Abstract
To the best of our knowledge, the impacts of crop residue cover (CRC) on agricultural productivity and soil fertility have not been studied by previous researchers. In this regard, this study aims to apply an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis to detect CRC and monitor the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, as well as soil chemical and physical characteristics. To achieve this, a series of Landsat images and 275 ground control points (GCPs) collected from the study areas for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021 were used. A convolutional neural network (CNN), a class of artificial neural network has commonly applied to analyze visual imagery, was employed in this study for CRC detection in two classes (Not-CRC and CRC) for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021. To assess the effects of CRC, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was applied to Landsat image series for the years 2015 (22 images), 2019 (20 images), and 2022 (23 images). Furthermore, this study evaluates the impacts of CRC on soil fertility based on collected field observation data. The results show a high performance (Accuracy ofโ>โ0.95) of the CNN for CRC detection and mapping. The findings also reveal positive effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, indicating an increase in vegetation density by about 0.1909 and 0.1377 for study areas 1 and 2, respectively, from 2015 to 2022. The results also indicate an increase in soil chemical and physical characteristics, including EC, PH, Na, Mg, HCO3, K, silt, sand, and clay from 2015 to 2022, based on physical examination. In general, the findings underscore that the value of an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis for detecting CRC and monitoring its impacts on agricultural productivity and soil fertility. This research can offer valuable insight to researchers and decision-makers in the field of soil science, land management and agriculture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Crop residue cover (CRC) refers to the deceased crop biomass that remains in fields after crop harvesting1,2. CRC is critical for preventing soil erosion and enhancing soil fertility due to its rich nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus contents3,4. CRC has a significant impact on agriculture production and can influence biological production and biodiversity by increasing vegetation density and soil fertility5,6. It can also enhance the speed of enzymatic activities, decrease water consumption, lower soil temperature, and reduce air pollution and harmful gas emissions7,8,9. In summary, CRC can contribute to the sustainability of agriculture10,11.
Having accurate spatially and temporally resolved information about field-scale CRC and its impacts on vegetation and soil fertility will assist decision-makers in assessing the effectiveness of government conservation programs and voluntary ecosystem service markets. This information will also facilitate the quantification of cropland biogeochemical processes through agro-ecosystem modeling12,13. The most conventional method for obtaining information about CRC and agricultural production is through field-based data collection, which involves farmers participating in commercial and governmental programs and annual residue surveys14,15,16. These techniques, however, are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Furthermore, several factors, including the personal judgment of surveyors, the high cost of field surveys, and farmersโ concerns regarding data privacy, have affected the quality and accuracy of the data17,18. Additionally, field-based approaches cannot provide timely information on CRC and its impacts over a wide region19. Therefore, it is necessary to employ a timely, cost-effective, and accurate approach to map and monitor CRC and its effects on agricultural production.
Remote sensing provides multi-spectral and hyper-spectral datasets for mapping CRC and monitoring vegetation density across large areas20. Within the realm of CRC mapping, the primary challenge lies in distinguishing CRC from bare soil21,22. This issue has been addressed by identifying specific bands near 2100ย nm, leading to the development of several indexes, such as the Cellulose Absorption Index (CAI)23, Lignin Cellulose Absorption (LCA)24, Shortwave Infrared Normalized Difference Residue Index (SINDRI), Normalized Difference Index (NDI), and Dead Fuel Index (DFI)25,26,27. These indexes, on the other hand, are susceptible to atmosphere and ground features since they are based on spectral reflectance28,29. Additionally, the spectral reflectance for CRC indexes can be influenced by the type and shape of crop residues30. Many CRC indexes also exhibit reduced sensitivity in areas densely covered by CRC and can saturate to various extents31. Soil Adjusted Corn Residue Index (SACRI) and Modified Soil Adjusted Corn Residue Index (MSACRI), for instance, are both sensitive to CRC and become saturated at CRC values up to 0.2532. Therefore, learning-based approaches, such as machine and deep learning have been employed to retrieve bio-geophysical variables due to their computational efficiency32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39. These approaches excel in capturing the non-linear relationships between input variables and desired outputs40. According to the literature review, few studies have investigated the efficiency of deep learning convolutional neural networks for CRC monitoring and mapping. However, they have applied for landuse/cover mapping41,42 and crop type identification43.
Remote sensing also provides various spectral indexes for monitoring and mapping the structure (i.e., density and complexity) and distribution of green areas44. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is one of the vegetation indexes that has frequently used to assess the long-term trends of vegetation on a large scale. NDVI proves to be an effective method for monitoring plant productivity over time45, investigating the relationship between productivity and biodiversity, and determining vegetation composition and landscape structure46,47.
