Abstract
Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) is a fish species with growing economic significance in the aquaculture industry. However, successful positioning of pikeperch in large-scale aquaculture requires advances in our understanding of its genome organization. In this study, an ultra-high density linkage map for pikeperch comprising 24 linkage groups and 1,023,625 single nucleotide polymorphisms markers was constructed after genotyping whole-genome sequencing data from 11 broodstock and 363 progeny, belonging to 6 full-sib families. The sex-specific linkage maps spanned a total of 2985.16 cM in females and 2540.47 cM in males with an average inter-marker distance of 0.0030 and 0.0026 cM, respectively. The sex-averaged map spanned a total of 2725.53 cM with an average inter-marker distance of 0.0028 cM. Furthermore, the sex-averaged map was used for improving the contiguity and accuracy of the current pikeperch genome assembly. Based on 723,360 markers, 706 contigs were anchored and oriented into 24 pseudomolecules, covering a total of 896.48 Mb and accounting for 99.47% of the assembled genome size. The overall contiguity of the assembly improved with a scaffold N50 length of 41.06 Mb. Finally, an updated annotation of protein-coding genes and repetitive elements of the enhanced genome assembly is provided at NCBI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) is a freshwater fish species from the Percidae family native to Europe and Asia1,2. Its meat quality, with low fat content and high protein3, has placed it as a fish of high commercial value and a candidate for intensive inland aquaculture. In a period of 10 years, from 2007 to 2017, the global capture production of pikeperch increased from 17,891 to 20,481 tonnes, while the global inland aquaculture production increased from 627 to 1418 tonnes4, making evident the growing demand for this species.
Several studies have been performed in pikeperch concerning productive (e.g., growth and survival)5,6,7 and reproductive (e.g., fecundity and spawning)8,9 traits. However, despite the growing commercial importance of this species, little information is available regarding its genetic and genomic makeup. In 2018, the first high-density linkage map of pikeperch was built using specific locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). The map consisted of 8159 SLAFs including 8767 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers in 24 linkage groups (LGs) and spanned 3421.81 cM, with an average inter-marker distance of 0.46 cM10.
Linkage analysis of high-density genomic markers has facilitated the assembly of reference genomes by anchoring scaffolds, produced during de novo genome assembly, into linkage groups and providing a chromosome frame11. The resulting linkage maps provide useful information or even the essential basis for the analysis of sex-related structural differences and inheritance patterns12. Furthermore, linkage maps are often used for the detection of chromosomal locations of functional or disease genes and the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated to economically important traits13,14. Several linkage maps have been produced for a number of fish species and used with different purposes. In common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and yellow drum (Nibea albiflora), high-density linkage maps were built for comparative genomic analysis and identification of QTLs for growth and sex related traits15,16. A linkage map produced in European whitefish (Coregonus sp. “Albock”) helped to investigate its genomic basis of adaptation and speciation17. Recently, in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), a high-density linkage map was used for the construction of chromosome maps18.
With the fast advancements in next-generation sequencing technologies, an increasing number of sequencing and genotyping methodologies for SNPs have been developed, making it possible to rapidly discover a huge number of markers at relatively low cost19,20. The challenge persists to arrange this excessive amount of genetic information into physical coordinates. The first highly contiguous draft genome assembly of pikeperch was published recently21. It contained ~ 900 Mb of total sequence, comprising 1966 contigs ordered into 1313 scaffolds. However, this first draft assembly is fragmented and requires improvement to a chromosome-scale. Genomes with accurate and complete architecture provide additional genomic context by orienting genes relative to each other and helping to determine other genomic features such as centromeres, telomeres, complex repeat elements and regulatory regions22. Assemblies with low integrity and completeness have been one of the major limitations to improve research in aquaculture species23,24. Therefore, a linkage analysis is urgently required to build a basis for upgrading the current pikeperch genome, and developing breeding strategies in pikeperch aquaculture.
In this study, we report the construction of an ultra-high density linkage map for pikeperch based on the most common form of genetic variation, i.e., SNPs, and the improvement of the pikeperch genome assembly to chromosome-scale. The workflow described covers tissue sampling to raw sequence data, to finally yield a large panel of hard-filtered SNPs. A linkage map was constructed using the software Lep-Map325 suited to sequence data and capable of handling millions of markers, and the characteristics of the 24 resulting linkage groups are reported. The generated linkage map was then used to enhance the pikeperch genome assembly by anchoring and ordering its scaffolds into chromosome-scale pseudomolecules. The key genomic features were annotated for the enhanced pikeperch genome, including coding genes, non-coding RNA, and various repeat elements.
Results
Sequence processing and genotyping
A total of 90,416,509,334 paired-end reads (151 bp) from the 394 pikeperch samples were generated with an average number of 229,483,526 reads per sample and an average of 31.08-fold coverage. After trimming and quality filtering, a total of 87,771,258,936 paired-end reads were retained, with an average number of 222,769,693 reads per sample. The average percentage of properly paired reads was 96.43%. Although the Genome Analysis Toolkit v4.0 (GATK) variant calling pipeline26 simultaneously discovers SNPs and Indels, we focused only on the SNPs and obtained a total of 1,619,874 SNPs after hard-filtering. For completeness, results for both types of variants are shown in Fig. 1.
Pipeline showing the number of variants involved in the different steps. SNPs hard-filtering criteria: QualByDepth (QD) < 10.0, Quality (QUAL) < 30.0, StrandOddsRatio (SOR) > 3.0, FisherStrand (FS) > 60.0, RMSMappingQuality (MQ) < 40.0, MappingQualityRankSumTest (MQRankSum) < -12.5 and ReadPosRankSumTest (ReadPosRankSum) < -8.0. Indels hard-filtering criteria: QualByDepth (QD) < 2.0, Quality (QUAL) < 30.0, FisherStrand (FS) > 200.0 and ReadPosRankSumTest (ReadPosRankSum) < -20.0.
Pedigree construction
Results from the pedigree showed that the 375 pikeperch sampled from the pool of progeny belonged to six out of the seven matings performed at the fish facility. Four of the families were full-sibs and two other full-sib families built one paternal half-sib family. The number of progeny corresponding to each mating is shown in Table 1. The mating, from which no progeny was found, was reported to have a very low number of eggs. Additionally, two more matings had extremely few progeny, which could be related to multiple factors, such as fertilization and hatching rate27,28, stocking density29, size sorting30, and cannibalistic behaviour in early stages31, among others.
Linkage map construction
From the 1,563,541 initial biallelic variants, 1,478,421 were identified as informative out of which 91,252 were discarded after filtering by segregation distortion and after allowing at most 10% of missing genotypes. Hence, a total of 1,387,169 variants were kept for further analysis. A range of logarithm of odds (LOD) scores from 5 to 70 incrementing by 5 was tested for linkage grouping. A LOD score of 50 resulted in 24 LGs that were expected to match to the 24 chromosomes observed in karyotype studies in pikeperch32,33. In total, 1,023,625 SNPs were uniquely assigned to the 24 LGs and ordered to generate the female, male and sex-averaged linkage maps (Table 2, Fig. 2). The number of SNPs per LG ranged from 28,022 to 59,051 with an average of 42,651 markers per LG. In total, 863 out of 1313 scaffolds were involved, covering 894.02 Mb of the total genome length of 900.48 Mb. The number of SNPs per scaffold ranged from 1 to 25,495 with mean 1186. Out of the 863 scaffolds, 65 had only one SNP and 15 had more than 10,000 SNPs, while all magnitudes in between were almost equally represented: 136 scaffolds contained two to 10 SNPs, 165 scaffolds included 11 to 100 SNPs and 1001 to 10,000 SNPs were found in 209 scaffolds.
Genetic positions of markers for the 24 linkage groups in the (a) female, (b) male and (c) sex-averaged linkage maps. A black bar represents a SNP marker. The scale on the left indicates the genetic position in centiMorgan (cM).
The SNPs on the female map were arranged on 7805 distinct positions with observed recombination events constituting a total genetic length of 2985.16 cM. The genetic length of LGs ranged from 85.79 cM (LG22) to 176.19 cM (LG12) with an average length of 124.38 cM. The average inter-marker distance was 0.0030 cM with the smallest and largest distance being 0.0022 (LG1) and 0.0039 (LG18 and LG19). The largest gap between adjacent markers was of 22.77 cM (LG15).
The SNPs on the male map were arranged on 3917 distinct positions with observed recombination events constituting a total genetic length of 2540.47 cM. The genetic length of LGs ranged from 80.88 cM (LG7) to 145.25 cM (LG6) with an average length of 105.85 cM. The average inter-marker distance was 0.0026 cM with the smallest and largest distance being 0.0015 cM (LG2) and 0.0049 cM (LG22). The largest gap between adjacent markers was of 53.73 cM (LG22). The female:male (F:M) length ratio for the LGs varied from 0.60 (LG22) to 1.74 (LG2), with an average of 1.21. The LGs showed different recombination activities between the female and male maps; Figure S1 shows its non-linear relationship. Furthermore, 18 LGs showed larger genetic distances in females than in males. In contrast, three LGs (LG5, LG8 and LG22) showed larger genetic distances in males than females. Three LGs (LG6, LG13 and LG21) had approximately the same length between sexes.
The SNPs on the sex-averaged map were arranged on 11,459 distinct positions with a total genetic length of 2725.53 cM. The genetic length for the LGs ranged from 86.59 cM (LG20) to 144.61 cM (LG6) with an average length of 113.56 cM. The average inter-marker distance was 0.0028 cM with the smallest and largest distance being 0.0019 (LG1) and 0.0037 (LG19, LG21 and LG22). The largest gap between adjacent markers was 19.97 cM (LG22).
