Abstract
SIN3/HDAC is a multi-protein complex that acts as a regulatory unit and functions as a co-repressor/co-activator and a general transcription factor. SIN3 acts as a scaffold in the complex, binding directly to HDAC1/2 and other proteins and plays crucial roles in regulating apoptosis, differentiation, cell proliferation, development, and cell cycle. However, its exact mechanism of action remains elusive. Using the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) model, we can surpass the challenges posed by the functional redundancy of SIN3 isoforms. In this regard, we have previously demonstrated the role of SIN-3 in uncoupling autophagy and longevity in C. elegans. In order to understand the mechanism of action of SIN3 in these processes, we carried out a comparative analysis of the SIN3 protein interactome from model organisms of different phyla. We identified conserved, expanded, and contracted gene classes. The C. elegans SIN-3 interactome -revealed the presence of well-known proteins, such as DAF-16, SIR-2.1, SGK-1, and AKT-1/2, involved in autophagy, apoptosis, and longevity. Overall, our analyses propose potential mechanisms by which SIN3 participates in multiple biological processes and their conservation across species and identifies candidate genes for further experimental analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cell death and aging are known to play a crucial role in development, health and disease. Biological processes such as cell death and aging are tightly controlled by gene expression, mediated by complex interactions between chromatin, epigenetic modifiers, and transcription regulatory proteins (TRPs). TRPs such as the SIN3 protein are associated with DNA-binding transcription factors in addition to different co-activator and co-repressor complexes. These protein–protein interactions function as writers, erasers, readers and modifiers of the chromatin design for the functioning of a cell1,2. SIN3 protein is a transcriptional regulator that functions as the central scaffold unit of the multi-protein SIN3/HDAC co-repressor complex3. This SIN3 core complex and its interaction partners play a significant role in several critical pathways such as autophagy, apoptosis and longevity.
A typical SIN3 protein harbours several paired amphipathic α-helix (PAH) domains, a prominent HDAC interacting domain (HID), and a highly conserved region (HCR)4. These evolutionarily conserved domains enable the protein to control transcription5,6. Though SIN3 has multiple roles in apoptosis, differentiation, cellular proliferation, development, cell cycle, cancer and aging7,8,9,10, the exact mechanism of regulation mediated by the protein is unknown.
The functional diversity of SIN3 can be facilitated by the diversity in its interactome. However, the mechanistic studies are impeded by the presence of multiple isoforms of SIN3 in mammals and their functional redundancy. The presence of SIN-3 and the absence of isoforms of SIN3 in C. elegans makes it a suitable model for understanding the functional diversity of SIN3.
In C. elegans, SIN-3 protein plays a vital role in male sensory organ development11, muscle integrity, motility, and longevity. It also controls several physiological parameters such as stress tolerance, protein homeostasis, muscle and mitochondrial functioning, cuticle integrity, accumulation of age-associated pigments, fecundity and fertility12. Remarkably, the protein modulates autophagy and lifespan in an unconventional way. Usually, an increase in autophagy leads to lifespan extension. However, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and intracellular oxidative stress in sin-3 deletion mutants are associated with uncoupling of autophagy and longevity such that increased autophagy leads to a shorter lifespan13. In order to understand the factors involved in SIN3 regulated autophagy and longevity, we carried out an analysis of the interactome of SIN3 in different model organisms from different phyla. Further analysis of gene ontology and the expansion/contraction of the gene classes led to the identification of conserved factors important for these functions that can serve as candidate genes for further analysis.
Methods
Software and databases
NCBI Protein database, Clustal Omega web server, MAFFT, MEGA-X v10, NCBI Conserved domain database, G-BLOCKS online web server v0.91b, GeneMANIA, DAVID Bioinformatics Resource v6.8, NCBI Conserved domain database, Ensembl genome, Orthofinder (version 2.3.12), RStudio v2021.09.0+351.pro6 (https://www.rstudio.com/)14, Microsoft Excel 2013 (https://www.microsoft.com/)15.
Retrieval of sequences and their analysis
The FASTA sequences of SIN3 homologs were downloaded from the NCBI Protein database16 and submitted to the Clustal Omega web server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) for proper sequence alignment and domain comparison17,18,19. The percent identity matrix was obtained for all the SIN3 homologs. Similarly, the percent identity matrix for SIN3 protein domains, such as PAH, SIN3A_C, and HDAC interaction domain, was also prepared for domain-specific comparison.
Phylogenetic analysis
The FASTA sequences of SIN3 homologs were downloaded and aligned in the MAFFT (L-INS-I method) online web server v720. L-INS-i is one of the most accurate multiple sequence alignments, particularly suitable to align 10–100 protein sequences. The amino acid alignment was curated in the G-BLOCKS online web server v0.91b21 with default parameters (except minimum block length set as 5 and allowed gap positions set as half). Phylogenetic tree was constructed through Maximum likelihood (ML) using MEGA-X v1022. Statistical significance was increased by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates23. The phylogenetic tree for SIN3 protein domains, PAH, SIN3A_C and HID, was obtained in the same manner.
Domain search
The FASTA sequences of SIN3 homologs were submitted to the NCBI Conserved domain database24 and analyzed for the different functional domains present in the SIN3 proteins.
Protein–protein interaction network
GeneMANIA (http://Genemania.org) was used to examine the various physical interactions of SIN3 homologs with a limitation on the maximum resultant genes, set to 10025. After selecting the specific organism under study, the official gene symbol of the protein of interest was submitted to the database. All default network attributes were de-selected, and only physical interactions were selected for generating the final SIN3 protein interactome.
Gene ontology analysis
DAVID (the information base for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery) Bioinformatics Resource v6.8 was used for analyzing the physical protein interactors of C. elegans SIN-326,27,28. First, the gene list was uploaded to the database, and the saved list was then used as the input for the Functional Annotation tool. Finally, the protein list was separately used to extract and summarize the KEGG pathways29, InterPro domains30, and Gene ontology31 of the SIN-3 protein interactors using the different parameters.
Orthology
For evaluating the orthology of proteins of interest, the predicted proteomes of C. elegans (WBcel235), S. cerevisiae (R64-1-1), D. melanogaster (BDGP6.32), D. rerio (GRCz11), H. sapiens (GRCh38.p13), and M. musculus (GRCm39) from the Ensembl genome (ensembl.org) were used. Orthofinder (version 2.3.12) was run with default parameters to find orthogroups among the whole deduced proteomes of all six organisms listed above32. If there are multiple predicted proteins/transcripts for a gene, the primary transcript of the predicted protein was chosen for analysis.
Results and discussion
SIN3 is well-conserved across phyla due to the significant similarities in the functional domains of the protein. These domains and other protein motifs enable SIN3 to participate in multiple protein–protein interactions, hence regulating multiple pathways. The analysis we have carried out identifies candidate protein–protein interactions of SIN3 involved in the eukaryotic regulation of crucial biological processes like apoptosis, autophagy and longevity.
ceSIN3 shares sequence identity with homologs
One of the main approaches to understanding SIN3 function is the study of protein conservation determined via sequence homology between C. elegans SIN-3 protein (ceSIN3) and SIN3 isoforms present in other model organisms. Previous studies have reported that ceSIN3 has homology with human and mouse SIN311,13. Therefore, we carried out phylogenomic analyses of the SIN-3 protein of C. elegans and five other model organisms, namely, S. cerevisiae, D. melanogaster, D. rerio, H. sapiens, and M. musculus, to deduce the level of protein homology in the context of the functional domains. ceSIN3 is an orthologous member of the SIN3A phylogenetic family (Fig. 1A). Traditionally, C. elegans shares a close evolutionary relationship with Drosophila, followed by the yeast33. This is reflected in the phylogenetic tree of the SIN3 protein, which shows that SIN3 homologs of C. elegans, Drosophila, and yeast form a separate cluster within the SIN3A family, indicating high relatedness in the model organisms with lower complexity.
SIN3 phylogeny based on alignments of the amino-acid sequences of Caenorhabditis elegans SIN-3 protein and its domains. Phylogenetic tree based on (A) SIN3 protein, (B) SIN3 HID domain, (C) SIN3 SIN3A_C domain, (D) SIN3 PAH domain, and (E) SIN3 PAH1 domain. The PAH1 domain was analysed separately due to its high sequence identity with PAH domain of C. elegans SIN-3 protein. The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method of phylogenetic tree construction, with 1000 bootstrap replicates, using MEGA-X. The number mentioned at each node is the bootstrap percentage for a particular branch (Cele, Caenorhabditis elegans; Hsap, Homo sapiens; Mmus, Mus musculus; Drer, Danio rerio; Dmel, Drosophila melanogaster; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
To determine the quantitative similarity, a percent identity (PID) analysis was carried out using ClustalW sequence alignment. ceSIN3 protein has a significant identity, ̴ 21%, with all SIN3 isoforms present in different organisms that we analysed (Table 1, Fig. S1). It is generally believed that two sequences are homologous only if there is more than 30% identity at the protein sequence level34. However, the sequence length determines the possibility of correct alignment, and if proteins with large sequence length exhibit ≥ 20% identity, they are considered significant even in the twilight zone of evolutionary relatedness (20–30%)35. Therefore, the current study demonstrates that ceSIN3 protein shares homology with human and mice SIN3. It also shows significant similarity with the SIN3 isoforms of S. cerevisiae, D. melanogaster, and D. rerio.
However, the multiple sequence alignment indicates that the sequence identity of ceSIN3 with the rest of the proteins is restricted to specific regions. While the PAH and HID domains contain the well-aligned regions of the protein, it was also seen that the C. elegans protein has large stretches of unaligned regions that seem to be only partially conserved in SIN3 proteins of yeast and Drosophila (Fig. S2). The close phylogenetic relationship among SIN3 homologs of these organisms could arise from the conservation of these specific regions. Interestingly, the nematode protein shares a closer relationship with SIN3A isoforms than SIN3B even though it shares the same sequence identity with both the isoforms (Fig. 1A). This might be because SIN3A and SIN3B are paralogs that evolved out of gene duplication. While SIN3A retained its similarity to the ancestral lineage, SIN3B underwent substantial diversification since its origin.
SIN3 homology for PAH and HID
SIN3 protein has multiple protein partners that interact through several structural and functional domains. In order to understand the nature of conservation in ceSIN3 protein, these unique domains were also analyzed for their sequence homology.
Earlier studies on SIN3 by Chaubal and Pile36 indicated the presence of PAH, HID and SIN3A_C domains in the isoforms of C. elegans, Drosophila, zebrafish and mouse. Our analysis supports this finding and further discloses that CeSIN3 protein is the only SIN3 homolog to harbor a single PAH domain. This domain has homology with all the three PAH domains of SIN3 isoforms. The CeSIN3 protein also contains one HDAC interaction domain and one SIN3A_C domain (Table 2).
We found unique motifs, a large stretch of Glutamine rich repeats, and two interspersed regions of Aspartate rich repeats in the ceSIN3 protein (Fig. 3). These amino acid repeats seem to coincide with the unaligned regions of ceSIN3 (Table S2). These repeats are absent in other SIN3 homologs except yeast Sin3 protein, which contains a big stretch of Glutamine rich repeats. While excessive repeat expansion is pathogenic, Glutamine-rich repeats and Aspartate or Glutamate repeat with regular lengths help in gene regulation and protein–protein interaction37,38. Hence, ceSIN3 protein could participate in specific protein interactions involved in biological processes unique to the organism.
Proteins and transcription factors binding to the PAH domain in yeast or mammalian systems might also bind to C. elegans SIN-3 PAH (cePAH). The current study reveals that the PAH domain of ceSIN3 has ≥ 28% identity with all the three PAH domains of SIN3 isoforms. The cePAH domain is remarkably similar to the PAH1 (≥ 50%) domain of the other SIN3 homologs, especially the yeast Sin3 PAH1 (Table 2, Fig. S2). Surprisingly, despite the sequence homology of the cePAH domain, the protein domain is phylogenetically distant from all the three PAH domains, forming an out-group in the cluster containing PAH1 domains (Fig. 1D). But when the domain is studied exclusively in relation to PAH1 domains, it shows a close phylogenetic relationship with yeast Sin3 PAH1 domain (Fig. 1E).
Similarly, C. elegans HDAC interaction domain shows 38.14–40.62% sequence identity with all SIN3 homologs HDAC domains, principally the SIN3 isoforms in zebrafish (Table 2). However, it shares the closest phylogenetic relationship with the yeast Sin3 protein (Fig. 1B). In addition, C. elegans HDAC interaction domain has almost perfect sequence alignment with its homologs (Fig. S2). Due to this alignment, a good percentage of identity exists between the HDAC interaction domain of ceSIN3 protein and homologs. Unlike HID and PAH domains, the percent identity matrix and poor sequence alignment of the evolutionarily well-conserved SIN3A_C domain hint at a low sequence identity between the nematode protein and the other SIN3 homologs (Table 2, Fig. S2). This also accounts for the phylogenetic relationship between SIN3A_C domains of the worm and yeast (Fig. 1C). Overall, the conservation in CeSIN3 protein seems to be localized in the PAH and HID domains.
Orthologs in C. elegans genome
The gain or loss of gene function or its regulation contributes to the adaptation and survival of organisms. As the study focuses on understanding SIN3 mediated regulation of apoptosis, autophagy and longevity, the orthology of the major nematode proteins associated with these crucial biological processes was examined. The data derived from 18,002 comparative analyses of proteins using OrthoFinder, that are over-represented or under-represented in the proteome of C. elegans, Yeast, Drosophila, Zebrafish, Human, and Mouse was used to construct orthogroups (Fig. 2). Of the 41 proteins investigated, we identified 34 different orthogroups having conservation, expansion, and contraction and 7 single copy orthologue sequences (Fig. 2, Fig. S3).
Abundance of proteins involved in apoptosis, autophagy and longevity in C. elegans. (A) Heatmap depicting the orthology of 41 proteins derived from 18,002 comparative analyses of gene classes using OrthoFinder, in the proteome of Caenorhabditis elegans (Cele), Danio rerio (Drer), Drosophila melanogaster (Dmel), Homo sapiens (Hsap), Mus musculus (Mmus), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Scer). Color scale key is depicted at the side. The spider plots further indicate the number of proteins in the different species; C. elegans specific pathways like core apoptosis machinery (B), longevity regulators (C), core autophagic proteins (D) and autophagic regulator proteins) (E) are indicated at the top of each spider plot.
Protein orthogroups involved in signaling pathways are well conserved in higher eukaryotes. While the number of proteins attributed to the different orthogroups is similar for the invertebrates, C. elegans and Drosophila, proteins involved in important pathways such as the ERK-MAPK pathway (LIN-45, MEK-2, MPK-1), p38-MAPK pathway (NSY-1, PMK-1), and insulin signaling pathway (DAF-2, DAF-16, AGE-1, AKT-1) are conserved across phyla and expanded in proteomes of three or more species. These pathway proteins are crucial for cellular processes preceding apoptosis and longevity, and are expanded in the eukaryotic system. The ERK-MAPK pathway is the primary signaling network involved in regulating cell division, growth, development, apoptosis39 and tumor formation, and the p38-MAPK pathway works in response to stress to regulate cellular functions such as differentiation, apoptosis, and senescence40. The insulin/IGF signaling (IIS) pathway is involved in stress resistance and longevity along with nutrient regulation and growth41. Interestingly, orthogroups of signaling proteins (MKK-4, PDK-1, AKT-1 AND PMK-1) are also expanded in the nematode proteome, revealing the need for increased signaling proteins even in lower eukaryotes.
Orthogroups of nematode proteins that show poor conservation in other model organisms are mainly associated with the main apoptotic pathway. While the main cell death protein CED-3 (caspase 2/3/6 homolog) protein is expanded in higher eukaryotes, rest of the apoptosis proteins (CED-4, CED-9, EGL-1, CEP-1) are contracted in the species included in the study. This is likely because of the functional redundancy of the proteins associated with essential functions. For example, CEP-1, a functional p53 homolog, has very low sequence identity with p53 isoforms of different model organisms42.
Most of the orthogroups do not have any yeast protein as the unicellular organism lacks homologs for most eukaryotic proteins involved in apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity. Yeast does not have distinct cell death pathways similar to mammalian ones43; even the MAPK cascade components are only conserved in function44 but not in terms of sequence identity. Certain zebrafish proteins are over-represented due to genome duplication, which precedes the teleost evolution. As a result, many mammalian genes have more than one ortholog in the zebrafish genome45,46.
Protein–protein interactions in the SIN3 network
Protein–protein interactions are crucial for the basic functionality of cells (40). The detailed study of the protein interactome holds the key to identifying biological pathways and predicting protein functions47,48,49,50. Therefore, identifying the interaction repertoire of transcriptional regulator SIN-3 will give a better understanding of the regulation of various biological processes in C. elegans51.
The SIN3 interactome is well studied in yeast, human, and mouse52,53. Therefore, the protein–protein interactions of these eukaryotic systems can be extrapolated to ceSIN3 ortholog with computational methods54. GeneMANIA was used to obtain protein–protein interactions of SIN3 in different eukaryotic systems. The database extracted 100 physical interactions, represented in the form of a network image (Fig. S4), of the SIN3 protein for each species included in the study. In the nematode SIN-3 interactome, we found several protein interactions conserved across evolution (Fig. 3).
Schematic representation of motifs in Caenorhabditis elegans SIN-3 protein. Motif Scan105 was used for finding all the known motifs that occur in the protein sequence of SIN-3 protein using HAMAP profiles [hamap], PROSITE patterns [pat], PROSITE patterns (frequent match producers) [freq_pat], Pfam HMMs (global models) [pfam_ls], Pfam HMMs (local models) [pfam_fs], PROSITE profiles [prf], More profiles [pre]. The legends at the bottom of the figure are provided for the key to the numbering of the protein domains/motifs. [!] represents a strong match (low likelihood of a false positive) while [?] represents a questionable or weak match (additional biological evidences are required for true/false negative status).
21 proteins out of the 100 C. elegans SIN-3 interactors were found to be conserved in one or more SIN3 interactomes of other model organisms (Table 3). While the number of conserved protein interactions seems low, this could be due to the limitations of studying only 100 protein–protein interactions within the database used to generate the protein interactome and ambiguity in the available data. These interactors are involved in essential biological processes like transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, development and lifespan regulation55. Notably, ceSIN3 protein also participates in many unique protein interactions (Table S1). Some of these interactions might be mediated by Glutamine-rich and Aspartate repeats present outside the protein's functional domains (PAH and HID) and via similar repeats occurring in SIN-3 interacting nematode proteins.
Missing data is a major problem in large-scale profiling experiments, and their adverse effect on the downstream analysis is beyond the capacity of simple computational methods56. To find reliable protein–protein interactions of ceSIN3, interactions with experimental evidence should be analyzed along with the GeneMANIA dataset57. Therefore, ceSIN3 protein–protein interactions were manually curated from published data and represented in a network constructed using Cytoscape (Fig. S5).
Orthology of the nematode proteins in the SIN-3 interactome, obtained via GeneMANIA and literature based evidence method, was checked in other model organisms included in the analysis using the Orthofinder tool. It was found that many of the SIN-3 interactors found in C. elegans were not conserved in other organisms (Fig. S6). This contraction in protein orthogroups could be due to the lower sequence identity of nematode proteins with higher eukaryotic proteins. Further, SIN3 might be involved in multiple transient interactions to be able to regulate several pathways at a time. This poses a challenge in the in-vitro characterization of SIN3 protein–protein interactions. Some C. elegans proteins involved in the SIN-3 interaction network are quite expanded in the nematode proteome. These proteins (HDA-1, NHR-67, MAB-3, ODD-2, AKT-1, AKT-2, EGL-38, ELT-7, LIN-15A, FKH-6, FOZI-1 etc) are involved in important processes like sex differentiation, multicellular development, cell differentiation and cell signaling pathways, thereby enabling SIN-3 mediated regulation via protein–protein interaction.
It has been well-established that both SIN3 isoforms, SIN3A and SIN3B, form distinct protein complexes. Phylogenetic analysis has revealed that ceSIN3 shares a closer relationship with SIN3A isoforms. Therefore, it was imperative to evaluate the nematode protein for conservation of SIN3A/SIN3B specific protein interactions in model organisms which harbor multiple isoforms of the SIN3 protein. While it was observed that very few SIN3A/SIN3B specific interactions are conserved in ceSIN3, no particular preference for SIN3A specific interactions is seen in humans, mice, or zebrafish. This might be due to the similarity in the protein sequence identity of the ceSIN3 protein with SIN3A and SIN3B isoforms.
Context-specific protein annotation
A protein can have multiple functions depending on the tissue/cellular context in which the protein is present. Some of the functions assigned to a protein are more relevant in certain conditions, such as programmed cell death, determination of adult lifespan and cellular response to oxidative stress. In this study, we investigated protein–protein functional associations by using GO terms, InterPro domains and KEGG pathways29,58 to identify the participation of SIN-3 protein interactors in apoptosis, autophagy and longevity. GO ‘biological process’ classification of ceSIN3 protein interactome reveals that 53% interactors are associated with the regulation of transcription, the majority being transcription factors (Fig. 4). Furthermore, when annotated with InterPro domains, most of the interactor proteins indicated the presence of DNA binding domains, homeobox domain, zinc finger domain and winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain (Fig. 5) that assist in transcriptional regulation59,60. Previous studies also supported this by establishing SIN3 interaction with many transcriptional factors3,9.
Biological processes associated with protein interactome of C. elegans SIN-3 protein, obtained from (A) GeneMANIA database and (B) Direct Evidence method using the NIH LHRI DAVID 6.8 service. In order to find reliable protein–protein interactions, experimental evidence was analyzed along with the GeneMANIA dataset via literature based evidence method. The y-axis represents the GO biological processes, while the x-axis represents the number of proteins associated with a particular biological process.
