Machine-learning algorithms trained with data that encode human bias will reproduce, not eliminate, the bias, says Kristian Lum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Sentiment analysis of Canadian maritime case law: a sentiment case law and deep learning approach
International Journal of Information Technology Open Access 08 June 2024
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares unpaid advice to the New York Legal Aid Society and the San Francisco Public Defender's Office.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lum, K. Limitations of mitigating judicial bias with machine learning. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0141
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0141
This article is cited by
-
Sentiment analysis of Canadian maritime case law: a sentiment case law and deep learning approach
International Journal of Information Technology (2024)
-
The long road to fairer algorithms
Nature (2020)
-
Fair play in research and policy
Nature Human Behaviour (2017)