Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants

Abstract

Under some circumstances, Diptera and Hymenoptera learn visual shapes retinotopically, so that they only recognize the shape when it is viewed by the same region of retina that was exposed to it during learning1,2. One use of such retinotopically stored views is in guiding an insect's path to a familiar site3,4,5. Because the retinal image of an object changes with viewing distance and (sometimes) direction, a single stored view may be insufficient to guide an insect from start to goal. Little, however, is known about the number of views that insects store. Here we show that wood ants take several ‘snapshots’ of a familiar beacon from different vantage points. An ant leaving a newly discovered food source at the base of a landmark performs a tortuous walk back to its nest during which it periodically turns back and faces the landmark. The ant, on revisiting the familiar landmark, holds the edges of the landmark's image steady at several discrete positions on its retina. These preferred retinal positions tend to match the positions of landmark edges that the ant captured during its preceding ‘learning walks’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Recognizing cones.
Figure 2: A wood ant's approaches to extended black-and-white edges and a cone, and its return path from the cone.
Figure 3: Distribution of peaks.
Figure 4: Approaches to inverted cones and black bars.
Figure 5: Retinal position of the edge of an upright cone or of a black-and-white edge is plotted against the ant's distance from: a, an upright cone (66 approaches); and b, a black-and-white edge (20 approaches).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dill, M., Wolf, R. & Heisenberg, M. Visual pattern recognition in Drosophila involves retinotopic matching. Nature 365, 751–753 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wehner, R. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VII/6C (ed. Autrum, H.) 287–616 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collett, T. S. & Land, M. F. Visual spatial memory in a hoverfly. J. Comp. Physiol. 100, 59–84 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wehner, R. & Räber, F. Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Experientia 35, 1569–1571 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright, B. A. & Collett, T. S. Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J. Comp. Physiol. 151, 521–543 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zollikofer, C. P. E., Wehner, R. & Fukushi, T. Optical scaling in conspecific Cataglyphis ants. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 1637–1646 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vollbehr, J. Zur Orientierung junger Honigbienen bei ihrem ersten Orientierungsflug. Zool. Jb. 79, 33–69 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zeil, J. Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): I. Description of flight. J. Comp. Physiol. A172, 189–205 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehrer, M. Why do bees turn back and look? J. Comp. Physiol. A172, 549–563 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collett, T. S. & Lehrer, M. Looking and learning: a spatial pattern in the orientation flight of the wasp Vespula vulgaris. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 252, 129–134 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rock, I., DiVita, J. & Barbeito, R. The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 719–732 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rock, I. & DiVita, J. Acase of viewer centred object perception. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 280–293 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarr, M. J. & Pinker, S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 233–282 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bülthoff, H. H. & Edelman, S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 60–64 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ullman, S. High Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Manly, B. F. J. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (Chapman and Hall, London, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. F. Land and D. Osorio for valuable comments. Financial support came from the BBSRC and Human Frontier Science Program. S.P.D.J. received a BBSRC research studentship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Judd, S., Collett, T. Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants. Nature 392, 710–714 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/33681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/33681

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing