Abstract
Statistical mechanics can describe the major conformational ensembles determining the equilibrium free-energy landscape of a folding protein. The challenge is to capture the full repertoire of low-occurrence conformations separated by high kinetic barriers that define complex landscapes. Computationally, enhanced sampling methods accelerate the exploration of molecular rare events. However, accessing the entire protein’s conformational space in equilibrium experiments requires technological developments to enable extended observation times. We used single-molecule magnetic tweezers to capture over a million individual transitions as a single talin protein unfolds and refolds under force in equilibrium. When observed at classically probed timescales, talin folds in an apparently uncomplicated two-state manner. As the sampling time extends from minutes to days, the underlying energy landscape exhibits gradually larger signatures of complexity, involving a finite number of well-defined rare conformations. Fluctuation analysis allows us to propose plausible structures of each low-probability conformational state. The physiological relevance of each distinct conformation can be connected to the binding of the cytoskeletal protein vinculin, suggesting an extra layer of complexity in talin-mediated mechanotransduction. More generally, our experiments directly test the fundamental notion that equilibrium dynamics depend on the observation timescale.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The code is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Englander, S. W. & Mayne, L. The nature of protein folding pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15873–15880 (2014).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Moore, P. B., Hendrickson, W. A., Henderson, R. & Brunger, A. T. The protein-folding problem: not yet solved. Science 375, 507 (2022).
Lazaridis, T. & Karplus, M. ‘New view’ of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 278, 1928–1931 (1997).
Dill, K. A. & Chan, H. S. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 10–19 (1997).
Bryngelson, J. D., Onuchic, J. N., Socci, N. D. & Wolynes, P. G. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 21, 167–195 (1995).
Onuchic, J. N., Nymeyer, H., Garcia, A. E., Chahine, J. & Socci, N. D. The energy landscape theory of protein folding: insights into folding mechanisms and scenarios. Adv. Protein Chem. 53, 87–152 (2000).
Onuchic, J. N. & Wolynes, P. G. Theory of protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 70–75 (2004).
Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z. & Wolynes, P. G. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 545–600 (1997).
Karplus, M. Behind the folding funnel diagram. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 401–404 (2011).
Ferreiro, D. U., Komives, E. A. & Wolynes, P. G. Frustration in biomolecules. Q. Rev. Biophys. 47, 285–363 (2014).
Tzul, F. O., Vasilchuk, D. & Makhatadze, G. I. Evidence for the principle of minimal frustration in the evolution of protein folding landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1627–E1632 (2017).
Chen, M. et al. Surveying biomolecular frustration at atomic resolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 5944 (2020).
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O. & Shaw, D. E. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334, 517–520 (2011).
Zheng, W. & Best, R. B. Reduction of all-atom protein folding dynamics to one-dimensional diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 15247–15255 (2015).
Neupane, K., Manuel, A. P. & Woodside, M. T. Protein folding trajectories can be described quantitatively by one-dimensional diffusion over measured energy landscapes. Nat. Phys. 12, 700–703 (2016).
Petrosyan, R., Narayan, A. & Woodside, M. T. Single-molecule force spectroscopy of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167207 (2021).
Cecconi, C., Shank, E. A., Bustamante, C. & Marqusee, S. Direct observation of the three-state folding of a single protein molecule. Science 309, 2057–2060 (2005).
Shank, E. A., Cecconi, C., Dill, J. W., Marqusee, S. & Bustamante, C. The folding cooperativity of a protein is controlled by its chain topology. Nature 465, 637–640 (2010).
Gebhardt, J. C., Bornschlogl, T. & Rief, M. Full distance-resolved folding energy landscape of one single protein molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2013–2018 (2010).
Rognoni, L., Most, T., Zoldak, G. & Rief, M. Force-dependent isomerization kinetics of a highly conserved proline switch modulates the mechanosensing region of filamin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5568–5573 (2014).
Heidarsson, P. O. et al. Direct single-molecule observation of calcium-dependent misfolding in human neuronal calcium sensor-1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13069–13074 (2014).
Stigler, J., Ziegler, F., Gieseke, A., Gebhardt, J. C. & Rief, M. The complex folding network of single calmodulin molecules. Science 334, 512–516 (2011).
Lof, A. et al. Multiplexed protein force spectroscopy reveals equilibrium protein folding dynamics and the low-force response of von Willebrand factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18798–18807 (2019).
Sen Mojumdar, S. et al. Partially native intermediates mediate misfolding of SOD1 in single-molecule folding trajectories. Nat. Commun. 8, 1881 (2017).
Yu, H. et al. Direct observation of multiple misfolding pathways in a single prion protein molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5283–5288 (2012).