According to the literature, few studies have explored the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. Previous researchers have predominantly applied various indexes (e.g., CAI) and machine learning techniques (e.g., Random Forest) for CRC detection and mapping48,49. The present research, however, intends to accomplish three primary objectives: (1) map and monitor the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity using NDVI from 2015 to 2022, (2) model and monitor the impacts of CRC on soil chemical and physical characteristics from 2015 to 2022, and (3) examine the efficiency of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting and mapping CRC over the study areas. Landsat series images hold substantial potential for monitoring long-term changes in various features50,51. In this regard, Landsat series images used to detect CRC and evaluate its impacts on agricultural productivity and soil fertility in Maragheh and Heris, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran, spanning from 2013 to 2022.
Materials and methodology
Materials
To evaluate the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics, Landsat images with a spatial resolution of 30 m were utilized for the years 2013/09/28, 2015/08/17, 2019, 2021/08/17, and 2022 (Table 1). A total of 275 ground control points (GCPs) were collected from the study areas using the global positioning system (GPS) and Google Earth, which were then used to construct CNN models. Of these GCPs, 70% were allocated for training the CRC models, while the remaining 30% were employed to validate the accuracy of the CNNs.
Various variables, including precipitation, soil temperature, and soil moisture, were generated from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and employed in this study to properly monitor the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. Monthly and annual data of precipitation rate data were obtained from the General Department of Meteorology of East Azarbaijan Province (www.wamo.ir). We also accessed monthly and annual soil temperature and soil moisture data from https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov.
Soil sample points collection and laboratory measurement
To assess the effects of CRC on soil chemical and physical characteristics, soil samples were collected from the study areas at the end of June, prior to any plowing of agricultural land, ensuring the pristine condition of the topsoil texture. A total of 74 and 62 GCPs were collected from study areas 1 and 2, respectively. These GCPs were selected based on real field observations, existing digital soil type information, and landuse/cover maps spanning from 2015 to 2022. At each sampling point, four topsoil samples were collected and combined using a soil drill. To record the geographical position of soil sampling points, a portable GPS (UniStrong G120 with a positioning accuracy of 0.5ย m) was used. Following collection, all soil samples were properly sealed, labelled, and moved to the laboratory for the measurement of key physicochemical soil attributes. To facilitate accurate analysis, soil samples were fully air-dried and sieved through a 2 mm sieve to eliminate extraneous materials. Using a digital multi-parameter measuring apparatus (Multi 3420 Set B, WTWGmbH, Germany) at a room temperature of 25ย ยฐC, soil electrical conductivity and soil water ratio were determined based on the leachate prepared at a soil-to-water ration of 1:2.5.
Methodology
This study applied an integrated approach of remote sensing and deep learning data-driven for assessing the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. The methodology consisted of several phase. In the first phase, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was utilized to detect all instances of CRC within the study areas. Moving to the second phase, a series of Landsat 8 images were employed to estimate the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), which served as a means to monitor the density of vegetation in the study areas between 2015 and 2022. Additionally, changes in soil chemical and physical characteristics across the study areas from 2015 to 2022 were assessed. Finally, various quantitative approaches were applied to validate the accuracy of the obtained results. Figure 1 reveals an overview of the methodology employed in this study for assessing the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics.
Convolutional neural network for CRC mapping
CNN is a neural network architecture inspired by neuroscience findings52,53. It has been widely applied in the field of remote sensing for modeling and mapping various Earth features, including landforms54, forest fires55, soil salinity distribution56, landslide57, landuse/cover41 and more. It is made of layers of artificial neurons called nodes. Each node calculates a weighted sum of inputs and returns an activation map53,58. Each node in a layer is defined by its weight values59. In the context of images, when a layer receives input, such as an image, it extracts visual properties. Initially, the CNN finds edges in the image. This partial definition of the image is then passed to the next layer, which begins to identify features like corners and color groups. This refined image definition is further processed in subsequent layers until the network makes prediction60,61. This research utilized GCPs in conjunction with Landsat 8 imagery, featuring a 30-m spatial resolution, to facilitate the training of CRC models. A comprehensive set of 275 GCPs was used for the model training process. Subsequently, all generated CRC models were categorized into two classes: Not-CRC and CRC. In the realm of input images, elevating the model's input resolution yields enhanced performance. The rationale behind this phenomenon is that the inclusion of finer details (specifically, information) results in improved overall performance. The underlying hypothesis posits that the augmentation of performance with increased image size is solely attributed to the infusion of more intricate details62. Table 2 represents further details regarding the applied parameters in CNN.
In CNN, like in other neural networks, there are three layers, namely an input layer, a hidden layer (can be more than one), and an output layer63. An input layer is comprised of a \(m\times n\) matrix with a respective feature value at each node. A convolutional layer that is immediately adjacent to the input layer is sometimes referred to as a feature extractor. The reason for this is that it is used to extract the features of an image. A back-propagation algorithm optimizes several convolutional kernels in the convolutional layer64,65. The output of the convolutional layer will be the input for the next layer66. A convolutional layer consists of a pooling layer, multiple weights, and an activation function67. Max-pooling is similar to the convolutional layer but instead of taking a dot product between the input and the kernel, it takes the max of the region from the input overlapped by the kernel. In this study, a maximum operator was used to downsample the feature maps in the encoder. Maximum pooling is required to split the feature maps into several rectangular regions for generating maximum values in each layer68.
