The human intestinal microbiota is an extremely dense mixed microbial population within the human gut. It is composed of trillions of microbial cells forming a complex and competitive ecosystem that significantly impacts 'host' human cells as well as invading bacterial pathogens1. Disruption of gut microbiota diversity with oral antibiotics increases the risk of enteric infections and also causes a number of immune disorders (e.g., atopic dermatitis, asthma, and type 1 diabetes)2,4. A recent article by Ng et al.5 identifies a mechanism by which invading pathogens exploit this disruption in the intestinal microbiota through the uptake of liberated host carbohydrates. Such a discovery suggests that antibiotics not only negatively affect our indigenous microbiota, but they can also actually promote the proliferation of enteric pathogens.

Enteric pathogens interact extensively with the intestinal microbiota3, therefore it should be no surprise that these pathogens use an antibiotic-disturbed gut microbiota to their advantage. In 2008, Serkirov et al.6 used increasing doses of vancomycin and streptomycin to disrupt the murine microbiota prior to infecting these mice with S. Typhimurium (the causative agent of enteric salmonellosis/gastroenteritis in humans). They found that these antibiotics altered the gut microbiota in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, in mice treated with increasing doses of antibiotics prior to infection, S. Typhimurium was more capable of colonizing the intestinal tract. Stecher et al.7 found that S. Typhimurium actually exploits the host's inflammatory immune response to overcome colonization resistance from the intestinal microbiota. Hence, the mechanisms by which these enteric pathogens evade the protection of our gut microbiota are rather complex and more investigation is required.

In a recent paper published in Nature, Ng and colleagues, based in Justin Sonnenburg's Stanford laboratory, identify a mechanism by which antibiotic-associated pathogens exploit the increase in mucosal carbohydrate availability that occurs after disruption of the gut microbiota with oral antibiotics5. Many commensal and pathogenic bacteria use sialic acids acquired from their hosts as an energy source8. However, some bacteria, such as Bacteroides thetatiotaomicron (Bt), encode a sialidase required to cleave and release sialic acid from the mucosal glycoconjugates, but lack the catabolic pathway to consume it. S. Typhimurium and C. difficile conversely possess the nan operon necessary to consume sialic acid within the lumen of the intestine but lack the sialidase to liberate it9,10.

Ng et al. infected both germ-free (microbiota-free) and Bt-monoassociated mice with S. Typhimurium and C. difficile to assess the uptake of free sialic acid by these pathogens in a microbiota-dependent environment. In the mice infected with S. Typhimurium, transcriptional profiling revealed that the nanE and fuc1 operons (genes encoding catabolic pathways for sialic acid and another monosaccharide, fucose, respectively) were significantly upregulated in the Bt-monoassicated mice relative to the germ-free mice. They constructed a mutant strain of S. Typhimurium in which they deleted the nanA and fuc1 operons. In competition experiments, the mutant strain showed a significant disadvantage in the Bt-monoassociated mice, yet this deletion had no effect on germ-free mice. C. difficile encodes the nan operon necessary for sialic acid consumption but does not encode any genes related to fucose consumption. Ng et al. measured the expression of nanA and nanE upon infection of germ-free and Bt-monoassociated mice with C. difficile by quantitative RT-PCR. In Bt-monoassociated mice both genes exhibited elevated expression levels and an increased density of C. difficile relative to germ-free mice. Such findings show that usage of sialic acid by S. Typhimurium and C. difficile and fucose consumption by S. Typhimurium is microbiota-dependent.

The authors also assessed whether sialic acid use is related to pathogen proliferation in antibiotic-treated microbiota. After treatment of conventional mice with streptomycin, they quantified free sialic acids in the caeca of these mice and found lower levels of sialic acid in untreated mice relative to the streptomycin-treated mice. S. Typhimurium mutants with deletions in the nan and fuc operons (St-ΔnanA and St-ΔnanAΔfucI) displayed a competitive defect relative to wild-type (WT) S. Typhimurium, which is consistent with sialic acid and fucose being necessary for S. Typhimurium proliferation. They reported a similar finding in C. difficile mutants lacking nanT (Cd-nanT−), as Cd-nanT− expansion was significantly compromised in antibiotic-treated mice relative to conventional mice. Furthermore, the nan operon in WT C. difficile was highly induced in antibiotic-treated mice relative to the C. difficile in vitro model. These models support the idea that antibiotics not only disrupt the gut microbiota but they also allow for the release of carbohydrates necessary for the proliferation of enteric pathogens (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic overview of antibiotic-altered microbiota experiments. The caecum of conventional mice (normal microbiota) exhibited low sialic acid levels compared to antibiotic-treated mice (altered microbiota). C. difficile mutant expansion was significantly compromised in conventional mice and the C. difficile nan operon was highly induced in antibiotic-treated mice. S. Typhimurium mutants displayed a competitive defect in antibiotic-treated mice relative to conventional mice. All results are consistent with the concept that liberated sialic acid allows for the growth and proliferation of WT S. Typhimurium and C. difficile within an antibiotic-disturbed gut microbiota.

Diseases such as vaginal candidiasis, Clostridium difficile colitis, and bacterial urinary tract infections typically arise shortly after antibiotic therapy6. As shown by Ng et al., it is unlikely that simple disruption of the gut microbiota homeostasis is the cause for these enteric infections. Further insight into the mechanisms involved in antibiotic disruption of the intestinal microbiota is necessary to determine what molecules or mechanisms each of these pathogens is exploiting to effectively grow and proliferate inside its host. Moreover, this study could potentially lead to novel therapeutic strategies, possibly through probiotic regimens using bacteria that target these carbohydrates for digestion or via the administration of drugs that might inhibit the enzymes used by the gut microbiota to free these carbohydrates5.