Background

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible central vision loss in Caucasians 50 years and older in the United States. The prevalence increases with age1 and AMD can either be dry or wet (neovascular). In neovascular AMD, there is ingrowth of new blood vessels choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from the choriocapillaris through Bruchs membrane and retinal pigmented epithelium into the subretinal spaces.2 Central vision loss usually occurs because of fibrous tissue that accompanies the ingrowth of new vessels in addition to the disruption of the retinal pigment epithelium—photoreceptor complex owing to leakage of serum and blood.3, 4

The results of photodynamic therapy study (TAP) and verteporfin in photodynamic therapy (VIP) studies showed that there was beneficial effect in terms of stabilization of vision treated with verteporfin therapy. In subgroup analysis of patients with predominantly classic and pure occult subfoveal CNV, there could be improvement of vision.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 However, these studies were carried out in North America and Europe where the main target population was Caucasian.16 Therefore, the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) by verteporin in Asian Chinese eyes is still unknown.17, 18 We reported our experience of treating patients with subfoveal CNV due to AMD in the Chinese population and compared the first year result with those of TAP/VIP studies.

Design

Retrospective case series from a single centre.

Methods

We reviewed all clinical records of patients who had PDT performed in our centre in Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, with clinical evidence of subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, from July 2002 to June 2003. The study population consisted of patients older than 50 years of either gender and with visual acuity >20/200. All patients were examined by a single ophthalmologist (CM Fan) and assessed for suitability of performing PDT. Fluorescein angiogram was performed and interpreted by the same ophthalmologist based on the definition used in previous trial.6, 10, 19 Patients had to have fluorescein angiographic evidence of CNV due to AMD extending within the geographic centre of the foveal avascular zone in order to participate in our study. Lesions were divided into predominantly classic, minimally classic and pure occult according to their angiographic findings. We only recruited predominantly classic and pure occult lessions into our study. The predominantly classic lesion was defined as any subfoveal lesion in which the area of the classic component on FA occupied at least 50% of the area of the entire lesion at baseline, while the pure occult lesion was defined as any subfoveal lesion with pure occult component and no classic component on FA. Moreover, the greatest linear dimension of the entire lesion could not, exceed 5400 μm on the retina.

Patients were excluded from the study if any of the following conditions were noted: features other than AMD; a tear (rip) of retinal pigment epithelium; any significant ocular disease compromising their vision; inability to obtain any photograph for documentation; history of laser treatment for AMD before; previous verteporfin therapy for AMD; history of intraocular surgery or Nd : YAG capsulotomy in the last few months; active liver disease, history of porphyria or related hypersensitivity reaction.

Further courses of PDT for eligible patients were recommended as often as every 3 months until month 12 provided that fluorescein angiographic evidence of recurrent CNV was observed.

Descriptive analysis of patient's demographic, baseline characteristic, and visual outcome were recorded and compared with TAP/VIP reports at first year.

Results

In all, 46 eyes of 42 patients were recruited into our study, which included, 38 patients with either eye involved and four patients with both eyes involved. Of the patients, 30 were male while 12 were female. The mean age was 72 years (ranged from 50 to 80 years). On fluorescein angiogram, 11 eyes were classified as predominantly classic type of CNV and 35 eyes were classified as pure occult type of CNV. The size of the lesion ranged from 1.03 to 5.4 mm. The mean lesion size for predominantly classic and pure occult CNV was 2.9 and 3.9 mm, respectively. The mean number of PDT performed for each patient was 2.9 (ranged from 1 to 4) at the first year.

The changes in visual acuity throughout the study are summarized in Figures 1 and 2 as well as in Tables 1 and 2. Of the 11 patients with predominantly classic CNV, seven patients (64%) showed visual improvement of which five improved from one to three lines and two improved from three to six lines. On the contrary, four patients (36%) showed loss in vision that included one loss from one to three lines and three loss from three to six lines. As for the 35 patients with pure occult CNV, 10 patients (29%) showed visual improvement that included eight improved from one to three lines and two improved from three to six lines. Of the 14 patients (40%) had the same vision as before, while 11 patients (31%) lost their vision that included eight deteriorating from one to three lines and three deteriorating from three to six lines.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chart showing frequency distribution of change in VA from baseline to month 12.

Figure 2
figure 2

Chart showing frequency distribution of change in VA from baseline to month 12.

Table 1 Frequency distribution of changes in visual acuity from baseline at month 12
Table 2 Frequency distribution of changes in visual acuity from baseline at the month 12

Discussion

The baseline demographic characteristics of our patients including mean age and lesion size are similar to that of TAP/VIP studies. The average treatment session is also comparable to the recommendation from TAP/VIP studies19 (2.9 vs 3.4/1st year).

Of the 11 predominantly classic CNV in our study, three (27%) suffered a loss more than three lines and seven (64%) had visual improvement after treatment at 12 months. The TAP 1 randomized clinical trials in 1999 revealed that at 12 months in the verteporfin-treated group, 246 of 402 eyes (61%) had a loss of less than three lines.3 In further subgroup analysis, when looking at patients with predominantly classic CNV, there was a statistically significant benefit in the prevention of visual acuity loss in the verteporfin-treated group as compared with the placebo group (67 vs 39%). When we compared our result with that of TAP report 1 for predominantly classic lesion, a smaller number of our patients had visual deterioration in terms of visual acuity loss of more than three lines than that of TAP report 1 subgroup analysis (27 vs 33%). As for the pure occult CNV group, three (9%) out of 35 patients had visual acuity loss of more than three lines while 10 (29%) had visual improvement after the treatment at 12 months. The VIP report 2 showed that the primary outcome of pure occult CNV of the verteporfin and placebo groups had similar results at the 12 month examination (51 vs 54% losts of at least three lines), although secondary outcome measures, such as angiographic outcomes, significantly favoured the verteporfin-treated group.9 When we compared our results with that of VIP report 2, a smaller number of our patients had visual deterioration in terms of visual acuity loss of more than three lines than that of VIP report 2 (9 vs 51%).

Although evidence suggests that the Chinese population with neovascular AMD have a natural history similar to that of the Caucasian population with neovascular AMD,17 our study showed that the visual outcome in Chinese AMD patients was better than in Caucasian patients after PDT at 1 year, even though our study and TAP/VIP investigations may not be directly comparable.

There are a number of limitations in our study. Firstly, our study is retrospective while TAP/VIP studies are prospective in nature. Secondly, our sample size is small when compared with either TAP or VIP study. Thirdly, there is no control group in this study.

Conclusion

The 1-year result of PDT for AMD patients with predominantly classic and pure occult CNV in Chinese eyes seems to be better than that of TAP and VIP studies. Further observation and follow-up will be necessary for documentation.