Abstract
Biomass fires impact global atmospheric chemistry. The reactive compounds emitted and formed due to biomass fires drive ozone and organic aerosol formation, affecting both air quality and climate. Direct hydroxyl (OH) Reactivity measurements quantify total gaseous reactive pollutant loadings and comparison with measured compounds yields the fraction of unmeasured compounds. Here, we quantified the magnitude and composition of total OH reactivity in the north-west Indo-Gangetic Plain. More than 120% increase occurred in total OH reactivity (28 sā1 to 64 sā1) and from no missing OH reactivity in the normal summertime air, the missing OH reactivity fraction increased to ~40 % in the post-harvest summertime period influenced by large scale biomass fires highlighting presence of unmeasured compounds. Increased missing OH reactivity between the two summertime periods was associated with increased concentrations of compounds with strong photochemical source such as acetaldehyde, acetone, hydroxyacetone, nitromethane, amides, isocyanic acid and primary emissions of acetonitrile and aromatic compounds. Currently even the most detailed state-of-the art atmospheric chemistry models exclude formamide, acetamide, nitromethane and isocyanic acid and their highly reactive precursor alkylamines (e.g. methylamine, ethylamine, dimethylamine, trimethylamine). For improved understanding of atmospheric chemistry-air quality-climate feedbacks in biomass-fire impacted atmospheric environments, future studies should include these compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Biomass burning is a widespread practice globally1, which causes soil nutrient loss and impacts atmospheric chemistry, air quality and climate2,3,4. Among all forms of biomass burning, agricultural waste burning is completely anthropogenic and its adverse environmental effects are exacerbated due to the short time period (few weeks) and large area, over which the activity occurs1. Of more than 3700 Tg of agricultural residue produced every year globally5, 10ā25% is burnt openly1, injecting several hundred million metric tonnes of reactive pollutants into the atmosphere3,6,7. The north-western Indo-Gangetic Plain (N.W. IGP) is a critical demographic region of the world that serves as the agricultural ābread basketā of South Asia. Due to increasing anthropogenic activities, there is concern that air pollution in the form of increased surface ozone is adversely affecting crop yields8. A multi-year study has recently documented frequent exceedances in the 8h average national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone9 (>60 % annually). In particular, the summertime air influenced by emissions from the agricultural biomass fires9 is characterized by the highest ambient ozone during the year. Approximately 67.7 Tg of agricultural residue is burnt over 9593 km2 cropland annually10, in the N.W. IGP.
Controlled combustion of various biomass fuels under laboratory conditions have revealed presence of greater than 500 different volatile organic compounds (VOCs)11,12,13 differing in their reactivity, health effects and ability to form climate active constituents such as ozone and organic aerosol14. Grab sampling experiments which involve collection of ambient smoke plumes directly from the fires in the agricultural fields in pressurized glass flasks/stainless steel canisters followed by subsequent analysis in the laboratory, further allow comparison of laboratory and field determined emission ratios and emission factors for specific kind of biomass fuels15. However, the quanta of additional atmospheric reactivity introduced due to such fires11,12 as well as the identity and photochemical transformations of the primary emissions in ambient conditions are still poorly understood. In particular, we still do not know whether all important compounds involved in this process have been identified and accounted for in atmospheric models. The oxidizing efficiency of the atmosphere depends primarily on the concentration of ambient hydroxyl radicals (OH)16,17,18. Thus, the presence of additional/unmeasured compounds that can deplete hydroxyl radicals, also has implications for the chemical lifetime of greenhouse gases such as methane, for which the main removal pathway is reaction with hydroxyl radicals18. Moreover, gas to particle conversion of reactive gases can influence the growth and properties of cloud condensation nuclei, thereby potentially affecting even the hydrological cycle19.
Direct measurement of the total gas phase OH reactivity (mentioned as OH reactivity henceforth) provides a measure of the total gaseous reactive pollutant burden20 and fraction of unmeasured reactive VOCs in an atmospheric environment by comparison with the calculated OH reactivity due to the measured OH reactants21. The total OH reactivity is defined as the summation over products of the concentration of the OH reactant [Xi] (e.g. Xiā=āCO, VOCs, NO2 etc.) and its rate coefficient with the hydroxyl radical (kOH+Xi), expressed mathematically as:
This is analytically a very challenging measurement22 as there can be thousands of OH reactants in most atmospheric environments23. While previous OH reactivity measurements in forested, urban and suburban sites have improved understanding of emissions in these environments17,21,24,25, no such investigation of the effects of open agricultural biomass fires using direct OH reactivity measurements in ambient environments exist. Considering the dual effect of fire emissions on production and loss of hydroxyl radicals, their impact on atmospheric oxidation chemistry is still uncertain.
Here, we investigated the impact of agricultural fires by measuring a suite of OH reactants and the total OH reactivity of air directly at a regionally representative suburban site located downwind of agricultural fields in the north-west IGP during the summertime pre-harvest non crop-residue fire influenced and post-harvest crop-residue fire influenced periods from March ā May 2013. Detailed analyses of the composition and fraction of missing OH reactivity was undertaken for both periods using a state of the art chemical box model. Further grab sampling and analyses of the chemical emissions from an agricultural biomass fire at the source were also employed for interpretation of the results.
Results
Site description and classification of Non Crop-residue Fire Influenced (NCFI) and Biomass Crop-residue Fire Influenced (CFI) periods
The ambient VOC and trace gas measurements reported here were performed from 28 February 2013 till 31 May 2013 at the IISER Mohali atmospheric chemistry facility (30.679Ā°N, 76.729Ā°E; 310 m a.s.l.), a regionally representative suburban site located in the north-west Indo-Gangetic Plain (N.W. IGP), which has been described in detail in previous works26,27. The three-month long period in 2013 captured the summertime pre-harvest and post-harvest conditions in the N.W. IGP. The year 2013 was not anomalous in terms of emissions and meteorological conditions compared to other years as demonstrated through analyses of multi-year chemical and meteorological data from the site9. Ambient total OH reactivity and VOCs were measured using the VOC-OHM (Volatile Organic Compounds ā OH reactivity Measurement) system described and characterized in detail in Kumar and Sinha28. This technique enables rapid sequential measurements of both ambient VOC concentrations and total OH reactivity at a temporal resolution of 1 minute. The VOC and OH reactivity measurement modes are alternated every ~13 minutes using the same proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS). The schematic and flow layout for sequential measurements of VOCs and OH reactivity can be found in Fig. 1 of Kumar and Sinha28. Details pertaining to VOC measurements using the PTR-MS technique can be found in several comprehensive reviews29,30 and details of the OH reactivity technique can be found in previous works22,31. While most of the technical details are provided in the methods section, some pertinent aspects are provided below.
VOC measurements using PTR-MS are based on the principle of āsoftā chemical ionization mass spectrometry in which hydronium ions (H3O+) act as the primary reagent ions within the instrument. VOCs having a proton affinity greater than that of pure water (165.2 kcal molā1) can typically be detected at a nominal mass to charge ratio (m/z) equal to their molecular weight+1, generally without fragmentation for small organic ions. A PTR-MS equipped with a quadrupole mass analyzer (PTR-QMS) cannot resolve nominal isobaric ions with its unity mass resolution and hence identification of compounds based only on the m/z values can in principle result in overestimations of the true ambient concentrations of compounds. However, reviews29,30 of several studies and inter-comparisons between PTR-MS and other more specific analytical techniques (e.g. gas chromatography based instruments) in diverse environments and plumes have shown that for compounds such as methanol, acetonitrile, acetaldehyde, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, sum of C-9 aromatics and sum of methyl vinyl ketone and methacrolein, only minor contributions from other isobaric compounds have been observed in ambient atmospheric environments. Hence one can be confident of the compound assignment for these species using PTR-QMS. The potential interferences in the mass identification of rarely measured VOCs using PTR-QMS are discussed later (Methods).
Direct OH reactivity measurements were performed during two measurement intensives: from 10 April 2013 till 21 April 2013 to quantify the pre-harvest summertime OH reactivity and from 11 May 2013 till 17 May 2013 to quantify the post-harvest summertime OH reactivity. The most prevalent wind direction at the site was from the north-west (Fig. 1), where the land use is primarily agricultural and rural in nature26 and wheat crop is grown extensively (~3.5 million hectares in the state of Punjab)32. The black circle in Supplementary Fig. 1 shows the location of the site. The N.W. IGP is influenced by the biomass crop residue fires in May, a practice that gained popularity with the introduction of mechanized combine harvesters in 1986. Satellite fire counts data over the region are shown as detected by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)33 installed on two sun-synchronous polar orbiting satellites called Aqua and Terra (red dots in Supplementary Fig. 1). The start and end periods of post-harvest wheat residue fires could be ascertained from the daily satellite fire counts data (shown in inset of Supplementary Fig. 2) and were found to be consistent with enhancements in chemical tracers of biomass fires such as acetonitrile (see Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3)9. In the spatial extent of fires observed by the MODIS satellite, large scale fires are only observed in the states of Punjab and Haryana which majorly consist of irrigated croplands. Significant fires are not observed in the states of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand which comprises of forested regions27, so the occurrence of large scale forest fires during our study period is highly unlikely. As no major highway or industry was reported to have been commissioned in the fetch region upwind of our measurement site9 during the study period, it is also highly unlikely that the traffic related emission sources changed considerably between pre-harvest and post-harvest summertime periods. On the other hand, the crop residue fires were visible regionally, widespread and could be discerned both using satellite fire activity data as well as chemical tracer compounds characteristic of biomass burning.
Figure 1 shows the wind roses indicating the fetch region for the pre-harvest and post-harvest periods reported in this work along with the temperature and relative humidity values (average Ā± 1Ļ ambient variability). The most frequent fetch regions, temperature and relative humidity were similar for both periods. Clear sky conditions were observed during both pre and post-harvest measurement periods except the period from 11 May 2013 (afternoon) till 12 May 2013 (noontime) when cloudy conditions and 16 mm of rainfall occurred. This can also be observed in the solar radiation data shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. To ensure that such washout of pollutants due to rain do not drive the differences between the two measurement periods, the periods with overcast condition and rainfall (shown as blue shaded region in Supplementary Fig. 2) were excluded from further analyses. Consistency of fetch region and meteorological conditions implied that the key difference between both periods were the chemical composition changes due to agricultural biomass fire emissions.
Henceforth, we refer to the period from 10 April 2013 to 21 April 2013 as the pre-harvest Non Crop-residue Fire Influenced period (NCFI) and the period from 11 May 2013 to 17 May 2013 (except 11 May 2013 15:30 to 13 May 2013 11:30 local time) as the post-harvest biomass Crop-residue Fire Influenced period (CFI). These two periods were representative of the extended pre-harvest summertime conditions when the biomass crop residue fires were absent (28 February 2013 to 30 April 2013; termed extended NCFI period) and the post-harvest biomass crop-residue fire influenced period (01 May 2013 to 31 May 2013; termed extended CFI period), respectively. This is also borne by the similarity in the diel concentration profiles derived from measurements performed during the intensives (Supplementary Fig. 3) and profiles of the same compounds, namely acetonitrile, sum of C-9 aromatics, acetaldehyde and acetone, for extended NCFI and extended CFI periods as shown later.
Diel variability and chemical composition analyses of total and calculated OH reactivity
Figure 2 shows the magnitude and diel variability of the total measured OH reactivity (red) and calculated OH reactivity (black) due to measured OH reactants for both NCFI and CFI periods. The calculated OH reactivity shown in Fig. 2 was calculated according to equation (1) using measured concentration of OH reactants listed in Supplementary Table 1 including O3 and SO2. The relevant rate constants for reaction of individual OH reactants with hydroxyl radicals were taken from Atkinson et al.34,35. The pie charts in Fig. 2 further show the contribution of individual OH reactants and the fraction that could be accounted for by the measured compounds. Both the measured and calculated OH reactivity (OHR) increased significantly during CFI periods relative to NCFI periods, with greater than 120 % increase in the average measured OH reactivity (28 sā1 to 64 sā1), accompanied by 40 % increase in the average calculated OH reactivity (15 sā1 to 21 sā1). The missing OH reactivity was the highest in the afternoon (49 %) followed by evening (30 %) and morning (27 %) hours during the NCFI period. However, during the CFI periods, surprisingly the unaccounted fraction of OH reactivity was always higher than that accounted for by the measured OH reactants ranging from as high as 69 % during morning and noon hours to 55 % in the evening hours. This suggests the presence of many new/unmeasured VOCs during the CFI periods, with likely significant contribution from oxidation products. Typically agricultural burning of the wheat straw occurs in the evening or early morning hours36 resulting in large contribution of primary emissions to pollutant loadings. The contribution of non-oxygenated VOCs (isoprene, aromatics, monoterpenes) and carbon monoxide (CO) in the CFI period was less than 27 %, and the maximum occurred during evening hours. Higher variability was also observed in the directly measured total OH reactivity during the CFI period (Supplementary Fig. 2), consistent with rapidly changing VOC concentrations in sampled pollution plumes37. Supplementary Table 1 lists the average, range of peak concentrations (75thā90th percentiles) and enhancements which occurred at a confidence interval greater than 99.9 % for the key measured OH reactants including acetonitrile, a chemical tracer of biomass-fires. Enhancement ratios ranging from 1.5ā2.0 were observed for several reactive VOCs such as methyl ethyl ketone, isoprene, acetaldehyde, and the sum of C-9 aromatic compounds (e.g. trimethylbenzene). Supplementary Table 2 similarly lists the enhancement ratios of additional reactive compounds measured in the same season during the extended NCFI and CFI periods, which also ranged from 1.5ā2.2 for most compounds.
The calculated OH reactivity only accounted for the directly measured OH reactants (total of seventeen gases), which does not include several reactive oxidation products such as pinonaldehyde, formaldehyde, propionaldehyde, glyoxal, methylglyoxal and acrolein which are formed from the measured organic compounds. As oxygenated VOCs are known to contribute significantly towards OH reactivity of biomass burning plumes, it is important to account for them in the OH reactivity calculation11. Further, several compounds known to be emitted from biomass fires such as C2-C5 alkanes/alkenes and their oxidation products were missing from the set of directly measured OH reactants. To account for the contribution of all these important species that were not directly quantified, we therefore applied a detailed 0-D steady-state box model38 employing MCM 3.3.1 chemistry containing 1363 species39, for analyzing the OH reactivity budget in both NCFI and CFI periods. The model was constrained with diel hourly average concentrations of seventeen measured chemical species, methane and hydrogen during respective periods, twelve approximated C2-C5 alkanes and alkenes (Supplementary Tables 1ā3) and meteorological parameters (Methods). For estimating the concentrations of C2-C5 alkanes and alkenes which were not directly measured during our study (Supplementary Table 3), we multiplied the hydrocarbon/CO emission ratios reported by Andreae and Merlet3 in agricultural residue fires with the average CO concentration measured during the CFI period. The hydrocarbon concentrations during the NCFI periods were then estimated by dividing the CFI period concentrations by 1.6, which was the average enhancement ratio of the directly measured VOCs between the CFI and NCFI periods.
Figure 3 summarizes the results which show that the average total OH reactivity in the NCFI period can be fully explained (~95%) by the compounds present in the model (within measurement uncertainty of ~20 %), whereas using the same set of OH reactant compounds and chemistry, the model is able to explain only ~60 % of the total OH reactivity during the CFI periods. Thus a large unexplained missing OH reactivity fraction of ~40% persists. We note that percentage contribution of the modeled oxidation products changed from 20% of 28 sā1 which is 5.6 sā1 in NCFI period to 16% of 64 sā1, which is 10.2 sā1 in CFI period (Fig. 3). So in terms of absolute magnitude the contribution increased significantly (by 82%) relative to the NCFI period. This points to the increased contribution of photochemically formed reactive compounds to the total measured OH reactivity during the CFI periods. Increased initial concentrations of measured compounds definitely led to higher concentration of the model calculated oxidation products.
For many of the rarely measured VOCs (Supplementary Table 2), a calibration gas standard was unavailable and so the total uncertainty of the measurement for these VOCs is ~30%. To assess how much the 30 % concentration uncertainty for rarely measured VOCs could affect our OH reactivity calculations and hence our conclusion of the large missing OH reactivity during the CFI periods, model runs were performed for the NCFI and CFI periods with 30 % higher concentrations of rarely measured VOCs compared to the actual measurements. We found that doing so reduced the missing OH reactivity fraction only to 3 % (from 5 %) in the NCFI period and to 37 % (from 39 %) in CFI period. Model sensitivity runs were also performed assuming minimum and maximum rate constants for the lumped species (e.g. sum of C-8 aromatics, sum of C-9 aromatics and sum of monoterpenes) to provide upper and lower bounds (assuming the least reactive or most reactive compound contributed to the entire measured m/z) of the missing OH reactivity (Supplementary Note 1). The change in values of missing OH reactivity relative to present values reported in Fig. 3 (5 % missing in NCFI and 39 % missing in CFI), still resulted in no missing OH reactivity in NCFI period (within uncertainty of measurements) and less than 6 % reduction in missing OH reactivity for the CFI period. Thus, the conclusion concerning a large fraction of unexplained OH reactivity in the CFI period remained unaffected. For estimating the concentrations of C2-C5 alkanes and alkenes which were not directly measured, we did not subtract the background CO concentrations. Generally enhancements in CO are used to estimate concentrations of hydrocarbons when multiplying by the VOC/CO emission ratios. In order to assess the magnitude of change in missing OH reactivity due to this, we undertook the following calculation. Given that the measured average CO in CFI period was 395 ppb (Supplementary Table 1) and the 10th percentile of CO data (reasonable to consider as the background CO) in CFI period was 150 ppb, the resulting increase in missing OH reactivity due to lower approximated C2-C5 alkanes/alkenes concentrations, was found to be less than 3% in CFI period and less than 2% in NCFI period. Thus, no significant bias arises in the missing OH reactivity fraction during CFI and NCFI periods due to the current method of estimating the C2-C5 hydrocarbon concentrations. In addition to the C2-C5 alkanes and alkenes, larger alkanes/alkenes and furans are known to be emitted from agricultural residue fires3. Using the emission ratio with respect to CO and the concentration enhancement in CO, we have estimated the concentration and subsequently the OH reactivity of 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-hexene, n-hexane, isohexane, heptane, octene, 2-methylfuran, ethylfuran, dimethylfuran, tetrahydrofuran, benzofuran and furfural in the CFI period. The total OH reactivity due these species during the CFI period is 0.35āsā1 which is ~0.5% of the directly measured total OH reactivity. Again the missing OH reactivity fraction remains virtually unchanged.
Figure 4 shows the strong enhancements that occurred during the CFI period in the concentrations of acetonitrile (a chemical marker compound for biomass-burning), sum of C-9 aromatics (trimethylbenzenes), as well as acetaldehyde and acetone which are emitted from biomass fires but are also formed photochemically due to oxidation of precursor compounds emitted from the fires such as C2-C5 alkanes and alkenes40. Surprisingly, we also observed much higher photochemical formation rates in rarely measured VOCs like hydroxyacetone and butane-2,3-dione and strong enhancements in ambient concentrations of photochemically formed nitrogenous compounds e.g. nitromethane and isocyanic acid (HNCO) during the CFI periods. The slope of the line fit from sunrise (05:00 local time) till attainment of peak daytime concentrations for hydroxyacetone increased from 0.27 ppb hā1 in the NCFI period to 0.54 ppb hā1 in the CFI period whereas that of butane-2,3-dione increased from 0.19 ppb hā1 to 0.43 ppb hā1 between NCFI and CFI periods. The removal of HNCO from the atmosphere takes place primarily through wet and dry deposition, since the two major gas phase pathways, reaction with hydroxyl radical (OH) and photolysis are slow41. The solubility of HNCO and its kinetics imply lifetimes due to heterogeneous removal on the order of days to a few weeks42, which would be even slower under the extremely dry conditions of the Indian pre-monsoon summer season (RH as low as 15% in the daytime9). Thus HNCO would have a high accumulation tendency under such conditions. The precursor of isocyanic acid through hydroxyl radical initiated oxidation is formamide41 which in turn can be formed from hydroxyl radical initiated oxidation of methylamine (Supplementary Note 2). Further, formation of nitromethane can occur from ozone initiated oxidation of dimethylamine. With the PTR-MS technique dimethylamine, ethylamine and formamide can be detected at m/z 46 after protonation. Similarly trimethylamine and acetamide can be detected at m/z 60 after protonation. Since dimethylamine, ethylamine and trimethylamine cannot be formed photochemically, we attributed the signals to be majorly due to oxidation products of amine oxidation i.e. formamide at m/z 46 and acetamide at m/z 60 for the daytime data (Supplementary Fig. 4). However for the night time data, there could certainly be equally significant contribution from both the alkylamines and amides. The diel variation of m/z 46 and m/z 60 (Supplementary Fig. 4) measured with the PTR-MS clearly show strong evening time secondary peaks only during the CFI periods. These peaks would coincide very nicely with the timing of the fire activity (evening). Further it is known from laboratory studies and has been reported by Stockwell, et al.12 (Supplement) that burning of many agricultural residues (e.g. African grass, wheat residue, paddy residue, alfalfa, hay, sugarcane and sawgrass) emits several alkylamines. It appears that higher concentrations of both amines and amides emitted at night during CFI periods tend to accumulate and just after sunrise trigger photochemical production of the oxidation products such as amides, nitromethane and isocyanic acid. As the concentrations of the precursor compounds are higher in the CFI periods, the rate of photochemical formation which depends on the concentration of the precursor compounds is also higher in CFI period.