The fully connected layer is used to reduce the loss function and subsequently outputs the classification result69. Equationsย (1)โ(3) are defined convolutional manipulation and max pooling, respectively.
where \(f\) denotes the non-linear function, \(*\) represents the represented convolutional operator, \(k\) denotes convolutional kernels, \(w_{j}\) represents the weights, and \(b_{j}\) denotes the bias.
where \(\mu \left( {n, 1} \right)\) is the window function to patch the earlier layer and \(a_{j}\) is the maximum in the patch.
In the next step, a weighted sum was calculated by adding up the convolutional layers. This sum was then passed through an activation function to generate output. The Rectified Linear Unit (ReLu) function employed in this study to construct the CRC model. Equationย (4) is defined the ReLu70.
Finally, all parameters in the CNN were optimized using the back-propagation algorithm. The parameter optimization is applied to reduce the loss function value, which is expressed by Eq.ย (5). The results obtained from the CRC-CNNs were categorized into two classes: not-CRC and CRC (See Fig.ย 4).
where \(N\) is the total number of the data samples, \(y_{i}\) is the actual result of sample \(i\) (0 or 1), \(\hat{y}_{i}\) is the predicted likelihood of sample \(i\) having the output 1, and \(y\) and \(y_{i}\) are the vectors of real outputs and predicted probabilities.
Normalized difference vegetation (NDVI) for extracting vegetation density
In numerous studies, satellite-derived vegetation indexes are frequently employed to monitor vegetation status, with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) being a commonly utilized choice. NDVI serves to gauge the spatial distribution and relative abundance of vegetation71,72,73. These remote sensing-based spectral indexes utilize reflectance measurements gathered from satellites and aircraft to evaluate vegetation status71. NDVI is commonly used to measure vegetation cover and is closely associated with chlorophyll content, energy absorption, and photosynthetic capacity74. This study applied the NDVI indicator for assessing the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity from 2015 to 2022, as defined by Eq.ย (6). The NDVI uses the Red (620โ670ย nm) and Near Infra-Red (NIR) (841โ876ย nm) spectrums to estimate vegetation density.
where \(P_{NIR}\) and \(P_{Red}\) are top of atmosphere reflectance (TOA) in the NIR and Red bands, respectively. NDVI values range fromโโโ1 toโ+โ1. Since chlorophyll absorbs light, the red spectrum reflection is always lower than the NIR band spectrum reflectance for green vegetation. NDVI values in vegetation regions cannot be less than 0 and below or equal to 0.1 represent water bodies or bare ground due to low reflectance recorded in NIR. The values 0.2โ0.5 represent sparse vegetation, while values near 1 represent dense vegetation. Thus this study employed a series of Landsat 8 images (A total number of 65 images) from 2015 to 2022, which were individually converted to NDVI using Eq.ย (6) for each year.
Accuracy assessment
Accuracy assessment is a crucial step in the domain of image classification75. In this regard, a set of quantitative approaches, including Intersection Over Union (IOU) values, Recall (RC), Precision (PC), Specificity (SP), F-measure (FM), Accuracy (ACC), and Kappa (KP) applied to assess the accuracy of the classification. Equationsย (7)โ(11) describe the employed approaches. The results of the CNN for detecting and monitoring CRC changes also are presented in Table 3. According to the information presented in Table 3, the CNN performs well with the ACC ofโ>โ0.95 for CRC mapping.
where \(AO\) is actual output; \(EO\) is on behalf of expected result; \(TP\), \(FP\), \(FN\), and \(TN\) are true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative, respectively.
Study area
Case study area 1
The case study area is located at 46ยฐ 27สน 21สบ E, 37ยฐ 15สน 44สบ N in Maragheh, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran (Fig.ย 2a, b and e). Clay loam is the main soil texture in the study area. Wheat and pea are the major crops, sometimes in rotation with forage crops. Figureย 2c reveals the observed CRC in the case study area 1. Since tillage and planting were mostly conducted under conservation tillage and reduced tillage procedures, different percentages of CRC were readily available. Based on our observation, this area has a regular rotation of products. This convinces us to focus on this area for assessing the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. The annual precipitation rate and temperature are 330 ml and 12.5ย ยฐC, respectively for the study area76,77.
Case study area 2
Figureย 2a, b and f shows the case study area 2, located in Heris, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Wheat is the predominant crop grown in this area. Figureย 2d reveals the observed CRC over the case study area 2. From a soil perspective, clay is the dominant soil type in this region. Additionally, this area is characterized as a semi-arid region with hot summers and cold winters. The annual precipitation rate and temperature for this study area are approximately 315ย mm and 8.5ย ยฐC, respectively.