Genome assembly and annotations
The generated de novo assembly consisted of 1602 contigs with N50 size of 6.3 Mb, which is more than a twofold improvement over the previously published draft assembly (GenBank accession: PRJNA561467). The integrated chromosome-scale assembly yielded 336 scaffolds with N50 size of 41.06 Mb from which the 24 largest scaffolds represented the putative 24 pikeperch chromosomes, and covered 896.48 Mb (99.47%) of the assembly size. Only 4.74 Mb (0.53%) could not be anchored into pseudomolecules. The average accuracy at base-level was 99.9996 (i.e., 1 error in 100 kb). Over 99.80% of the genomic paired-end reads mapped to the improved assembly, with 97.50% of them mapping concordantly. Moreover, from a total of 4584 actinopterygians core genes, BUSCO assessment recovered 94.50% as full-length single-copy, 2.23% as duplicated, 1.59% as fragmented and 1.68% were missing, indicating that most genes were accurately assembled (Table 3).
Homology and structure-based approaches were used for functional annotation of protein-coding genes. We found 31,234 genes (93.36% of protein-coding genes) with at least one significant hit in one of the functional databases queried. The predicted non-coding genes included 2345 transfer RNA (tRNA), 160 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 145 microRNA (miRNA) (Table 3).
Repetitive sequences accounted for ~ 37% of the assembled genome, and spanned 334 Mb in total, which is in range with the repeats content reported in other Percidae fish34. With more than 250 Mb (27.76% of assembly size), DNA transposons and retroelements were the most abundant type of repeats found in the pikeperch genome. In particular, long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), long terminal repeat (LTR) elements and hobo-Activator occupied 10.16%, 3.22% and 4.94%, respectively, of the assembled genome (Fig. 3a).
(a) The percentage coverage of the most abundant families of transposable elements in pikeperch. LINE: long interspersed nuclear elements; LTR: long terminal repeat. Correlation between (b) total introns length, (c) total exons length, and (d) gene content per chromosome and the pikeperch chromosome size (Mb).
The obtained consensus gene models included a total of 33,456 high-quality protein-coding genes, which was substantially higher than that found in the previously published draft assembly (GenBank accession: PRJNA561467) version. The average length of coding sequences (CDS) was 1451 bp. On average, each S. lucioperca gene had 7.8 exons, each with an average length of 156 bp. About 82% of the 278,346 exonic sequences were < 200 bp. Introns showed an average length of 2276 bp, with 2% of them having a length of > 10 kb. Moreover, the total length of intronic and exonic DNA on each chromosome was significantly correlated to the chromosome size with correlation coefficients of R = 0.78 and R = 0.81, respectively (Fig. 3b,c). Consequently, the gene content per chromosome was also significantly correlated to the chromosome size, with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.96 (Fig. 3d). Overall, the distribution of CDS length, intron length and exon number is comparable with other percid genomes34. The 24 chromosomes were sorted by physical size, from largest to smallest and named accordingly (Table 4, Fig. 4). Given a genome-wide average of 40 genes per Mb, the chromosomes 21 and 23 displayed the highest and lowest gene density with 52 and 34 genes per Mb, respectively. Additionally, we observed a putative nucleolus organizer region (NOR) on chromosome 7, which had already been observed in previous cytogenetics analysis on pikeperch35.
Gene density on each pikeperch chromosome ordered by length and distribution of non-coding RNA loci including miRNA (orange triangle), tRNA (purple circle) and rRNA (green square). The colour code within each chromosome represents the gene density from low (blue) to high (red) in a window of 1 Mb.
A liftover of the SNPs assigned to LGs to the chromosome-scale build yielded a panel of 992,340 genome-wide reference SNPs for pikeperch (Table S2). In total, 31,278 SNPs failed to map to the chromosome-scale assembly and 7 duplicated SNPs were removed.
Discussion
We reported the construction of an ultra-high density SNP-based linkage map for pikeperch, and the further anchoring of the genome assembly into the first chromosome-scale assembly.
Our map comprised 24 linkage groups, with a total of one million SNP markers which spanned between 2500 and 3000 cM for the female, male and sex-averaged maps. In order to obtain a high quality linkage map, we strictly filtered the data and finally retained 1.6 million SNP markers from sequence data. Roughly, 600 K SNPs could not be assigned to any LG. The female map was slightly longer than the male map, with an overall F:M length ratio of 1.21, though some LGs harboured extreme differences between genders (F:M length ratio up to 1.74). This result was consistent with the only linkage map reported in pikeperch, where the female map was also found to be longer than the male map, with an overall F:M length ratio of 1.62 (4179.41 cM vs. 2582.83 cM)10. Our results are also consistent with the pattern between sexes in several teleost fish species like red-spotted grouper (1.47 F:M length ratio36), Pacific bluefin tuna (1.34 F:M length ratio37) and barramundi (2.1 F:M length ratio38).
