Introduction

Coarse Woody Debris (CWDs) play important ecological role within the forest ecosystem1,2,3, serving as food for saprophagous organisms4,5, habitat for vertebrates and invertebrates6, and as a component of the carbon cycle7,8,9. The relevance of CWDs in the carbon cycle has expanded over the years due to the tree mortality increase10. Factors such as forest degradation11,12, land use change13,14 and the negative effects of climate change15,16 are primarily responsible for this growth in tree mortality in forests around the world, including the forests of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest17,18.

The carbon contained in CWDs can be stored for over 30 years in tropical environments19,20. However, the decomposition process, makes this forest component an emitting source of carbon to the atmosphere21,22,23. The decomposition of CWDs is a process that involves a complex series of transformations, which leads to the reduction of organic structures to their mineral form24. During this process, the physical and chemical properties of CWDs are altered due to microbial action (respiration and biological transformation), insects, physical degradation, leaching and fire1,25,26,27.

Changes in the physical and chemical properties of CWDs begin with the degradation of wood cell walls, which are mostly made up of holocelluloses (cellulose and hemicellulose) and lignin28,29. The concentrations of these structural compounds in dead wood are modified as decomposition progresses30. The concentration of holocelluloses is preferentially reduced in the early stages of CWDs decomposition. In more advanced stages, the holocelluloses are selectively decomposed and lignin concentration tends to increase in the remaining materials31,32,33.

These modifications in holocelluloses and lignin concentrations due to the decomposition process affects the apparent density34,35 and the contents of chemical compounds such as Carbon (C) and Nitrogen (N) of the CWDs36,37,38,39. Furthermore, the concentrations of these structural compounds influence the CWDs resistance to decomposition24,40 and determine the degree of deterioration of wood already subjected to this process, removing the subjectivity in the classification of the decay class of these materials1,25,38. In this sense, chemical analyzes such as immediate analysis and thermogravimetric analysis, which indicates the structural chemical composition of CWDs from determination of volatile materials content, fixed carbon, residual weight (ash) and weight loss in different temperature ranges, become essential for understanding the effect of CWDs decomposition.

In our study, we present a physical and chemical characterization of CWDs submitted to the natural process of decomposition, which contributes to the understanding of the wood degradation dynamics in tropical forests. In addition, our study can be used to support the carbon stock quantification by CWDs in international reports such as the Forest Resources Assessments (FRA)41, which address the protection and sustainability of forest management in worldwide42.

Thus, the objectives of this study were: (i) to verify if the decomposition affects the physical properties (apparent density) and chemical properties (elemental chemical analysis) of the CWDs in a secondary forest of the Atlantic Forest; (ii) verify if the chemical structural composition of CWDs is altered as a function of the natural process of decomposition using immediate chemical analysis and thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTG).

Material and methods

Characterization of the study area

The study was carried out in a fragment of secondary Atlantic Forest with an area of 17 ha, known as “Mata da Silvicultura”, which is located in the municipality of Viçosa-MG, Brazil (Fig. 1). The local climate is Cwa type (Köppen classification) with temperature, humidity and average precipitation of 19.9 °C, 79.9% and 1269.4 mm, respectively43. The fragment's altitude varies from 670 to 730 m16 and the region has pedogeomorphologic gradients with aluminum-rich dystrophic latosols at the tops of hills, colluvial ramps with shallow latosols and cambic horizon, while the bottoms of the groves present a predominance of epieutrophic cambisols rich in nutrients44.

Figure 1
figure 1

Location of the studied at Atlantic Forest fragment (the map was generated using QGIS 3.10.6-http://qgis.osgeo.org45.

The vegetation in the region is classified as seasonal semideciduous forest46. The forest fragment studied is in a medium stage of regeneration16, with quadratic mean diameter and total heigh of trees ranging between 10 and 20 cm and 5 and 12 m, respectively47. Phytosociological parameters, floristic composition, dendrometric variables and forest dynamics were periodically quantified over the years (Table 1).