InterPro domain analysis of protein interactome of C. elegans SIN-3 protein, obtained from (A) GeneMANIA database and (B) direct evidence method using the NIH LHRI DAVID 6.8 service. The y-axis represents the InterPro domains, while the x-axis represents the number of proteins associated with a particular domain.
GO term analysis revealed that some ceSIN3 protein interactors are involved in the positive regulation of programmed cell death, cellular response to oxidative stress and determination of adult lifespan in C. elegans (Table 4). HLH-3 and CES-2 are involved in the positive regulation of programmed cell death, while DAF-16 and BAR-1 are involved in the cellular response to oxidative stress. Further, 12% of SIN-3 interactors are involved in the determination of adult lifespan. Among these SIN-3 interactors, BAR-1, DAF-12, JUN-1, and PHA-4 undergo a significant transcriptional up regulation in case of sin-3 deletion (q value < 0.05, log2 Fold Change > 1)61. The rest of the proteins are also modulated upon sin-3 deletion but at a lower statistical significance (q value > 0.05).
Notable KEGG pathways corresponding to cell death and longevity were associated with some of these ceSIN3 interactors. The FOXO (controls starvation-induced autophagy along with Foxk1/2 and SIN3 proteins), MAPK and Jak-STAT (Fig. 6) pathways involve DAF-16, SIR-2.1, AKT-1/2, SGK-1, MXL-3 from the SIN-3 interactome.
KEGG pathway analysis of protein interactome of C. elegans SIN-3 protein, obtained from (A) GeneMANIA database and (B) direct evidence method using the NIH LHRI DAVID 6.8 service. The y-axis represents the KEGG Pathways, while the x-axis represents the number of proteins associated with a particular KEGG Pathway.
PAH domain interaction motif in nematode protein interactors
Motifs are used as scaffolds by proteins and transcription factors interacting with SIN3 PAH domains. LxxLL (x indicates any amino acid) motif is an acidic leucine (L)–rich protein binding motif used by proteins to interact with the PAH1 domain of SIN3 protein103. SIN3 interactors like SAP25 and MAD1 interact with the PAH1 domain of SIN3 protein via this unique sequence104. Such motifs are likely to be conserved in the case of ceSIN3 PAH domain protein interactions. This unique motif was checked for its presence in the SIN-3 interactor protein sequences. It was found that AKT-2, AKT-1, SIR-2.1, CES-2, and BAR-1, which are associated with apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity, harbor one or more LxxLL-type motifs (Table 5). Since the ceSIN3 PAH domain is primarily similar to the PAH1 domain of other SIN3 homologs, C. elegans proteins might interact with the SIN-3 protein via the LxxLL motif. In addition, it was seen that six nematode proteins (DCP-66, FOZI-1, TAF-12, GEI-13, SMA-9, CEH-36) interacting with ceSIN3 protein contain a stretch of Glutamine-rich repeats or Aspartate repeats (Table S3).
Effect of mutation in protein interactors
Consequential mutant phenotypes provide evidence-based annotations for a majority of proteins. Such an approach helps to investigate the presence of SIN3 mutant-like phenotypes. Therefore, the mutant phenotypes associated with apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity were curated for all the proteins in the ceSIN3 interactome (Fig. 7). We used extensive text mining to identify such phenotypes. We further wanted to check whether phenotypes associated with mutants of the interactor proteins were phenocopies known for the sin-3 mutants. Mutant phenotypes of multiple proteins show sin-3 mutant-like phenotypes with respect to apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity. Remarkably, four mutants, pha-4 (ortholog of human FOXA1 and FOXA2), daf-16 (ortholog of human FOXO1; FOXO3; and FOXO4), sgk-1 (ortholog of human SGK2), and sir-2.1 mutant (ortholog of human SIRT1), show elevated autophagy, programmed cell death and shortened lifespan like that of sin-3 mutants. Other mutants such as akt-2, akt-1, ces-2, and bar-1 also show phenotypes related to apoptosis and longevity. These interactor proteins seem to have a well-established connection with the apoptosis-autophagy-longevity axis (Konwar et. al., unpublished results)13.
Analysis of SIN-3 protein interactome of mutants of C. elegans obtained from (A) GeneMANIA database and (B) direct evidence method using WormBase107 phenotype option. Green indicates an increase, while red indicates a decrease in apoptosis/autophagy/ longevity of C. elegans mutants.
Conclusion
Our study identifies novel protein interactors of the SIN3 protein. The protein homology and phylogenetic relationship between the ceSIN3 and other eukaryotic SIN3 isoforms provides a basis for the genetic and functional correlation of the C. elegans protein with the other homologs. Protein–protein interactions of ceSIN3 protein revealed many interacting proteins associated with the regulation of programmed cell death, autophagy, and adult life span. Some of these interacting proteins, such as SIR-2.1, AKT-1/2, BAR-1, and CES-2, contain the SIN3 PAH domain interaction (LXXLL) motif, while others, like SMA-9, FOZI-1, and CEH-36, harbor Glutamine rich repeats known to be involved in protein–protein interactions. A few of these protein interactors also display mutant phenotypes similar to that of sin-3 mutants, indicating their potential in regulating apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity. However, experimental evidence will provide better insight. It is important to check the protein interactions of the ceSIN3 protein by performing a protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assay followed by Mass Spectroscopic (MS) analysis. This will confirm SIN3 protein interactions, which can be genetically studied for their role in apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity.
Data availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information file.
References
Kuo, M.-H. & Allis, C. D. Roles of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in gene regulation. BioEssays 20, 615–626 (1998).
Wray, G. A. et al. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1377–1419 (2003).
Adams, G. E., Chandru, A. & Cowley, S. M. Co-repressor, co-activator and general transcription factor: The many faces of the Sin3 histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex. Biochem. J. 475, 3921–3932 (2018).
van Ingen, H., Baltussen, M. A. H., Aelen, J. & Vuister, G. W. Role of structural and dynamical plasticity in Sin3: The free PAH2 domain is a folded module in mSin3B. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 485–497 (2006).
Pile, L. A., Spellman, P. T., Katzenberger, R. J. & Wassarman, D. A. The SIN3 deacetylase complex represses genes encoding mitochondrial proteins: Implications for the regulation of energy metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 37840–37848 (2003).
Silverstein, R. A. & Ekwall, K. Sin3: A flexible regulator of global gene expression and genome stability. Curr. Genet. 47, 1–17 (2005).
Bansal, N., David, G., Farias, E. & Waxman, S. Emerging roles of epigenetic regulator Sin3 in cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 130, 113–135 (2016).
Barnes, V. L., Laity, K. A., Pilecki, M. & Pile, L. A. Systematic analysis of SIN3 histone modifying complex components during development. Sci. Rep. 8, 17048 (2018).
Kadamb, R., Mittal, S., Bansal, N., Batra, H. & Saluja, D. Sin3: Insight into its transcription regulatory functions. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 92, 237–246 (2013).
Saha, N., Liu, M., Gajan, A. & Pile, L. A. Genome-wide studies reveal novel and distinct biological pathways regulated by SIN3 isoforms. BMC Genom. 17, 111 (2016).
Choy, S. W., Wong, Y. M., Ho, S. H. & Chow, K. L. C. Elegans SIN-3 and its associated HDAC corepressor complex act as mediators of male sensory ray development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 358, 802–807 (2007).
Pandey, R., Sharma, M. & Saluja, D. SIN-3 as a key determinant of lifespan and its sex dependent differential role on healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging (Albany NY) 10, 3910–3937 (2018).
Sharma, M., Pandey, R. & Saluja, D. ROS is the major player in regulating altered autophagy and lifespan in sin-3 mutants of C. elegans. Autophagy 14, 1239–1255 (2018).
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R (RStudio PBC, 2020).
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel (One Microsoft Way, 2013).
Geer, L. Y. et al. The NCBI BioSystems database. Nucl. Acids Res. 38, D492–D496 (2010).
Higgins, D. G. & Sharp, P. M. CLUSTAL: A package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73, 237–244 (1988).
Sievers, F. & Higgins, D. G. Clustal Omega. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 48, 1.25.1- 1.25.33 (2014).
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J. & Higgins, D. G. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 00, 2.3.1–2.3.22 (2003).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Talavera, G. & Castresana, J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 56, 564–577 (2007).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
Lemoine, F. et al. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 556, 452–456 (2018).
Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucl. Acids Res. 43, D222–D226 (2015).
Warde-Farley, D. et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: Biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucl. Acids Res. 38, W214–W220 (2010).
Huang, D. W. et al. DAVID bioinformatics resources: Expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucl. Acids Res. 35, W169–W175 (2007).
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucl. Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).
Yuan, F. et al. Analysis of protein–protein functional associations by using gene ontology and KEGG pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, e4963289 (2019).
Hunter, S. et al. InterPro: The integrative protein signature database. Nucl. Acids Res. 37, D211–D215 (2009).
Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D258–D261 (2004).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Zaidel-Bar, R. Evolution of complexity in the integrin adhesome. J. Cell Biol. 186, 317–321 (2009).
Pearson, W. R. An introduction to sequence similarity (“Homology”) searching. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 42, 3.1.1-3.1.8 (2013).
Thompson, J. D., Plewniak, F. & Poch, O. A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 27, 2682–2690 (1999).
Chaubal, A. & Pile, L. A. Same agent, different messages: Insight into transcriptional regulation by SIN3 isoforms. Epigenet. Chromatin 11, 17 (2018).
Chou, C.-C. & Wang, A.H.-J. Structural D/E-rich repeats play multiple roles especially in gene regulation through DNA/RNA mimicry. Mol. BioSyst. 11, 2144–2151 (2015).
Gemayel, R. et al. Variable glutamine-rich repeats modulate transcription factor activity. Mol. Cell 59, 615–627 (2015).
Guo, Y.-J. et al. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp. Ther. Med. 19, 1997–2007 (2020).
Asih, P. R. et al. Functions of p38 MAP kinases in the central nervous system. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 13, 172 (2020).
Pan, H. & Finkel, T. Key proteins and pathways that regulate lifespan. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 6452–6460 (2017).
Koonin, E. V. & Galperin, M. Y. Evolutionary Concept in Genetics and Genomics. Sequence–Evolution–Function: Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics (Kluwer Academic, 2003).
Váchová, L. & Palková, Z. Caspases in yeast apoptosis-like death: Facts and artefacts. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 12–21 (2007).
Banuett, F. Signalling in the yeasts: An informational cascade with links to the filamentous fungi. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 249–274 (1998).
Lu, J., Peatman, E., Tang, H., Lewis, J. & Liu, Z. Profiling of gene duplication patterns of sequenced teleost genomes: Evidence for rapid lineage-specific genome expansion mediated by recent tandem duplications. BMC Genom. 13, 246 (2012).