Average inter-marker distances were between 0.0026 cM and 0.0030 cM for the female, male and sex-averaged map leading to a more than 100 times higher resolution compared with the linkage map published by Guo et al.10. Additionally, our linkage map was based on about one million SNPs from whole-genome sequencing of 6 full-sib families comprising 363 progeny, while the map derived by Guo et al. was built using 8767 SNPs from a single family with 150 progeny. Though the total length of male map was almost equal, the female map length differed being 1.4 times longer in the earlier study. However, a larger mapping population, enormously increased number of markers, and thus essentially smaller average inter-marker distance, substantiated a more precise estimation of the genetic distances. Because of the close proximity of SNPs, recombination events rarely happened within scaffolds and this was manifested by genetic positions hardly differing within long stretches, see Supplementary Table S1. Though being beneficial at the large scale, ordering of markers at the fine scale might be insufficient based on linkage analysis only11. However, high-quality linkage maps are a valuable source for the correct placement of scaffolds into chromosomes39. Our ultra-high density linkage map was used to anchor the genome scaffolds into chromosome-scale. Compared to the previous genome assembly21, the scaffold N50 length was increased from 4.9 Mb to 41.06 Mb covering 896.48 Mb (99.47%) of the assembly size. This new chromosome-scale genome assembly represents an important resource to fill the gap in the Percidae family tree, where Luciopercinae (Sander spp.) was the only sub-family missing a chromosome-level assembly (according to NCBI query: June 2020).
Anchoring scaffolds into chromosomes has been performed with Chromonomer software (http://catchenlab.life.illinois.edu/chromonomer/). Alternatively, well-suited software such as Lep-Anchor40 or ALLMAPS41 provide potential for further advances.
The conversion of the genomic positions of SNPs into the chromosome-scale assembly successfully lifted over 96.94% of the markers. The remaining 3.06% (31,278) of the SNPs could not be lifted over because they resided in contigs that only existed in the older assembly build or because of sequence incompatibilities between the assemblies, such as mismatching reference alleles, e.g., a variant that was considered an alternate in the source assembly was now considered the reference in the target assembly. Additionally, 7 SNPs were found to be duplicated; they mapped to the same physical position because of collapsing or overlapping contigs in the target assembly.
The karyotype of the pikeperch consists of one pair of metacentric, 15 pairs of submetacentric and 8 pairs of subtelo-acrocentric chromosomes32,33. The number of linkage groups for the female, male and sex-averaged maps built in this study was chosen corresponding to the number of chromosome pairs from microscopic observations32,33. With the aim of identifying the chromosome type and specifying the location of centromeric regions, we applied the centromere mapping method developed by Limborg et al. (2015)42 to all linkage groups of our female map. This required recombination frequencies (RF) between each of the two terminal markers and any other marker (m) on each linkage group. The resulting RFm curves shall indicate a metacentric chromosome if the two curves cross at almost 0.5 and an acrocentric chromosome if the curves smoothly approach 0.5 at the ends. In our study, this method did not allow for a clear differentiation between metacentric and acrocentric LGs and therefore, remained inconclusive (Supplementary Figure S2). In order to account for possible genotype errors at the terminal markers, markers close to them have been verified, and they confirmed the inconclusive outcome. As mentioned by Limborg et al. (2015)42, this method has reduced precision if recombination interference is incomplete and chromosome arms are long (> 50 cM). This leads to an increasing frequency of double crossover events inducing RFm to level off after ~ 50 cM. This was observed in our study, possibly indicating incomplete interference in pikeperch. Thus, further research is needed to elucidate the extent of interference and to narrow down the location of the centromere by studying regions with repressed recombination activity43. Once centromeres have been identified, the order of chromosomes will change accordingly.
The development of genomic resources for pikeperch will allow a better understanding of the species and a faster positioning in the aquaculture industry. Pushed by the advancements in high-throughput methods for SNP genotyping, genomic selection has been introduced in some aquaculture breeding programs, but further research is needed to effectively combine existing breeding designs with available genomic information44. Mapping of genomic regions associated with diseases will provide further possibilities to accelerate the breeding success in aquaculture species45. Moreover, the genomic resources generated in this project will serve for various future studies, including the improvement in the contiguity and accuracy of the chromosome-scale assembly for pikeperch and the development of a SNP array.
Material and methods
All procedures involving the handling and treatment of fish used in this study were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales LAGuS). Approval ID: 7221.3–1-009/19. The methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Broodstock management and family production
Seven matings of pikeperch were generated in a state´s aquaculture facility in Hohen Wangelin (State Research Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries in Hohen Wangelin, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany) within their normal production cycle. For the production of the families, mature broodstock were placed in spawning tanks using a sex ratio of 2:1 and 1:1. Spawning tanks dimensions were 1.17 × 0.88 × 1.10 m (l × w × h) with a water column of 1.0 m kept at 12 °C and daily water exchange rate of 5%. Broodstock were fed with a diet for trout broodstock containing 44% protein. After spawning, per family eggs were collected and treated to prevent bacterial and fungal growth. The treatment consisted of a 10 min bath in a solution made of 50 ml of 37% formalin in 10 L of water. Eggs were then placed in incubation tanks in a small scaled recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with continuous aeration, cooling system and UV-disinfection. After a 24 h hatching period, all obtained progeny from each family were mixed and transferred into round tanks each with a water column of 0.5 m and kept at a water temperature of 15 °C and daily water exchange rate of 5%. As first exogenous prey, larvae were fed with marine copepods in the first two days, followed by Artemia spp. for the next 10 days, and were then adapted to dry food. After 45 days with a mean weight of 0.5 g, family mixed larvae were stocked in round tanks with a water volume of 3 m3 at a water temperature of 21 °C and daily water exchange rate of 5%. Larvae were fed with dry food containing between 50 to 64% protein according to the growth stage; daily diet consisted of 5% to 10% of the biomass of the tank.
DNA extraction and sequencing
Genomic DNA from the 18 broodstock (11 males and 7 females) used for the family production was isolated from flash-frozen caudal fin tissue sampled after mating. One male fish was used twice, giving a total of 19 samples from 18 different individuals. A total of 375 progeny were collected for sampling at the age of 16 and 28 weeks. Genomic DNA from the progeny was isolated from blood obtained from the caudal vein or flash-frozen caudal fin. For both, broodstock and progeny, genomic DNA isolation was performed using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and following manufacturer’s protocol. DNA quantity and quality were determined with the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDropTechnologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). Whole genome paired-end sequencing was performed on each of the individuals (Macrogen, Korea) with Illumina NovaSeq 6000 technology.
Sequence processing and genotyping
The pikeperch draft assembly (GenBank accession: PRJNA561467)21 was used as reference genome. This draft assembly consists of ~ 900 Mb of total sequence, comprising 1966 contigs ordered into 1313 scaffolds with N50 lengths of 3.0 Mb and 4.9 Mb, respectively. In total, 394 whole genome paired-end sequences were genotyped. Quality control of sequencing data was performed with FastQC v0.11.746. Fastp v0.19.1047 was used for adapter and overrepresented sequences trimming. Short variants (SNPs and Indels) were discovered following the Genome Analysis Toolkit v4.0 (GATK) pipeline26: (i) Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA-MEM)48,49 was used to map the reads of each sample to the reference genome. (ii) Picard tools were used to sort the SAM files and mark duplicates. (iii) Variants were called using the HaplotypeCaller tool. Since no database of known SNPs and Indels was available for pikeperch, such a database was bootstrapped. First, an initial round of variant calling was performed. Then, SNPs and Indels with the highest confidence were used as database of known SNPs and Indels and fed into the base quality score recalibrator. Details on how to bootstrap a set of known variants can be found at https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035890531-Base-Quality-Score-Recalibration-BQSR-. Finally, a second round of variant calling with the recalibrated data was performed. SNPs were hard-filtered by the following criteria: QualByDepth (QD) < 10.0, Quality (QUAL) < 30.0, StrandOddsRatio (SOR) > 3.0, FisherStrand (FS) > 60.0, RMSMappingQuality (MQ) < 40.0, MappingQualityRankSumTest (MQRankSum) < -12.5 and ReadPosRankSumTest (ReadPosRankSum) < -8.0. Details on how to choose the filter criteria can be found at https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035890471-Hard-filtering-germline-short-variants.
Pedigree construction
The production procedures at the fish facility did not allow for the identification of the successful male in 2:1 matings, as well as the progeny belonging to each mating. Therefore, the reconstruction of a pedigree was required. This was carried out using the parentage assignment algorithm AlphaAssign50. Prior to this, the VCF file containing the set of SNPs, which remained after hard-filtering, was recoded with PLINK 1.951 according to AlphaAssign requirements. Additionally, we kept only the bi-allelic variants without missing genotypes. Then 18 putative parents and 375 progeny with 1,356,797 markers were included in the analysis. Due to the fact that the sampled individuals came from an inbred population, additional filtering for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and minor allele frequency were not considered.
Linkage map construction
Building of LGs and ordering of SNPs within LGs were performed using Lep-Map325. Prior to this, the VCF file containing the SNPs after hard-filtering was processed with the GATK tool SelectVariants to keep only the bi-allelic markers and to remove the samples of individuals from the broodstock that did not have progeny. Additionally, BCFtools was used to check for Mendelian errors, and after visual inspection, individuals with > 2% Mendelian error rate were discarded. A total of 11 broodstock and 363 progeny, from 6 full-sib families, and 1,563,541 markers were included in the analysis. Lep-Map3 modules were used starting with the ParentCall2 module to identify informative markers. Then, the Filtering2 module was used to remove markers with segregation distortion (dataTolerance = 0.01) and missing genotypes > 10% (MissingLimit = 0.1). The assignment of markers into LGs was performed with the SeparateChromosomes2 module with a LOD score of > 50 (LodLimit = 50). The JoinSingles2All module was used for assigning singular markers to existing LGs with a LOD score of > 30 (LodLimit = 30) and a LOD difference of > 10 (lodDifference = 10). Markers that could not be uniquely assigned to any LG were discarded. The OrderMarkers2 module was used to order the markers within each LG. The output of this module consisted of marker names with paternal and maternal map position in centiMorgan units. The ordering of markers within this module was based on random number generation. To account for the occurring stochastic variation, this step was repeated 10 times for each LG. For each LG the ordering of markers with highest haplotype likelihood was taken to build the final map. Sex-specific genetic positions were reported. The sex-averaged genetic positions were obtained via the module OrderMarkers2 (sexAveraged = 1).
Genome assembly, scaffolds anchoring and reference SNPs set
The pikeperch draft assembly (GenBank accession: PRJNA561467) was upgraded in two steps. First, we generated a new de novo assembly with the previously released sequencing data of S. lucioperca21, i.e. the genomic PacBio Single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT) reads (Accession: SRX6760932) and Illumina paired-end data (Accession: SRX6750544) available at NCBI BioProject PRJNA561467. For a comprehensive description of these data, please refer to Nguinkal et al. (2019)21. The MaSuRCA Genome Assembly and Analysis Toolkit v.3.4.0252 was used to construct this de novo assembly.
Second, flanking sequences of the SNP loci (100 bp upstream and 100 bp downstream from the SNP) of the sex-average genetic map were extracted and aligned to the de novo assembled genome with BWA48. In total, 723,360 markers uniquely mapped to 706 contigs which were ordered and integrated into 24 pseudomolecules using the software Chromonomer v1.11 (http://catchenlab.life.illinois.edu/chromonomer/). The genome was polished in three iterations with POLCA52 using short paired-end reads. The structural accuracy of the anchored assembly was assessed by mapping the 394 whole-genome paired-end sequences generated in this study (BioProject: PRJNA626522) to the genome, and the gene space completeness was measured by analysing the rate of highly conserved single-copy orthologs in the ray-finned fish lineage, using BUSCO v3 tools53.
In order to obtain the final reference SNP panel, all SNPs assigned to LGs were lifted over to this polished and gap-filled chromosome-scale build: (i) A chain file was produced with flo54. (ii) Crossmap55 was used to covert the coordinates between the two assemblies.
Identifying transposable elements and re-annotating the pikeperch genome
RepeatModeler v2.0.1 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler/) was used to identify transposable elements (TE) in the genome assembly. To specifically identify miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITE), the open source software MITE-Tracker56 was applied. Subsequently, the outputs from RepeatModeler and MITE-Tracker were combined with FishTEDB (http://www.fishtedb.org/) and RepBase57, and used as custom repeats library for repeatMasker (http://repeatmasker.org) to classify repetitive elements and estimate their distribution in the enhanced pikeperch genome.
Annotation of gene models was carried out using the funannotate pipeline v.1.5 (https://funannotate.readthedocs.io). First, we obtained transcript and protein sequences of closely related Percidae, including Perca flavescens, Perca fluvialitis, Etheostoma spectabile, and Etheostoma cragini. Second, RNA-Seq from different pikeperch tissues (unpublished data) were aligned to the soft-masked genome with HISAT258 followed by StringTie259 to reconstruct transcripts. Further, augustus v3.260, GlimmerHMM61, SNAP62, and GeneMark63 were used for de novo predictions of protein coding genes. Finally, funannotate was used to integrate transcript evidences, proteins- and transcripts alignments, and de novo gene models to create a consensus gene set. The final gene set was obtained by filtering out genes which were either too short (< 50 amino acids), or had in-frame stop-codons or with significant open reading frame (ORF) homology to TE sequences.
In addition, we predicted the three main types of non-coding RNAs, which play important roles in different cellular processes. We applied tRNAscan-SE algorithm64 to identify transfer RNA (tRNA) genes in pikeperch genome. The ribosomal RNA (rRNA) including 5S, 18S and 28S were predicted with RNAmmer algorithms v1.265. MicroRNA (miRNA) was predicted using the standalone version of miRNAFold66.
Functional annotations of predicted protein-coding genes were carried out based on several functional databases, including Swissprot, Tr-EMBL, NCBI-NR, KEGG, and eggNOG. Association of gene products with Go-terms was performed using Blast2GO within the OmicsBox suite67. We also used InterProScan v568 to map protein domains in the InterPro database, which includes CATH-Gene3D, CDD, HAMAP, PANTHER, Pfam, PIRSF, PRINTS, ProDom, PROSITE, SMAT, SUPERFAMILY, and TIGRFAMs. Lastly, high scoring functional annotations in each database were retained as the final consensus functional annotation results.
Data availability
The raw sequencing data used in this project is available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under Accession Number PRJNA626522. The annotated assembly of Sander lucioperca is available at the NCBI GenBank under the Accession Number GCA_008315115.2.