Table 1 Phytosociological parameters, floristic composition, dendrometric variables and forest dynamics of “Mata da Silvicultura”.

Data collection

Coarse Woody Debris (CWDs) such as branches, stumps and fallen trees on the forest floor and with a diameter ≥ 5 cm were inventoried in ten permanent plots of 20 m × 50 m, from July to October 2018. The arithmetic means of the diameters measured at the ends of the residues was calculated to separate the material into diameters classes with an amplitude of 5 cm. The CWDs found into these plots were divided into 4 classes according to their stage of decomposition48,49,50: (i) Materials that have just fallen to the ground with leaves and bark intact; (ii) Materials similar to those of class “i”, but with the bark showing rotting or peeling; (iii) Materials with a high stage of decomposition and showing some resistance to being broken; (iv) Materials that are rotten, friable and without resistance to being broken.

Sampling and sample preparation

Three samples of each diameter and decay class were collected, when possible, in the ten inventoried plots. Two subsamples were taken from this material to determine the physical analysis (apparent density) and the rest of the material was dried in an oven with forced air circulation at ± 60 °C, until its dry weight stabilized, for the determination of chemical (elementary and immediate) and thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) analyzes.

The oven-dried material was picked and ground in a Willey-type knife mill (Thomas Scientific®). The crushed material was sieved using 40 mesh and 60 mesh granulometric sieves for elemental, immediate and thermogravimetric chemical analysis. The materials retained in the 60 mesh sieves were homogenized by randomly choosing three plots per diameter and decay class, totaling 28 composite samples for each type of analysis.

Physical properties

Apparent density

The CWDs apparent density was determined through mercury immersion method due to the material fragility, according to NBR 1194151,52. The expression used to determine the apparent density was: \(\rho = {\text{m}}/{\text{v}}\), where: ρ is the apparent density, in g cm−3; \({\text{m}}\) is the mass of the sample, in g; and \({\text{v}}\) is the apparent volume, in cm3. In this specific case, the apparent volume (v) was obtained by the expression: \(\text{v } = {\text{m}}_{1}/{ \rho }_{\text{Hg}}\), where: m1 is the immersed mass, in g; and ρHg is the density of mercury, in g cm−3. The mean values of apparent density were calculated for each diameter and decay class, considering the density arithmetic mean of each subsample.

Chemical properties

Elementary chemical analysis

The Carbon (C) and Nitrogen (N) contents of CWDs were determined using a dry combustion elemental analyzer (LECO TruSpec® Micro Elemental Series CHN/CHNS/O; St. Joseph, MI). In this method, the gases emitted by samples burning at 1050ºC were quantified by an infrared detector, which allows the determination of the content, in %, of these elements39. The C/N ratio of CWDs was calculated as an indicator of the natural decomposition of these materials on the forest floor.

Immediate chemical analysis

Volatile materials (Vol), ash content (Ash) and fixed carbon (FC) were quantified using a Linn Elektro Therm® muffle furnace, according to the ASTM standards D1762-8453. The calculations to determine these parameters, in %, were based on the following expressions:

$$\text {Vol}=100 [(\text{P}_1 - \text{P}_2)/\text{P}],\text {Ash}=100[(\text{P}_2-\text{P}_0)/\text{P}] \text {e FC}=100-\text{Vol}-\text{Ash},$$

where P is the original mass of the sample, in g; P0 is the original mass of the crucible, in g; P1 is the initial mass of the crucible + the mass of the sample, in g; P2 is the final mass of the crucible + the mass of the sample, in g54,55.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTG)