Results
This study applied an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis for assessing the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. To this end, an automated CNN employed to detect CRC in two classes: not-CRC and CRC, for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021. A total of 275 GCPs were incorporated into the CRC models, with 70% for training and 30% for testing the results of CRC networks. The results show the high efficiency of CNN for detecting and mapping CRC. According to Table 3, CNN performed well in mapping CRC with an ACC ofโ>โ0.95 for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021. Figureย 3 provides the results of applied CNN for detecting and monitoring CRC for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021.
A series of Landsat images was then used to evaluate vegetation status using NDVI for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022. Figureย 4 reveals the results of NDVI in the study areas. This study also considered the effects of other predisposing variables, including precipitation, soil moisture, and soil temperature, on the changes in vegetation density for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022. The results reveal an increase in NDVI values from 2015 to 2022. According to Fig.ย 4, the highest NDVI values were 0.5945 and 0.6288 for the year 2015 in case study areas 1 and 2, respectively. However, the NDVI values increased by about 0.1909 and 0.1377 in case study areas 1 and 2, respectively for the year 2022 (as shown in Fig.ย 4). This means that the impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity may be positive. For being sure about the positive effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, monthly and annual changes in certain predisposing variables, including precipitation, soil moisture, and soil temperature, were evaluated. The results indicate no significant changes in precipitation, soil moisture, and soil temperature. As seen in Table 4, several points were created over the study areas, and the Zonal Statistics as Table tool in the Arc GIS 10.8 environment was used to assess the changes in precipitation, soil moisture, and soil temperature for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022. According to Table 4, the mean precipitation values were 331, 329, and 328 for study area 1 for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022. Similarly, the mean precipitation values for study area 2 were estimated at 252, 250, and 249 for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022 (Table 4). Regarding soil moisture, the mean values for study area 1 were 0.3804, 0.3919, and 0.3878 for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022, respectively. The mean soil moisture values were estimated at 0.4247, 0.4122, and 0.4214 for the same years, as shown in Table 4. Lastly, the mean soil temperature values in Kelvin (K) were 283.52ย K, 282.61ย K, and 283.21ย K for study area 1 for the years 2015, 2019, and 2022, respectively. Similarly, for study area 2, the mean soil temperature values were 282.85ย K, 281.86ย K, and 281.98ย K for the same years, as presented in Table 4.
Discussion
General discussion
CRC improves soil structure, increases organic matter content, enhances vegetation density, reduces evaporation, and aids in carbon dioxide fixation. Managing residues on agricultural land has a variety of positive effects on soil quality. Moreover, crop residues can be used for the production of biofuels35,78. Previous studies have not explored the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity and the chemical and physical characteristics of the soil. They have applied several spectral indexes, including LCA, SINDRI, NDI, and DFI, for detecting and mapping CRC. Moisture tends to darken soils and residue more equally in the visible bands, unless the residue is very fresh79. When attempting to use spectral differences (multi-band indices) for residue characterization, the influence of moisture on this process becomes more intricate. Under dry conditions, it is possible to distinguish the adsorption characteristics of crop residue from soil80. Well-calibrated broadband spectral indexes like Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI) can accurately map CRC during such conditions. However, in wet conditions, differences between Landsat SWIR bands become less noticeable, causing these indexes to lose effectiveness. This is because moisture presence can both consistently lower reflectance across the SWIR spectrum and variably impact the reflectance (due to moisture absorption features) of both soil and residue, which may dry or wet at varying rates. Addressing both these challenges requires applying a moisture correction to NDTI to generate reliable percent residue assessments under high moisture conditions81. Recent studies have also applied learning-based approaches such as machine learning algorithms32,33,34 for detecting and mapping CRC. This study, on the other hand, employed an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis to map and monitor the CRC and assess its impacts on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. The findings highlight the high ability of automated CNN in detecting and mapping CRC. The outcomes of this study demonstrate the CNN's capacity for mapping CRC using Landsat remote sensing images. In comparison to traditional machine learning methods like support vector machines and neural networks, CNN mitigates the loss of edge information during the extraction of CRC from remote sensing images. Traditional machine learning techniques primarily rely on the accuracy of the extracted features, encompassing factors like pixel values, shapes, textures, and positions. Conversely, deep learning through convolutional neural networks can autonomously acquire pertinent high-level features directly from remote sensing images for CRC classification. This streamlines the process, lessening the need to design custom feature extractors for every classification task. The results of this study also reveal the positive impacts of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil fertility (See Fig.ย 4 and Tables 7 and 8).
The impacts of CRC on vegetation density
As mentioned in previous sections, a primary objective of this study is to assess the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity. In this regard, the NDVI index applied to Landsat series images captured in the years 2015, 2019, and 2022 to map the greenness of the study areas. Subsequently, we established a total of 10 points for study area 1 and 8 points for study area 2. These points were strategically positioned within the ArcGIS 10.8 environment. In order to accurately quantify the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, we utilized the Zonal Statistics as Table tool within the ArcGIS 10.8 environment. Tables 5 and 6 show the results of applied Zonal Statistics as Table tool over the study areas 1 and 2, respectively.
