Abstract
Fatty acid synthase (FAS) is the key enzyme of de novo fatty acid synthesis and has been shown to be involved in carcinogenesis of numerous human malignancies, including breast, colorectal, and prostate carcinomas, often associated with a worse prognosis. Although FAS is mainly expressed in the liver, an implication of FAS in hepatocarcinogenesis, has not yet been investigated. FAS expression is stimulated by insulin and glucose, and insulin is also the primary trigger of hepatocarcinogenesis in an endocrine experimental model, which is induced by low-number transplantation of islets of Langerhans into the livers of diabetic rats. We therefore investigated, whether FAS is implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis in this model and in comparison to chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis after N-nitrosomorpholine (NNM) treatment in diabetic and normoglycemic rats. Preneoplastic clear-cell foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH), harvested after laser-microdissection of kryostat sections, showed an overexpression of FAS messenger RNA in gene expression profiles, done by array-hybridization, and in quantitative RT-PCR (Light-Cycler). Virtually, all (96–98%) of the subsequently investigated FAH and the glycogenotic hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas showed an additional strong FAS protein overexpression. In the NNM-model, FAS protein was also overexpressed in the vast majority (87%) of glycogenotic FAH and neoplasms, in particular in the diabetic animals. Also two spontaneous glycogenotic FAH in control animals displayed strong FAS overexpression. Basophilic lesions and neoplasms, which occasionally develop out of the primary clear-cell FAH at later stages of carcinogenesis, however, lost FAS overexpression. In conclusion, FAS overexpression is an early phenonemon in spontaneous, hormonally and chemically induced rat hepatocarcinogenesis, demonstrable in early clear-cell (glycogenotic) FAH and hepatocellular neoplasms. FAS overexpression can be attributed to the local hyperinsulinemia in the transplantation model and belongs to cellular and metabolic alterations in the chemical model, which are induced by an insulinomimetic but yet unknown mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
After low-number transplantation of islets of Langerhans into the livers of diabetic rats, the liver acini draining the blood from the islet grafts show cellular alterations, the foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH).1 FAH resemble the glycogen-storing or clear-cell phenotype of preneoplastic foci known from experimental and human hepatocarcinogenesis.2, 3 In the transplantation model, these preneoplastic FAH may develop into hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) and carcinomas (HCC) within 6–24 months after islet transplantation.4 Previous results indicate that insulin is the primary trigger for the development of FAH and hepatocarcinogenesis in this model.1, 4, 5, 6, 7 In the beginning of the carcinogenic process, however, these FAH can be regarded as purely adaptative in nature. At this stage, insulin effects manifested in several aspects, that is, an increase in glycogen storage and proliferative activity, lipid accumulation, and altered expression of several insulin-related proteins, including IGF-I and its binding proteins, such as IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-4.1, 4, 6 Moreover, we recently demonstrated increased insulin signalling within the FAH, reflected in a translocation of the insulin receptor and overexpression of several insulin signal transduction proteins, such as insulin receptor substrate-1, Raf-1 and Mek-1.7 The carbohydrate metabolism in FAH has also been thoroughly investigated and was altered in an insulin-typical manner,5 showing downregulation of glucose-6-phosphatase or upregulation of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase among other altered enzyme activities. Based on the lipid accumulation, one might presume that insulin also altered the lipid metabolism in these preneoplastic hepatocytes.
Part of this study is a tentative evaluation of the gene expression profile in very early FAH, performed by array-hybridization, which identified an overexpression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) in the FAH as one of the major alterations. FAS is a multifunctional enzyme complex catalyzing different reactions in the biosynthesis of long-chain fatty acids, starting from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA.8, 9, 10 Thus, it plays a key role in the de novo lipid synthesis in rodents and humans. It is usually expressed at low levels in most adult tissues, as nutritional fatty acids downregulate de novo fatty acid synthesis. However, it is expressed more strongly in the liver, in the lactating breast, or during embryonic development.11, 12 Insulin is known to transcriptionally regulate FAS expression.13, 14, 15
Several human neoplasms overexpress FAS, including colorectal,16, 17 endometrial,18 gastric,19 mammary,20, 21 ovary,22 and prostate23 adenocarcinomas, as well as oral24 and pulmonary25 squamous cell carcinomas, often associated with poor prognosis.22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Moreover, FAS inhibition triggered apoptosis in the MCF7 human breast cancer cell line.31 Regarding its low expression in most tissues, FAS inhibition is thus an interesting target for cancer therapy.32, 33, 34 Although FAS is physiologically mainly expressed in the liver, the implication of FAS in hepatocarcinogenesis has not yet been investigated.
In addition to the gene expression profile mentioned above and quantitative RT-PCR, we examined FAS expression in the transplantation model immunohistochemically, using streptozotocin- and autoimmune-diabetic rats. Furthermore, we evaluated FAS expression in chemically induced preneoplastic foci after N-nitrosomorpholine-(NNM)-treatment and in spontaneous FAH in old control animals, which resemble hepatocarcinogenesis in the transplantation model in several aspects.35
Materials and methods
Animal Treatment
Animals were subdivided into four experimental groups (EG) and one control group (CG). In EG I (n=46), the main group, diabetes was induced in adult 3-month-old inbred male Lewis rats by treatment with a single subcutaneous dose of streptozotocin (80 mg/kg body weight). Then, the animals received only 250–450 islet grafts as reported in detail previously,1 so that mild hyperglycemia (250–300 mg/dl) persisted for at least 10 months. Rats were killed under anesthesia between 2 weeks and 24 months after transplantation.
EG II consisted of BB/Pfd rats of the same age. These animals have become diabetic by an autoimmunological mechanism, similar to human type I diabetes at an age of 3–5 months. Approximately 70% of these BB/Pfd rats showed a previously described spontaneous re-establishment of self-tolerance to the islet cells, caused by an unknown mechanism.36 Only these rats were used to prevent immunological destruction of the transplanted islets and only animals showing vital transplants at the time of killing were included in this study (n=12). Transplantation was performed as in EG I. Animals were killed between 2 weeks and 12 months after transplantation.
Hepatocarcinogenesis in Lewis rats of EG III and EG IV was chemically induced. In EG III (n=7), 4-month-old animals received a daily administration of NNM via oral application for 6 weeks (16 mg/kg body weight). Thereafter, they were kept for another 26 weeks before they were killed.
EG IV-rats (n=7) were initially made diabetic by streptozotocin injection as described for the main group (EG I). Then, they also received NNM and were killed 26 weeks after cessation of the NNM treatment as EG III.
The CG was made up of 10 nondiabetic rats that were not transplanted. Animals of this group served for observing spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis and were killed at the age of 2 years.
All animals were investigated immunohistochemically, except for two and seven animals of EG I, which were instead examined by atlas-array hybridization and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. Housing and treatment of the animals were in line with the guidelines of the Society for Laboratory Animal Service (GV-SOLAS) and the strict German animal protection law.
Tissue Sampling and Processing
For array analysis and quantitative RT-PCR, liver tissue obtained from the middle lobe 2 weeks after transplantation and six additional HCC from five animals 12–24 months after transplantation were snap-frozen in isopentane (at −120°C) and immediately stored at −80°C. Thereafter, and in the remaining animals, the livers were fixed by perfusion with a fixation cocktail, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with the periodic acid–Schiff reaction as described previously.1
Laser Microdissection
For array analysis and quantitative RT-PCR, several FAH were microdissected using the Laser Microbeam Microdissection Microscope (Palm, Bernried, Germany) as shown previously.37 For quantitative RT-PCR, 20–30 serial kryostat sections (8 μm thickness) were microdissected. As we performed only two array analyses, we wanted to exclude any interference in validity owing to amplification errors caused by utilization of PCR-based methods. Thus, 250 serial cryostat sections containing FAHs were laser-microdissected for one array analysis; the corresponding control was also harvested by laser microdissection from unaltered tissue of 50 cryostat sections. Total RNA was extracted with the RNAeasy-Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Array Analysis
Array analysis was performed in two animals 14 days after islet transplantation using nylon arrays containing 1176 gene-specific primers for cDNA labeling (BD Atlas™ Nylon cDNA Expression Array, Rat 1.2, Cat.# 7854-1, BD Biosciences/Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany). The quantity of the samples and integrity of the messenger RNA (mRNA) were evaluated by photometric measurement and agarose gel electrophoresis. Equal amounts (4.5–7 μg) of total RNA were then labelled with 32P (Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany) and transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA). Hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The membranes were finally visualized on X-ray-films (2–3 days processing). Array analysis was carried out in order to obtain a tentative overview of the gene expression in very early FAH after transplantation and not to define a characteristic pattern of alterations. Thus, we did not make a computerized evaluation of the membranes to detect each slight difference. Only differences that were clearly visible to the naked eye were considered for further investigation.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in laser-microdissected FAH and unaltered liver tissue of two animals. After RNA preparation (RNAeasy kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcription (Reverse transcription system, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), cloning and PCR-amplification were conducted as described elsewhere.37 Briefly, FAS and β-actin (internal control) were amplified using the LightCycler-FastStart DNA Master Hybridization Probes kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Sequences of primers, hybridization probes, annealing temperatures, and length of PCR-products are given in Table 1 . Relative expression levels of different samples of FAHs were calculated by quantification of FAS levels, normalized to the endogeneously expressed house keeping gene β-actin according to the formula: 2(Rt−Et)/2(Rn−En). Rt and Et are the threshold cycle numbers for the reference gene β-actin and the FAS gene in FAHs, respectively, whereas Rn and En fulfill the same purpose for the unaltered tissue.
