Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Drosophila Mad binds to DNA and directly mediates activation of vestigial by Decapentaplegic

Abstract

The TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β)-related signalling proteins, including Decapentaplegic (Dpp) in Drosophila and bone morphogenic proteins and activin in vertebrates, affect the growth and patterning of a great variety of structures. However, the mechanisms by which these ligands regulate gene expression are not understood. Activation of complexes of type I with type II receptors results in the phosphorylation and nuclear localization of members of the SMAD protein family1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, which are thought to act as co-activators of transcription, perhaps in conjunction with sequence-specific cofactors10. Here we show that the amino-terminal domain of the Drosophila Mothers against dpp protein (Mad), a mediator of Dpp signalling11,12,13,14, possesses a sequence-specific DNA-binding activity that becomes apparent when carboxy-terminal residues are removed. Mad binds to and is required for the activation of an enhancer within the vestigial wing-patterning gene in cells across the entire developing wing blade. Mad also binds to Dpp-response elements in other genes. These results suggest that Dpp signalling regulates gene expression by activating Mad binding to target gene enhancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mad activity is required for Vg expression in the cells of the developing wing blade.
Figure 2: The binding of MadN protein to the vg quadrant enhancer is sequence specific and essential for activation in vivo.
Figure 3: The N-terminal domain of Mad protein (MadN) binds to the vg quadrant enhancer.
Figure 4: The lab endodermal and Ubx midgut enhancers contain MadN binding sites similar to those in the vg quadrant enhancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Graff, J. M., Bansal, A. & Melton, D. A. Xenopus Mad proteins transduce distinct subsets of signals for the TGFβ superfamily. Cell 85, 479–487 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoodless, P. A. et al. MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 85, 489–500 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, F. et al. Ahuman Mad protein acting as a BMP-regulated transcriptional activator. Nature 381, 622–623 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eppert, K. et al. MADR2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGF β-regulated MAD-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma. Cell 86, 543–552 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y., Feng, X.-H., Wu, R.-Y. & Derynck, R. Receptor-associated Mad homologues synergize as effectors of the TGF-β response. Nature 383, 168–172 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lagna, G., Hata, A., Hemmati-Brivnlou, A. & Massagué, J. Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-β signalling pathways. Nature 383, 832–836 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Savage, C. et al. C. elegans genes sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 genes define a conserved family of TGF-β pathway components. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 790–794 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Macias-Silva, M. et al. MADR2 is a substrate of the TGF-β receptor and its phosphorylation is required for nuclear accumulation and signaling. Cell 87, 1215–1224 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Derynck, R. & Zhang, Y. Intracellular signalling: The Mad way to do it. Curr. Biol. 6, 1226–1229 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, X., Rubock, M. J. & Whitman, M. Atranscriptional partner for MAD proteins in TGF-β signalling. Nature 383, 691–696 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Raftery, L., Twombly, V., Wharton, K. & Gelbart, W. Genetic screens to identify elements of the decapentaplegic pathway in Drosophila. Genetics 139, 241–254 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sekelsky, J., Newfeld, S., Raftery, L., Chartoff, E. & Gelbart, W. Genetic characterization and cloning of Mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139, 1347–1358 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newfeld, S. J., Chartoff, E. H., Graff, J. M., Melton, D. A. & Gelbart, W. M. Mothers against dpp encodes a conserved cytoplasmic protein required in DPP/TGF-β responsive cells. Development 122, 2099–2108 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wiersdorff, V., Lecuit, T., Cohen, S. M. & Mlodzik, M. Mad acts downstream of Dpp receptors, revealing a differential requirement for dpp signaling in initiation and propagation of morphogenesis in the Drosophila eye. Development 122, 2153–2162 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blair, S. Compartments and appendage development in Drosophila. BioEssays 17, 229–309 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basler, K. & Struhl, G. Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature 368, 208–214 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tabata, T. & Kornberg, T. Hedgehog is a signalling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 76, 89–102 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zecca, M., Basler, K. & Struhl, G. Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development 121, 2265–2278 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ingham, P. W. & Fietz, M. J. Quantitative effects of hedgehog and decapentaplegic activity on the patterning of the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 5, 432–440 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Posakony, L., Raftery, L. & Gelbart, W. Wing formation in Drosophila melanogaster requires decapentaplegic gene function along the anterior–posterior compartment boundary. Mech. Dev. 33, 69–82 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Capdevilla, J. & Guerrero, I. Targeted expression of the signalling molecule decapentaplegic induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings. EMBO J. 13, 4459–4468 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nellen, D., Burke, R., Struhl, G. & Basler, K. Direct and long-range action of a Dpp morphogen gradient. Cell 85, 357–368 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lecuit, T. et al. Two distinct mechanisms for long-range patterning by Decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Nature 381, 387–393 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J. et al. Integration of positional signals and regulation of wing formation and identity by Drosophila vestigial gene. Nature 382, 133–138 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. de Celis, J. F., Bario, R. & Kafatos, F. C. Agene complex acting downstream of dpp in Drosophila wing morphogenesis. Nature 381, 421–424 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grimm, S. & Pflugfelder, G. O. Control of the gene optomotor-blind in Drosophila wing development by decapentaplegic and wingless. Science 271, 1601–1604 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chouinard, S. & Kaufman, T. C. Control of expression of the homeotic labial (lab) locus of Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for both positive and negative autogenous regulation. Development 113, 1267–1280 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tremml, G. & Bienz, M. Induction of labial expression in the Drosophila endoderm: response elements for dpp signalling and for autoregulation. Development 116, 447–456 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thuringer, F., Cohen, S. M. & Bienz, M. Dissection of an indirect autoregulatory response of a homeotic Drosophila gene. EMBO J. 12, 2419–2430 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eresh, S., Riese, J., Jackson, D. B., Bohmann, D. & Bienz, M. ACREB-binding site as a target for decapentaplegic signalling during Drosophila endoderm induction. EMBO J. 16, 2014–2022 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ausubel, F. M. et al. (eds) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology supplement 28, pp. 16.6.1–16.7.7 (Wiley, New York, (1994)).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen Laughon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Johnson, K., Chen, H. et al. Drosophila Mad binds to DNA and directly mediates activation of vestigial by Decapentaplegic. Nature 388, 304–308 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/40906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/40906

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing