Abstract
Common half-cell measurements deliver oxygen reduction activities linked to the chosen scan rate, limiting their value for fundamental and comparative studies on platinum. Here we show a deconvolution of the intrinsic kinetics from the effect of surface oxygen on platinum. We find an electronic effect of the surface oxygen, substantiate a Tafel slope of ~120 mV/decade, obtain an exchange current density of 13 ± 4 µA/cm2, and an activity of 7 mA/cm2 at 900 mV. Eventually, we broaden the scope of this analysis to the effects of surface rearrangement, alloying, and supported Pt nanoparticles, the latter providing insight into discrepancies between half-cell and fuel cell measurements. We find through computational methods that binding energies of intermediates would be weakened by the presence of highly coordinated oxygen atoms. Finally, we obtain a phenomenological rate equation for the oxygen reduction and evolution reaction, suggesting that both reactions follow a shared mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR/OER) in aqueous media are fundamental reactions in electrocatalysis. One or both reactions will be encountered in most electrocatalysis applications as main or side reactions, including but not limited to the production of chlorine, (photo-) electrolytic water splitting, gas sensors, and, most notably, hydrogen fuel cells. For the ORR, platinum is the most common catalyst, providing a capable model system for fundamental investigations1,2,3,4,5,6. Platinum is not a good OER catalyst compared to iridium oxide in acidic and nickel in alkaline environments7. Still, it provides value through its ubiquity in electrochemical research. Therefore, the mechanism of these reactions on platinum has received significant interest in the past decades, leading to substantial progress in the mechanistic understanding of the ORR3,8,9,10,11 on platinum and the OER on platinum12 and oxide materials13,14. The ORR is suggested to proceed via several oxygen intermediate steps in which a one-electron transfer step is the rate-determining step (rds). In contrast, surface oxygen species modulate the availability and nature of the active sites. DFT calculations have supported this view by investigating the role of possible ORR intermediates11,15. The standard method to evaluate the fundamental kinetic properties of the ORR is the half-cell RDE protocol on metallic platinum surfaces2,16,17, where the ORR can only be assessed through potentiodynamic methods due to its susceptibility to minuscule amounts of impurities and oxide species building up on the platinum surface. The Butler-Volmer (BV) equation predicts that the ORR activity should be independent of the scan rate and follow a Tafel relationship at potentials below 1000 mV vs RHE. However, experimental observations through half-cell measurements deviate from these expectations18, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The dependency of the ORR activity on the scan rate is a significant problem when reporting the performance of the ORR, both for catalyst development and their mechanistic understanding: While one is experimentally limited in the selection of scan rates, choosing a particular scan rate is arbitrary from a fundamental point of view, consequently providing arbitrary ORR activity values. Overall, these limitations have been attributed to surface oxygen species19, a mixed potential20, multiple simultaneous reaction pathways21,22, or electrolyte impurities, and are well summarized in A. M. Gómez-Marín et al.23. These are not new phenomena and have been extensively studied on single-crystal platinum electrodes, such as Pt(111)19. Particularly the interplay of surface oxygen and scan rate is not well understood. Regarding the catalyst surface itself, in real applications, uninterrupted single-crystal surfaces do not exist, and the surface encountered is polycrystalline platinum (Pt(pc)), addressed, e.g., by studies on stepped single-crystal surfaces24. Moreover, alloyed Pt(pc) surfaces are often25,26, but not always27,28, an essential step in developing new platinum nanocatalysts. Therefore, Pt(pc) is the most important platinum surface configuration, but its fundamental ORR kinetics has not been studied to the same depth as it has for single crystal Pt surfaces.
In this work, we demonstrate the extraction of the kinetic parameters of the ORR on Pt(pc) that are independent of scan rate and scan direction and how the surface oxygen interacts with the ORR. We show that this can be achieved by experimental means without requiring a model fit used in previous studies19,29. This results in the extraction of the intrinsic ORR current and a quantification of the contribution of surface oxygen: The common half-cell protocol delivers scan rate dependent kinetic current-voltage curves as displayed in Fig. 1. When the scan rate is chosen to be very low, the Pt(pc) surface is assumed to be oxidized, while our protocol delivers the kinetic current-voltage curve on a fully metallic Pt(pc) surface. Instead, the currently applied protocol only delivers kinetic data at an undefined intermediate state of the Pt(pc) surface.