According to Table 5, for point 1, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.2039 from 2015 to 2022 in study area 1. Similarly, the NDVI mean value for point 2 increased by about 0.1511 from 2015 to 2022, as shown in Table 5. As we can see in Table 5, for point 3, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.1965 from 2015 to 2022. Point 4 also exhibited an increase in the NDVI mean value of about 0.2911 from 2015 to 2022, as indicated in Table 5. According to Table 5, for point 5, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.1884 from 2015 to 2022. Point 6 depicted a similar trend with an increase of about 0.2611 in the NDVI mean value from 2015 to 2022. As we can see in Table 5, for point 7, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.1783 from 2015 to 2022. The NDVI mean value also increased by about 0.1898 from 2015 to 2022 for point 8, as shown in Table 5. According to Table 5, for point 9, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.2576 from 2015 to 2022. Similarly, the NDVI mean value for point 10 increased by about 0.1965 from 2015 to 2022, as shown in Table 5.
According to Table 6, for point 1, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.0555 from 2015 to 2022 in study area 2. Similarly, the NDVI mean value for point 2 increased by about 0.0671 from 2015 to 2022, as shown in Table 6. As we can see in Table 6, for point 3, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.0057 from 2015 to 2022. Point 4 also saw an increase in the NDVI mean value by about 0.1049 from 2015 to 2022, as indicated in Table 6. According to Table 6, for point 5, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.1592 from 2015 to 2022 in study area 2. Point 6 exhibited a similar trend with an increase of about 0.1407 in the NDVI mean value from 2015 to 2022. As we can see in Table 6, for point 7, the NDVI mean value increased by about 0.0861 from 2015 to 2022. Lastly, point 8 indicated an increase in the NDVI mean value of about 0.1373 from 2015 to 2022, as shown in Table 6.
The impacts of CRC on soil chemical and physical characteristics
Tables 7 and 8 show the results of CRCโs effects on soil chemical and physical characteristics. As we can see in Table 7, the EC level increased by about 0.04 and 0.02 from 2015 to 2022 in case study areas 1 and 2, respectively. According to Table 7, while the PH decreased by about 0.02 for study area 1 from 2015 to 2022, it increased by about 0.03 for study area 2. The Na values also exhibited an increase of about 0.02 and 0.01 for study areas 1 and 2, respectively, during the same period, as shown in Table 7. As we can see in Table 7, the Mg level increased by about 0.08 and 0.06 from 2015 to 2022 in case study areas 1 and 2, respectively. The HCO3 values also shown an increase of about 0.07 and 0.22 for study areas 1 and 2, respectively, from 2015โ2022, as shown in Table 7. According to Table 7, while the K level decreased by about 0.01 for study area 1 from 2015 to 2022, it increased by about 0.01 for study area 2.
As seen in Table 8, the amount of sand increased by about 0.21 and 0.54 in case study areas 1 and 2, respectively, from 2015 to 2022. Similarly, the amount of silt also increased by about 0.16 and 0.87 in the study areas 1 and 2, respectively during the same period, as shown in Table 8. According to Table 8, there was an increase of 0.43 and 0.01 in clay content for study areas 1 and 2, respectively, between 2015 and 2022.
Limitation of this study
This study developed an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis for monitoring and mapping the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. Despite the satisfying results obtained from this work, there exist two primary limitations that future research in the domain of CRC and its impacts on vegetation density and soil fertility could address. Firstly, the current study relied on Landsat series images with a spatial resolution of 30ย m. In future endeavors, the availability of Sentinel-2 images could be exploited as a potential alternative for a more extended time period, aiding in the detection and mapping of CRC. Secondly, a recommended avenue for forthcoming research is the adoption of an integrated methodology that combines object-based image analysis and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to monitor CRC changes. This amalgamation is noteworthy because object-based image analysis harnesses numerous features, such as brightness, to detect specific features. This comprehensive approach enhances the precision and accuracy of the outcomes obtained. In conclusion, this study's innovative approach has provided valuable insights into the effects of CRC on agricultural systems. The outlined limitations offer a roadmap for subsequent research endeavors to build upon and further refine our understanding of CRCโs impact on vegetation density and soil fertility.
Conclusion
This study introduced an integrated approach combining remote sensing and geospatial analysis to effectively identify and map CRC while also evaluating its impact on vegetation density, as well as soil chemical and physical attributes. The results exhibit the remarkable efficiency of an automated CNN data-driven approach (>โ0.96) in detecting and mapping CRC. Furthermore, the outcomes underscore the positive influence of CRC on vegetation density and soil chemical and physical characteristics.
The findings of this study demonstrate that the integration of remote sensing and geospatial analysis is adept at accurately detecting and mapping CRC while simultaneously assessing its effects on vegetation status and soil fertility. The efficiency of Landsat series images in mapping and monitoring dynamic features like vegetation and soil is also emphasized in this research.
