Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Diet-dependent female choice for males with ‘good genes’ in a soil predatory mite

Nature volume 401, pages 581–584 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Female choice for mates with ‘good genes’ presupposes that some males have better genes than others1. However, the resulting selection against inferior males causes such genetic variability to disappear. This paradox may be resolved when substantial variability is maintained at a balance between selection and mutation2. Alternatively, populations may exhibit genetic polymorphisms maintained by frequency-dependent selection or hybrid vigour3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Here we show that a local population of soil predatory mites exhibits genetic variation in preference for two prey species. We find that hybrids between selected preference lines are superior or inferior in population growth rate, depending on the composition of the diet. Finally, we show that females in this population mate disassortatively when hybrids are superior, but switch to assortative mating otherwise. Thus, mate choice varies with diet and is tuned to incorporate ‘good genes’ in the offspring, that is, genes that promote the population growth rate of the offspring on the same diet as that experienced by the parents. In this way, hybrid success and mate choice act together in maintaining or eliminating genetic polymorphism in local populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Observed (black columns) percentage of female predatory mites that, in three two-choice tests, attacked prey R 3, 2, 1 and 0 times.
Figure 2: Histograms of attacks on prey R for F1 × parent backcrosses.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson,M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulmer,M. G. Maintenance of genetic variability by mutation–selection balance. Genome 31, 761–767 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falconer,D. S. & McKay,R. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 3rd edn (Longman, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Felsenstein,J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why there are so few kinds of animals. Evolution 35, 124–138 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoekstra,R. F., Bijlsma,R. & Dolman,A. J. Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: Models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favoured homozygote in each environment. Genet. Res. 45, 299–314 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Dorado,A. The effect of niche preference on polymorphism protection in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 40, 936–945 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meeus, T. de, Michalakis,Y., Renaud,F. & Olivieri,I. Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation: soft and hard selection models. Evol. Ecol. 7, 175–198 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones,J. S. Can genes choose habitats? Nature 286, 757–758 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown,J. L. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity Behav. Ecol. 8, 60–65 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sabelis,M. W. in Natural Enemies, The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and Diseases (ed. Crawley, M. J.) 225–264 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lesna,I., Sabelis,M. W. & Conijn,C. G. M. Biological control of the bulk mite, Rhizoglyphus robini, by the predatory mite, Hypoaspis aculeifer, on lilies: Predator–prey interactions at various spatial scales. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 369–376 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lesna,I. Bulb mite biocontrol: evolutionary genetics of prey choice in soil predators. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Amsterdam (1998).

  13. Witalinski,W. Sperm competition in the Acari. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23, 455–465 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maynard Smith,J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637–650 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Futuyma,D. J. & Moreno,G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 207–233 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chesson,P. L. in Community Ecology (eds Diamond, J. & Case, T. J.) 240–254 (Harper and Row, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chesson,P. A need for niches? Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 26–28 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Serradilla,J. M. & Ayala,F. J. Alloprocoptic selection: A mode of natural selection promoting polymorphism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 2022–2025 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilburn,A. A. & Day,T. H. Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 159–165 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Houtman,A. M. & Falls,J. B. Negative assortative mating in the white-throated sparrow: the effect of mate choice and intrasexual competition. Anim. Behav. 48, 377–383 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenington,S. The t-complex: a story of genes, behavior, and populations. Adv. Study Behav. 20, 51–86 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coopersmith,C. B. & Lenington,S. Preferences of female mice for males whose t-haplotype differs from their own. Anim. Behav. 40, 1179–1181 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lenington,S., Coopersmith,C. B. & Erhart,M. Female preference and variability among t-haplotypes in wild house mice. Am. Nat. 144, 766–784 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Potts,W. K., Manning,C. J. & Wakeland,E. K. The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 346, 369–378 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Penn,D. J. & Potts,W. K. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153, 145–164 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Penn,D. J. & Potts,W. K. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1299–1306 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Edwards,S. V. & Hedrick,P. W. Evolution and ecology of MHC molecules: from genomics to sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 305–311 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sokal,R. R. & Rohlf,F. J. Biometry (Freeman, New York, 1995).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Boerlijst, H. Breeuwer, S. Elliot, A. Janssen, R. Lingeman, Y. Michalakis, N. van Straalen, F. Vala and A. Weeks for discussion and comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the Technology Foundation (S.TW) and the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section for Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 320, Amsterdam, 1098 SM, The Netherlands

    Izabela Lesna & Maurice W. Sabelis

Authors
  1. Izabela Lesna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maurice W. Sabelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izabela Lesna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lesna, I., Sabelis, M. Diet-dependent female choice for males with ‘good genes’ in a soil predatory mite. Nature 401, 581–584 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/44125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/44125

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing