Abstract
Understanding the allocation of metabolic energy between the sustenance of an organism and its growth is an important issue in ecology. West et al.1 have built on their earlier attempts to explain the exponent for the allometric scaling of metabolism and have derived a single, parameterless universal curve that describes the growth of many species. Here we show that the universal curve arises from general considerations that are independent of the specific allometric model used by West et al. and that the data do not distinguish between a 3/4 or 2/3 exponent in the relationship between metabolic rate and mass scaling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
von Bertalanffy2 (see his equation (5)) considered a general equation of the form dm/dt = aαmα−bαmβ, where m is the body's mass at time t, and α and β are unspecified exponents, and aα and bα are positive coefficients. The equation considered by West et al.1 is a special case, with α = 3/4 and β = 1, whereas von Bertalanffy studied the case with α = 2/3 and β = 1. Such an equation can be cast in a scaling form: dm/dt = mαf(m/M), where M provides a scale for the organism's mass and is usually chosen to be the asymptotic maximum body size. The scaling function f approaches a constant value for a small argument — when m(t) is small compared with M, relatively little energy is required to sustain the organism and virtually all of the metabolic energy is funnelled into growth processes. The requirement that dm/dt = 0 when m reaches the value M leads to the condition that f(1) = 0.
Moreover, the initial condition of the mass at t = 0 being equal to the birth mass, m0, must be satisfied. For von Bertalanffy's equation2, f(x) = aα(1 − x1−α), with aα = bαM1−α.
We have analysed the data of West et al.1 on the cow, hen and guppy to assess whether it is possible to discriminate between the two choices for α. We find that their equation (5) (which is a special case of equation (6) of ref. 2), written in the form
or, equivalently, as
(with the dimensionless mass ratio r = (m/M)1−α and the dimensionless time τ = ), fits the observations equally well for both values of α (Fig. 1).
For simplicity, we have chosen M from Table 1 of ref. 1. We determined γα = aα(1−α)/M1−α using the values of a3/4 from the same table and a2/3 for the cow, hen and guppy to be 0.62, 0.67 and 0.064, respectively, to ensure that γ2/3 = γ3/4 for simplicity. (We have not tried to adjust the value of M and γ to achieve a better fit because that is beside the point here.) Also, an equally good fit of the universal curve is obtained (Fig. 1d) for the three species with both values of α. Furthermore, the form of the universal curve (equation (2)) is independent of the value of α. Thus, the existence of a universal curve indicates nothing about the value of α.
References
West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. Nature 413, 628–631 (2001).
von Bertalanffy, L. Q. Rev. Biol. 32, 217–231 (1957).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banavar, J., Damuth, J., Maritan, A. et al. Modelling universality and scaling. Nature 420, 626 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/420626a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/420626a
This article is cited by
-
Modelling von Bertalanffy growth function of fish with fractals
Hydrobiologia (2024)
-
Universal ontogenetic growth without fitted parameters: implications for life history invariants and population growth
Theoretical Ecology (2023)
-
Explorability and the origin of network sparsity in living systems
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate
Journal of Comparative Physiology B (2013)
-
On the Structure-Bounded Growth Processes in Plant Populations
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2010)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.