References
Kestemont, P., Dabrowski, K. & Summerfelt, R. C. Biology and culture of percid fishes: principles and practices. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7227-3 (2015).
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. Editors. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org (2019).
Jankowska, B., Zakȩś, Z., Zmijewski, T. & Szczepkowski, M. A comparison of selected quality features of the tissue and slaughter yield of wild and cultivated pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 217, 401–405 (2003).
FAO. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global production by production source 1950–2017 (FishstatJ). (2019).
Mattila, J. & Koskela, J. Effect of feed pellet size on production parameters of pike-perch (Sander lucioperca). Aquac. Res. 49, 586–590 (2018).
Steinberg, K., Zimmermann, J., Stiller, K. T., Meyer, S. & Schulz, C. The effect of carbon dioxide on growth and energy metabolism in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquaculture 481, 162–168 (2017).
Swirplies, F. et al. Identification of molecular stress indicators in pikeperch Sander lucioperca correlating with rising water temperatures. Aquaculture 501, 260–271 (2019).
Olin, M. et al. Trait-related variation in the reproductive characteristics of female pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Fish. Manag. Ecol. 25, 220–232 (2018).
Schaefer, F. J., Overton, J. L., Kloas, W. & Wuertz, S. Length rather than year-round spawning, affects reproductive performance of RAS-reared F-generation pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) – Insights from practice. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 34, 617–621 (2018).
Guo, J. et al. Construction of the first high-density genetic linkage map of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) using specific length amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing and QTL analysis of growth-related traits. Aquaculture 497, 299–305 (2018).
Fierst, J. L. Using linkage maps to correct and scaffold de novo genome assemblies: Methods, challenges, and computational tools. Front. Genet. 6, 220 (2015).
Maroso, F. et al. Highly dense linkage maps from 31 full-sibling families of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) provide insights into recombination patterns and chromosome rearrangements throughout a newly refined genome assembly. DNA Res. 25, 439–450 (2018).
Boopathi, N. M. Genetic mapping and marker assisted selection: basics (Springer, Berlin, Practice and Benefits, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0958-4.
Tong, J. G. & Sun, X. W. Genetic and genomic analyses for economically important traits and their applications in molecular breeding of cultured fish. Sci. China Life Sci. 58, 178–186 (2015).
Peng, W. et al. An ultra-high density linkage map and QTL mapping for sex and growth-related traits of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Sci. Rep. 6, 1–16 (2016).
Qiu, C. et al. A high-density genetic linkage map and QTL mapping for growth and sex of yellow drum (Nibea albiflora). Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).
De-Kayne, R. & Feulner, P. G. D. A european whitefish linkage map and its implications for understanding genome-wide synteny between salmonids following whole genome duplication. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 8, 3745–3755 (2018).
Zhang, S. et al. Construction of a high-density linkage map and QTL fine mapping for growth- and sex-related traits in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Front. Genet. 10, 251 (2019).
Davey, J. W. et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 499–510 (2011).
Liu, L. et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 251364 (2012).
Nguinkal, J. A. et al. The first highly contiguous genome assembly of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), an emerging aquaculture species in Europe. Genes 10, 708 (2019).
Peñalba, J. V. et al. Genome of an iconic Australian bird: High-quality assembly and linkage map of the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 560–578 (2020).
Zenger, K. R. et al. Genomic selection in aquaculture: Application, limitations and opportunities with special reference to marine shrimp and pearl oysters. Front. Genet. 9, 693 (2019).
Abdelrahman, H. et al. Aquaculture genomics, genetics and breeding in the United States: Current status, challenges, and priorities for future research. BMC Genomics 18, 191 (2017).
Rastas, P. Lep-MAP3: Robust linkage mapping even for low-coverage whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 33, 3726–3732 (2017).
Van der Auwera, G. A. et al. From fastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: The genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 43, 11.10.1–11.10.33. (2013).
Kristan, J. et al. Fertilizing ability of gametes at different post-activation times and the sperm–oocyte ratio in the artificial reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquac. Res. 49, 1383–1388 (2018).
Güralp, H. et al. Development, and effect of water temperature on development rate, of pikeperch Sander lucioperca embryos. Theriogenology 104, 94–104 (2017).
Szkudlarek, M. & Zakȩś, Z. Effect of stocking density on survival and growth performance of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), larvae under controlled conditions. Aquac. Int. 15, 67–81 (2007).
Szczepkowski, M., Zakeś, Z., Szczepkowska, B. & Piotrowska, I. Effect of size sorting on the survival, growth and cannibalism in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) larvae during intensive culture in RAS. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 56, 483–489 (2011).
Colchen, T., Fontaine, P., Ledoré, Y., Teletchea, F. & Pasquet, A. Intra-cohort cannibalism in early life stages of pikeperch. Aquac. Res. 50, 915–924 (2019).