First, we will discuss the relevant electrochemical features on an extended surface of Pt(pc). Subsequently, we deconvolute the intrinsic ORR kinetics using the oxygen surface charge. We show its applicability in the presence of specifically adsorbing species, surface rearrangement, platinum alloys, and supported platinum nanoparticles. This new method should be included in the assessment and research of fuel cell catalysts. We hypothesize that reducing the susceptibility of platinum to surface oxygen provides another path in developing new ORR catalysts. We then use DFT to investigate the effects of surface oxygen on the binding energy of the ORR intermediates. Finally, we discuss the OER kinetics using the herein-developed method and show that the same rate equation, with a single set of parameters, can describe the ORR and OER.
Results and discussion
The electrochemistry of polycrystalline platinum
While most fundamental studies focus on the low-index facets of platinum, we performed our analysis on Pt(pc). While the Pt(pc) surface has the disadvantage of not being uniquely defined on the surface atom level, the low index planes are unstable when cycled to potentials above 900 mV (Pt(100), Pt(110)) and 1050 mV (Pt(111))3. In contrast, the Pt(pc) exhibits exceptionally stable features and kinetics in a potential window ranging from the HER to the OER region and can be viewed, to a crude approximation, as a superposition of various Pt facets30. Compared to a single crystalline surface, the polycrystalline surface can be repeatedly cycled to high potentials, maintaining cleanliness and reproducibility over an extended series of measurements, see Fig. S1b and the associated discussion. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) of Pt(pc) can be separated into five regions (Fig. 2a). Starting from the double layer region (DL), the water and electrolyte dipole interactions provide a capacitance of around 80–100 µF/cm2. Going negative, supposed underpotential deposited hydrogen (H-upd) forms reversibly, and molecular hydrogen evolves (HER) when approaching the RHE potential at 0 mV; noting that all potentials in this contribution refer to the RHE scale at pH = 1. When reversing the scan direction, any adsorbed molecular hydrogen is oxidized to water (HOR), transitioning into the oxidation of the H-upd until the DL region is reached, after which oxygen species form on the surface. The nature of these species is not fully understood. Likely, reversible hydroxyl species (*OH) form on the surface, while most of the subsequent charge stems from other, electrochemically irreversible, oxygen species31. From the symmetry of CVs on Pt(111) and Pt(100), we know that the charge associated to *OH is strongly reversible32, similarly to the H-upd charge, and is also affected by the presence of specifically adsorbing anions such as bisulfate. Using scanning potential controlled electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (SPEIS), substituting the equivalent AC Voltammetry technique, used previously to determine oxygen species on platinum33,34 (see the SI for details, Fig. 2b, c), we can separate the *OH charge (40 ± 5 µC/cm2) from the irreversible charge. We find that species causing the irreversible charge dominates the oxygen region, denoting them as *O from hereon. The *OH and the elusive *O mimic the pseudocapacitive nature of the H-upd, as indicated from CVs recorded at various scan rates (Fig. S1c). This supports the distinction between different oxygen species made previously35. We, therefore, use the term O-upd for the entire surface oxygen region, a term initially introduced in 197336. Additionally, if the Pt surface is subjected to high potentials for a sufficiently long time, more persistent oxide species form, that are only being reduced in the H-upd region. These oxide species are not the subject of this study and are avoided through our experimental protocol. At potentials above 1500 mV, molecular oxygen evolves, marking the start of the OER region. Reversing the scan direction leads to the reduction of the O-upd in one characteristic peak followed by the initial DL region.
The intrinsic ORR kinetics
Presently, the most common kinetic description (Eq. 1a) of the ORR on platinum is derived from the BV equation37 that simplifies to a Tafel equation at sufficiently high overpotentials \(\left|E-{E}_{{\rm{eq}}}\right|/b \, \gg \, 1\). The contribution of the Tafel equation can be written as the kinetic current, \({i}_{\text{kin}}\). \(b\) is the Tafel slope, \(E\) is the electrode potential, \({E}_{{\rm{eq}}}\) is the equilibrium potential of the ORR/OER on the RHE scale (Eq. 1b) with \({E}^{0}\) as its standard potential, and \({a}_{{O}_{2}}\) as the oxygen activity. Blocking and electronic effects of adsorbents are included by additional terms, \({T}_{\text{Blocking}}\) and \({T}_{\text{Electronic}}\), respectively. The blocking effect here refers to physically blocking a reaction site by an observer species, while the electronic effect refers to a change in the binding energy of the reaction site by a nearby adsorbed observer species.
\({i}_{{ORR}}\) is the apparent, but background and mass transport corrected ORR activity. \(Q\) is the surface charge of specifically adsorbing species, \({Q}_{0}\) is its maximum value. \(\gamma\) and \(n\) are empirical constants loosely connected to the number of sites blocked and the number of sites involved in the rds, respectively. \(\omega\) is an empirical energy interaction parameter of the adsorbent and \({i}_{0}\) is the Tafel exchange current density. The value of the Tafel slope \(b\) is understood here as the value that would be observed in the absence of blocking and electronic effects from adsorbents. Commonly, only the anodic scan is used to determine the ORR activity at the chosen benchmark potential without explicitly accounting for either the blocking or electronic effect. These effects contribute to the apparent Tafel slope, which then would lead to the prevalent curved Tafel plot with a varying slope between 60 and 120 mV/decade exemplified in Fig. 1. By increasing the upper vertex potential, \({E}_{{uVtx}}\), more O-upd charge is passed. When the scan direction is reversed, this charge is not immediately recovered (Fig. 3a). Hence, the O-upd charge and ORR current observed at a particular potential in the cathodic scan depend on the chosen \({E}_{{uVtx}}\), see Fig. 3b, c. Subsequently, Eq. 1a can be linearized (\(y\left(x\right)=a+{mx}\)) yielding a test for the blocking effect (Eq. 2a) and for the electronic effect (Eq. 2b) by omitting the alternative effect, respectively. \({C}_{{DL}}\) is the double-layer capacitance measured at 450 mV and \(v\) is the scan rate:
This linearization requires that the O-upd charge is related to the surface coverage \(\theta\) via \(\theta=Q/{Q}_{0}\). \(Q\) is determined through the integration of pseudocapacitive current, \({i}_{{Ar}}\), in the anodic and cathodic direction (Eq. 2c). In both, the blocking and the electronic effect, \({Q}_{0}\) is part of the slope of the linearized form and is incorporated into the empirical interaction parameter \(m\) (Eq. 2a, b). Wang et al.19 found a value of \(n=1\) or \(n=2\) for the blocking effect of *OH on Pt(111), providing reasonable guesses for \(n\). In the case of Pt(pc), Fig. 3d demonstrates that for \(n=1\) (Case for \(n=2\), Fig. S1e) the blocking effect of the O-upd cannot be linearized according to Eq. (2a). In contrast, the linearization of Eq. (2b) as displayed in Fig. 3e is successful with (R2 > 0.99), hence, on Pt(pc), the O-upd acts on the ORR through an electronic effect rather than via a site-blocking mechanism. Extrapolating \({i}_{{ORR}}\) to \(Q=\,\)0 µC/cm2 in Fig. 3e yields a Tafel plot of the ORR kinetics (Fig. 4a) that is free of the effects of the O-upd over a potential range of about 250 mV. We also tested this technique by varying the amount of the O-upd charge by holding the potential at the upper vertex potential for a set of time durations and found the same relationship (Figs. 3f, S1e). This suggests that the O-upd charge formed potentiodynamically or potentiostatically (at a sufficiently small timescale) has the same origin. Additionally, the slope of the linearization contains information on the interaction of the species responsible for the O-upd effect on the ORR. Within this analysis, a site-blocking effect is only possible when setting \(n\) to an unreasonably high value (>5) or as a minor contribution dwarfed by the electronic effect. These results are not in contradiction with the existence of *OH on the Pt(pc) surface: First, *OH adsorption on Pt(pc) appears to be a minor contribution as suggested by the AC voltammograms in Fig. 2. Secondly, in the potential range of near maximum *OH coverage, its blocking effect manifests itself as a constant factor. Due to its reversibility, its contribution cannot be quantified directly on Pt(pc) and is therefore considered part of the value of the intrinsic exchange current density itself.
Both from the cathodic and the anodic branches, we can perform a Tafel analysis using the definition in Eq. (3).
The apparent exchange current density \({i}_{0}^{*}\) includes the effects of specific adsorbates other than from the O-upd. While the cathodic branch is obtained by extrapolation, the anodic branch is constructed according to Eq. (4).