Discussion
Potential contributors to the missing OH reactivity
Hydroxyacetone and butane-2,3-dione are formed primarily as photo-oxidation products of isoprene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene39,43 with some direct emission also having been observed from agricultural crop residue fires in laboratory studies12. The photochemical formation of nitromethane is likely driven by ozone initiated atmospheric oxidation of compounds such as trimethylamine which also has high OH reactivity (Table 1). Significant photochemical formation of formamide and acetamide was also observed in the daytime data during CFI period. The photochemical formation of several first and second generation photochemical oxidation products of amines e.g. formamide, acetamide, nitromethane and isocyanic acid strongly suggest that their precursor compounds such as alkylamines are also being emitted from crop residue fires. Both agricultural biomass fires and animal husbandry activities12,44 are recognized as major atmospheric sources of alkylamines. Considering that the fetch region was similar during both the NCFI and CFI periods, and there was no evidence for substantial increase in animal husbandry activities between the two periods, we surmise that the agricultural biomass fires are a likely source for the emission of alkylamines. While the OH reactivity contribution of nitromethane, isocyanic acid, butane-2,3-dione and hydroxyacetone is collectively less than 2 sā1 in the CFI period, their reactive precursors such as alkylamines have very high OH reactivity (see Table 1) and could help explain a significant fraction of the missing OH reactivity. Figure 5 shows the correlation of the increased OH reactivity between CFI and NCFI periods with absolute concentration increases between CFI and NCFI periods of photochemically formed and nitrogen containing compounds such as hydroxyacetone, nitromethane, sum of formamide and C-2 amines, sum of acetamide and trimethylamine, acetone and acetonitrile. The individual points in the different panels were derived by calculating the differences between CFI and NCFI periods using the average diel profile data of measured OH reactivities (shown in Fig. 2), hydroxyacetone, nitromethane, acetone and acetonitrile (shown in Fig. 4) and the data for sum of formamide and C-2 amines (m/z 46), sum of acetamide and trimethylamine (m/z 60) shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. Acetonitrile being a chemical marker for biomass burning is a proxy for primary fire emissions and its good correlation with the enhanced OH reactivity observed during CFI periods indicates that primary fire emissions which could not be measured likely contributed to the high OH reactivity in CFI period. The highest correlation (r ā„ 0.8) was observed for sum of formamide and C-2 amines (m/z 46), sum of acetamide and trimethylamine (m/z 60), suggesting that nitrogen containing compounds may be playing a key role in driving the enhanced OH reactivity during the CFI period. Further, the good correlation (r ā„ 0.6) of the enhanced OH reactivity in the CFI periods with hydroxyacetone, nitromethane, and acetone, all compounds which were observed to have a strong photochemical source in our measured dataset, also suggests that oxidation products of precursor compounds emitted from the fires contributed to the high measured OH reactivity in the CFI period. Based on chamber oxidation studies of OH radical initiated oxidation of trimethylamine, 1 ppb of trimethylamine can yield 0.75 ppb of formaldehyde (HCHO) and trace amounts of less reactive nitrogen containing VOCs (amides and N-nitroamines)45. Using the product yields and the relevant rate constants for reaction of these oxidation products with OH radicals, the presence of an additional 14 ppb of trimethylamine like reactive compounds and the extra photo-oxidation products45 formed thereof, could account for the entire missing OH reactivity fraction of ~40% (25 sā1) observed during the CFI period. While we are not suggesting that a high concentration of 14 ppb of only trimethylamine would be present in ambient air, the point is that given that dimethylamine, ethylamine and methylamine have rate constants with the hydroxyl radical which are of the same order of magnitude (10ā11 cm3 moleculeā1sā1; Table 1), and the observed diel profiles of m/z 46 and m/z 60 show values as high as 12 ppb and 3 ppb at night (m/z at which methylamine and ethylamine can contribute significantly at night), and the consideration that approximately 150 amines have been detected in ambient air44 with smoke being a major source of amines, it is plausible that collectively amines could explain a major fraction of the missing OH reactivity in the crop residue fire impacted periods.
Grab sampling of wheat residue fires in a nearby agricultural field (30.652Ā° N, 76.709Ā° E, 305 m a.s.l.) under ambient smoldering (low modified combustion efficiency (MCE)) and flaming wheat straw fire stages yielded extremely high emission factors of several compounds during the smoldering stage of the fire (Table 2). Biomass combustion experiments conducted in laboratory studies11 are based primarily on data from flaming stage fires. In the real world, such smoldering fires can persist for hours and the āpoorā combustion conditions are rarely captured and characterized in laboratory studies. Considering that the temperatures are really high (~40 Ā°C)9 during May in north-west IGP, in order to keep fires from spreading out of control, we noted that farmers do sprinkle water at the border of certain patches in their field. This practice could certainly contribute to smoldering fires characterized by low combustion efficiency at-least for several patches in a large agricultural field. Moreover the straws are less than 1 foot above the ground and root-bound at the time of fire, which can contribute to a lowering of the MCE. As the VOC emission factors of flaming stage fires are significantly lower than the smoldering stage, we believe our grab sampling experiment results support the contention that several compounds may be underestimated/unreported as emissions from biomass fires. Additionally, the high reactivity due to photochemically formed pollutants in the ambient atmospheric environments would escape notice in the laboratory studies focused on characterizing the primary emissions. The relevance of the reported emission factors for the smoldering stage fires in our study is that they demonstrate that several compounds with negligible emission factors in the flaming stage can have really high emission factors in the smoldering stage. As we could not sample statistically significant number of fires, it would be inappropriate to use them as representative values, but they are sufficient evidence for the primary point, that the reduced nitrogen compounds can be emitted in large quantities and this is the new insight of the emission factor data reported here.
Implications for regional air quality and climate
Total OH reactivity provides a measure of all gaseous reactive pollutants that are directly emitted and formed by atmospheric oxidation of the emissions. The large missing OH reactivity during periods affected by agricultural fires has major implications for understanding the formation of tropospheric ozone and other secondary pollutants in biomass fire impacted atmospheric environments (Fig. 6). It reveals that in the biomass fire impacted periods almost half of the reactive atmospheric chemical composition is unknown and therefore their chemical feedbacks are not considered in typical models and field studies. For example, atmospheric oxidation of hydroxyacetone forms HO2 radicals (Supplementary Note 3), which may be an important atmospheric pathway for reforming hydroxyl radicals and sustaining/enhancing oxidizing efficiency in a polluted environment. It has previously been shown9 that the maximum number of exceedance events in the 8h NAAQS for ozone in India (100 Āµg mā3) occurred in the north-west Indo-Gangetic Plain during the month of May, which is strongly affected by the crop residue biomass fires. 29 and 30 out of 31 days in the years 2012 and 2013, respectively were out of compliance9. It was also observed in that study9, that the ozone enhancement increased from 19 ppb to 28 ppb between pre-harvest and post-harvest summertime air of the north-west IGP for the air masses with high residence time over the burnt agricultural fields.