Rico-Pasto, M., Alemany, A. & Ritort, F. Force-dependent folding kinetics of single molecules with multiple intermediates and pathways. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 1025–1032 (2022).
Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12562–12566 (2002).
Faradjian, A. K. & Elber, R. Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10880–10889 (2004).
Sugita, Y. & Okamoto, Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 314, 141–151 (1999).
Popa, I. et al. A HaloTag anchored ruler for week-long studies of protein dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10546–10553 (2016).
Greenleaf, W. J., Woodside, M. T., Abbondanzieri, E. A. & Block, S. M. Passive all-optical force clamp for high-resolution laser trapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 208102 (2005).
Neupane, K. et al. Direct observation of transition paths during the folding of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 352, 239–242 (2016).
Goult, B. T., Yan, J. & Schwartz, M. A. Talin as a mechanosensitive signaling hub. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3776–3784 (2018).
Yao, M. et al. Mechanical activation of vinculin binding to talin locks talin in an unfolded conformation. Sci. Rep. 4, 4610 (2014).
Tapia-Rojo, R., Alonso-Caballero, A. & Fernandez, J. M. Talin folding as the tuning fork of cellular mechanotransduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21346–21353 (2020).
Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 540–548 (2016).
Stannard, A. et al. Molecular fluctuations as a ruler of force-induced protein conformations. Nano Lett. 21, 2953–2961 (2021).
Valle-Orero, J. et al. Mechanical deformation accelerates protein ageing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 9741–9746 (2017).
Beedle, A. E., Lynham, S. & Garcia-Manyes, S. Protein S-sulfenylation is a fleeting molecular switch that regulates non-enzymatic oxidative folding. Nat. Commun. 7, 12490 (2016).
Zosel, F., Mercadante, D., Nettels, D. & Schuler, B. A proline switch explains kinetic heterogeneity in a coupled folding and binding reaction. Nat. Commun. 9, 3332 (2018).
Serrano, A. L., Tucker, M. J. & Gai, F. Direct assessment of the α-helix nucleation time. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 7472–7478 (2011).
Zhu, Y. et al. Ultrafast folding of α3D: a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15486–15491 (2003).
Williams, S. et al. Fast events in protein folding: helix melting and formation in a small peptide. Biochemistry 35, 691–697 (1996).
Munoz, V. & Cerminara, M. When fast is better: protein folding fundamentals and mechanisms from ultrafast approaches. Biochem. J. 473, 2545–2559 (2016).
Guo, Z. & Thirumalai, D. Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding of a de novo designed four-helix bundle protein. J. Mol. Biol. 263, 323–343 (1996).
Tapia-Rojo, R., Alonso-Caballero, A. & Fernandez, J. M. Direct observation of a coil-to-helix contraction triggered by vinculin binding to talin. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4707 (2020).
del Rio, A. et al. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 323, 638–641 (2009).
Yao, M. et al. The mechanical response of talin. Nat. Commun. 7, 11966 (2016).
Baldwin, R. L. The nature of protein folding pathways: the classical versus the new view. J. Biomol. NMR 5, 103–109 (1995).
Rico-Pasto, M., Zaltron, A., Davis, S. J., Frutos, S. & Ritort, F. Molten globule–like transition state of protein barnase measured with calorimetric force spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2112382119 (2022).
Austen, K. et al. Extracellular rigidity sensing by talin isoform-specific mechanical linkages. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1597–1606 (2015).
Hakonardottir, G. K. et al. In vivo quantitative analysis of talin turnover in response to force. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 4149–4162 (2015).
Parsons, J. T., Horwitz, A. R. & Schwartz, M. A. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 633–643 (2010).
Oakes, P. W., Beckham, Y., Stricker, J. & Gardel, M. L. Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J. Cell Biol. 196, 363–374 (2012).
Broussard, J. A. et al. Automated analysis of cell-matrix adhesions in 2D and 3D environments. Sci. Rep. 5, 8124 (2015).
Elosegui-Artola, A., Trepat, X. & Roca-Cusachs, P. Control of mechanotransduction by molecular clutch dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 356–367 (2018).
Geertsma, E. R., & Dutzler, R. A versatile and efficient high-throughput cloning tool for structural biology. Biochemistry 50, 3272–3278 (2011).
Boujemaa-Paterski, R. et al. Talin-activated vinculin interacts with branched actin networks to initiate bundles. Elife 9, e53990 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Francis Crick Institute that receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001002), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001002) and the Wellcome Trust (FC001002). R.T.-R. is the recipient of a King’s Prize Fellowship. O.M. was funded by the Swiss National Foundation grant (310030_207453). This work was supported by the European Commission (Mechanocontrol, grant agreement 731957BBSRC), BBSRC sLoLa (BB/V003518/1), Leverhulme Trust Research Leadership Award (RL-2016-015), Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (212218/Z/18/Z) and Royal Society Wolfson Fellowship (RSWF/R3/183006), to S.G.-M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.T.-R., M.M. and S.G.-M. designed the research. R.T.-R. and M.M. conducted the single-molecule mechanical experiments and analysed the data. S.B. and J.W. expressed and purified the protein constructs. R.B.-P. and O.M. expressed and purified the full-length vinculin. R.T.-R., M.M. and S.G.-M. wrote the paper. All the authors contributed to revising and editing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Gallery of selected magnetic tweezers recordings of R3IVVI at F0.5.