Immunohistochemistry
Sections of 5 μm thickness were deparaffinized and boiled for 20 min in Dako Target Retrieval Solution High pH (Dako, Denmark, No. S3307) in a microwave oven (450 W). Incubation with the primary antibody (monoclonal mouse-Ig-G-anti-FAS, BD Transduction Labarotories, Germany, No. 610963) was performed overnight at 4°C. Biotinylated horse-anti-mouse/rabbit-IgG (H+L, Alexis Corp., Germany No. VC-BA-1400) was used as the second antibody, and visualization was done automatically by the StreptABC method (Vectastain ABC-AP Kit AK 500, Alexis Corp.) using alkaline phosphatase as enzyme and neufuchsin as chromogen. Slides were finally counterstained with hemalaun. Polyclonal antiinsulin, antiglucagon and antisomatostatin antibodies (Dako; dilution 1:200, 4°C incubation for 20 h) were used as described previously to prove the existence of the transplanted islets or smaller remnants within the foci or tumors.4
Results
Atlas-Array-Hybridization
As a whole, the gene expression profile in both animals was relatively congruent and showed a pattern that is typical of liver tissue. This was, for example, reflected in a high activity of genes coding for liver-specific proteins, such as α1-antitrypsin or fibrinogen (Figure 1). Only few genes were differentially expressed to such an extent that they were visible to the naked eye. These were upregulation of FAS, apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein A-IV in FAH in both arrays, as well as IGFBP-1-precursor downregulation in FAH in one array.
FAS-RT-PCR
Quantitative RT-PCR displayed a 3.0- and 6.7-fold overexpression of FAS in the FAH of both animals, confirming the results of the arrays (Figure 2). FAS expression in the HCC was more variable, showing a downregulation in four tumors (0.24–0.39-fold of the expression of the unaltered liver tissue), and an unaltered expression or slight overexpression in the other two (0.94- and 1.77-fold, respectively).
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
In the transplantation experiment, the usual distribution and arrangement of FAH were identified. Transplanted islets of Langerhans were situated in the terminal portal venules, and the FAH were recognized as glycogen- and fat-storing clear-cell foci, strictly confined to the borders of the draining liver acini. Regarding the morphology, no differences were observed between streptozotocin-diabetic Lewis and autoimmune-diabetic BB rats. A total of 80 and 45 FAH were noted in the streptozotocin-diabetic and BB rats, respectively, and then examined immunohistochemically. The preneoplastic foci in the diabetic and nondiabetic animals of the NNM-model were randomly distributed within the liver parenchyma. In this experiment, we identified 47 lesions for subsequent immunohistochemical analysis. Two spontaneous clear-cell foci were noted in the nondiabetic control rats. In addition, we found three HCA (two basophilic, one clear-cell) and one well-differentiated clear-cell HCC in the transplantation experiment, as well as two basophilic and one clear-cell well-differentiated HCC in the NNM-model.
FAS expression was always granular and cytoplasmic. In the non-diabetic control rats (Figure 3a), we encountered a weak to moderate and more evenly distributed staining pattern. In the diabetic animals, however, expression was often stronger and predominated in hepatocytes of the acinar zone 3 (Figure 3b).