Several previous studies from the Indo-Gangetic plain region (for example Rajput, et al.46 and Ram, et al.47) have also reported direct emissions and secondary formation of carbonaceous aerosol particles such as elemental carbon and organic carbon including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the agricultural residue fires. Based on the estimates by Rajput, et al.46 circa 26% and ~7% of the PM2.5 mass fraction is organic carbon and elemental carbon respectively in the wheat residue emissions from the IGP region. PM data from IISER Mohali atmospheric chemistry facility27, during the period of our study show that between the NCFI and CFI periods, the average mass concentration of PM2.5 increased from 57 Āµg mā3 to 100 Āµg mā3 whereas for PM10 it increased from 128 Āµg mā3 to 213 Āµg mā3 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Wheat residue fires in the summertime have already been reported to increase the number of NAAQS exceedance events for both PM10 and PM2.5 in the north-west IGP. Garg, et al.48 have previously also reported co-emission of black carbon in three wheat residue fire plumes in May 2013. Calculation of the Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) production potential due to measured concentrations of toluene, benzene, xylene, isoprene and monoterpenes using the method used in Sarkar, et al.49, showed a 40% enhancement in SOA production potential due to these compounds between the NCFI (4.1 Āµg mā3) and CFI period (5.8 Āµg mā3). Detailed studies of SOA formation processes in similar biomass fire impacted atmospheric environments, also considering the role of amides and alkylamines which can participate in particle formation and growth processes50 may be very important and will require further investigations.
Exposure to elevated concentrations of isocyanic acid has been documented to pose health risks41 and it is worth noting that the average hourly concentrations were always >1 ppb during the CFI periods. While alkylamines and amides can cause irritation in eye, skin and respiratory system upon high exposure, atmospheric oxidation of alkylamines in the presence of nitrogen oxides can also produce carcinogens like dimethylnitrosamine and dimethylnitramine (Supplementary Note 2)44, which together with benzene, another known carcinogen emitted from the fires could pose enhanced health risks36,51.
We therefore conclude that a larger suite of compounds and chemical reactions needs to be considered for improved understanding of atmospheric chemistry-air quality-climate feedbacks in biomass-fire impacted atmospheric environments and incorporating direct OH reactivity measurements would also aid for understanding such important processes globally. Currently even the most detailed state-of-the-art atmospheric chemistry models and the chemical mechanisms used therein (Supplementary Table 4) exclude formamide, acetamide, nitromethane and isocyanic acid and their highly reactive precursor alkylamines (e.g. methylamine, ethylamine, dimethylamine, trimethylamine).
All the major compounds detected in the wheat stubble fires are also emitted from a large variety of biomass fuels burnt across various parts of world12, including different types of crop residue, natural grasses and wood. However, the variation in the modified combustion efficiency and fuel type does change the emission factors of the VOCs. Emission factors during the flaming stage are not particularly high for wheat when compared to other fuel types. Thus while designing the ambient studies, it is important to take into account the major known emissions as highlighted in previous works (e.g. Stockwell, et al.12, Akagi, et al.52) and also discussed in our work. Emission factor recommendations for model predictions3,53 typically use emission factors over the MCE range of 0.80ā0.99. In order to accurately account for the emissions from the smoldering stages of biomass fires globally, emission factors at lower MCE54, which can be significantly higher for some compounds should also be studied in detail in laboratory chamber studies of fires (if possible) and included in emission inventories used for model predictions.
As shown in this study incorporating direct OH reactivity measurements aids in accounting for the total gas phase reactivity and missing compounds. Future studies in the biomass burning affected regions including direct measurements of OH radicals and major OH radical production pathways in addition to the OH reactivity, could be very interesting also from the perspective of whether āshiftsā in chemistry17,55 occur and if so determining the net impact on the oxidation capacity of such perturbed atmospheric environments.
Methods
Sampling details
All the instrument inlets were co-located at ~20 m above ground26. The inlets were made from Teflon tubing and protected from dust using inline Teflon particle filters26, which were changed every seven days. The facility is positioned on the rooftop and the short inlets resulted in inlet residence times <8ās. The PTR-MS was housed in a separate room on the first floor and had a longer Teflon inlet line (12 m).
Measurements of total OH reactivity and VOCs using a PTR-MS
The PTR-MS instrument used in this work has been characterized in detail in previous works from our group26,36. The instrument was operated at a drift-tube voltage of 600V, pressure of 2.2 mbar and temperature of 333 K corresponding to E/N ratio of ~135 Townsend. The primary ion was greater than 7.5āĆā106 cps (counts per second) and the impurity ions e.g. NO+ and O2+ were less than 0.3% and 3.9% respectively of the primary ion. The dwell time at m/z channels corresponding to the individual VOCs was 1s. The measured counts per second (cps) at each m/z channel was normalized to a total primary ion count of 1āĆā106 cps as the sum of the primary (H3O+) and the first water cluster ions ((H2O) H3O+), drift tube pressure of 2 mbar and drift tube temperature of 298 K. Dynamic dilution of VOC gas standards (Apel-Riemer Environmental, Inc., Colorado, USA) containing a mixture of 12 VOCs at ~500 ppb was used to experimentally obtain the sensitivity in normalized cps/ppb, for methanol, acetonitrile, acetaldehyde, acetone, isoprene, methyl vinyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, benzene, toluene, p-xylene, 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene and alpha-pinene26. For other compounds reported in this work, the sensitivities were determined theoretically29:
where \({k}_{VOC+{H}_{3}{O}^{+}}\)ā=āRate constant of proton transfer from H3O+ to VOC
Lā=āLength of drift tube (9.2 cm)
\({\mu }_{o}\)ā=āReduced mobility of H3O+ ions (2.8 cm2 Vā1 sā1)56
Nā=āNumber density of gases in the drift tube
Eā=āElectric field across the drift tube
\(\frac{{T}_{VOC{H}^{+}}}{{T}_{{H}_{3}{O}^{+}}}\)ā=āRatio of transmission efficiency of protonated VOC ion and H3O+ ion
The values of \({k}_{VOC+{H}_{3}{O}^{+}}\) for different VOCs were taken from Zhao and Zhang57 and the transmission efficiencies at different m/z channels for our instrument were used for calculation of respective sensitivity factors. We found that the differences between the sensitivity factors derived using calibration experiments and theoretically derived sensitivity factors for the compounds were within 30% of each other. This is consistent with the predicted accuracy of PTR-MS measurements as proton transfer reactions typically occur at the collisional-limit and without specific calibration standards, the accuracy is better than 40%58. The detection limit of PTR-MS was typically less than 100 ppt28. The measurement uncertainty was less than 16% for all VOCs where experimentally determined sensitivities were obtained through calibrations. Assignment of m/z ratios (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) to specific compounds was done after careful consideration of the known fragmentation issues at certain m/z, potential isobaric interferences (discussed below), ambient profiles, and changes in instrumental background.
Potential interferences in mass identification using PTR-MS
Butane-2,3-dione
Methacrylic acid, crotonic acid, pentanal, pent-2-one, pent-3-one can interfere with butane-2,3-dione at m/z 87, but these compounds have been reported to cause interferences only in the forested environments59. Previous studies reporting PTR-MS measurements from suburban locations or from biomass burning plumes have attributed m/z 87 to butane-2,3-dione only12,49.
Formamide and acetamide
The signal for acetamide was corrected for 3.4% of acetone contribution at m/z 60 due to the 13C isotope60. This accounted for ~15ā20% correction in acetamide concentration in general. Similarly, the signal for formamide was corrected for the 2.5% contribution of acetaldehyde due to 13C isotope at m/z 46.
Hydroxyacetone
Butanol isomers, diethyl ether and propionic acid also contribute to m/z 75 when measured with a PTR-MS, but previous studies have found hydroxyacetone to be the main contributor49,59.
