Abstract
The evolution of chemical signals is subject to environmental constraints. A multicomponent signal may combine semiochemical molecules with supporting compounds able to enhance communication efficacy. Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are ubiquitous enzymes catalysing the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide, a reaction involved in a variety of physiological processes as it controls the chemical environment of the different tissues or cellular compartments, thus contributing to the overall system homeostasis. CA-IV isoform has been recently identified by mass spectrometry in the femoral gland secretions (FG) of the marine iguana, where it has been hypothesized to contribute to the chemical stability of the signal, by regulating blend pH. Lizards, indeed, use FG to communicate by delivering the waxy secretion on bare substrate, where it is exposed to environmental stressors. Therefore, we expect that some molecules in the mixture may play supporting functions, enhancing the stability of the chemical environment, or even conferring homeostatic properties to the blend. CA-IV may well represent an important candidate to this hypothesized supporting/homeostatic function, and, therefore, we can expect it to be common in FG secretions of other lizard species. To evaluate this prediction and definitely validate CA identity, we analysed FG secretions of eight species of wall lizards (genus Podarcis), combining mass spectrometry, immunoblotting, immunocytochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. We demonstrate CA-IV to actually occur in the FG of seven out of the eight considered species, providing an immunochemistry validation of mass-spectrometry identifications, and localizing the enzyme within the secretion mass. The predicted structure of the identified CA is compatible with the known enzymatic activity of CA-IV, supporting the hypothesis that CA play a signal homeostasis function and opening to new perspective about the role of proteins in vertebrate chemical communication.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chemical communication is ubiquitous in the animal kingdom, where it shows a variety of forms and designs, each representing an adaptation to different, concomitant evolutionary drivers1, not least the environmental background where communication takes place2,3,4. In terrestrial environments, for example, volatility plays a key role, since it determines the range and longevity of a signal, where high volatility corresponds to a rapid diffusion over large distance but also a quick fade5. In such context, the optimization of signal efficacy may lead to the evolution of chemical mixtures where semiochemicals, i.e., molecules active in communication6, are mixed with supporting compounds, not necessarily involved in signalling. Supporting compounds may work as an “active” chemical matrix able to influence the chemo-physical properties of specific compounds as well as of the whole blend, and eventually allow tuning signal longevity and volatility, according to the environmental conditions, and social functions4,6,7,8,9. A well-studied example comes from mice (Mus musculus), whose urine is enriched by specific proteins (MUPs10), which, besides being involved in individual recognition11, bind volatile molecules (e.g., 2-s-butyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole12), thus ensuring their slow release and increasing their longevity13. Alternatively, in insects, the array of cuticular hydrocarbons from different classes shows a melting point 15 °C higher to that predicted by the weighted average among the components14, thus greatly enhancing the environmental adaptability of the blend15. In lizards, cholesterol decreases the volatility of the chemical mixture, and its abundance increases with environmental temperature16,17; similarly, α-tocopherol, known for its antioxidant properties18, helps stabilizing the secretions in mesic environment19,20. Overall, by combining semiochemicals and supporting molecules, multicomponent signals can be adjusted to accommodate the changes in the environmental conditions in a finer way than single-component scents can do21,22.
Carbonic Anhydrases (CAs) are a superfamily of metalloenzyme catalysing the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide, an elemental reaction which is involved in a variety of physiological functions (pH regulation, ion transportation, carbon dioxide fixation, calcification, signal transduction;23,24,25). Originally purified from human blood cells26, CAs were later found to be common27, and many genetic families (α-, β-, γ -, δ-, ζ-, η-) have been recognized25. In vertebrates, notably mammals (the best studied group), sixteen α-CA isoforms have been identified, located in different tissues and organs (e.g., blood, muscle, lung, kidney, brain, gut25,28), as well in different cellular compartments (cytosol, mitochondria, cytoplasmatic membrane28), or even secreted29,30,31.
In 2020, CA-IV was identified by mass spectrometry as one of the most abundant protein in the femoral gland (FG) secretions of the Galapagos’ marine iguana, Amblyrhynchus cristatus32. The occurrence of this enzyme in FG secretions has been later confirmed in a phylogenetically distant species, the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis33, and, very recently, also in the Gran Canaria giant lizard, Gallotia stehlini34. FG secretions are chemical cues used in lizard intra- and interspecific communication35,36,37,38,39,40. Secreted by specialized epidermal glands occurring as two symmetric series along the thighs41,42, FG secretions consist of a waxy mixture of lipids and proteins43,44,45. Lipids have been chemically identified and mostly associated to semiochemical function46,47,48. The proteinaceous fraction has been less studied32, 33,42,49, and recently characterized only in the two above-mentioned species32,33. In both cases, this fraction mainly includes keratins, small serum proteins, and lipid-binding proteins32,33, suggesting it can represent the supporting component of the chemical cue32, despite previous evidence for additional semiochemical function8,50,51.
The CA-IV isoform identified by Tellkamp et al.32 is a 35 kDa protein, usually occurring on the extracellular side of the membrane28, where it is anchored by a GPI (glycosylphosphatidylinositol) tail52. CA-IV is remarkably stable, due to the occurrence of two disulphide linkages53, has a C-terminal hydrophobic domain54, and keeps its catalytic activity even in its secretory form, i.e., when the C-terminal anchoring domain is removed55. The above considerations are fully compatible with a supporting-role in FG secretions, where CA-IV can be directly involved in the chemical homeostasis of the mixture. This hypothesis is made even more intriguing considering that FG secretions are often delivered on bare substrates, like stones, rocks or walls41,56, thus potentially experiencing very high temperature, UV exposure, and rapid desiccation22,57,58. Consequently, the chemical mixture, and supporting compounds therein, should be able to work also in such extreme conditions.
Given its potential role and its wide diffusion among very different taxa27, we can expect CA-IV to occur also in the secretions of other lizard species. To test this hypothesis and to confirm, validate and generalize previous findings, we combined mass-spectrometry analysis, immunoblotting techniques, immunocytochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy to detect, identify, and visualize CA-IV in the FG secretions of eight species from the Podarcis genus (Fig. 1). The genus includes small-sized lacertid lizards, distributed from Central to Mediterranean Europe, Maghreb, and the Black Sea59,60, therefore encompassing a wide range of environmental conditions61, and it has been the focus of many studies about chemical communication (e.g.,37,39,45,49,50, 62,63,64,65,66). Further, protein electrophoretic profiles of FG secretions for some wall lizard species have been already published37, and a putative CA band seems easily identifiable in all, but one, cases, thus offering an ideal case study for an in-depth analysis using a multi-technique approach.
Results
Protein isolation from Podarcis femoral gland secretions and selection of candidate CA-IV bands
We successfully managed to extract protein fractions from the femoral gland secretions of all the eight different Podarcis species (Table S1). Sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of these samples showed very similar patterns. Their comparison revealed, as expected37, limited yet significant qualitative and quantitative differences between the samples (Fig. 2). In particular, we focused on a consistently present protein band found in all samples except in P. liolepis (Fig. 2). This protein band had a molecular weight of about 30–35 kDa, which we hypothesized could correspond to CA-IV. The bands of interest were then carefully excised from the gel, destained, digested with trypsin, and resulting peptides were submitted to mass spectrometry.
Mass spectrometry analysis identifies a CA-IV-like protein in Podarcis femoral gland secretions
Mass spectrometry (MS) peaks associated to trypsin-digested polypeptides were searched against the SwissProt and the proteome of P. muralis (NCBI txid64176), as extrapolated from its reference proteome as found on the NCBI database. Peptide sequences from P. muralis CA-IV-like protein (NCBI reference sequence XP_028560944.1), but not CA-IV (NCBI reference sequence XP_028564309.1) were consistently detected as almost unique hits in all samples analysed (Fig. 3). Despite the lack of available proteomes for other Podarcis species, our approach allowed the identification of peptides from CA-IV-like protein sequences in all analysed samples, suggesting a remarkable similarity amongst Podarcis species. A detailed overview of MS data, including percent of sequence coverage, number of peptides identified and score percentage of each protein identified in each sample is reported in Table 1.
Western blotting confirms CA-IV in the femoral gland secretions of Podarcis species
To further validate the identification of the putative CA-IV-like protein as obtained by mass spectrometry, we opted for western blot analysis of the protein samples. In absence of a Podarcis-specific CA-IV antibody, we reasoned on the high degree of sequence conservation between CA-IV proteins of different species (Fig. 4) and opted for using a commercial antibody against vertebrate CA-IV for detection. Samples from each profile of the femoral gland secretions of the various Podarcis species were therefore subject run into SDS-PAGE followed by transfer onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane and incubation with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against vertebrate CA-IV, followed by a polyclonal goat anti-rabbit antibody. A single protein band was consistently revealed by western blotting exactly in the same position as the band used for MS detection (Fig. 5). This result was further confirmed by the absence of bands in the lane corresponding to P. liolepis, as already observed in its protein pattern of the SDS-PAGE analysis.
Ultrastructural analysis localizes CA-IV in femoral gland secretions
Immunocytochemestry (ICC) was performed to detect CA-IV at Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Immunolabeling revealed extensive presence of the enzyme in the femoral gland secretions, identified as the gold particles (Fig. 6). Moreover, the ultrastructural investigation allowed us to notice a degree of variability in the secretions as they are characterized by different levels of electron-density amidst the same sample. Interestingly, we found a correlation between this parameter and the detection of CA-IV immunolabeling. Indeed, darker femoral gland secretions, i.e., the less electron-dense ones, showed higher abundancy of CA-IV (Fig. 6C–D).
Discussion
The efficacy of chemical communication in terrestrial environment can take advantage from using a multicomponent design21,22, where semiochemicals and supporting compounds are combined to confer adaptive and modulable properties to the signal. CA-IV has been potentially identified as the first supporting molecule example in the FG secretions of two lizard species32,33. By combining different approaches and techniques, we generalized this finding to seven more lizard species, not only confirming CA-IV occurrence, but also providing the first independent validation of its identity. Notably, (1) the SDS-PAGE profile of all the considered species, except for Podarcis liolepis, showed a well-definite band in the predicted molecular range for CA-IV (Fig. 2); (2) MS analysis confirmed all these proteins to match almost uniquely the CA-IV-like sequence of P. muralis reference proteome (Table 1; Fig. 3); (3) WB validated CA-IV-like identification only in the species bearing the CA-IV band in SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5); finally, (4) ICC localized CA-IV-like proteins within the secretions (Fig. 6).
Besides confirming and validating the occurrence of CA-IV in lizards’ FG secretions, our results provide circumstantial evidence of the hypothesis that CA-IV plays a supporting function. Firstly, all CAs seem to be rather similar with each other, since both MS and WB were able to identify them basing on the information from the reference proteome of a single species, P. muralis, the only available at the time of the analysis for the whole genus. This agrees with the supporting function hypothesized for CA. Indeed, although some species-specific patterns have been recognized in the FG protein profiles of lacertid lizards37, we should expect supporting compounds not to follow such pattern, since they should mainly respond to the signalling context (e.g., the environmental conditions;58,66) rather than to the conveyed information, such as species identity70. Secondly, the computational structural predictions based on Alphafold2 pipelines71 highlighted that P. muralis CA-IV-like and CA-IV share the same folding topology and their catalytic sites are compatible with binding of Zn2+, essential cofactor for carbonic anhydrase activity (Fig. 7;25,53). The main differences within the catalytic site were associated to Podarcis CA-IV-like Tyr91 replacing CA-IV Thr108 at a site critical for substrate processing (Fig. 7). Notably, this site hosted a conserved small polar side chain (i.e., either Ser or Thr) in most vertebrate CA-IV enzymes (Fig. 4). Collectively, these observations suggest that Podarcis CA-IV-like could act as a carbonic anhydrase enzyme similar to its annotated CA-IV counterpart, but with different substrate specificity in reason of its localization in the FG secretions. Thirdly, ICC showed CA to be scattered within the secretions, and not clustered along the boundaries of the compartmentalized ultrastructure (Fig. 6). This may suggest CA to be spread in the mixture, ensuring a homogeneously spatial distribution also of its enzymatic action, which, in turn, agrees with its potential homeostatic function (e.g., pH-regulation;28). Further, it also implies CA-IV not to be bound to membrane structures, as expected by the analogy with mammal CA-IV28,72: therefore, the identified CA-IV-like protein represents a secreted form, i.e., without the anchoring GPI group52,54, which keeps its catalytic activity55. Lastly, despite widespread within the secretion mass, CA concentration seemed to be inversely related to the electron-density of the mixture (Fig. 6C–D). This may mean that: (i) secretions are not completely homogeneous (Fig. 6A–B), showing some degree of compositional variation at local scale, as already hypothesized for worm lizards73,74; (ii) CA concentration follows such variation, suggesting it can be tuned according to the local composition of the mixture, which is in line with a supporting function.
CAs catalyse bicarbonate dehydration/carbon dioxide hydration, a basic reaction which may directly and indirectly affect a number of processes23,24,25. Following Tellkamp et al.32 and Ibanez et al.33, we may speculate CA in FG secretions to act on pH regulation, a pivotal parameter of the blend that, in turn, may influence the stability, volatility, and activity of other compounds, be they semiochemicals or supporting molecules, lipids75,76 or proteins77,78. This way, CA may confer dynamic properties to the mixture, making it able to respond to the variation of the ambient conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, …), and contributing to the system homeostasis of the FG secretions, similarly to what happens for other isoforms in mammal secretions (milk, tear fluid, saliva;29,31,79,80). Recently, CA abundance in FG secretions of lacertid lizards has been found to correlate with that of provitamin D334, a molecule known for its semiochemical role in lizard communication81. This is in line with what we could expect if CA helped stabilizing other, more labile molecules. Of course, we cannot rule out other functions, and targeted studies are required to verify the above hypothesis.
Finally, WB failed to detect CA-IV in P. liolepis (Fig. 5). Although this outcome validates the specificity of the immunolabeling and reinforces the reliability of the results for the other species, it also opens the question about the lack of CA-IV in the FG secretions of this species. We can reasonably exclude it is a false-negative, since the SDS-PAGE profile (Fig. 2) is almost identical to the average profile of the species (see Figs. 1 and 2 in37), where the CA-IV band is missing. The absence of CA-IV from the secretions may mean this enzyme not to be pivotal in guaranteeing the efficacy of the chemical signal in this species, although P. liolepis uses FG secretions in intraspecific-communication82. Nor we can exclude that the missing piece falls within the intraspecific variability of the species (our samples come from a high-elevation population; Table S1). Such pattern has been documented for the lipophilic fraction of the secretions in this species, where populations living at different altitudes showed unique compounds83.
In conclusion, we established that CA-IV certainly occurs in the FG secretions of Podarcis lizards, generalizing and validating previous findings from two non-congeneric species. This CA isoform is almost homogenously spread amidst the blend, where it may contribute to the system homeostasis, exemplifying what we defined a supporting function. Further studies are necessary to confirm the latter point, and to assess whether CA-IV holds its enzymatic activity within the waxy mixture, notably in view of the potentially extreme environmental conditions the cues have to experience. Moreover, other proteins may be involved in supporting functions and our first assessment opens up to future research on the subject.
Methods
Samples collection
For the analysis, we used samples of femoral gland secretions collected from two adult males of each of the following eight species (Fig. 1): Podarcis bocagei, P. carbonelli, P. erhardii, P. liolepis, P. melisellensis, P. milensis, P. muralis. The choice to focus on wall lizards (genus Podarcis) depended on a combination of reasons. Notably: (1) a preliminary comparison of the electrophoretic profiles available for 36 lacertid lizards37 showed that a potential CA band (visible as a peak just before or corresponding to the 40 kDa tick mark; see Figs. 1 and 2 in37) seemed to occur in almost all the eleven mapped species, therefore making easier to target and analyse the bands; (2) a single species (P. liolepis) did not show such a peak, providing a potential negative control to the experiment; (3) despite sharing many ecological traits, the geographic distribution of the chosen taxonomic group encompasses quite different environments, and spatial extent59,60,61; (4) we were able to collect original samples for eight of these species from different research groups. Samples were collected between 2007 and 2015 (Table S1; Fig. S1), during the breeding season (maximum of glandular activity;39). Lizards were captured by noosing84 and epidermal gland secretion were collected by gently pressing around the femoral pores while wearing fresh nitrile gloves: the procedure was not invasive and did not cause damage to any animal tissues64. All lizards were released healthy at capture points after sample collection. Samples of femoral gland secretions were stored in glass vials fitted with Teflon-lined stoppers, and kept at − 20 °C until analysis. Capture and handling procedures were performed in accordance with the National relevant guidelines and regulation: Croatia (UP/I-612-07/14-48/111 & UP/I-612-07/14-48/33); Italy (PNM-2015-0010423); Greece: all species were collected in accordance with the Hellenic National Legislation (Presidential Decree 67/81); Spain: captures of lizards and sampling procedures were performed under different licenses for the Environmental Agencies of the different Regional Governments of Spain where lizards were studied. This study followed the recommendations reported in the ARRIVE guidelines85,86 and was approved by University of Antwerp (Belgium) animal welfare standards and protocols (ECD 2014-32).
Protein extraction and quantitation
All chemicals were > 98% purity and purchased from VWR unless specified. Protein from FG secretions were extracted following39,49. Briefly: secretions were defatted by adding 200 μL of n-hexane to samples (an average of 1–2 mg of dense waxy material) and incubating at room temperature for 2 h. Afterwards, the samples were centrifuged (14,000 rpm for 10 min), and proteins were enriched within the pellet fraction. The procedure was repeated three times and proteins were finally air-dried. Protein pellets were then dissolved in 200 μL of 10 mM PBS buffer pH 7.4, containing 137 mM NaCl and 2.7 mM KCl. The total protein concentration was determined by applying the Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay using a calibration curve obtained with bovine serum albumin (BSA) at concentrations between 5 and 25 μg/mL.
Sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
Aliquots containing a maximum of 10 μg of proteins for each sample were added to 10 μL of loading buffer solution (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 10% glycerol). Prepared samples were denatured by incubating at 95 °C for five minutes. Electrophoretic runs were performed in a discontinuous mode (5% stacking gel and 15% running gel) by applying a constant voltage of 180 V for 2 h. Gels were stained with a 0.12% (w/v) Coomassie Blue G-250 solution, containing 40% ethanol (v/v) and 10% (v/v) acetic acid; gels were destained using a solution of 5% (v/v) acetic acid. After running a first gel with both samples for each species, we chose the sample with the best electrophoretic profile (Figs. 2 and S2), notably in the CA band region. This set of eight samples (one for each species) was eventually used for all subsequent analyses.
In situ enzymatic digestion
The selected bands were excised from the gel, placed into 1.5 mL tubes and broken into small pieces. This material was then washed with aliquots (200 μL) of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer pH 7.8, 50% acetonitrile (ACN) until complete destaining. Gels were dehydrated by addition of ACN (100 μL). After removal of the organic solvent by air-drying, reduction was performed by addition of 50 μL of 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) solution (30 min at 37 °C). DTT was then replaced with 50 μL of 55 mM iodoacetamide for 45 min at 60 °C. The solution was then removed, and the gel pieces were washed twice with 200 μL of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate for 10 min. The resulting gel was dehydrated by addition of 200 μL of ACN until the gel pieces became of an opaque-white colour. ACN was finally removed, and gel pieces were air-dried. Gels were rehydrated once again by addition of 75 μL of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer pH 7.8, containing 20 ng/μL sequencing grade trypsin (Promega) and digestion was performed overnight at 37 °C. Following enzymatic digestion, the resultant peptides were extracted sequentially from gel matrix by a two-step treatment (each step for 15 min, while vortexing) with 100 μL of 50% ACN in water, containing 5% formic acid (FA). The original supernatant and those obtained from sequential extractions were pooled, dried under vacuum, and stored at − 20 °C until mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. At the moment of use, the peptide mixtures were solubilized in 50 μL of water containing 0.1% formic acid (FA) for MS analyses.
Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis
All analyses were carried out with a LC unit (ExionLC AD, AB Sciex) equipped with a column oven thermostated at 40 °C, an autosampler cooled at 10 °C and a binary gradient pump system. MS instrument consists of a high resolution QTOF mass spectrometer (X500B, AB Sciex) equipped with a Turbo V Ion source and a Twin Sprayer ESI (electrospray ionization) probe, controlled by the OS 2.1 software (AB Sciex). Peptides were separated by reverse phase (RP) HPLC on a Hypersil Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific) C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm particle size, 175 Å pore size) using a linear gradient (2–50% solvent B in 15 min) in which solvent A consisted of 0.1% aqueous FA and solvent B of ACN containing 0.1% FA. Flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. Mass spectra were generated in positive polarity under constant instrumental conditions: ion spray voltage 4500 V, declustering potential 100 V, curtain gas 30 psi, ion source gas 1 40 psi, ion source gas 2 45 psi, temperature 350 °C, collision energy 10 V. Spectra were acquired the generated data were processed with Peaks studio 4.5 software for protein identification. The mass list was searched against the SwissProt and ad hoc databases.
Western blotting (WB)
Separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane with a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad), using a pre-programmed protocol for mixed molecular weights (1.3 A constant current for 7 min). After 1 h incubation in the blocking solution (5% bovine serum albumin, BSA, in Tris-buffered saline, TBS, buffer) and three additional washes with TBS supplemented with 0,1% Tween (TBST), the membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against vertebrate CA-IV (Proteintech), diluted 1:1000 in 1% BSA in TBST. After washing the membrane three times with TBST, incubation with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Proteintech), diluted 1:10,000 with 1% BSA in TBST, was carried out for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was finally washed three times with TBS and incubated with the Clarity wester ECL detection substrate (Bio-Rad). Immunoblots were acquired with the ChemiDoc MP System (Bio-Rad).
Bioinformatics analyses
CA-IV (XP_028564309.1) and CA-IV-like (XP_028560944.1) protein sequences were retrieved from the proteome of P. muralis (NCBI txid64176) deposited on NCBI. Homologous searches were carried out using NCBI BLAST. Results were narrowed based on the annotations for CA-IV or CA-IV-like proteins. The retrieved sequences were downloaded and subject to multi-sequence alignment using EBI MUSCLE87, and the computed alignments were displayed using ESPRIPT388. Structural predictions of P. muralis CA-IV and CA-IV-like proteins were generated using Alphafold2 pipelines71 through the COSMIC website89. Comparisons with the experimental structure of human CA-IV (PDB ID 5IPZ,69), superpositions and structural figures were carried out using PyMOL90.
Immunocytochemestry (ICC) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
For transmission electron microscopy, femoral gland secretions were fixed by immersion in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 2 h at 4 °C. After several rinses in PBS, samples were incubated in 0.5 M NH4Cl in PBS to block free aldehydic groups, dehydrated in a graded ethanol scale and then embedded in LR White resin polymerized for 24 h at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections (60–80 nm) were cut on a Reichert OM-U3 ultramicrotome, collected on nickel grids coated with a Formvar-carbon layer. For the immunocytochemical analysis, sections were floated on normal goat serum (NGS) diluted 1:100 in PBS for 3 min and then incubated over-night at 4 °C with the primary antibody directed against vertebrate CA-IV (Proteintech) diluted 1:50 in PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween20. After rinsing, sections were floated on NGS and then incubated for 30 min at RT with a 12 nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.) diluted 1:20 in PBS. Then, sections were rinsed, air-dried and stained. In detail, grids were incubated for 10 min at RT in uranyl acetate and then in lead citrate for 2 min at RT.
The specimens were observed with a JEM 1200 EX II (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA) TEM operating at 100 kV and equipped with a MegaView G2 CCD camera (Olympus OSIS, Tokyo, Japan).
Data availability
Raw mass spectrometry data associated with the manuscript are available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8288458.
References
Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer Associates Inc., 2011).
Endler, J. A. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 340, 215–225 (1993).
Alberts, A. C. Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates. Am. Nat. 139, S62–S89 (1992).
Apps, P. J., Weldon, P. J. & Kramer, M. Chemical signals in terrestrial vertebrates: Search for design features. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 1131–1153 (2015).
Bossert, W. H. & Wilson, E. O. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. Theor. Biol. 5, 443–469 (1963).
Wyatt, T. D. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Wyatt, T. D. Pheromones and signature mixtures: Defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J. Comp. Physiol. A 196, 685–700 (2010).
Alberts, A. C. & Werner, D. I. Chemical recognition of unfamiliar conspecifics by green iguanas: Functional significance of different signal components. Anim. Behav. 46, 197–199 (1993).
Junker, R. R. et al. Covariation and phenotypic integration in chemical communication displays: Biosynthetic constraints and eco-evolutionary implications. New Phytol. 220, 739–749 (2018).
Finlayson, J. S., Asofsky, R., Potter, M. & Runner, C. C. Major urinary protein complex of normal mice: Origin. Science 149, 981–982 (1965).
Hurst, J. L. et al. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414, 631–634 (2001).
Harvey, S., Jemiolo, B. & Novotny, M. Pattern of volatile compounds in dominant and subordinate male mouse urine. J. Chem. Ecol. 15, 2061–2072 (1989).
Mucignat-Caretta, C. & Caretta, A. Message in a bottle: Major urinary proteins and their multiple roles in mouse intraspecific chemical communication. Anim. Behav. 97, 255–263 (2014).
Gibbs, A. Physical properties of insect cuticular hydrocarbons: Model mixtures and lipid interactions. Comp. Biochem. Phys. B 112, 667–672 (1995).
Otte, T., Hilker, M. & Geiselhardt, S. Phenotypic plasticity of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 44, 235–247 (2018).
Martín, J., Ortega, J. & López, P. Interpopulational variations in sexual chemical signals of Iberian wall lizards may allow maximizing signal efficiency under different climatic conditions. PLoS ONE 10, e0131492 (2015).
Escobar, C. M., Escobar, C. A., Labra, A. & Niemeyer, H. M. Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of two Liolaemus fabiani populations: are they different?. J. Chem. Ecol. 29, 629–638 (2003).
Burton, G. W. & Traber, M. G. Vitamin E: Antioxidant activity, biokinetics, and bioavailability. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 10, 357–382 (1990).
Gabirot, M. et al. Chemical composition of femoral secretions of oviparous and viviparous types of male common lizards Lacerta vivipara. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 36, 539–544 (2008).
García-Roa, R., Jara, M., López, P., Martín, J. & Pincheira-Donoso, D. Heterogeneous tempo and mode of evolutionary diversification of compounds in lizard chemical signals. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1286–1296 (2017).
Wyatt, T. D. Proteins and peptides as pheromone signals and chemical signatures. Anim. Behav. 97, 273–280 (2014).
Campos, S. M. et al. Volatile fatty acid and aldehyde abundances evolve with behavior and habitat temperature in Sceloporus lizards. Behav. Ecol. 31, 978–991 (2020).
Tripp, B. C., Smith, K. & Ferry, J. G. Carbonic Anhydrase: New insights for an ancient enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 48615–48618 (2001).
McKenna, R. & Frost, S. C. Overview of the carbonic anhydrase family. In Carbonic Anhydrase: Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial Applications (eds Frost, S. C. & McKenna, R.) 3–5 (Springer, 2014).
Supuran, C. T. Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases. Biochem. J. 473, 2023–2032 (2016).
Meldrum, N. U. & Roughton, F. J. W. Carbonic anhydrase and the state of carbon dioxide in blood. Nature 131, 874–875 (1933).
Hewett-Emmett, D. Evolution and distribution of the carbonic anhydrase gene families. In Exs (eds Chegwidden, W. R. et al.) 29–76 (Birkhäuser, 2000).
Frost, S. C. Physiological functions of the alpha class of carbonic anhydrases. In Carbonic Anhydrase: Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial Applications (eds Frost, S. C. & McKenna, R.) 9–30 (Springer, 2014).
Parkkila, S. et al. Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes VI, II, and I in human parotid and submandibular glands. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 38, 941–947 (1990).
Karhumaa, P. et al. The identification of secreted carbonic anhydrase VI as a constitutive glycoprotein of human and rat milk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11604–11608 (2001).
Ogawa, Y. et al. Characterization of lacrimal gland carbonic anhydrase VI. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 50, 821–827 (2002).
Tellkamp, F. et al. Proteomics of Galápagos marine iguanas links function of femoral gland proteins to the immune system. Mol. Cell Proteomics 19, 1523–1532 (2020).
Ibáñez, A., Skupien-rabian, B., Jankowska, U., Kędracka-krok, S. & Zając, B. Functional protein composition in femoral glands of sand lizards (Lacerta agilis). Molecules 27, 1–13 (2022).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Protein–lipid association in lizard chemical signals. Integr. Org. Biol. 5, obad016 (2023).
Escobar, C. A., Labra, A. & Niemeyer, H. M. Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of Liolaemus lizards. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 1677–1690 (2001).
Martín, J. & López, P. Interpopulational differences in chemical composition and chemosensory recognition of femoral gland secretions of male lizards Podarcis hispanica: implications for sexual isolation in a species complex. Chemoecology 16, 31–38 (2006).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Evolutionary and biogeographical support for species-specific proteins in lizard chemical signals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 134, 912–928 (2021).
Alberts, A. C. Phylogenetic and adaptive variation in lizard femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1991, 69–79 (1991).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Seasonal variations in femoral gland secretions reveals some unexpected correlations between protein and lipid components in a lacertid lizard. J. Chem. Ecol. 45, 673–683 (2019).
Alberts, A. C., Phillips, J. A. & Werner, D. I. Sources of intraspecific variability in the protein composition of lizard femoral gland secretions. Copeia 1993, 775–781 (1993).
Cole, C. J. Femoral glands in lizards: A review. Herpetologica 22, 199–206 (1966).
Mayerl, C., Baeckens, S. & Van Damme, R. Evolution and role of the follicular epidermal gland system in non-ophidian squamates. Amphib. Reptil. 36, 185–206 (2015).
Weldon, P. J., Flachsbarth, B. & Schulz, S. Natural products from the integument of nonavian reptiles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 25, 738–756 (2008).
Alberts, A. C. Chemical properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 13–25 (1990).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Inter- and intra-population variability of the protein content of femoral gland secretions from a lacertid lizard. Curr. Zool. 63, 657–665 (2017).
Alberts, A. C. Chemical and behavioral studies of femoral gland secretions in iguanid lizards. Brain Behav. Evol. 41, 255–260 (1993).
Martín, J. & López, P. Pheromones and chemical communication in lizards. In Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny Of Lizards and Tuatara (eds Rheubert, J. L. et al.) 54–88 (Taylor and Francis Group, 2014).
Mason, R. T. & Parker, M. R. Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles. J. Comp. Physiol. A 196, 729–749 (2010).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Morph-specific protein patterns in the femoral gland secretions of a colour polymorphic lizard. Sci. Rep. 9, 8412 (2019).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. First experimental evidence that proteins from femoral glands convey identity-related information in a lizard. Acta Ethol. 22, 57–65 (2019).
Mangiacotti, M. et al. Proteins from femoral gland secretions of male rock lizards Iberolacerta cyreni allow self—but not individual—recognition of unfamiliar males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 74, 68 (2020).
Zhu, X. L. & Sly, W. S. Carbonic anhydrase IV from human lung. Purification, characterization, and comparison with membrane carbonic anhydrase from human kidney. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 8795–8801 (1990).
Stams, T. et al. Crystal structure of the secretory form of membrane-associated human carbonic anhydrase IV at 2.8-Å resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13589–13594 (1996).
Okuyama, T., Sato, S., Zhu, X. L., Waheed, A. & Sly, W. S. Human carbonic anhydrase IV: cDNA cloning, sequence comparison, and expression in COS cell membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 1315–1319 (1992).
Okuyama, T., Waheed, A., Kusumoto, W., Zhu, X. L. & Sly, W. S. Carbonic anhydrase IV: Role of removal of C-terminal domain in glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchoring and realization of enzyme activity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 320, 315–322 (1995).
Gabe, M. & Saint Girons, H. Contribution à la morphologie comparée du cloaque et des glandes épidermoides de la région cloacale chez les lépidosauriens. Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris Ser. A Zool. 33, 149–292 (1965).
Martín, J. et al. Chemical signals in desert lizards: Are femoral gland secretions of male and female spiny-tailed lizards, Uromastyx aegyptia microlepis adapted to arid conditions?. J. Arid Environ. 127, 192–198 (2016).
Baeckens, S. et al. Environmental conditions shape the chemical signal design of lizards. Funct. Ecol. 32, 566–580 (2018).
Sillero, N. et al. Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphib. Reptil. 35, 1–31 (2014).
Sindaco, R. & Jeremcenko, V. K. The reptiles of the western palearctic: annotated checklist and distributional atlas of the turtles, crocodiles, amphisbaenians and lizards of Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Central Asia (2008).
Roll, U. et al. The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1677–1682 (2017).
Runemark, A., Gabirot, M. & Svensson, E. I. Population divergence in chemical signals and the potential for premating isolation between islet- and mainland populations of the Skyros wall lizard (Podarcis gaigeae). J. Evol. Biol. 24, 795–809 (2011).
Martín, J., López, P., Garrido, M., Pérez-Cembranos, A. & Pérez-Mellado, V. Inter-island variation in femoral secretions of the Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi (Lacertidae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 50, 121–128 (2013).
Baeckens, S., Huyghe, K., Palme, R. & Van Damme, R. Chemical communication in the lacertid lizard Podarcis muralis: The functional significance of testosterone. Acta Zool. 98, 94–103 (2017).