Notably, the Tafel plot in Fig. 4a exhibits a constant slope and is virtually identical in the anodic and cathodic branches. Repeating this analysis at scan rates up to 500 mV/s yields comparable Tafel parameters (Fig. 4b). At scan rates >500 mV/s, the background correction from the pseudocapacitive current contribution on the apparent ORR activity becomes too large, introducing great uncertainty in the analysis. Nearly identical results are obtained in 0.1 M sulfuric acid (Fig. 4b, c, S1f), except for a sharp decrease in the apparent exchange current density, suggesting a high but incomplete surface coverage of bisulfate. This decrease may be a combination of a blocking effect, effects on the electrochemical double layer, and a shift in the point of zero charge. When the electrolyte contained 0.1 M chloride, no ORR current was observed until chloride leaves in the H-upd region (see S1i). The complete and incomplete coverage of the halides and bisulfate, respectively, has been demonstrated on Pt(111) by STM studies38 and the latter also by radiotracer methods39.
The obtained Tafel slope of around 120 ± 10 mV/decade is consistent with a one-electron one-step process being the rds. Using the thermodynamic reversible potential of the ORR of \({E}^{0}\) = 1229 mV vs RHE in Eq. 1b, the exchange current density in the absence of specific adsorbates calculates to around 13 ± 4 µA/cm2 and 1 ± 0.7 µA/cm2 in the presence of bisulfate. The uncertainty of the value originates from the extrapolation in Eq. (2b) and averaging over multiple scan rates. The values of the interaction parameter \(m\) agree for different scan rates, displaying that the effect of the O-upd on the ORR is, as expected, independent of the scan rate (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, the impact of the O-upd on the ORR increases at higher overpotentials. Details of the analysis can be found in the supplementary information. The value for the exchange current density agrees well with previous estimates obtained for platinum surfaces (7–25 µA/cm2)19,29. In contrast, Luo and Koper5 confirmed a Tafel slope of 60 mV/dec on Pt(111), attributed to the effect of *OH surface groups11,19. Therefore, the transfer of the kinetics of Pt(111) to that of Pt(pc) and its derivates, such as the ubiquitous Pt (alloy) nanocatalysts, is not straightforward. To the best of our knowledge, no previous analysis of the ORR on Pt surfaces has yielded such consistent kinetic data: The agreements of the Tafel kinetics over such a wide potential range, range of scan rates, and of both the anodic and cathodic branch is unprecedented. We conclude that the ORR indeed follows the rate equation (Eq. 1a) on Pt(pc) when the O-upd charge is accounted for (Eq. 5). To demonstrate the universal applicability of this analysis, we conduct the same analysis on Pt(pc) surfaces with different levels of rearrangement, on the alloys Pt3Co(pc) and Pt3Ni(pc), and on supported Pt nanoparticles.
Surface rearrangement
Commonly, a freshly polished surface of platinum is “activated” by potential cycling until a stable voltammogram is obtained. In each cycle O-upd species are formed and then reduced which leads to dissolution of a small amount of platinum40. The high reduction potential of Pt ions leads to their immediate redeposition on the surface, resulting in surface rearrangement towards the lowest surface energy while at the same time, possible contaminants are oxidized or expelled from the surface. Both processes are functions of the upper vertex potential (Fig. 2a) and to what extend the surface rearrangement originates from a redistribution of facets/reconstruction or the removal of contaminates is not answered in this study. We find that the apparent ORR current decreases slightly with increased surface rearrangement while the Tafel slope, the exchange current density and the O-upd interaction parameter remain unchanged, see Fig. 5c. This suggests that the tendency to form O-upd species is altered in the process. Through our XPS measurements on the Pt crystal surfaces before and after cycling (Fig. S3a, S3b) it appears that our surface is clean to an extend that can be probed by XPS. We find that when the surface is cycled to lower upper vertex potentials, higher apparent ORR activities are observed meaning that the effect of any contaminants on the ORR is neglectable. Hence, we cautiously suggest that the surface rearrangement from a polished surface to a cycled (activated) surface is a form of reconstruction, ultimately altering the binding energy of the O-upd species binding stronger and earlier on an activated surface.