The thermogravimetric analysis of CWDs was performed using a DTG-60H Shimadzu equipment, under a nitrogen atmosphere, with a constant flow rate of 50 ml min−1. Thermograms were obtained from a temperature of 100 °C to a temperature of 450 °C, with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The thermogravimetric curves (TG) of CWDs were analyzed by diameter and decay classes to evaluate the weight loss as a function of temperature, while the first derivative of the thermogravimetric curve (DTG) was obtained to identify the temperatures at which the highest weight losses occurred. Weight losses were calculated from TG curve for the following temperature ranges: 100–200 °C; 200–300 °C; 300–450 °C. The residual weight was obtained at a temperature of 450 °C, considering the mass of the absolutely dry sample at a temperature of 100 °C as the initial value.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test was applied to test whether the means of the physical (apparent density) and chemical (elementary and immediate chemical analysis) parameters of the CWDs differed statistically between the decay classes. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to test the assumption of normality in the following thermogravimetric analysis datasets: (i) weight losses by decay classes of CWDs, in 3 temperature ranges; (ii) residual weight by decay classes of CWDs; (iii) residual weight by diameter classes of CWDs. Only the dataset with losses weight at temperatures of 100–200 °C and 200–300 °C violated the assumption of data normality (P < 0.05). In these cases, the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to test whether there were statistical differences between the medians of the evaluated groups. In the other data sets in which normality was reached (P > 0.05), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's post-hoc test, were applied to test whether there were statistical differences between the means of the evaluated groups.

Spearman's correlation was calculated to quantify the association degree of two nonparametric variables in intensity and direction16,56,57. The correlation matrix was generated by the software R Core Team58 using the thermogravimetric, physical and chemical properties of CWDs.

Complies with international, national and/or institutional guidelines

The collection of plant material, experimental research and field studies complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Results

Physical properties

Apparent density

The apparent density (mean ± standard deviation) decreased as a function of the decay class of CWDs, ranging from 0.62 g cm−3 (± 0.13 g cm−3) for the least decomposed residue (class 1) to 0.37 g cm−3 (± 0.17 g cm−3) for the most decomposed (class 4). The apparent average densities did not follow a pattern of increase or decrease in value as a function on the CWD’s diameter classes variation (Table 2).

Table 2 Apparent density (g cm-3) (mean ± standard deviation) by diameter and decay classes of CWDs.

Chemical properties

Elementary chemical analysis

Carbon (C) contents (mean ± standard deviation) showed a low variation between the CWD decay classes: 49.66% (± 0.90) to 48.80% (± 1.39%). This same behavior was observed for Nitrogen (N) contents (mean ± standard deviation), which ranged from 0.44% (± 0.08%) to 0.58% (± 0.20%). The C/N ratio ranged from 88.14 (± 19.86) to 116.61 (± 21.72), with the lowest values for the highest decomposition classes. The CWD’s diameter classes did not significantly affect these parameters and they did not show a well-defined behavior pattern (Table 3).

Table 3 Carbon Contents-C (%) (mean ± standard deviation), Nitrogen-N (%) (mean ± standard deviation) and C/N Ratio (mean ± standard deviation) by diameter and decay classes of CWDs.

Immediate chemical analysis

The volatile materials (mean ± standard deviation) contained in the CWDs ranged from 67.71% (± 5.70%) to 81.59% (± 2.63%) while the ash content (mean ± standard deviation) showed values ranging from 1.47% (± 0.36%) to 10.07% (± 5.89). The CWDs Fixed Carbon contents ranged from 16.63% to 22.22%. The parameters of the immediate chemical analysis did not show a pattern of behavior as a function of the increase in the CWD’s diameter classes (Table 4).

Table 4 Volatiles-Vol (%) (mean ± standard deviation), Ash content-Ash (%) (mean ± standard deviation) and Fixed Carbon-C (%) (mean) by diameter and decay classes of CWDs.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTG)

The wood degradation components occurred in a narrow temperature range, partially overlapping, where: (i) water loss (0–100 °C); (ii) degradation of hemicellulose (225–275 °C); (iii) cellulose degradation (275–375 °C); and (iv) lignin degradation (> 370 °C).

Thermogravimetric curves (TG/DTG) were obtained for each CWD diameter and decay class (Fig. 2). The curves indicated that thermal degradation profiles of CWDs suffered variations in the residual masses and in the maximum peaks of woods constituent’s degradations. Thermogravimetric curves (TG/DTG) indicated that thermal degradation profiles suffered variations in the residual masses and in the maximum peaks of woods constituent’s degradations according to the diametric and decomposition class of the CWDs. Weight losses for the first decay class (G1) were similar. However, a longer length of the DTG curve (close to 287 °C) was observed for the larger diameter sample. The second DTG peak (close to 351 °C) showed greater weight loss for samples with larger diameters. Weight losses for the second decay class (G2) were different, with smaller diameter samples showing greater length in the DTG curve (close to 295 °C). DTG peaks ranged from 348–361 °C, with larger diameters having higher peaks. The third decay class (G3) presented a wide range of weight losses, as well as in G2. The first DTG peak (close to 297 °C) did not show significant differences for the diameter classes of the CWDs. However, the maximum decomposition temperature of the second peak (close to 358–366 °C) increased as the CWD diameter increased. The last decay class (G4) showed a lower weight loss compared to the other decay classes. The DTG peaks (close to 277 °C) had a longer length for samples with larger diameters.

Figure 2
figure 2

TG/DTG curves by diameter and decay classes of CWDs. (i) TG (a) and DTG (b) curve for decay class 1 (G1); (ii) TG (a) and DTG (b) curve for decay class 2 (G2); (iii) TG (a) and DTG (b) curve for decay class 3 (G3); (iv) TG (a) and DTG (b) curve for decay class 4 (G4). Decay classes: G1-Materials that have just fallen to the ground with leaves and bark intact; G2-Materials similar to those of class “i”, but with the bark showing rotting or peeling; G3-Materials with a high stage of decomposition and showing some resistance to being broken; G4-Materials that are rotten, friable and without resistance to being broken.

Weight losses and residual mass were quantified for each diameter and decay class of CWDs, in different temperature ranges (Table 5). The weight loss ranged from 0.00 to 1.55% in the first temperature range (100–200 °C), from 10.84 to 18.65% in the second temperature range (200–300 °C) and from 25.63 to 65.13% in the last temperature range (300–450 °C). The residual mass at 450 °C ranged from 21.54 to 60.59%, being higher in the more decomposed CWDs.

Table 5 Weight loss (%) as a function of temperature range and residual mass at 450 °C by diameter and decay classes of CWDs.

Statistical analysis

The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated that differences between weight loss medians in the first (100–200 °C) and second (200–300 °C) temperature ranges, by decay class, were not significant (P > 0.05). On the other hand, ANOVA indicated a significant difference in the range of 300–450 °C and for residual mass at 450 °C (P < 0.05), being the class 4 decomposition mean, different from the other classes by Tukey test (Fig. 3). In this way, the thermogravimetric analysis was able to differentiate CWD samples into two groups, the first involving decay classes 1, 2 and 3 and the second group involving only decay class 4. The differences between the residual mass averages, by CWD’s diameter classes, were not significant (P > 0.05).

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Boxplot and weight loss averages, by decay class, in the temperature range of 300 – 450 °C; (b) Boxplot and residual mass averages at 450 °C, by decay class. Boxplots followed by the same letter do not differ statistically by Tukey's test, at the 5% significance level.

In this way, the Spearman correlation was calculated for the weight losses in the temperature range of 300–450 °C and for the residual weight at 450 °C, separating the statistically different groups by the Tukey test into: Group 1 (G1)-decay classes 1, 2 and 3; Group 2 (G2)-decay class 4. The physical and chemical properties used to calculate the correlation were: volatile materials (%), ash content (%), fixed carbon (%), C/N ratio and apparent density (g cm−3).