Ráb, P., Roth, P. & Mayr, B. Karyotype study of eight species of European percid fishes (pisces, percidae). Caryologia 40, 307–318 (1987).
Jankun, M., Mochol, M. & Ocalewicz, K. Conventional and molecular cytogenetics of the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.). Aquac. Res. 45, 1084–1089 (2014).
Feron, R. et al. Characterization of a Y-specific duplication/insertion of the anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor gene based on a chromosome-scale genome assembly of yellow perch. Perca flavescens. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 531–543 (2020).
Goldammer, T. & Klinkhardt, M. Karyologische Studien an verschiedenen Süsswasserfischen aus brackigen Küstenwässern der südwestlichen Ostsee. V. Der Zander Stizotedion lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758). Zool. Anz. 228, 129–139 (1992).
Wang, X. et al. An SNP-based genetic map and QTL mapping for growth traits in the red-spotted grouper (Epinephelus akaara). Genes 10, 793 (2019).
Uchino, T. et al. Constructing genetic linkage maps using the whole genome sequence of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) and a comparison of chromosome structure among teleost species. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 7, 85–122 (2016).
Chun, M. W. et al. A microsatellite linkage map of barramundi.Lates calcarifer. Genetics 175, 907–915 (2007).
Lewin, H. A., Larkin, D. M., Pontius, J. & O’Brien, S. J. Every genome sequence needs a good map. Genome Res. 19, 1925–1928 (2009).
Rastas, P. Lep-Anchor: automated construction of linkage map anchored haploid genomes. Bioinformatics 36, 2359–2364 (2020).
Tang, H. et al. ALLMAPS: Robust scaffold ordering based on multiple maps. Genome Biol. 16, 3 (2015).
Limborg, M. T., Mckinney, G. J., Seeb, L. W. & Seeb, J. E. Recombination patterns reveal information about centromere location on linkage maps. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 655–661 (2016).
Nambiar, M. & Smith, G. R. Repression of harmful meiotic recombination in centromeric regions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 54, 188–197 (2016).
Jonas, E. & de Koning, D. J. Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs. Front. Genet. 6, 49 (2015).
Houston, R. D. Future directions in breeding for disease resistance in aquaculture species. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 46, 545–551 (2017).
Andrews, S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/ (2010).
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ pre-processor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv, 1303.3997 (2013).
Whalen, A., Gorjanc, G. & Hickey, J. Parentage assignment with low density array data and low coverage sequence data. bioRxiv (2018).
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 1–16 (2015).
Zimin, A. V. et al. Hybrid assembly of the large and highly repetitive genome of Aegilops tauschii, a progenitor of bread wheat, with the MaSuRCA mega-reads algorithm. Genome Res. 27, 787–792 (2017).
Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 227–245 (2019).
Pracana, R., Priyam, A., Levantis, I., Nichols, R. A. & Wurm, Y. The fire ant social chromosome supergene variant Sb shows low diversity but high divergence from SB. Mol. Ecol. 26, 2864–2879 (2017).
Zhao, H. et al. CrossMap: A versatile tool for coordinate conversion between genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 30, 1006–1007 (2014).
Crescente, J. M., Zavallo, D., Helguera, M. & Vanzetti, L. S. MITE Tracker: An accurate approach to identify miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in large genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 348 (2018).
Bao, W., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob. DNA 6, 11 (2015).
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Kovaka, S. et al. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 20, 278 (2019).
Stanke, M., Schöffmann, O., Morgenstern, B. & Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 62 (2006).
Majoros, W. H., Pertea, M. & Salzberg, S. L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: Two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20, 2878–2879 (2004).
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 59 (2004).
Ter-Hovhannisyan, V., Lomsadze, A., Chernoff, Y. O. & Borodovsky, M. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Res. 18, 1979–1990 (2008).
Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 1–14 (2019).
Lagesen, K. et al. RNAmmer: Consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100–3108 (2007).
Tav, C., Tempel, S., Poligny, L. & Tahi, F. miRNAFold: a web server for fast miRNA precursor prediction in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W181–W184 (2016).
Götz, S. et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3420–3435 (2008).
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The project was funded by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany; grant MV-II.1-RN-001. Special thanks are given to Brigitte Schöpel, Ingrid Hennings and Luisa Falkenthal (Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf) for the technical assistance.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.d.l.R.P. performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. M.V., A.R., R.M.B. and N.S. contributed to the sample collection and preparation. J.A.N. contributed to the sample collection and performed bioinformatics analyses. J.K. helped to create the figures and assisted in the bioinformatics analysis. T.G. developed the idea for the collaborative project and raised project funding. M.S. provided samples and support in terms of rearing conditions. D.W. conceived and supervised the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
de los Ríos-Pérez, L., Nguinkal, J.A., Verleih, M. et al. An ultra-high density SNP-based linkage map for enhancing the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) genome assembly to chromosome-scale. Sci Rep 10, 22335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79358-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79358-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