Isoprene
With a PTR-QMS both isoprene and furan are detected at m/z 69. However, with the deployment of the VOC-OHM technique in the month of May at our measurement site, we were able to conclude that the VOC detected at m/z is primarily isoprene28. However, even if the contribution of furan at m/z 69 increases due to crop-residue fires, the calculated OH reactivity will decrease due to the lower rate constant of furan (4.01āĆā10ā11 cm3 moleculeā1 sā1)61 for reaction with hydroxyl radicals. Hence the missing OH reactivity fraction will only increase further and bolster our conclusion that crop residue fires lead to a large unexplained OH reactivity further.
OH reactivity measurements by VOC-OHM technique are based on the comparative Reactivity method22. An initial concentration (C1) of a reagent molecule (pyrrole, C4H5N) is allowed to react with zero air and ambient air respectively in different steps in the presence of synthetically generated OH radicals inside the glass reactor. In the step where only pyrrole, nitrogen and zero air enter the reactor, pyrrole completely titrates OH radicals generated inside the reactor, and its concentration is C2 in this stage. The difference in pyrrole concentration between stage C1 and C2 yields the net available OH radical concentration inside the reactor. When the incoming flow of zero air inside the reactor is replaced by an equivalent flow of ambient air, there is a competition between compounds present in the ambient air and pyrrole for reaction with the net available OH radicals. The pyrrole concentration in this stage (termed C3) is higher than that in the previous stage (C2). Solving for competitive kinetics inside the glass reactor yields the total OH reactivity of the ambient air (\({R}_{air}\)) which is only dependent on the measured pyrrole concentrations in different steps of the experiment and the rate constant for the reaction of pyrrole with OH radicals (\({k}_{p}\)).
The measurement in the C3 stage is preceded and followed by C2 measurement. Hence for estimation of total OH reactivity using E3, interpolation of the C2 measurements performed before and after the C3 are necessary. In the C3 stage, ~170 sccm of ambient air was sucked into the reactor which was diluted by the total flow through the CRM reactor (~275 sccm). Hence the OH reactivity obtained using Equation (3) was multiplied by the dilution factor (~1.6) to quantify the total OH reactivity of ambient air. Since the total OH reactivity is determined for pseudo first order conditions, a correction factor is applied for slight deviations. This correction factor is calculated numerically62 by allowing different concentrations of an OH reactant (e.g. propane) to react with OH radicals at the pyrrole/OH concentration ratio used during the experiments22,28. During the two measurement periods reported in this study, the pyrrole/OH ratio varied between 1.8 and 2.7. The accuracy of the method was checked using propane standards of known Reactivity during both the measurement periods. Supplementary Fig. 5 shows the results highlighting good reproducibility, linearity (r2ā=ā0.98) and accountability (slopeā=ā1.06) for the introduced reactivity over the entire dynamic range for experiments performed on 19 April 2013 during the NCFI period and on 17 May 2013 during the CFI period. The maximum introduced reactivity of 91 sā1 during these tests actually represent 146 sā1 under ambient condition taking into account the dilution inside the reactor. The detection limit for OH reactivity measurements was 4.5 sā1 and the total uncertainty was 18.8 %28.
OH reactivity measurements performed using CRM method on which our VOC-OHM system is based are known to have interferences due to following two factors:
-
1.
Humidity difference between C2 and C3 steps of measurement which results in different amount of net available OH radicals inside the reactor for reaction with pyrrole and zero air (C2 step) and pyrrole mixed with ambient air (C3 step).
-
2.
OH recycling due to the reaction between HO2 and NO in an environment where ambient NO concentrations exceed 10 ppb.
Use of an advanced Gas Calibration Unit (GCU-A, Ionimed Analytik) for generation of zero air directly from the ambient air, matches the humidity to that of ambient air and no significant humidity difference between C2 and C3 steps were observed during our measurements using the VOC-OHM method28.
During the measurement periods reported in this work, ambient NO concentrations were generally less than 2 ppb barring seven short peaks in which concentrations reached ~10 ppb (20 April 2013 19:37ā19:43, 21 April 2013 14:30ā14:35, 13 May 2013 11:48ā14:19, 14 May 2013 13:00ā13:55, 14 May 2013 06:00ā07:30, 16 May 2013 07:50ā08:00 and 16 May 2013 23:30ā23:40 L.T.). During most of these events, the VOC-OHM system was in C2 step when ambient air was not being sampled or in the ambient VOC measurement mode. The OH reactivity data removed due to NO peaks of 10 ppb was therefore less than ~4.5 % of the total measured OH reactivity data.
Grab sampling of biomass fire plumes
Samples of plumes from flaming (modified combustion efficiencyā=ā0.99) and smoldering (modified combustion efficiencyā=ā0.43) stages of wheat residue fires were collected in pressurized glass flasks wrapped with aluminium foil15 directly at an agricultural field in Raipur Khurad, Mohali (30.652Ā° N, 76.709Ā° E, 305 m a.s.l.) on 2 May 2015 in the evening time (17:30ā18:00 local time). Ambient air samples were also collected in separate glass flasks from the field before the fires were lit after ensuring there were no active nearby fires, to establish the background concentrations at the field site. All the whole air samples collected in the glass flasks were then transported and analyzed within 5 hours of sample collection at the IISER Mohali Atmospheric Chemistry Facility using the PTR-QMS instrument in ion selective mode with a dwell time of 1s. The emission factors of VOCs were calculated for flaming and smoldering stages as described in Chandra, et al.15.
Ancillary measurements
Carbon monoxide (CO), sum of nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3) and meteorological parameters such as solar radiation, ambient temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction were measured continuously at a time resolution of one minute. CO, NOx and O3 measurements from the site have already been analyzed and reported from September 2011 to September 20139, along with a detailed description of the sampling methodology and calibration protocol9,26,51. Briefly, CO, NOx, SO2 and O3 measurements were performed using gas filter correlation non-dispersive infra-red (GFC-NDIR) technique (Model 48i), chemiluminescence technique (Model 42i), pulsed UV fluorescence technique (Model 43i) and UV absorption photometry (Model 49i; Thermo Fischer Scientific, Franklin, USA) respectively. Data for meteorological parameters were acquired from meteorological sensors (Met One Instruments Inc., Oregon, USA) installed at the measurement site and located within 2 m of horizontal distance from the instrument inlets. CO calibrations were performed on 08 April 2013 and 06 May 2013, NOx calibrations were performed on 26 April 2013 and 22 May 2013, O3 calibrations were performed on 28 April 2013 and 23 May 2013 and SO2 calibrations were performed on 30 April 2013. The uncertainties in measurements of CO, NOx, SO2 and O3 are less than 6% and the detection limits of these instruments were 28 ppb, 114 ppt, 1 ppb and 1 ppb respectively. Carbon dioxide and methane concentrations in the grab samples were measured using a high precision Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy (CRDS) analyzer (Model G2508, Picarro, Santa Clara, USA) as described in Chandra, et al.15. These were used for calculation of emission factors15.