The study underscores the efficacy of learning-based methods in proficiently classifying Earthโs features. When paired with satellite-based datasets and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), this computer-based approach proves to be notably efficient. Importantly, the research reveals that crop residue cover contributes to heightened soil productivity in terms of chemical and physical attributes. Moreover, it serves as means to maintain soil moisture levels, a critical factor for crop survival, particularly in semi-arid and arid regions.
The insights from this study hold significant value for researchers engaged in soil science and agriculture. Additionally, the findings provide essential information for decision-makers and planners involved in land management and soil erosion control. Ultimately, our research contributes to enhancing the understanding of the multifaceted impacts of CRC, benefiting both scientific advancements and practical land management strategies.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Quemada, M. & Cabrera, M. Characteristic moisture curves and maximum water content of two crop residues. Plant Soil 238, 295โ299 (2002).
Quemada, M. Predicting crop residue decomposition using moisture adjusted time scales. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 70, 283โ291 (2004).
Mehra, P. et al. A review of tillage practices and their potential to impact the soil carbon dynamics. Adv. Agron. 150, 185โ230 (2018).
Deines, J. M., Wang, S. & Lobell, D. B. Satellites reveal a small positive yield effect from conservation tillage across the US Corn Belt. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 124038 (2019).
Pathak, D. R. & Bhandary, N. P. Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in shallow aquifer using multi-layer fuzzy inference system within GIS environment. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 11, 100470 (2020).
Kazemi-Garajeh, M. et al. Learning-based methods for detection and monitoring of shallow flood-affected areas: Impact of shallow-flood spreading on vegetation density. Can. J. Remote Sens. 48, 481โ503 (2022).
Drury, C. F. et al. Red clover and tillage influence on soil temperature, water content, and corn emergence. Agron. J. 91, 101โ108 (1999).
Melero, S., Lรณpez-Garrido, R., Murillo, J. M. & Moreno, F. Conservation tillage: Short-and long-term effects on soil carbon fractions and enzymatic activities under Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 104, 292โ298 (2009).
Salem, H. M., Valero, C., Muรฑoz, M. ร., Rodrรญguez, M. G. & Silva, L. L. Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil water potential, and maize yield. Geoderma 237, 60โ70 (2015).
Smith, W. et al. Crop residue removal effects on soil carbon: Measured and inter-model comparisons. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 161, 27โ38 (2012).
He, F., Mohamadzadeh, N., Sadeghnejad, M., Ingram, B. & Ostovari, Y. Fractal features of soil particles as an index of land degradation under different land-use patterns and slope-aspects. Land 12, 615 (2023).
Zhang, H. et al. Emission characterization, environmental impact, and control measure of PM2.5 emitted from agricultural crop residue burning in China. J. Clean. Prod. 149, 629โ635 (2017).
Massey, R., Sankey, T. T., Yadav, K., Congalton, R. G. & Tilton, J. C. Integrating cloud-based workflows in continental-scale cropland extent classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 219, 162โ179 (2018).
Morrison, J. E., Huang, C.-H., Lightle, D. T. & Daughtry, C. S. Residue measurement techniques. J. Soil Water Conserv. 48, 478โ483 (1993).
USDA, N. United States department of agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Plants Database (1999, accessed 2000). http://plants.usda.gov.
Hagen, S. C. et al. Mapping conservation management practices and outcomes in the corn belt using the operational tillage information system (OpTIS) and the denitrificationโdecomposition (DNDC) model. Land 9, 408 (2020).
Yue, J., Tian, Q., Dong, X. & Xu, N. Using broadband crop residue angle index to estimate the fractional cover of vegetation, crop residue, and bare soil in cropland systems. Remote Sens. Environ. 237, 111538 (2020).
Zhou, D. et al. Detection of ground straw coverage under conservation tillage based on deep learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 172, 105369 (2020).
Zheng, B., Campbell, J. B., Serbin, G. & Galbraith, J. M. Remote sensing of crop residue and tillage practices: Present capabilities and future prospects. Soil Tillage Res. 138, 26โ34 (2014).
Pu, R. & Gong, P. Hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation bioparameters. Adv. Environ. Remote Sens. Sens. Algor. Appl. 7, 101โ142 (2011).
Daughtry, C. S. Discriminating crop residues from soil by shortwave infrared reflectance. Agron. J. 93, 125โ131 (2001).
Cao, X., Chen, J., Matsushita, B. & Imura, H. Developing a MODIS-based index to discriminate dead fuel from photosynthetic vegetation and soil background in the Asian steppe area. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31, 1589โ1604 (2010).
Daughtry, C., McMurtrey, J., Chappelle, E., Hunter, W. & Steiner, J. Measuring crop residue cover using remote sensing techniques. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 54, 17โ26 (1996).
Numata, I. et al. Evaluation of hyperspectral data for pasture estimate in the Brazilian Amazon using field and imaging spectrometers. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 1569โ1583 (2008).
McNairn, H. & Protz, R. Mapping corn residue cover on agricultural fields in Oxford County, Ontario, using Thematic Mapper. Can. J. Remote Sens. 19, 152โ159 (1993).