The two spontaneous FAH in the control animals showed strong FAS overexpression when compared to the adjacent parenchyma (Figure 3c). The NNM-induced FAH had a morphology that was similar to these spontaneous foci, and 87% of them displayed FAS overexpression (Figure 3d). Two of these FAH showed intermingled basophilic cells, qualifying them as mixed-cell foci. These basophilic cells were immunohistochemically negative. FAS overexpression within the NNM-model could be demonstrated in both the diabetic and non-diabetic animals, although it was more pronounced in the hyperglycemic rats.
In the transplantation experiment, 98 and 96% of FAH in the streptozotocin- and autoimmune-diabetic rats showed strong overexpression of FAS, respectively. As we noted no differences in staining intensity between these two groups, a crucial role of streptozotocin was excluded. FAS overexpression was so strong that the FAH could be easily observed at very low magnification (Figure 4a). The transplanted islet within the FAH and the strict confinement of the FAH to the borders of liver acinus were well recognizable (Figure 4b). Staining was more intense in FAH with predominant glycogen than in those with fat accumulation, but this was merely a result of the smaller cytosolic compartment in fat-storing hepatocytes, caused by extending fat vacuoles.
FAS was overexpressed in the clear-cell but not in the basophilic tumors of both, the endocrine and the chemical model, irrespective of whether they were HCA or HCC and to which experimental group they belonged (Figure 4c, d). In most cases, clear-cell HCA and HCC also displayed a few intermingled basophilic cells that did not overexpress FAS.
Discussion
Array hybridization of early FAH revealed an overall similar gene expression pattern when compared to the unaltered normal tissue. In particular, there was no altered expression of certain oncogenes or tumor supressor genes, although this was not expected at this early time-point 2 weeks after transplantation. Nevertheless, some genes did show an altered expression, which, in part, confirmed observations made in former studies. The upregulation of apolipoprotein A-IV (A-IV) has recently been shown in this model.37 This was the first indication of alterations in the lipoprotein metabolism within the FAH. Regarding carcinogenesis, however, downregulation of IGFBP-1 is more important, as IGFBP-1 has been ascribed tumor suppressive potential via its supposed inhibitory effect on IGF-1. This confirms the results of a previous study that investigated the gene expression of the IGF axis components in detail and that, apart from an overexpression of IGF-1 and IGFBP-4, demonstrated downregulation of IGFBP-1 in this model.6
The most intriguing result of the array analysis was the discovery of FAS overexpression in the FAH, confirmed by RT-PCR. FAS gene expression in rat hepatocytes is regulated by both insulin and glucose. It has been suggested that insulin regulation of FAS is at least partly mediated by the basic/helix–loop–helix/leucine zipper transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c)38 and that glucose induction of FAS is mediated through a SREBP-1c-distinct transcription factor, designated as either carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP)39 or carbohydrate-responsive factor.40 Interestingly, glucose and insulin stimulate FAS expression synergistically, that is, high glucose levels increase the insulin stimulatory effect,38 which explains the strong FAS overexpression in our hormonal model. It has also been proposed that the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway and the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase pathway are involved in the SREBP-1c-mediated FAS gene expression41, 42 and that hepatic glucokinase (glucose-specific hexokinase) is required for the synergistic action of ChREBP and SREBP-1c in lipogenic gene expression.39 The high hexokinase activity in the transplantation model has already been demonstrated5 and we have recently also shown, that insulin signalling via the MAP kinase pathway is strongly increased in the FAH.7 Thus, our in vivo study confirms the observations made in cultured hepatocytes: high levels of insulin and glucose in conjunction with high glucokinase expression, possibly mediated by the MAP kinase pathway, lead to upregulation of the FAS gene.
Although we did not perform a quantitative analysis of the protein expression, the synergistic effect of glucose and/or insulin on FAS expression is, nevertheless, displayed by our immunohistochemical results. In the transplantation experiment, the staining signal was lowest in the liver tissue of the control animals (low insulin, low glucose), stronger in the nonaltered liver tissue of diabetic EG I and EG II animals (high glucose, low insulin), and highest in FAH (high glucose, high insulin). The stimulatory effect of hyperglycemia was also noted in the NNM-model, as FAS expression in the insulinomimetic FAH was higher in diabetic animals of EG IV than in normoglycemic rats of EG III.