García-Roa, R. et al. Interpopulational and seasonal variation in the chemical signals of the lizard Gallotia galloti. PeerJ 5, e3992 (2017).
Donihue, C. M. et al. Rapid and repeated divergence of animal chemical signals in an island introduction experiment. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 1458–1467 (2020).
Garcia-Porta, J. et al. Environmental temperatures shape thermal physiology as well as diversification and genome-wide substitution rates in lizards. Nat. Commun. 10, 4077 (2019).
Uetz, P., Freed, P, Aguilar, R., Reyes, F. & Hošek, J. The Reptile Database. http://www.reptile-database.org. Accessed 6 June 2023.
Mickevičiūtė, A. et al. Intrinsic thermodynamics of high affinity inhibitor binding to recombinant human carbonic anhydrase IV. Eur. Biophys. J. 47, 271–290 (2018).
Tibbetts, E. A., Mullen, S. P. & Dale, J. Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: The effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160347 (2017).
Tunyasuvunakool, K. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596, 590–596 (2021).
Parkkila, S. An overview of the distribution and function of carbonic anhydrase in mammals. In Exs (eds Chegwidden, W. R. et al.) 79–93 (Birkhäuser, 2000).
Antoniazzi, M. M., Jared, C., Pellegrini, C. M. R. & Macha, N. Epidermal glands in Squamata: Morphology and histochemistry of the pre-cloacal glands in Amphisbaena alba (Amphisbaenia). Zoomorphology 113, 199–203 (1993).
Jared, C., Antoniazzi, M. M., Silva, J. R. & Freymüller, E. Epidermal glands in Squamata: Microscopical examination of precloacal glands in Amphisbaena alba (Amphisbaenia, Amphisbaenidae). J. Morphol. 241, 197–206 (1999).
Van Ruth, S. M., Roozen, J. P., Posthumus, M. A. & Jansen, F. J. H. M. Volatile composition of sunflower oil-in-water emulsions during initial lipid oxidation: Influence of pH. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 4365–4369 (1999).
Kim, S. K. & Nawar, W. W. Parameters influencing cholesterol oxidation. Lipids 28, 917–922 (1993).
Wang, Y.-H. & Narayan, M. pH Dependence of the isomerase activity of protein disulfide isomerase: Insights into its functional relevance. Protein J. 27, 181–185 (2008).
Talley, K. & Alexov, E. On the pH-optimum of activity and stability of proteins. Proteins 78, 2699–2706 (2010).
Parkkila, S. et al. Salivary carbonic anhydrase protects gastroesophageal mucosa from acid injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 42, 1013–1019 (1997).
Kitade, K. et al. Expression and localization of carbonic anhydrase in bovine mammary gland and secretion in milk. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 134, 349–354 (2003).
Martín, J. & López, P. Condition-dependent chemosignals in reproductive behavior of lizards. Horm. Behav. 68, 14–24 (2015).
Font, E., Barbosa, D., Sampedro, C. & Carazo, P. Social behavior, chemical communication, and adult neurogenesis: Studies of scent mark function in Podarcis wall lizards. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 177, 9–17 (2012).
Ortega, J., Martín, J., Crochet, P.-A., López, P. & Clobert, J. Seasonal and interpopulational phenotypic variation in morphology and sexual signals of Podarcis liolepis lizards. PLoS ONE 14, e0211686 (2019).
Fitzgerald, L. A. Finding and capturing reptiles. In Reptile Biodiversity (eds McDiarmid, R. et al.) 77–88 (University of California Press, 2012).
du Sert, N. P. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000410 (2020).
du Sert, N. P. et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000411 (2020).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).
Cianfrocco, M., Wong-Barnum, M., Youn, C., Wagner, R. & Leschziner, A. COSMIC2: A science gateway for cryo-electron microscopy structure determination. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093338.3093390 (2017).
Schrödinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We are in debt with Simon Baeckens (Antwerp University) and José Martin (Spanish National Research Council, Madrid) who provided most of the samples used in the analysis.
Funding
MM was funded by Fondo Sociale Europeo REACT EU - Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020 (Italian Ministry for University and Research - MUR - CCI2014IT16M2OP005). Research in the FF lab is supported by the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MUR, grant PRIN 2017RPHBCW_001 to FF and Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022 to the Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia), the Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation (CDA 2013 to FF), the NATO Science for Peace and Security Program (grant SPS.MYP G5701). None of the funding sources had roles in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit this article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M., M.F., and R.S. conceived the ideas. M.M., M.F., C.C., F.F., and M.B. designed methodology; M.M. and R.S. collected the data; M.F., C.C. performed lab analysis; M.F., F.F., C.C., M.B. analysed the data; M.M. led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mangiacotti, M., Fumagalli, M., Casali, C. et al. Carbonic anhydrase IV in lizard chemical signals. Sci Rep 13, 14164 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41012-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41012-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.