Platinum alloy surfaces
Platinum surfaces exhibit increased ORR activity when alloyed with an appropriate metal, such as nickel or cobalt, to induce negative lateral surface strain. The resulting downshift in the d-band center lowers the binding energy of oxygen species, such as the intermediates in the ORR10,41. We find that on Pt3Ni(pc) and P3Co(pc) surfaces, the H-upd features are slightly depressed compared to Pt(pc), while those of the surface oxygen regions behave virtually identically regardless of surface preparation method (polishing or Ar-sputtering) (Fig. S1g). Moreover, the formation of non-adventitious surface oxygen (M-O, associated with PtxOy), see Fig. 5d, does not change on the platinum alloys compared to pure platinum before and after the measurement. These observations and the high platinum-to-metal ratio (Fig. 5d) of the non-sputtered samples agree with the presence of a protective platinum overlayer on Pt alloys42. Consequently, the ORR appears to follow the same mechanism on all surfaces, as the kinetic analysis finds that the Tafel slope is unchanged. Here, \(\kappa\) is the rate at which the ORR activity increases with the contraction of the Pt-layer. Its value is comparable for the apparent ORR activity and the exchange current density at around \(\kappa\) = 0.15%/decade. The interaction parameter \(m\) becomes more negative at more compressive surface strain (Fig. 5b), implying that the strength of the electronic effect of the O-upd increases with a downshift in the d-band center. Overall, the ORR activity increases observed for Pt3Co and Pt3Ni mainly arise from an increased intrinsic exchange current density to 25 ± 5 and 30 ± 5 µA/cm2, respectively, consistent with literature data (Table 1) and theory9. While the O-upd is unchanged, it seems to interact slightly stronger with the ORR kinetics, reducing some of the ORR activity gains compared to Pt(pc). The stronger O-upd effect could be attributed to the greater proximity of the ORR intermediates and transition states to the sphere of influence of the elusive O-upd species. While the surface strain relationship is conserved for Pt(pc), Pt3Ni(pc), and P3Co(pc), the O-upd effect may account for discrepancies observed in Volcano relationships between experiment and theory, e.g. those discussed by Stephens et al.9.
Supported platinum nanoparticles
While extended Pt(pc) surfaces are the focus of this work, supported Pt nanoparticles (Pt/C) dominate catalyst applications due to their orders of magnitude higher Pt-utilization2. The surface of Pt/C closely resembles that of Pt(pc), as is evident from the CV in Fig. 6. Despite the similarities, the ORR activities on Pt/C are significantly lower than for Pt(pc), both in this work and in the literature (Table 1), known as the particle size effect1,43. Since the O-upd onset and reduction occurs at lower potentials on Pt/C compared to Pt(pc), this phenomenon is attributed to greater coverage of oxygen species on Pt nanoparticles2 in perchloric and sulfuric acid, which is likely linked to stronger binding on Pt nanoparticles than extended surfaces. Our analysis now provides a method to quantify this effect by comparing the O-upd corrected kinetic parameters of the ORR on Pt/C to Pt(pc) (Fig. S1f). The interaction parameter \(m\), the intrinsic Tafel slope, and the exchange current density (only for HClO4) on Pt/C match their respective values on Pt(pc). The apparent exchange current density of Pt/C (for H2SO4) is only half of the value found on Pt(pc). The reason becomes apparent when one notices that bisulfate adsorbs differently on Pt/C than on Pt(pc) (Fig. 6), with a characteristic peak at 600 mV instead of 300 mV. This peak is likely a contribution of the (111) facet of Pt nanoparticles44 since parts of the characteristic adsorption feature of bisulfate on Pt(111) have been shown to persist even after its surface has been subjected to reconstruction45. It is also known that bisulfate adsorbs stronger and reduces the ORR activity on Pt(111) more than on the other low-index planes46. Together, this explains how bisulfate has a stronger effect on Pt/C than on Pt(pc), while when no bisulfate is present, their exchange current densities are nearly equal. Overall, we conjecture that these results translate to Pt alloy nanoparticles in that activity enhancements, as predicted from their respective extended-surface counterparts (Table 1), are not guaranteed and are subject to changes in the properties of the O-upd.