Serbin, G., Hunt, E. R. Jr., Daughtry, C. S., McCarty, G. W. & Doraiswamy, P. C. An improved ASTER index for remote sensing of crop residue. Remote Sens. 1, 971โ991 (2009).
Wang, G. et al. Estimating the fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil from MODIS data: Assessing the applicability of the NDVI-DFI model in the typical Xilingol grasslands. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 76, 154โ166 (2019).
Garajeh, M. K. et al. An automated deep learning convolutional neural network algorithm applied for soil salinity distribution mapping in Lake Urmia, Iran. Sci. Total Env. 778, 146253 (2021).
Ghanbari, R., Heidarimozaffar, M., Soltani, A. & Arefi, H. Land surface temperature analysis in densely populated zones from the perspective of spectral indices and urban morphology. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 2883โ2902 (2023).
Iqbal, A., Beaugrand, J., Garnier, P. & Recous, S. Tissue density determines the water storage characteristics of crop residues. Plant Soil 367, 285โ299 (2013).
Tane, Z. et al. Evaluating endmember and band selection techniques for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis using post-fire imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. 10, 389 (2018).
Yue, J. & Tian, Q. Estimating fractional cover of crop, crop residue, and soil in cropland using broadband remote sensing data and machine learning. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 89, 102089 (2020).
Ding, Y. et al. A comparison of estimating crop residue cover from sentinel-2 data using empirical regressions and machine learning methods. Remote Sens. 12, 1470 (2020).
Najafi, P., Feizizadeh, B. & Navid, H. A comparative approach of fuzzy object based image analysis and machine learning techniques which are applied to crop residue cover mapping by using Sentinel-2 satellite and UAV imagery. Remote Sens. 13, 937 (2021).
Gella, G. W., Bijker, W. & Belgiu, M. Mapping crop types in complex farming areas using SAR imagery with dynamic time warping. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 175, 171โ183 (2021).
Tao, W. et al. Mapping the corn residue-covered types using multi-scale feature fusion and supervised learning method by Chinese GF-2 PMS image. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 859 (2022).
Pepe, M., Pompilio, L., Ranghetti, L., Nutini, F. & Boschetti, M. Mapping spatial distribution of crop residues using PRISMA satellite imaging spectroscopy. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 1โ16 (2022).
Zhao, W., Qu, Y., Zhang, L. & Li, K. Spatial-aware SAR-optical time-series deep integration for crop phenology tracking. Remote Sens. Environ. 276, 113046 (2022).
Wang, S. et al. Cross-scale sensing of field-level crop residue cover: Integrating field photos, airborne hyperspectral imaging, and satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 285, 113366 (2023).
Kazemi Garajeh, M., Salmani, B., Zare Naghadehi, S., Valipoori Goodarzi, H. & Khasraei, A. An integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis for modeling and predicting the impacts of climate change on food security. Sci. Rep. 13, 1057 (2023).
Sertel, E., Ekim, B., Ettehadi Osgouei, P. & Kabadayi, M. E. Land use and land cover mapping using deep learning based segmentation approaches and vhr worldview-3 images. Remote Sens. 14, 4558 (2022).
Benhammou, Y. et al. Sentinel2GlobalLULC: A Sentinel-2 RGB image tile dataset for global land use/cover mapping with deep learning. Sci. Data 9, 681 (2022).
Adrian, J., Sagan, V. & Maimaitijiang, M. Sentinel SAR-optical fusion for crop type mapping using deep learning and Google Earth Engine. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 175, 215โ235 (2021).
Aplin, P. Remote sensing: Ecology. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 29, 104โ113 (2005).
Peng, J., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, J. & Han, Y. Trend analysis of vegetation dynamics in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau using Hurst Exponent. Ecol. Ind. 14, 28โ39 (2012).
Li, X. et al. Assimilating leaf area index of three typical types of subtropical forest in China from MODIS time series data based on the integrated ensemble Kalman filter and PROSAIL model. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 126, 68โ78 (2017).
Oliveira, S. et al. Mapping wildfire vulnerability in Mediterranean Europe. Testing a stepwise approach for operational purposes. J. Environ. Manage. 206, 158โ169 (2018).
Mirzaei, M. et al. Preliminary effects of crop residue management on soil quality and crop production under different soil management regimes in corn-wheat rotation systems. Agronomy 11, 302 (2021).
Hiel, M.-P. et al. Impact of crop residue management on crop production and soil chemistry after seven years of crop rotation in temperate climate, loamy soils. PeerJ 6, e4836 (2018).
Lin, Y. et al. An optimized machine learning approach to water pollution variation monitoring with time-series Landsat images. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 102, 102370 (2021).
Zhao, Z. et al. Monitoring and analysis of abandoned cropland in the Karst Plateau of eastern Yunnan, China based on Landsat time series images. Ecol. Ind. 146, 109828 (2023).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436โ444 (2015).
Mohajane, M. et al. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecol. Ind. 129, 107869 (2021).
