This page has been archived and is no longer updated
DNA fingerprints from fingerprints
Author: Roland A. H. van Oorschot
Keywords
Keywords for this Article
Add keywords to your Content
Save
|
Cancel
Share
|
Cancel
Revoke
|
Cancel
Rate & Certify
Rate Me...
Rate Me
!
Comment
Save
|
Cancel
Flag Inappropriate
The Content is
Objectionable
Explicit
Offensive
Inaccurate
Comment
Flag Content
|
Cancel
Delete Content
Reason
Delete
|
Cancel
Close
Full Screen
"Nature � Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1997 1. Koch, P. L. et al. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 108, 277?287 (1992). 2. Fisher, R. S. & Stueber, A. M. Wat. Resour. Res. 12, 1061?1068 (1976). 3. Graustein, W. C. & Armstrong, R. L. Science 219, 289?292 (1983). 4. �berg, G., Jacks, G. & Hamilton, P. J. J. Hydrol. 109, 65?78 (1989). 5. Miller, E. K., Blum, J. D. & Friedland, A. J. Nature 362, 438?441 (1993). 6. Bailey, S. W., Hornbeck, J. W., Driscoll, C. T. & Gaudette, H. E. Wat. Resour. Res. 32, 707?719 (1996). 7. Simkiss, K. in The Ageing of Fish (ed. Bagenal, T. B.) 1?12 (Unwin, Old Woking, 1974). 8. Graustein, W. C. in Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research (eds Rundel, P. W., Ehleringer, J. R. & Nagy, K. A.) 491?512 (Springer, New York, 1989). 9. Kalish, J. M. Fish. Bull. US 88, 657?666 (1989). 10. Limburg, K. E. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 119, 25?35 (1995). 11. Chamberlain, C. P. et al. Oecologia 109, 132?141 (1997). 12. Campana, S. E. & Neilson, J. D. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 1014?1032 (1985). 13. Hodell, D. A., Mueller, P. A., McKenzie, J. A. & Mead, G. A. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 92, 165?178 (1989). dles (n46, mean 17.8 ng DNA), a mug (n41, 6.8 ng), a glass (n41, 34 ng) as well as new vinyl gloves worn for 20 to 90 min (n48, mean 51 ng) gave the genetic profile of the holder or wearer. We found alleles in addition to those of the wearer in samples from two of the gloves, which could be due to secondary transfer. We also found that swabs of the inside of worn (1 min) condoms (n44), where no ejaculation occurred, also provide the wearer?s genetic profile (mean 11.2 ng DNA). This is rele- vant to some sexual offence investigations. DNA yields from swabs of polypropyl- ene tubes held for varying lengths of time (5 s, 30 s, 3 min, 10 min), did not differ sig- nificantly, indicating that substantial trans- fer of material occurs during initial contact. Objects handled by many individuals all produced profiles with multiple alleles of varying intensity. To determine the effect of multiple handlers, we exchanged poly- propylene tubes between individuals (2 or 3, 10 min each) with different genotypes. Although the material left by the last holder was usually present on the tube, that of pre- vious holders was also retrieved to varying extents. The strongest profile obtained was not always that of the person who last held the object, but was dependent on the indi- vidual. We regularly observed profiles of previous holders of a tube from swabs of hands involved in these exchanges, showing that in some cases material from which DNA can be retrieved is transferred from object to hand (secondary transfer). Also, hands swabbed before and after a one-minute handshake revealed the transfer of DNA from one individual to another in one of the four hands tested. Thus genetic profiles from objects handled by several people or from minute blood stains on touched objects may be difficult to interpret. There are many cases in which the gen- etic profile of individuals who may have handled or touched particular objects asso- ciated with a crime could be extremely important to an investigation. Our methods have already been used at our laboratory to provide evidence in attempted murder, rape, armed robbery, extortion and drug- trafficking cases. Roland A. H. van Oorschot Maxwell K. Jones Victoria Forensic Science Centre, Victoria Police, Macleod, Victoria 3085, Australia 1. van Oorschot, R. A. H., Gutowski, S. J., Robinson, S. L., Hedley, J. A. & Andrew, I. R. J. Forensic Sci. 41, 142?145 (1996). 2. Higuchi, R., von Beroldingen, C. H., Sensabaugh, G. F. & Erlich, H. A. Nature 332, 543?546 (1988). 3. Hagelberg, E., Sykes, B. & Hedges, R. Nature 342, 485 (1989). 