Commentary

This paper presents the results of a systematic review examining the evidence available to support the use of 38% SDF to prevent or arrest caries. The paper starts by outlining the many current and historical uses of silver and silver compounds in medicine and dentistry, which stretch back as far as 1000 BC and of course includes amalgam restorations.

SDF is postulated to prevent or arrest caries by three mechanisms. The first of these is through the action of fluoride, the second via the reaction of silver with bacterial amino acids and nucleic acids, which prevents bacterial metabolism and is thus bactericidal, the third by precipitation of a layer of insoluble silver apatite. The application of SDF appears almost as simple as the application of fluoride varnish, as it can be painted on and left for 3 min per quadrant.

The systematic review methods used here appear sound but, unfortunately, only two RCT were identified that could be included in the review. Chu et al. (2002)1 compared an annual application of SDF with 3-monthly applications of 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish to carious upper anterior teeth of 3–5-year old children in China. There was a further control group where water was applied. They also investigated whether excavating the caries before application of the SDF or NaF varnish had any effect. The second RCT, by Llodra et al. (2005),2 compared a twice-yearly application of SDF to carious primary canines, molars and first molars of children in Cuba, with the application of water as the control. Both studies found SDF to be effective at preventing the development of new carious lesions and arresting existing ones and, compared with fluoride varnish, was more effective. Caries excavation had no effect on the findings.

These results are very promising but, as ever, further studies are required to confirm the results on other samples. For example, the participants in the study by Llodra and colleagues (2005)2 had little access to fluoride toothpaste, whereas the better use of fluoride toothpaste in the study by Chu et al. (2002)1 was still less then ideal. There has been one further RCT published this year which presumably would be included in any future revisions of this review, which again demonstrates SDF effectively arresting caries in primary teeth.3 Few side-effects were reported but, again, this requires further investigation as some adverse effects, such as gingival sensitivity and dark staining, are potential issues when SDF is used.

Although I cannot, on this evidence, agree that SDF is a “silver bullet”, it certainly appears to have great potential both to prevent and arrest caries and we should all consider its use.