The weight loss of CWDs in the temperature range of 300–450 °C of G1 showed a positive and stronger correlation with volatile materials, C/N ratio and density. The weight loss of G2 was positively associated only with volatile materials. The residual weight at 450 °C of G1 showed a positive correlation with ash and fixed carbon content, while G2 was also positively correlated with these variables plus the C/N ratio (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Spearman's correlation matrix between weight loss at 300–450 °C (Weight loss %), residual weight at 450 °C (Residual %), volatiles (Vol. %), ash content (Ash %), fixed carbon (FC %), C/N ratio (C/N) and density (Dens. g cm−3). (a) Weight loss of 300–450 °C from G1; (b) 300–450 °C weight loss of G2; (c) Residual weight at 450 °C of G1; (d) Residual weight at 450 °C of G2. Dark blue circles indicate positive correlations while dark red circles indicate negative correlations. The size of the circle indicates the strength of the correlation.

Discussion

Physical and chemical properties of CWDs

The decomposition of CWDs in forest ecosystems is a crucial pathway for nutrients return to soil59. During this process, CWDs on the forest floor undergo different transformations in their chemical and physical properties, such as a reduction in density, an increase in water content, accumulation of nutrients and lignin, and a reduction in pH60. Most of these physicochemical transformations were observed in this study.

The results indicated a reduction of the average apparent density in function of the increase of CWDs decomposition (Table 2). This reduction in density can be explained by the weight loss due to wood-decomposing microorganisms’ action61. Previous studies have also found this pattern of data behavior for CWDs density37,38,39,50.

The decomposition process had less impact on Carbon (C) concentrations, which did not show great variations with the decay class of CWDs increase (Table 3). The higher concentration of lignin in CWDs may be one of the factors limiting the C degradation, since it’s a large and complex structure, thus, difficult to decompose37,62,63,64. In addition, this wood constituent can also compromise the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose when incorporated in large amounts into cell wall structures26.

Nitrogen (N) contents also showed low variation with increasing decay classes of CWDs (Table 3). However, this behavior was not expected since this nutrient tends to accumulate over the years due to the fixation and translocation of this chemical element from the soil to CWDs by heterotrophic microorganisms1,65,66,67. Besides, the increase in structural bonds between nitrogen and elements more resistant to degradation such as lignin, aromatic and phenolic compounds may also favor N accumulation during the wood decomposition process68.

The C and N contents found in our study resulted in lower C/N ratio values for the more decomposed CWDs (Table 3). This pattern of declining C/N ratio was also found in studies conducted in tropical and subtropical forests37,38,69,70. A low C/N ratio of CWDs indicates a greater potential for wood decomposition causing these materials to remain a shorter time in the forest ecosystem71,72.

Immediate chemical analysis

The results indicated a tendency of volatile materials reduction with the CWDs decomposition (Table 4). This reduction in volatile materials may be correlated with the degradation of holocellulose and the decrease in extractive contents73. During the wood decomposition process, holocelluloses are readily degraded by decomposing microorganisms due to the greater ease of breaking down their structures compared to other compounds, such as lignin74. In the case of extractive contents, the reduction in their concentration occurs due to processes such as enzymatic deactivation, auto-oxidation, microbial degradation or by leaching1.

The ash contents showed a contrary trend to the volatiles, increasing their concentration with CWDs decay class increase (Table 4). These results suggest that CWDs accumulate inorganic nutrients such as potassium, calcium, magnesium and silicon in their composition as they lose weight and carbon through the decomposition process38,66,75. In addition, contamination by soil residues may also contribute to the higher ash content in the most decomposed CWDs. However, there is no way to measure the impacts of this contamination on our results.

Fixed carbon was not related to CWDs decay class in this study (Table 4). The fact that this component of immediate chemical analysis is obtained by difference may have influenced these results. However, fixed carbon presented values inversely proportional to volatile materials, indicating a negative correlation with holocelluloses and a positive correlation with lignin37,68.