4. Hagelberg, E., Gray, I. C. & Jeffreys, A. J. Nature 352, 427?429 (1991). 5. Brinkman, B., Rand, S. & Bajanowski, T. Int. J. Legal Med. 105, 59?61 (1992). 6. Hochmeister, M. N. et al. Int. J. Legal Med. 104, 229?233 (1991). 7. van Oorschot, R. A. H., Gutowski, S. J. & Robinson S. L. Int. J. Legal Med. 107, 121?126 (1994). scientific correspondence NATURE | VOL 387 | 19 JUNE 1997 767 DNA fingerprints from fingerprints Forensic scientists regularly generate genetic profiles from old blood stains, seminal stains, vaginal swabs, hair, bone, urine and cigarette butts 1?6 . We show that an individ- ual?s genetic profile can now also be generat- ed from swabs taken from objects touched by hands, providing a new tool for crime scene investigations. Our findings also demonstrate the need for caution when handling exhibits and when interpreting results. We swabbed specific areas of hands and objects with cotton cloth dampened with sterile water, using disposable forceps. We extracted 7 and quantified (ACES 2.0+ pro- gram, Gibco BRL) DNA from these swabs, and typed for a short tandem repeat locus using the polymerase chain reaction 7 . We compared the results with independent typings of blood or buccal samples from participating individuals. Initial tests showed that we could readily obtain correct genetic profiles from swabs taken directly from the palm of a hand (13 of 13). DNA yields varied from 2 to 150 ng (average 48.6 ng). Dry hands and those that had been washed recently tended to provide the least DNA. Swabs of objects handled regularly by specific individuals all provided genetic typ- ings that matched the user. Objects includ- ed: leather briefcase handles (n43, mean 75 ng DNA), pens (n43, mean 1.6 ng), a car key (n41, 1.1 ng), a personal locker handle (n41, 3.7 ng) and telephone hand- sets (n45, mean 10.3 ng). One of the tele- phone handsets also clearly displayed the genetic profile of a known secondary (minor) user. Furthermore, a number of pre-cleaned objects held for a relatively short period of time (15 min) including: plastic knife han- How many replicons make a nodule? Allan Downie, in his commendable News and Views discussion 1 of our work 2 , suggests that a second, non-chromosomal symbiotic replicon could be present in the bacterial Rhizobium species NGR234. So far, our as- yet unpublished work on physical mapping and random sequencing of the NGR234 genome by V. Viprey, C. Freiberg and X. P. has produced no evidence of another plas- mid. Further, the electrophoretic methods we used could visualize the twin symbiotic plasmids (relative molecular mass (M r ) 1210 9 ) of R. meliloti, but in the event con- sistently demonstrated only a single plasmid of M r 3.1210 8 � 2210 7 in NGR234 (refs 3, 4). Thus, although Morrison et al. 5 reported that NGR234 contains two plasmids of M r 3210 8 and 4.5210 8 , it seems unlikely that a second plasmid exists. It is true, however, that some nodulation and other symbiotic genes map to the chromosome 6 . (Inciden- tally, the fixABC cluster is present on pNGR234a.) Xavier Perret, William Broughton LBMPS, Universit� de Gen�ve, 1 chemin de l?Imp�ratrice, 1292 Chamb�sy/Gen�ve, Switzerland e-mail: broughtw@sc2a.unige.ch 1. Downie, A. Nature 387, 352?354 (1997). 2. Freiberg, C. et al. Nature 387, 394?401 (1997). 3. Broughton, W. J., Heycke, N., Meyer z. A., H. & Pankhurst, C. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3093?3097 (1984). 4. Broughton, W. J. et al. Arch. Microbiol. 141, 14?21 (1985). 5. Morrison, N. A. et al. J. Bacteriol. 160, 483?487 (1984). 6. Perret, X., Broughton, W. J. & Brenner, S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 1923?1927 (1991). Unique morphology of the human eye Human eyes have a widely exposed white sclera surrounding the darker coloured iris, making it easy to discern the direction in which they are looking 1 . We compared the external morphology of primate eyes in nearly half of all primate species, and show that this feature is uniquely human. Humans have the largest ratio of exposed sclera in the eye outline, which itself is elongated horizon- tally. We suggest that these are adaptations to extend the visual field by allowing greater eye movement, especially in the horizontal direc- tion, and to enhance the ease of detecting the gaze direction of another individual. We measured three parameters in 88 pri- mate species: an index of exposed sclera size (SSI) in the eye outline, the width?height ratio (WHR) of the eye outline and the scle- ra coloration. Human eyes have the largest Nature � Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1997 SSI and the outline shows extraordinary horizontal elongation. Humans are also the only species with white sclera. We failed to detect any significant sexual or racial differ- ences in these parameters. Although a small number of primates had pale sclera (Macaca sylvanus, M. nemestrina) or brown sclera with small white regions to the side of the iris (Saguinus midas, S. labiatus, Callithrix argentata, Callimico goeldii), almost all other primates examined have similar coloration to that of the skin around the eyes (Fig. 1). SSI correlates with weight and crown? rump length 2,3 (r40.59, P*0.001 in both cases), sitting height (r40.65, P*0.001) and walking height (r40.71, P*0.001) (Fig. 2). Larger SSIs allow the iris a wider range of movement and hence a larger visual field. This may be advantageous to larger species where eye movement becomes increasingly more efficient than head or body movement, especially as comparative eyeball size is smaller in larger animals 4 . In addition, in small species with comparatively large eyeballs in a small skull, muscle space may be seriously limited. We video-recorded various primates eating (18 species, 29 individuals), and counted eye and head movements. The amount of scanning by eye movement alone was correlated with SSI (r40.73, P*0.005) and was high in humans (61 � 28% of hori- zontal scanning, n45) compared with other primates (4.3?24.4%; mean, 10.6%). The highest rate in non-human primates was observed in the chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes (20?35%, n43). WHR is largest in terrestrial species, smallest in arboreal species, with semi-arbo- real species lying in-between (Fig. 1). There is a corresponding high ratio of horizontal to vertical scanning in terrestrial species, as might be expected to suit this lifestyle, and a low ratio in arboreal species. The ratio is correlated with WHR (scanning time ratio: r40.74, P*0.001; frequency ratio: r40.88, P*0.001). scientific correspondence 768 NATURE | VOL 387 | 19 JUNE 1997 Microscopic analysis of Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) eyes showed brown pigmentation of the sclera tissue around the cornea, apparently common in primates and other mammals. This pigmen- tation was thought to reduce glare as it is absent in many nocturnal and crepuscular species 5 , but nocturnal primates (Gelago senegalensis, Tarsius syrichta, Perodicticus potto, Nycticebus coucang and Aotus trivirga- tus) also had coloured sclera and diurnal humans showed no pigmentation. In many primates, gaze direction is important in communication, and direct eye contact often elicits attacks. Sclera pig- mentation to obscure the gaze direction may thus be adaptive 6 . It may also serve to deceive natural predators, as if the predator believes that the prey animal is aware of its presence, it may be less likely to attack 7 . In some nonhuman primates (9 of 10 species examined), sclera coloration of newborns was paler than adults, indicating that infant gaze signals might have special meanings in these species. In all of 14 species examined, including humans, SSI and WHR of new- borns were lower than those of adults. The human sclera is much paler than the facial skin or iris so it is very easy to discern the gaze direction. Predation risk might have decreased with the evolution of enlarged body size and the use of tools and fire. In addition, gaze-signal enhancement might aid the communication required for increased cooperative and mutualistic behaviours to allow group hunting and scavenging. A small change in sclera col- oration may have altered ?gaze-camouflaged? to ?gaze-signalling? eyes. SSI and WHR of human eyes are even larger than those of gorillas, the largest primate, which suggests adaptation for gaze-signal enhancement. The uniqueness of human eye morphology among primates illustrates the difference between humans and other primates in the ability to communicate using gaze signals. Hiromi Kobayashi, Shiro Kohshima Basic Biology, Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology (c/o Faculty of Science), Tokyo Institute of Technology, 12-1, O-okayama 2-chome,Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152, Japan e-mail: hiromi@chem.titech.ac.jp 1. Morris, D. Body Watching (Equinox, Oxford, 1985). 2. Itani, J. & Uehara, S. The Encyclopaedia of Animals (ed. Macdonald, D. W.) (Heibonsha, Tokyo, 1986). 3. Napier, J. R. & Napier, P. H. The Natural History of the Primates (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985). 4. Schultz, A. H. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Old Ser. 26, 389?408 (1940). 5. Duke-Elder, S. S. in System of Ophthalmology (ed. Duke-Elder, S. S.) 453 (Kimpton, London, 1958). 6. Perrett, D. I. & Mistlin, A. J. in Comparative Perception ? Complex Signals (eds Stebbins, W. C. & Berkley, M. A.) 187?215 (Wiley, New York, 1990). 7. Sherman, P. W. Science 197, 1246?1253 (1977). 8. Ohara, K. ONE (Tsukui Shokan, Tokyo, 1970). 9. Gomi, A. Americans 1.0 1994 Los Angels (Fuga Shobo, Tokyo, 1994). 0 50 100 150 200 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Prosimii Ceboidea Cercopithecoidea Hominoidea r = 0.71 P<0.001 SSI 1 2 3 4 5 8 67 11 13 10 12 9 14 W alking height (cm) erratum In the Scientific Correspondence Evidence for stone age cranial surgery by Kurt W. Alt et al. (Nature 387, 360; 1997), the carbon-14 estimate of the age of the human bones was printed incor- rectly. It should have read Utrecht 14 C laboratory sample UtC-5406: 6,155539 radiocarbon years before present, ~5100 BC . 0 1 2345 WHR SSI Hylobates spp. Pan troglodytes Pongo pygmaeus Gorilla gorilla Homo sapiens Terrestrial Semi-arboreal Arboreal (7 species) (34 species) (47 species) (n = 331) (n = 4) (n = 2) (n = 9) (4 species,n =1?2) Galago sp. Macaca thibetana Papio anubis G. gorilla P. pygmaeus Arboreal Semi-arboreal Terrestrial H. lar P. troglodytes Figure 1 Variation of WHR and SSI (mean5s.d.). Difference between habitat types was significant (WHR: F 2,85 418.69, P*0.01, least significant difference, mean square of errors40.058, P*0.01; SSI: F 2,85 4 10.86, P*0.01, least significant difference, mean square of errors 4 0.024, P*0.01). We studied frontal full-face images without obvious facial expression of 387 adult animals (88 species: Prosimii, 10; Ceboidea, 26; Cer- copithecoidea, 43; Hominoidea, 9). Facial images of 80 species were recorded by video camera at the Japan Monkey Centre and those of 8 species (Microcebus sp., Loris tardigradus, Perodicticus potto, Tar- sius sp., Saguinus imperator, Pithecia monachus, Cacajao rubicundus, Cercopithecus hamlyni) were col- lected from books. 182 Japanese, 80 Caucasian 8 and 68 Afro-Caribbean 8,9 adults were observed. Images were analysed using the NIH Image program. WHR4distance between the corners of the eye/longest per- pendicular line between the upper and lower eyelid; SSI4width of exposed eyeball/diameter of iris. Figure 2 Relationship between SSI and walking height. 1, Human (Japanese) male; 2, female; 3, G. gorilla male; 4, female; 5, P. pygmaeus female; 6, Pan troglodytes male; 7, female; 8, P. paniscus male; 9, H. agilis female; 10, H. lar male; 11, female; 12, H. pileatus female; 13, H. syndactylus male; 14, female. "
Add Content to Group
|
Bookmark
|
Keywords
|
Flag Inappropriate
share
Close
Digg
Facebook
MySpace
Google+
Comments
Close
Please Post Your Comment
*
The Comment you have entered exceeds the maximum length.
Submit
|
Cancel
*
Required
Comments
Please Post Your Comment
No comments yet.
Save Note
Note
View
Public
Private
Friends & Groups
Friends
Groups
Save
|
Cancel
|
Delete
Please provide your notes.
Next
|
Prev
|
Close
|
Edit
|
Delete
Genetics
Gene Inheritance and Transmission
Gene Expression and Regulation
Nucleic Acid Structure and Function
Chromosomes and Cytogenetics
Evolutionary Genetics
Population and Quantitative Genetics
Genomics
Genes and Disease
Genetics and Society
Cell Biology
Cell Origins and Metabolism
Proteins and Gene Expression
Subcellular Compartments
Cell Communication
Cell Cycle and Cell Division
Scientific Communication
Career Planning
Loading ...
Scitable Chat
Register
|
Sign In
Visual Browse
Close
Comments
CloseComments
Please Post Your Comment