OH reactivity calculations using the Framework for 0-D Atmospheric box Modeling (F0AM) Model
A zero-dimensional atmospheric box model F0AM38 was set up for calculating the OH reactivity using the measured and estimated compounds and their oxidation products. The model employs Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) 3.3.1 chemistry39,63,64,65. The NO2 photolysis rate constant J(NO2) was calculated using the measured solar radiation66. Other model prescribed photolysis frequencies (e.g. J(O(1D)), J(HCHO), J(H2O2), J(HONO) etc.) are corrected using a factor derived using the F0AM āhybridā method derived J(NO2)38. The MCM setup included a total of 1363 species and 4205 chemical reactions. The rate constants used in the model are taken from the reviewed rate constants published by Atkinson et al.34,35,67,68,69,70. If unavailable in the former they were taken from the NIST chemical kinetics database71. The model was constrained with hourly averaged concentrations of all the directly measured VOCs listed in Supplementary Table 1, VOCs measured in the extended NCFI period (Supplementary Table 2) whose chemistry is present in MCM 3.3.1, O3, NOx, SO2, J(NO2), estimated concentrations of hydrocarbons as described in previous section (Supplementary Table 3), relative humidity and ambient temperature37,72. Methane (CH4) and hydrogen (H2) mixing ratios are held constant at 1.8 ppm and 550 ppb respectively. The model calculated concentrations of secondary species at the end of each hour were used as the initial concentration of model run for the second hour. The simulations are performed in steady state conditions with a spin-up period of three days. A dilution in the background air with zero concentration of all the model calculated species was considered for the model setup38. The dilution is parameterized according to the following first order loss equation:
Here [X] is the concentration of the species and [X]b is the concentration in background air which is assumed to be zero. Kdil is the first order dilution constant which is chosen73 to be 1/86400 sā1 corresponding to an atmospheric lifetime of 24 hours, which was assumed to avoid build-up of unrealistically high concentration of model calculated secondary species. Note that the following measured compounds namely isocyanic acid, formamide, acetamide, 2-furaldehyde, nitromethane and acetonitrile are not included in the MCM 3.3.1, hence the box model calculations do not take into account their chemistry. Also alkylamines, which are precursors of nitromethane, amides and isocyanic acid are not included in the MCM 3.3.1.
Data Availability
All data can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author at vsinha@iisermohali.ac.in.
References
Crutzen, P. J. & Andreae, M. O. Biomass Burning in the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles. Science 250, 1669ā1678, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.250.4988.1669 (1990).
Jain, N., Bhatia, A. & Pathak, H. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14, 422ā430, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031 (2014).
Andreae, M. O. & Merlet, P. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 955ā966, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001382 (2001).
Stockwell, C. E. et al. Field measurements of trace gases and aerosols emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El NiƱo. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11711ā11732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11711-2016 (2016).
Lal, R. World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ. Int. 31, 575ā584, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005 (2005).
Yevich, R. & Logan, J. A. An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001952 (2003).
Crutzen, P. J., Heidt, L. E., Krasnec, J. P., Pollock, W. H. & Seiler, W. Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3Cl and COS. Nature 282, 253ā256 (1979).
Sinha, B. et al. Assessment of crop yield losses in Punjab and Haryana using 2 years of continuous in situ ozone measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 9555ā9576, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9555-2015 (2015).
Kumar, V., Sarkar, C. & Sinha, V. Influence of post-harvest crop residue fires on surface ozone mixing ratios in the N.W. IGP analyzed using 2āyears of continuous in situ trace gas measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 3619ā3633, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024308 (2016).
Venkataraman, C. et al. Emissions from open biomass burning in India: Integrating the inventory approach with high-resolution Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) active-fire and land cover data. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002547 (2006).
Gilman, J. B. et al. Biomass burning emissions and potential air quality impacts of volatile organic compounds and other trace gases from fuels common in the US. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 13915ā13938, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13915-2015 (2015).
Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J. & Yokelson, R. J. Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 845ā865, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015 (2015).
Hatch, L. E. et al. Multi-instrument comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol precursors. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 1471ā1489, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017 (2017).
Ortega, A. M. et al. Secondary organic aerosol formation and primary organic aerosol oxidation from biomass-burning smoke in a flow reactor during FLAME-3. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 11551ā11571, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013 (2013).
Chandra, B. P., Sinha, V., Hakkim, H. & Sinha, B. Storage stability studies and field application of low cost glass flasks for analyses of thirteen ambient VOCs using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 419, 11ā19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.05.008 (2017).
Levy, H. Normal Atmosphere: Large Radical and Formaldehyde Concentrations Predicted. Science 173, 141ā143, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141 (1971).
Hofzumahaus, A. et al. Amplified Trace Gas Removal in the Troposphere. Science 324, 1702ā1704, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164566 (2009).
Lelieveld, J., Dentener, F. J., Peters, W. & Krol, M. C. On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 2337ā2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004 (2004).
Rosenfeld, D. et al. Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation? Science 321, 1309ā1313, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606 (2008).
Sinha, V. et al. Constraints on instantaneous ozone production rates and regimes during DOMINO derived using in-situ OH reactivity measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7269ā7283, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7269-2012 (2012).
Di Carlo, P. et al. Missing OH reactivity in a Forest: Evidence for Unknown Reactive Biogenic VOCs. Science 304, 722ā725, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094392 (2004).
Sinha, V., Williams, J., Crowley, J. N. & Lelieveld, J. The Comparative Reactivity Method ā a new tool to measure total OH reactivity in ambient air. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 2213ā2227, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008 (2008).
Goldstein, A. H. & Galbally, I. E. Known and Unexplored Organic Constituents in the Earthās Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 1514ā1521, https://doi.org/10.1021/es072476p (2007).
Yang, Y. et al. Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity: A review. Atmos. Environ. 134, 147ā161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010 (2016).
Nolscher, A. C. et al. Unexpected seasonality in quantity and composition of Amazon rainforest air reactivity. Nat Commun 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10383 (2016).
Sinha, V., Kumar, V. & Sarkar, C. Chemical composition of pre-monsoon air in the Indo-Gangetic Plain measured using a new air quality facility and PTR-MS: high surface ozone and strong influence of biomass burning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 5921ā5941, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5921-2014 (2014).
Pawar, H. et al. Quantifying the contribution of long-range transport to particulate matter (PM) mass loadings at a suburban site in the north-western Indo-Gangetic Plain (NW-IGP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 9501ā9520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9501-2015 (2015).
Kumar, V. & Sinha, V. VOCāOHM: A new technique for rapid measurements of ambient total OH reactivity and volatile organic compounds using a single proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 374, 55ā63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2014.10.012 (2014).
de Gouw, J. & Warneke, C. Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the earth's atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 26, 223ā257, https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20119 (2007).
Yuan, B. et al. Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Applications in Atmospheric Sciences. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325 (2017).
Hansen, R. F. et al. Intercomparison of the comparative reactivity method (CRM) and pumpāprobe technique for measuring total OH reactivity in an urban environment. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 4243ā4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015 (2015).
Bahuguna, A. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2014. (Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi, 2015).
Davies, D. K., Ilavajhala, S., Wong, M. M. & Justice, C. O. Fire Information for Resource Management System: Archiving and Distributing MODIS Active Fire Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47, 72ā79, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002076 (2009).
Atkinson, R. et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I - gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 1461ā1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004 (2004).
Atkinson, R. et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II - gas phase reactions of organic species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3625ā4055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006 (2006).
Chandra, B. P. & Sinha, V. Contribution of post-harvest agricultural paddy residue fires in the N.W. Indo-Gangetic Plain to ambient carcinogenic benzenoids, toxic isocyanic acid and carbon monoxide. Environ. Int. 88, 187ā197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.025 (2016).
Lou, S. et al. Atmospheric OH reactivities in the Pearl River Delta ā China in summer 2006: measurement and model results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11243ā11260, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11243-2010 (2010).
Wolfe, G. M., Marvin, M. R., Roberts, S. J., Travis, K. R. & Liao, J. The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3309ā3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3309-2016 (2016).
Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C. & Rickard, A. R. The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 11433ā11459, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015 (2015).