Postlethwait, J. H. et al. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 10, 1890–1902 (2000).
Ding, Z. & Kihara, D. Computational identification of protein–protein interactions in model plant proteomes. Sci. Rep. 9, 8740 (2019).
Hawkins, T., Chitale, M. & Kihara, D. New paradigm in protein function prediction for large scale omics analysis. Mol. BioSyst. 4, 223–231 (2008).
Hawkins, T. & Kihara, D. Function prediction of uncharacterized proteins. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 05, 1–30 (2007).
Kuzmanov, U. & Emili, A. Protein–protein interaction networks: Probing disease mechanisms using model systems. Genome Med. 5, 37 (2013).
Khan, I. K. & Kihara, D. Genome-scale prediction of moonlighting proteins using diverse protein association information. Bioinformatics 32, 2281–2288 (2016).
Adams, M. K. et al. Differential complex formation via paralogs in the human Sin3 protein interaction network. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19, 1468–1484 (2020).
Hasan, T. & Saluja, D. Structural allostery and protein–protein interactions of Sin3. In Proteostasis and Chaperone Surveillance (eds Singh, L. R. et al.) 3–24 (Springer, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2467-9_1
Liu, L. et al. Combining sequence and network information to enhance protein–protein interaction prediction. BMC Bioinform. 21, 537 (2020).
Plewczyński, D. & Ginalski, K. The interactome: Predicting the protein–protein interactions in cells. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 14, 1–22 (2008).
Liebeskind, B. J., Aldrich, R. W. & Marcotte, E. M. Ancestral reconstruction of protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007396 (2019).
Mostafavi, S., Ray, D., Warde-Farley, D., Grouios, C. & Morris, Q. GeneMANIA: A real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function. Genome Biol. 9, S4 (2008).
Nguyen, C. D., Gardiner, K. J. & Cios, K. J. Protein annotation from protein interaction networks and gene ontology. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 824–829 (2011).
Krishna, S. S., Majumdar, I. & Grishin, N. V. Structural classification of zinc fingers: Survey and summary. Nucl. Acids Res. 31, 532–550 (2003).
Teichmann, M., Dumay-Odelot, H. & Fribourg, S. Structural and functional aspects of winged-helix domains at the core of transcription initiation complexes. Transcription 3, 2–7 (2012).
Müthel, S., et al. The conserved histone chaperone LIN‐53 is required for normal lifespan and maintenance of muscle integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging cell. 18, e13012 (2019).
Doonan, R., Hatzold, J., Raut, S., Conradt, B. & Alfonso, A. HLH-3 is a C. elegans Achaete/Scute protein required for differentiation of the hermaphrodite-specific motor neurons. Mech. Dev. 125, 883–893 (2008).
Thellmann, M., Hatzold, J. & Conradt, B. The snail-like CES-1 protein of C. elegans can block the expression of the BH3-only cell-death activator gene egl-1 by antagonizing the function of bHLH proteins. Development 130, 4057–4071 (2003).
Erdélyi, P. et al. Shared developmental roles and transcriptional control of autophagy and apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1510–1518 (2011).
Hatzold, J. & Conradt, B. Control of apoptosis by asymmetric cell division. PLoS Biol. 6, e84 (2008).
Hesp, K., Smant, G. & Kammenga, J. E. Caenorhabditis elegans DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor and its mammalian homologs associate with age-related disease. Exp. Gerontol. 72, 1–7 (2015).
Kondo, M. et al. The p38 signal transduction pathway participates in the oxidative stress-mediated translocation of DAF-16 to Caenorhabditis elegans nuclei. Mech. Ageing Dev. 126, 642–647 (2005).
Lapierre, L. R., Gelino, S., Meléndez, A. & Hansen, M. Autophagy and lipid metabolism coordinately modulate life span in germline-less C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 21, 1507–1514 (2011).
Lee, R. Y. N., Hench, J. & Ruvkun, G. Regulation of C. elegans DAF-16 and its human ortholog FKHRL1 by the daf-2 insulin-like signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 11, 1950–1957 (2001).
Sun, X., Chen, W.-D. & Wang, Y.-D. DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor in aging and longevity. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 548 (2017).
van der Bent, M. L. et al. Loss-of-function of β-catenin bar-1 slows development and activates the Wnt pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 4, 4926 (2014).
Yanase, S., Yasuda, K. & Ishii, N. Interaction between the ins/IGF-1 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in molecular compensation of sod genes and modulation related to intracellular ROS levels in C. elegans. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 23, 100796 (2020).
Byrne, A. B. et al. A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. 6, 8 (2007).
Essers, M. A. G. et al. Functional interaction between ß-catenin and FOXO in oxidative stress signaling. Science 308, 1181–1184 (2005).
Chiang, W.-C., Ching, T.-T., Lee, H. C., Mousigian, C. & Hsu, A.-L. HSF-1 regulators DDL-1/2 link insulin-like signaling to heat-shock responses and modulation of longevity. Cell 148, 322–334 (2012).
Gatsi, R. et al. Prohibitin-mediated lifespan and mitochondrial stress implicate SGK-1, insulin/IGF and mTORC2 in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 9, e107671 (2014).
Perrin, A. J. et al. Noncanonical control of C. elegans germline apoptosis by the insulin/IGF-1 and Ras/MAPK signaling pathways. Cell Death Differ. 20, 97–107 (2013).
Quevedo, C., Kaplan, D. R. & Derry, W. B. AKT-1 regulates DNA-damage-induced germline apoptosis in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 17, 286–292 (2007).