FAS expression in carcinogenesis is of growing interest, as FAS has been reported to be overexpressed in several human malignancies.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28 Interestingly, FAS is already overexpressed in some noninvasive precursors, such as intraepithelial neoplasia of the squamous24, 25 or prostate23 epithelium, intraductal mammary carcinoma,20 or colorectal adenoma.16, 17, 18 Thus, it seems to be an early event in carcinogenesis of these entities and resembles the early overexpression seen in our model. As FAS is overexpressed in many different tumor entities with a different pathogenetic background, it may be regarded as an alteration of general importance in carcinogenesis. Lipids are necessary not only for energy metabolism; they also provide the pool of available substrates for the biogenesis of cellular membranes, which is particularly important for tumor cells as a prerequisite for their proliferative activity. Moreover, it has recently been shown that FAS expression mainly affects the phospholipid content of detergent-resistant membrane fractions, thus possibly altering microdomain-controlled cell functions, including signal transduction and intracellular trafficking.43
To the best of our knowledge, FAS overexpression in HCC has not yet been reported. Thus, our observations are the first to give evidence of a FAS overexpression in hepatocellular preneoplastic foci and glycogenotic hepatocellular neoplasms. It still needs to be verified which mechanism triggers hepatocarcinogenesis in the NNM-model and in the spontaneous FAH in old control animals; however, in most aspects, these glycogenotic FAH resemble the insulin-triggered transplantation model,35 including the clear-cell morphology of the early preneoplastic lesions and most of the alterations in enzyme activities in carbohydrate metabolism.5, 44 Thus, FAS overexpression further substantiates the insulinomimetic phenotype of clear-cell FAH in chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis.
The variability of FAS overexpression in the hepatocellular tumors is in line with previous reports on other aspects of carcinogenesis in this model. In later stages of the carcinogenic process, which were not the primary subject of this study, the preneoplastic lesions and tumors become more diverse morphologically and biologically.4 The clear-cell character in some lesions gets lost with increasing basophilia of these cells, and other altered signalling pathways and protein expressions, such as an implication transforming growth factor α, have been noted; thus, these lesions do not reflect the insulinomimetic phenotype of the early FAH anymore. In this context, loss of FAS overexpression in the basophilic cell population is not surprising.
In humans, epidemiological studies have revealed an increased risk of primary liver cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus.45, 46 The situation in type II (non-insulindependent) diabetes mellitus, that is, hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic portal vein blood, is comparable to the FAH in our model. Thus, for these patients, the results of our studies, using this animal model, might provide a mechanism, which links the metabolic disorder to the carcinogenic process. Unfortunately, these studies did not distinguish between type I and type II diabetes. According to our observations, we would expect that particularly type II diabetic patients carry an increased risk of hepatocellular neoplasms.
Conclusively, we have shown FAS overexpression in clear-cell preneoplastic foci of spontaneously developing, as well as hormonally and chemically induced rat hepatocarcinogenesis, indicating a possible implication of FAS in the development of hepatocellular tumors. Moreover, FAS overexpression in the transplantation experiment can be explained as the result of a combined influence of insulin and glucose on FAS gene expression, which confirms observations that have formerly only been made in vitro.
References
Dombrowski F, Lehringer-Polzin M, Pfeifer U . Hyperproliferative liver acini after intraportal islet transplantation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Lab Invest 1994;71:688–699.
Bannasch P . Pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: sequential cellular, molecular, and metabolic changes. Prog Liver Dis 1996;14:161–197.
Su Q, Benner A, Hofmann WJ, et al. Human hepatic preneoplasia: phenotypes and proliferation kinetics of foci and nodules of altered hepatocytes and their relationship to liver cell dysplasia. Virchows Arch 1997;431:391–406.
Dombrowski F, Bannasch P, Pfeifer U . Hepatocellular neoplasms induced by low-number pancreatic islet transplants in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Am J Pathol 1997;150:1071–1087.
Dombrowski F, Filsinger E, Bannasch P, et al. Altered liver acini induced in diabetic rats by portal vein islet isografts resemble preneoplastic hepatic foci in their enzymic pattern. Am J Pathol 1996;148:1249–1256.
Scharf JG, Ramadori G, Dombrowski F . Analysis of the IGF axis in preneoplastic hepatic foci and hepatocellular neoplasms developing after low-number pancreatic islet transplantation into the livers of streptozotocin diabetic rats. Lab Invest 2000;80:1399–1411.
