Multiple guesses from one individual, like guesses from a crowd, yield a better estimate when averaged. How far can such solipsistic polling take us in real, high-stakes settings? Now 1.2 million incentivized, real-world guesses show just how much people can improve their judgements by reconsidering their own estimates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Galton, F. Nature 75, 450–451 (1907).
van Dolder, D. & van den Assem, M. J. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0247-6 (2017).
Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds (Random House, New York, NY, 2004).
Vul, E. & Pashler, H. Psychol. Sci. 19, 645–647 (2008).
Hopkins, D. Most voters haven’t changed their minds all year. FiveThirtyEight http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-voters-havent-changed-their-minds-all-year/ (2016).
Blais, A. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 37, 801–803 (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vul, E. Pulling guesses up by their bootstraps. Nat Hum Behav 2, 15–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0280-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0280-5