Greiss, S., Schumacher, B., Grandien, K., Rothblatt, J. & Gartner, A. Transcriptional profiling in C. elegans suggests DNA damage dependent apoptosis as an ancient function of the p53 family. BMC Genom. 9, 334 (2008).
Hashimoto, Y., Ookuma, S. & Nishida, E. Lifespan extension by suppression of autophagy genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Cells 14, 717–726 (2009).
Morselli, E. et al. Caloric restriction and resveratrol promote longevity through the Sirtuin-1-dependent induction of autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 1, e10–e10 (2010).
Morselli, E. et al. The life span-prolonging effect of Sirtuin-1 is mediated by autophagy. Autophagy 6, 186–188 (2010).
Aspernig, H. et al. Mitochondrial perturbations couple mTORC2 to autophagy in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 29, 1399.e5-1409.e5 (2019).
Jones, K. T., Greer, E. R., Pearce, D. & Ashrafi, K. Rictor/TORC2 regulates Caenorhabditis elegans fat storage, body size, and development through sgk-1. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000060 (2009).
Zhou, B. et al. Mitochondrial permeability uncouples elevated autophagy and lifespan extension. Cell 177, 299-314.e16 (2019).
Zhu, M. et al. Serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase-1 (SGK-1) plays a role in membrane trafficking in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 10, e0130778 (2015).
Antebi, A. Genetics of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 3, e129 (2007).
Li, W., Gao, B., Lee, S.-M., Bennett, K. & Fang, D. RLE-1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates C. elegans aging by catalyzing DAF-16 polyubiquitination. Dev. Cell 12, 235–246 (2007).
Sherwood, D. R., Butler, J. A., Kramer, J. M. & Sternberg, P. W. FOS-1 promotes basement-membrane removal during anchor-cell invasion in C. elegans. Cell 121, 951–962 (2005).
Zhang, Z., Liu, L., Twumasi-Boateng, K., Block, D. H. S. & Shapira, M. FOS-1 functions as a transcriptional activator downstream of the C. elegans JNK homolog KGB-1. Cell. Signal. 30, 1–8 (2017).
Andersen, E. C. & Horvitz, H. R. Two C. elegans histone methyltransferases repress lin-3EGF transcription to inhibit vulval development. Development 134, 2991–2999 (2007).
Checchi, P. M. & Engebrecht, J. Caenorhabditis elegans histone methyltransferase MET-2 shields the male X chromosome from checkpoint machinery and mediates meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002267 (2011).
Kramer, M. et al. Developmental dynamics of X-chromosome dosage compensation by the DCC and H4K20me1 in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005698 (2015).
Ni, Z., Ebata, A., Alipanahiramandi, E. & Lee, S. S. Two SET domain containing genes link epigenetic changes and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 11, 315–325 (2012).
Greer, E. L. & Brunet, A. Different dietary restriction regimens extend lifespan by both independent and overlapping genetic pathways in C. elegans. Aging Cell 8, 113–127 (2009).
O’Rourke, E. J., Kuballa, P., Xavier, R. & Ruvkun, G. ω − 6 Polyunsaturated fatty acids extend life span through the activation of autophagy. Genes Dev. 27, 429–440 (2013).
Li, J. et al. Caenorhabditis elegans HCF-1 functions in longevity maintenance as a DAF-16 regulator. PLoS Biol. 6, e233 (2008).
Ewald, C. Y., Marfil, V. & Li, C. Alzheimer-related protein APL-1 modulates lifespan through heterochronic gene regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 15, 1051–1062 (2016).
Karp, X. & Ambros, V. The developmental timing regulator hbl-1 modulates the Dauer formation decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 187, 345–353 (2011).
Larsen, P. L., Albert, P. S. & Riddle, D. L. Genes that regulate both development and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139, 1567–1583 (1995).
Li, S. et al. Specific regulation of thermosensitive lipid droplet fusion by a nuclear hormone receptor pathway. PNAS 114, 8841–8846 (2017).
Khan, M. H. et al. TAF-4 is required for the life extension of isp-1, clk-1 and tpk-1 Mit mutants. Aging (Albany NY) 5, 741–758 (2013).
Le Guezennec, X., Vermeulen, M. & Stunnenberg, H. G. Molecular characterization of Sin3 PAH-domain interactor specificity and identification of PAH partners. Nucl. Acids Res. 34, 3929–3937 (2006).
Zanier, K. et al. Structural basis for hijacking of cellular LxxLL motifs by papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins. Science 339, 694–698 (2013).
Pagni, M. et al. MyHits: improvements to an interactive resource for analyzing protein sequences. Nucleic acids research. 35, W433-W437 (2007).
Hulo, N. et al. The PROSITE database. Nucleic acids research. 34, D227-D230 (2006).
Davis, P. et al. WormBase in 2022—data, processes, and tools for analyzing Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 220, iyac003 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the University of Delhi for providing the infrastructure. The support from Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India for Bioinformatics Facility to D.S. (BT/PR40153/BTIS/137/8/2021(BIF) at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research is highly acknowledged. JRF Fellowship to C.K. from the University of Delhi and SRF fellowship to S.K. from ICMR is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.K., J.M. and D.S. conceived and designed the study. C.K. performed the experiments. C.K., J.M., S.K., V.B. and D.S. analyzed the data. C.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the manuscript. V.M. and D.S. provided overall supervision throughout the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Konwar, C., Maini, J., Kohli, S. et al. SIN-3 functions through multi-protein interaction to regulate apoptosis, autophagy, and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep 12, 10560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13864-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13864-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