Du, L. et al. Multi-modal deep learning for landform recognition. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 158, 63โ75 (2019).
Reis, H. C. & Turk, V. Detection of forest fire using deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 143, 110362 (2023).
Kazemi-Garajeh, M. et al. A comparison between sentinel-2 and landsat 8 OLI satellite images for soil salinity distribution mapping using a deep learning convolutional neural network. Can. J. Remote Sens. 48, 452โ468 (2022).
Hakim, W. L. et al. Convolutional neural network (CNN) with metaheuristic optimization algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Icheon, South Korea. J. Environ. Manage. 305, 114367 (2022).
Kazemi-Garajeh, M. et al. Monitoring trends of CO, NO2, SO2, and O3 pollutants using time-series sentinel-5 images based on google earth engine. Pollutants 3, 255โ279 (2023).
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (MIT press, 2016).
Morellos, A. et al. Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Biosys. Eng. 152, 104โ116 (2016).
Kazemi Garajeh, M., Li, Z., Hasanlu, S., Zare Naghadehi, S. & Hossein Haghi, V. Developing an integrated approach based on geographic object-based image analysis and convolutional neural network for volcanic and glacial landforms mapping. Sci. Rep. 12, 21396 (2022).
Tan, M. & Le, Q. International Conference on Machine Learning 6105โ6114 (PMLR, 2023).
Nhu, V.-H. et al. Effectiveness assessment of Keras based deep learning with different robust optimization algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping at tropical area. CATENA 188, 104458 (2020).
Hu, Q. et al. Utilizing unsupervised learning, multi-view imaging, and CNN-based attention facilitates cost-effective wetland mapping. Remote Sens. Environ. 267, 112757 (2021).
Aghazadeh, F. et al. An integrated approach of deep learning convolutional neural network and google earth engine for salt storm monitoring and mapping. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 14, 101689 (2023).
Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M., Tajbakhsh, N. & Liang, J. U. A nested U-Net architecture for medical image segmentation. arXiv:1807.10165 (2018).
Akar, ร. The Rotation Forest algorithm and object-based classification method for land use mapping through UAV images. Geocarto Int. 33, 538โ553 (2018).
Cadena, C., Dick, A. R. & Reid, I. D. Multi-modal Auto-Encoders as Joint Estimators for Robotics Scene Understanding. In Robotics: Science and Systems (2023).
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 84โ90 (2017).
Ma, L. et al. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 152, 166โ177 (2019).
Rhew, I. C., Vander Stoep, A., Kearney, A., Smith, N. L. & Dunbar, M. D. Validation of the normalized difference vegetation index as a measure of neighborhood greenness. Ann. Epidemiol. 21, 946โ952 (2011).
Liu, Y., Lu, H., Tian, P. & Qiu, L. Evaluating the effects of dams and meteorological variables on riparian vegetation NDVI in the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 831, 154933 (2022).
Thouverai, E. et al. Helical graphs to visualize the NDVI temporal variation of forest vegetation in an open source space. Eco. Inform. 74, 101956 (2023).
Sellers, P. J. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Int. J. Remote Sens. 6, 1335โ1372 (1985).
Garajeh, M. K., Feizizadeh, B., Weng, Q., Moghaddam, M. H. R. & Garajeh, A. K. Desert landform detection and mapping using a semi-automated object-based image analysis approach. J. Arid Environ. 199, 104721 (2022).
Kordi, F., Yousefi, H., Ghasemi, L. & Tajrishy, M. Investigation and comparison of land use map database in the Urmia lake basin. Iran. J. Ecohydrol. 8, 891โ905 (2021).
Kordi, F., Yousefi, H. & Tajrishi, M. Estimation of water consumption in the downstream agricultural area of Hasanlu Dam using METRIC algorithm. Water Irrig. Manag. 12, 171โ185 (2022).
Gao, L. et al. Mapping crop residue cover using Adjust Normalized Difference Residue Index based on Sentinel-2 MSI data. Soil Tillage Res. 220, 105374 (2022).
Kordi, F. & Yousefi, H. Crop classification based on phenology information by using time series of optical and synthetic-aperture radar images. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Env. 27, 100812 (2022).
Ghanbari, R., Sobhani, B., Aghaee, M., Oshnooei-nooshabadi, A. & Safarianzengir, V. Monitoring and evaluation of effective climate parameters on the cultivation and zoning of corn agricultural crop in Iran (case study: Ardabil province). Arab. J. Geosci. 14, 1โ11 (2021).
Quemada, M. & Daughtry, C. S. Spectral indices to improve crop residue cover estimation under varying moisture conditions. Remote Sens. 8, 660 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.K.G. is the major author who has organized the research, running the research methodology and wrote the manuscript. K.H, A.R.B.L, A.R, L.E, and M.S. have collaborated in revising and improving the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kazemi Garajeh, M., Hassangholizadeh, K., Bakhshi Lomer, A.R. et al. Monitoring the impacts of crop residue cover on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics. Sci Rep 13, 15054 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42367-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42367-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.