Alternatives for in vivo assays for drug testing have been proposed to solve open issues, such as costs, ethical, and logistical problems. One option is the chicken embryo. Here, we discuss its use as an experimental model for drug testing as well as limitations that researchers who want to work with the model should consider.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Transcriptomic analysis reveals the dynamic changes of transcription factors during early development of chicken embryo
BMC Genomics Open Access 13 December 2022
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Kue, C. S., Tan, K. Y., Lam, M. L. & Lee, H. B. Exp. Anim. 64, 129–138 (2014).
Mete, M. et al. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 32, 1715–1719 (2016).
Abe, C. et al. J. Control. Release 182, 67–72 (2014).
Li, W. et al. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–15 (2019).
Victorelli, F. D. et al. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 153, 273–284 (2020).
Dias, M. F. et al. Biomed. Pharmacother. 103, 1107–1114 (2018).
Vargas, A., Zeisser-Labouèbe, M., Lange, N., Gurny, R. & Delie, F. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59, 1162–1176 (2007).
Gebhardt, D. O. E. & van Logten, M. J. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 13, 316–324 (1968).
Hruba, H. et al. BMC Vet. Res. 15, 209 (2019).
Kurantowicz, N. et al. Int. J. Nanomedicine 12, 2887–2898 (2017).
Korhonen, A., Hemminki, K. & Vainio, H. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 8, 63–69 (1982).
Sadighara, P., Amoli, J. S., Ashrafihelan, J., Aliesfahani, T. & Farkhondeh, T. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 21, 560–563 (2011).
Khosravi, A. et al. PLoS One 13, e0196424 (2018).
Elsayed, M., Mohamed, N., Hatab, M. & Elaroussi, M. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci. 21, (2019).
Ribeiro, L.N.M. & Fonseca, B. B. Future Microbiol. fmb-2020-0118 (2020) https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2020-0118
Ribeiro, L.N.M. et al. Pharmaceutics 12, 769 (2020).
Wakenell, P. S. et al. Avian Dis. 46, 274–280 (2002).
Williams, C. J. & Hopkins, B. A. Poult. Sci. 90, 223–226 (2011).
Vaezirad, M. M., Koene, M. G., Wagenaar, J. A. & van Putten, J. P. M. Vaccine 36, 2139–2146 (2018).
American Veterinary Medical Association. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition. (American Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg, IL, 2020).
Lierz, M. & Korbel, R. J. Exot. Pet Med. 21, 44–58 (2012).
Rosenbruch, M. ALTEX 14, 111–113 (1997).
Aleksandrowicz, E. & Herr, I. ALTEX 32, 143–147 (2015).
Maina, J. N. Structure and Function of the Shell and the Chorioallantoic Membrane of the Avian Egg: Embryonic Respiration. in The Biology of the Avian Respiratory System 219–247 (Springer International Publishing, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44153-5_9
Yuan, L., Tang, Q., Cheng, T. & Xia, N. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 949–961 (2020).
Acknowledgements
To Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” (CNPq) that support our work. To Laudo Laboratório company (especially to Dr. Marcio Botrel, Gustavo Mazer Ferraz and Rogério de Avelar Ferraz) who always support us with Technical experience. To Hy Line and VALO BioMedia Companies that support us with eggs in our research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fonseca, B.B., da Silva, M.V. & de Morais Ribeiro, L.N. The chicken embryo as an in vivo experimental model for drug testing: Advantages and limitations. Lab Anim 50, 138–139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00774-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00774-3