Evert M, Sun J, Pichler S, et al. Insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate-1, Raf-1 and Mek-1 during hormonal hepatocarcinogenesis by intrahepatic pancreatic islet transplantation in diabetic rats. Cancer Res, (in press).
Smith S . The animal fatty acid synthase: one gene, one polypeptide, seven enzymes. FASEB J 1994; 8: 1248–1259.
Smith S, Witkowski A, Joshi AK . Structural and functional organization of the animal fatty acid synthase. Prog Lipid Res 2003;42:289–317.
Wakil SJ . Fatty acid synthase, a proficient multifunctional enzyme. Biochemistry 1989;28:4523–4530.
Chirala SS, Chand H, Matzuk M, et al. Fatty acid synthesis is essential in embryonic development: fatty acid synthase null mutants and most of the heterozygotes die in utero. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:6358–6363.
Kusakabe T, Maeda M, Hoshi N, et al. Fatty acid synthase is expressed mainly in adult hormone-sensitive cells or cells with high lipid metabolism and in proliferating fetal cells. J Histochem Cytochem 2000;48:613–622.
Wolf SS, Hofer G, Beck KF, et al. Insulin-responsive regions of the rat fatty acid synthase gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994;203:943–950.
Wang Y, Jones Voy B, Urs S, et al. The human fatty acid synthase gene and de novo lipogenesis are coordinately regulated in human adipose tissue. J Nutr 2004;134:1032–1038.
Sul HS, Wang D . Nutritional and hormonal regulation of enzymes in fat synthesis: studies of fatty acid synthase and mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene transcription. Annu Rev Nutr 1998;18:331–351.
Rashid A, Pizer ES, Moga M, et al. Elevated expression of fatty acid synthase and fatty acid synthetic activity in colorectal neoplasia. Am J Pathol 1997;150:201–208.
Visca P, Alo PL, Del Nonno F, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of fatty acid synthase, apoptotic-regulating genes, proliferating factors, and ras protein product in colorectal adenomas, carcinomas, and adjacent nonneoplastic mucosa. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:4111–4118.
Pizer ES, Lax SF, Kuhajda FP, et al. Fatty acid synthase expression in endometrial carcinoma: correlation with cell proliferation and hormone receptors. Cancer 1998; 83:528–537.
Kusakabe T, Nashimoto A, Honma K, et al. Fatty acid synthase is highly expressed in carcinoma, adenoma and in regenerative epithelium and intestinal metaplasia of the stomach. Histopathology 2002;40:71–79.
Alo PL, Visca P, Botti C, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of human erythrocyte glucose transporter and fatty acid synthase in infiltrating breast carcinomas and adjacent typical/atypical hyperplastic or normal breast tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:129–134.
Milgraum LZ, Witters LA, Pasternack GR, et al. Enzymes of the fatty acid synthesis pathway are highly expressed in in situ breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 1997;3:2115–2120.
Gansler TS, Hardman III W, Hunt DA, et al. Increased expression of fatty acid synthase (OA-519) in ovarian neoplasms predicts shorter survival. Hum Pathol 1997;28:686–692.
Swinnen JV, Roskams T, Joniau S, et al. Overexpression of fatty acid synthase is an early and common event in the development of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2002;98:19–22.
Krontiras H, Roye GD, Beenken SE, et al. Fatty acid synthase expression is increased in neoplastic lesions of the oral tongue. Head Neck 1999;21:325–329.
Piyathilake CJ, Frost AR, Manne U, et al. The expression of fatty acid synthase (FASE) is an early event in the development and progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Hum Pathol 2000;31: 1068–1073.
Alo PL, Visca P, Marci A, et al. Expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) as a predictor of recurrence in stage I breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 1996;77:474–482.
Kuhajda FP, Jenner K, Wood FD, et al. Fatty acid synthesis: a potential selective target for antineoplastic therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:6379–6383.
Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Partin AW . OA-519 (fatty acid synthase) as an independent predictor of pathologic state in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology 1995;45:81–86.
Shurbaji MS, Kalbfleisch JH, Thurmond TS . Immunohistochemical detection of a fatty acid synthase (OA-519) as a predictor of progression of prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1996;27:917–921.
Takahiro T, Shinichi K, Toshimitsu S . Expression of fatty acid synthase as a prognostic indicator in soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2204–2212.