Each protein spontaneously visits the different identified states (i-vi), highlighted in the insets. The recordings are smoothed with a 101-points Savitzky-Golay algorithm, and unedited (no drift correction). The occasional spikes correspond to floating debris that interferes with the image analysis of the reference or the magnetic bead, but do not affect the intrinsic folding dynamics of the protein.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Gallery of magnetic tweezers recordings showing that a high force pulse rescues R3IVVI from each trapped state back to its native folding dynamics.
State (iii) could not be probed, as it is too short-lived to be rescued with force.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Force dependency of R3IVVI with Pro881 in the trans state (ii).
(A) Dynamics of R3IVVI at F0.5 undergoing a spontaneous cis-trans isomerization of P881. The trans-state is probed at three different forces, showing two-state dynamics with a lower mechanical stability and faster folding/unfolding kinetics. After a few seconds, the cis-state is spontaneously recovered, and R3IVVI goes back to its native folding dynamics. (B) Population of the folded form in the cis-state (grey) and trans-state (red). Cis-trans isomerization of Pro881 shifts the mechanical stability of R3IVVI by ~1 pN.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Force dependency of state (iv).
R3IVVI spontaneously falls into state (iv), characterized by a shorter end-to-end extension (~3 nm shorter than the unfolded state). Exploring forces between 6 and 10 pN shows that this state lacks any internal dynamics (inset).
Extended Data Fig. 5 Force dependency of state (v).
(A) Magnetic tweezers recording of R3IVVI spontaneously falling into state (v). Subsequently, the dynamics of state (v) are measured between 4 pN and 11 pN, allowing one to monitor the relative population of the three conformations. (B) Detail of the recording in (A), which shows the three conformations, L1, L2, and L3. (C) Relative population of conformations L1, L2, and L3 as a function of force. Compared to the canonical native folding dynamics of R3IVVI (i) which exhibits a very sharp force dependency, state (v) shows dynamic transitions between 5 pN and 11 pN.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Force dependency of state (vi).
(A) Magnetic tweezers recording of R3IVVI spontaneously falling into state (vi). Subsequently, the dynamics of state (vi) are measured between 4 pN and 12 pN, allowing us to monitor the relative population of the three conformations. (B) Detail of the recording in (A), which shows the transitions between conformations M1 and M2. (C) Relative population of conformations, M1 and M2, as a function of force.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Unedited 58 hours-long recording of a single protein L at 7.4 pN.
Protein L transitions in equilibrium between the folded and unfolded conformations in a two-state manner, without showing any off-pathway state.
Extended Data Fig. 8 The native (un)folding dynamics in state (i) is reminiscent of a two-state behaviour with our instrumental time resolution.
(A) Raw magnetic tweezers recording showing native unfolding and refolding transitions within state (i) (squared regions). (B) Detail of a native unfolding (left) and refolding (right) transition path, sampled at ~1,500 Hz. (C) Histogram of the trajectory of the reference bead after filtering low-frequency components arising from local drift (blue line). Being firmly attached to the surface, the spread in the vertical position of the reference bead arises mostly due to artifacts in the image analysis algorithm that influence the experimental estimation of the molecular extension. The data are well-fit by a Gaussian (black dotted line) with σ=0.85 nm, which we use as the point-spread function to reconstruct the free energy landscape following a deconvolution procedure. (D) Free energy landscape of talin R3IVVI in state (i) at F0.5. The free energy landscape was reconstructed from >10,000 native (un)folding transitions following a deconvolution procedure (Jansson algorithm, Woodside et al., Science, 2006) using a point-spread function estimated from the trajectory of the reference bead (panel C). The dynamics within state (i) are two-state, as the landscape displays two free energy basins with a single free energy barrier of ~4kT separating them.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–11.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tapia-Rojo, R., Mora, M., Board, S. et al. Enhanced statistical sampling reveals microscopic complexity in the talin mechanosensor folding energy landscape. Nat. Phys. 19, 52–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01808-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01808-4
This article is cited by
-
Single-molecule magnetic tweezers to probe the equilibrium dynamics of individual proteins at physiologically relevant forces and timescales
Nature Protocols (2024)
-
Hidden depths of protein folding
Nature Physics (2023)