In its recent deliberations over the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the US Senate was not well served by the directors of the US weapons laboratories.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Johnson, K. et al. Stockpile Surveillance: Past and Future (Sandia National Laboratory (SAND 95-751/UCUC-700), January 1996).
Ledogar, S.J. Testimony to Senate Foreign Relations Committee (7 October 1999).
Mikhailov, V.N. (ed.) Catalog of Worldwide Nuclear Testing (Begell House, New York, 1999).
Drell, S. et al. Nuclear Testing: Summary and Conclusions (unclassified). JASON Report JSR-95-320 (MITRE Corp., August 1995). http://www.fas.org/rlg/jsr-95-320.htm
Kidder, R.E. Maintaining the US Stockpile of Nuclear Weapons During a Low-Threshold or Comprehensive Test Ban (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (UCRL-53820), October 1987).
Kidder, R.E. Nature 386, 645–647 (1997).
Richards, P. G. & Kim, W.-E. Nature 389, 781–782 (1997).
Wallace, T.C. Seismol. Res. Lett. 69, No. 5, 386–393 (September/October 1998). http://www.geo.arizona.edu/geophysics/faculty/wallace
Perkovich, G. India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation (University of California Press, 1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gottfried, K. Sowing nuclear misconceptions. Nature 403, 131–133 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35003046
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35003046
