by sub-Tenon’s anesthesia. Three-port 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and lensectomy were performed. Infusion pressures were kept low (10–20 mm Hg). Postoperative results were favorable, with no increase in neck pain.
Comment
Trendelenburg positioning and temporal approach can be used for vitrectomy in patients who cannot lie flat. In some cases a superior approach may be feasible, depending upon the surgeon’s access to the eye over the brow. Trendelenburg positioning can cause cardiac and pulmonary stress, increase intraocular pressure by 10–20 mm Hg3 and decrease cerebral perfusion and ocular perfusion pressure.4, 5 Infusion pressures should be kept low and operating times minimized to prevent these sequelae. An in-office trial of Trendelenburg positioning can simulate the operating table. Careful review of the patient’s ocular and medical history and planning with a multidisciplinary team can help achieve surgical goals while maximizing patient comfort and safety.
References
Rogers GM, Goins KM . Cataract surgery in the patient that cannot lie flat. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21 (1): 71–74.
Nair J, Rimmer T . Side saddle cataract surgery for patients unable to lie flat: learning from the past. Eye 2007; 21 (8): 1122–1123.
Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, Roth A, Yan W, Fernandez S et al. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2009; 109 (2): 473–478.
Molloy BL . Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure. AANA J 2011; 79 (2): 115–121.
Martin JT . The Trendelenburg position: a review of current slants about head down tilt. AANA J 1995; 63 (1): 29–36.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by That Man May See, Inc., and Research to Prevent Blindness.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afshar, A., Pongsachareonnont, P., Siegner, S. et al. Trendelenburg positioning with temporal approach for vitreoretinal surgery in a patient with severe kyphosis. Eye 28, 1261–1263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.171
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.171