Zhou W, Simpson PJ, McFadden JM, et al. Fatty acid synthase inhibition triggers apoptosis during S phase in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 2003;63:7330–7337.
Pizer ES, Pflug BR, Bova GS, et al. Increased fatty acid synthase as a therapeutic target in androgen-independent prostate cancer progression. Prostate 2001;47:102–110.
Baron A, Migita T, Tang D, et al. Fatty acid synthase: a metabolic oncogene in prostate cancer? J Cell Biochem 2004;91:47–53.
Kuhajda FP . Fatty-acid synthase and human cancer: new perspectives on its role in tumor biology. Nutrition 2000;16:202–208.
Weber E, Bannasch P . Dose and time dependence of the cellular phenotype in rat hepatic preneoplasia and neoplasia induced in stop experiments by oral exposure to N-nitrosomorpholine. Carcinogenesis 1994; 15:1227–1234.
Mathieu C, Kuttler B, Waer M, et al. Spontaneous reestablishment of self-tolerance in BB/Pfd rats. Transplantation 1994;58:349–354.
Evert M, Schneider-Stock R, Dombrowski F . Apolipoprotein A-IV mRNA overexpression in early preneoplastic hepatic foci induced by low-number pancreatic islet transplants in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Pathol Res Pract 2003;199:373–379.
Stoeckman AK, Towle HC . The role of SREBP-1c in nutritional regulation of lipogenic enzyme gene expression. J Biol Chem 2002;277:27029–27035.
Dentin R, Pegorier JP, Benhamed F, et al. Hepatic glucokinase is required for the synergistic action of ChREBP and SREBP-1c on glycolytic and lipogenic gene expression. J Biol Chem 2004;279:20314–20326.
Rufo C, Teran-Garcia M, Nakamura MT, et al. Involvement of a unique carbohydrate-responsive factor in the glucose regulation of rat liver fatty-acid synthase gene transcription. J Biol Chem 2001;276:21969–21975.
Yang YA, Han WF, Morin PJ, et al. Activation of fatty acid synthesis during neoplastic transformation: role of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Exp Cell Res 2002;279:80–90.
Van de Sande T, De Schrijver E, Heyns W, et al. Role of the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/PTEN/Akt kinase pathway in the overexpression of fatty acid synthase in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2002; 62:642–646.
Swinnen JV, Van Veldhoven PP, Timmermans L, et al. Fatty acid synthase drives the synthesis of phospholipids partitioning into detergent-resistant membrane microdomains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 302:898–903.
Bannasch P, Klimek F, Mayer D . Early bioenergetic changes in hepatocarcinogenesis: preneoplastic phenotypes mimic responses to insulin and thyroid hormone. J Bioenerg Biomembr 1997;29:303–313.
La Vecchia C, Negri E, Francheschi S, et al. A case–control study of diabetes mellitus and cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1994;70:950–953.
Adami HO, Chow WH, Nyren O, et al. Excess risk of primary liver cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1472–1477.
Acknowledgements
We thank Gabriele Becker, Monika Knoblich, Carola Kügler, Claudia Miethke, Uta Schönborn and Nadine Wiest for technical assistance, Yvonne Fischer for animal care, and Bernd Wüsthoff for editing the manuscript. We are also grateful to Dr Chantal Mathieu, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, for providing us with breeding pairs of BB/Pfd rats. ME was supported by a Start-up-Project of the Magdeburger Forschungsverbund ‘Neurowissenschaften’ & ‘Immunologie und Molekulare Medizin der Entzündung’. FD was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant numbers Do 622/1-3, 1-4, and 1-5).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evert, M., Schneider-Stock, R. & Dombrowski, F. Overexpression of fatty acid synthase in chemically and hormonally induced hepatocarcinogenesis of the rat. Lab Invest 85, 99–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700206
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700206
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Metabolic rearrangements in primary liver cancers: cause and consequences
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2019)
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-21 contributes to tumor progression by converting hepatocyte stellate cells to cancer-associated fibroblasts
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2018)
-
Molekulare und metabolische Veränderungen in humanen klarzelligen Leberherden
Der Pathologe (2015)
-
Alternation between dietary protein depletion and normal feeding cause liver damage in mouse
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry (2011)
-
Hepatozelluläre Karzinome in der nichtzirrhotischen Leber
Der Pathologe (2008)