Millet, D. B. et al. Global atmospheric budget of acetaldehyde: 3-D model analysis and constraints from in-situ and satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 3405ā3425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010 (2010).
Roberts, J. M. et al. New insights into atmospheric sources and sinks of isocyanic acid, HNCO, from recent urban and regional observations. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 1060ā1072, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD019931 (2014).
Young, P. J. et al. Isocyanic acid in a global chemistry transport model: Tropospheric distribution, budget, and identification of regions with potential health impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017393 (2012).
Li, Y. & Wang, L. The atmospheric oxidation mechanism of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene initiated by OH radicals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 17908ā17917, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP02027H (2014).
Ge, X., Wexler, A. S. & Clegg, S. L. Atmospheric amines ā Part I. A review. Atmos. Environ. 45, 524ā546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012 (2011).
Pitts, J. N., Grosjean, D., Van Cauwenberghe, K., Schmid, J. P. & Fitz, D. R. Photooxidation of aliphatic amines under simulated atmospheric conditions: formation of nitrosamines, nitramines, amides, and photochemical oxidant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 946ā953, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60144a009 (1978).
Rajput, P., Sarin, M., Sharma, D. & Singh, D. Characteristics and emission budget of carbonaceous species from post-harvest agricultural-waste burning in source region of the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 66, 21026, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.21026 (2014).
Ram, K., Sarin, M. M. & Tripathi, S. N. A 1 year record of carbonaceous aerosols from an urban site in the Indo-Gangetic Plain: Characterization, sources, and temporal variability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014188 (2010).
Garg, S. et al. Limitation of the Use of the Absorption Angstrom Exponent for Source Apportionment of Equivalent Black Carbon: a Case Study from the North West Indo-Gangetic Plain. Environmental Science & Technology, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03868 (2015).
Sarkar, C. et al. Overview of VOC emissions and chemistry from PTR-TOF-MS measurements during the SusKat-ABC campaign: high acetaldehyde, isoprene and isocyanic acid in wintertime air of the Kathmandu Valley. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3979ā4003, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3979-2016 (2016).
Tao, Y. et al. Effects of amines on particle growth observed in new particle formation events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 121, 324ā335, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024245 (2016).
Sarkar, C., Kumar, V. & Sinha, V. Massive emissions of carcinogenic benzenoids from paddy residue burning in North India. Current Science 104, 1703ā1706 (2013).
Akagi, S. K. et al. Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 4039ā4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011 (2011).
Urbanski, S. P. Combustion efficiency and emission factors for wildfire-season fires in mixed conifer forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, US. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7241ā7262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7241-2013 (2013).
Inomata, S. et al. Laboratory measurements of emission factors of nonmethane volatile organic compounds from burning of Chinese crop residues. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120, 5237ā5252, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022761 (2015).
Lelieveld, J. et al. Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest. Nature 452, 737ā740, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870 (2008).
Dotan, I. & Albritton, D. L. Mobilities of CO2+, N2H+, H3O+, H3O+ā H2O, and H3O+ā (H2O)2 ions in N2. The Journal of Chemical Physics 65, 5028ā5030, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.432943 (1976).
Zhao, J. & Zhang, R. Proton transfer reaction rate constants between hydronium ion (H3O+) and volatile organic compounds. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2177ā2185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.019 (2004).
Karl, T. et al. Efficient Atmospheric Cleansing of Oxidized Organic Trace Gases by Vegetation. Science 330, 816ā819, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192534 (2010).
Williams, J. et al. An Atmospheric Chemistry Interpretation of Mass Scans Obtained from a Proton Transfer Mass Spectrometer Flown over the Tropical Rainforest of Surinam. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 38, 133ā166, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006322701523 (2001).
Ievgeniia, K. et al. Compounds enhanced in a mass spectrometric profile of smokersā exhaled breath versus non-smokers as determined in a pilot study using PTR-MS. Journal of Breath Research 2, 026002 (2008).
Atkinson, R., Aschmann, S. M. & Carter, W. P. L. Kinetics of the reactions of O3 and OH radicals with furan and thiophene at 298 Ā± 2 K. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 15, 51ā61, https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550150106 (1983).
Curtis, A. R. & Sweetenham, W. P. Facsimile/Chekmat Users Manual. AERE Report R-12805, Her Majestyās Stationary Office England (1988).
Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G. & Pilling, M. J. World wide web site of a master chemical mechanism (MCM) for use in tropospheric chemistry models. Atmospheric Environment 31, 1249, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)85197-7 (1997).
Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G. & Pilling, M. J. Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCMv3 (Part A): tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 161ā180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003 (2003).
Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M. & Pilling, M. J. The tropospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds: a protocol for mechanism development. Atmospheric Environment 31, 81ā104, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7 (1997).
Trebs, I. et al. Relationship between the NO2 photolysis frequency and the solar global irradiance. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2, 725ā739, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-725-2009 (2009).
Atkinson, R. & Carter, W. P. L. Kinetics and mechanisms of the gas-phase reactions of ozone with organic compounds under atmospheric conditions. Chemical Reviews 84, 437ā470, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00063a002 (1984).
Atkinson, R. Kinetics and mechanisms of the gas-phase reactions of the hydroxyl radical with organic compounds under atmospheric conditions. Chemical Reviews 86, 69ā201, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00071a004 (1986).
Atkinson, R. & Aschmann, S. M. Rate constants for the reactions of O3 and OH radicals with a series of alkynes. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 16, 259ā268, https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550160308 (1984).
Atkinson, R. & Arey, J. Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds. Chemical Reviews 103, 4605ā4638, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420 (2003).
Manion, J. A. et al. Vol. 17 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2015).
Kaiser, J. et al. Speciation of OH reactivity above the canopy of an isoprene-dominated forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 9349ā9359, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9349-2016 (2016).
Wolfe, G. M. et al. Missing peroxy radical sources within a summertime ponderosa pine forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4715ā4732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4715-2014 (2014).
Warneke, C. et al. VOC identification and inter-comparison from laboratory biomass burning using PTR-MS and PIT-MS. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 303, 6ā14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.002 (2011).
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge the IISER Mohali Atmospheric Chemistry Facility and Glen Wolfe for suggestions with F0AM box modeling. We thank Baerbel Sinha and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. All authors thank the Director of IISER Mohali for encouragement and other members of the ACE and ARG research groups at IISER Mohali for technical support. V.K. and B.P.C acknowledge the DST INSPIRE program and CSIR for Ph.D. fellowships, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.S. planned the research and analyses. V.K. and B.P.C. acquired the measurement data. V.K. performed the analyses. V.K. and V.S. wrote the paper and all authors commented on the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleās Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleās Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, V., Chandra, B.P. & Sinha, V. Large unexplained suite of chemically reactive compounds present in ambient air due to biomass fires. Sci Rep 8, 626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19139-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19139-3
This article is cited by
-
Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and trends in the field of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission accounting
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2024)
-
Harnessing deep learning for forecasting fire-burning locations and unveiling \(PM_{2.5}\) emissions
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment (2024)
-
VOC source apportionment, reactivity, secondary transformations, and their prioritization using fuzzy-AHP method in a coal-mining city in India
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2024)
-
Fruit scent as an indicator of ripeness status in ābat fruitsā to attract āfruit batsā: chemical basis of chiropterochory
acta ethologica (2023)
-
Frequency distribution of pollutant concentrations over Indian megacities impacted by the COVID-19 lockdown
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.