Thermogravimetric analysis

Thermogravimetric analyzes indicated that samples with a high degree of decomposition have high residual mass and low weight loss. This pattern can be explained by the greater loss of carbon in the forest ecosystem due to the respiration of microorganisms, photodegradation and leaching76,77. Thermogravimetric analysis also indicated that hemicellulose decomposition occurs at lower temperatures (225–275 °C). The decomposition of hemicellulose in this temperature range is related to its amorphous chemical structure78, composed of sugars such as pentoses and hexoses79,80. Thermal degradation of cellulose occurs at 275–375 °C due to its crystallinity81. Lignin generally begins to decompose at lower temperatures82, but it is the last wood compound to fully decompose due to its cross-linked structure and high molecular weight79.

Furthermore, TG/DTG curves indicated different behaviors for the CWDs in the different size and decay classes. The longer lengths of the DTG curve, such observed in the first decay classes (G1), indicate higher concentrations of holocelluloses in samples with larger diameters. In addition, the lower residual weight for samples with larger diameters demonstrate that the rate of decomposition in the forest ecosystem is higher for smaller CWDs77. The distinct weight losses, such observed in the second (G2) and third (G3) decay classes, can be explained by the wide variety of tree species present in the forest. Less weight loss and greater residual weight, as observed in the last decomposition class (G4), demonstrate that the structural components of wood have already been significantly degraded in the forest ecosystem. Comparing the four decay classes, the DTG peaks were shifted to higher temperatures with increasing decay class, which is related to the removal of extractives. In fact, as the decomposition process occurs, the extractives are released and the temperature of thermal degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose shifts to higher temperatures83.

Analysis of variance and Tukey's test indicated statistical difference only for the averages of weight loss in the last temperature range (300–450 °C) and for the averages of residual weight at 450 °C, differing between the decay classes 1, 2 and 3 (Group 1) of decay class 4 (Group 2) (Fig. 3). The difference between Groups 1 and 2 can be explained mainly by the apparent density and the C/N ratio, which are highly impacted variables throughout the CWD decomposition process (Fig. 4). In this way, the determination of physical and chemical properties, together with immediate and thermogravimetric analysis, can be considered an important tool to study the effects of CWDs decomposition process, defining with greater precision the classes of CWDs decomposition.

Our results narrowed the existing uncertainties in understanding the natural decomposition dynamics of CWDs. Although our study area is limited, the new guidelines used to determine the physical–chemical parameters of CWDs will serve as a basis for the sustainable management of this component and for the refinement of international reports that aim to quantify the carbon balance in forest ecosystems. Future research should focus on performing these analyzes at the species level, since this factor has a great influence on the physicochemical properties of CWDs38,39. Furthermore, it is recommended to carry out the microbiota characterization present in the soil and in the CWDs to distinguish the types of microorganisms and their abilities to degrade each constituent of the wood1,84. Finally, climatic factors such as temperature and humidity must also be considered as they influence the activity and selection of these microorganisms in the forest ecosystem27,85.

Conclusions

The apparent density of CWDs is affected by the natural process of decomposition while the carbon and nitrogen contents are less impacted by this process. The C/N ratio decreased directly with the decomposition class of the CWDs. The size classes of CWDs are not relevant for determining these properties. The physical–chemical properties must be always quantified according to the decay classes of the CWDs due to the diversity of species and the climatic conditions of each forest ecosystem.

The CWDs structural chemical composition is affected by decomposition, resulting in loss of holocelluloses and extractives and an increase in lignin and ash concentration throughout this process. The weight loss is greater for the less decomposed CWDs and the residual weight is greater for the more decomposed ones. The smallest diameter classes have less weight loss and greater residual weight. The use of immediate chemical and thermogravimetric analysis removes the subjectivity to classify CWDs decomposition stages, reducing the number of tests to determine the physical and chemical properties of CWDs.

Our results contribute to a better understanding of the decomposition dynamics of CWDs and provide important information about their ecological role. The technical guidelines presented in this study should be applied and improved in other forest ecosystems around the world to increase the accuracy of scientific studies and international reports focused on the carbon cycle of these materials.