Many scientists consider peer review a crucial part of science, but are frustrated by its perceived failures. Historian of science Melinda Baldwin suggests we consider peer review’s historical development to better understand its present-day form.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldwin, M. To reform peer review, we need to understand its past. Nat Rev Phys 3, 600–601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00354-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00354-x
This article is cited by
-
Physics does not exist in a vacuum
Nature Reviews Physics (2024)
-
Peer review in a changing world
Nature Reviews Physics (2023)
-
140 k vs 40 k! Does this journal need short papers?
Bio-Design and Manufacturing (2022)