As we have demonstrated, the electronic effect of the O-upd on the ORR is consistent, quantifiable, and universal among polycrystalline platinum surfaces. Our results on Pt/C provide a valuable link to applications of such platinum catalysts in hydrogen fuel cells (PEMFC and AEMFC): The testing and operating modus of these systems are commonly chrono-potentiometric at 600–700 mV, about 200 mV more positive than where the O-upd is fully reduced and may already have appeared in in-situ spectroscopic studies during fuel cell operation47. Under operating conditions at elevated temperatures, the present O-upd species reduce the ORR activity significantly and, therefore, also reduce the overall performance of the fuel cell as has been found previously48,49. Notably, we find a Tafel slope of around 120 mV/dec on Pt/C rather than the commonly observed 60 mV/dec on Pt/C in low temperature PEMFCs2. A contributing factor to this discrepancy could be sulfonic acid groups interacting with the platinum surface50,51, as the adsorption of sulfate and sulfonic acid groups from the Nafion ionomer coincides with the examined potential range of PEMFCs. In contrast to applied fuel cells, the common half-cell RDE protocol aims to minimize the formation of the O-upd by choosing comparably fast anodic scans to determine the ORR activity of a given catalyst. Consequently, the standard protocol does not provide the intrinsic kinetic values of the ORR on platinum, nor does it predict the performance of a given catalyst in a fuel cell, as illustrated in Fig. 1: For fundamental analysis, one needs to obtain the curve of the intrinsic kinetics, while for fuel cell applications one needs to use a steady-state-like curve. However, the common protocol can only deliver ORR activities between these boundary cases. Alternative ways to test ORR catalysts for fuel cells have been developed by multiple workgroups e.g., by utilizing gas diffusion half-cells52,53. However, experimental challenges limit the wider adoption of these techniques, and the common half-cell RDE protocol remains the measurement tool of choice in developing new catalysts and fundamental studies. We suggest expanding the common protocol to incorporate the effects of the O-upd so that more accurate, comparable, and robust kinetic values are obtained for fundamental studies or when developing new catalysts54,55. Additionally, instead of tweaking the ORR intermediate binding energies to increase the intrinsic ORR activity, reducing the susceptibility towards the formation of surface oxygen may be a more fruitful pathway to better ORR catalysts.
Weakening of the ORR/OER intermediate binding energies by O-upd
To investigate the electronic effect of surface oxygen, we use DFT to calculate the binding energies of reaction intermediates *OO, *OOH, *O, and *OH in various configurations and oxygen coverages on Pt(111) and Pt(100). We calculate the change in binding energy \(\Delta {\mathbb{E}}\) of these intermediates in the presence of the possible *Oupd structures at 25% coverage intervals and find that the presence of *Oupd weakens the binding energy of all ORR intermediates (Fig. 8a).
The *Oupd structures considered, mainly consists of surface *O, because subsurface *O is kinetically unstable at low oxygen coverages. This agrees with previous DFT studies, by e.g. Gu and Balbuerna56 which found that on Pt(111) >0.75 ML *O is required before it becomes favorable to add oxygen to the subsurface rather than the surface. Simulations by Hu and co-workers57 have shown that at about 0.5 ML average O* on Pt(111), high local O coverage can pull Pt out of the Pt surface plane forming Pt2O6 units. Motifs with PtOx pulled out from the plane, have been widely considered as part of the place exchange mechanism, which allows *O to be incorporated into the subsurface below PtOx units58,59,60. We have therefore included *Oupd structures with Pt2O6 units and subsurface *O on Pt(111), and find that *Oupd weakens the binding of ORR intermediate regardless of the exact *Oupd structure.
Since the weakening of ORR intermediates appears to be a universal phenomenon on Pt(111) and Pt(100), it likely applies to the Pt(pc) surface as well. Notably, the weakening of the *OO and *OOH binding energies is correlated, showing the robustness of their scaling relationship beyond surface strain. Our results are in good agreement with previous works that found the O2 binding energies to vary approximately linearly with *Oupd coverage, with variations linked to changes in the metal d-band center induced by the *Oupd adsorbates61,62. The Bell/Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) principle correlates the changes in the change in reaction energy for elementary steps,11,63, which our calculations show depends approximately linearly on *Oupd coverage. For a multistep reaction where the influence of blocking species has been removed, the activation energy will take the form in eq. 6a with \(\alpha\) as the transfer coefficient and \(\beta\) as scaling constant. The ORR current density will therefore depend exponentially on the shifts in intermediate binding energy, the *Oupd coverage, or its surface charge, \({Q}_{O-{upd}}\). The effect of the shift in intermediate binding energy and the interaction parameter \(m\) are then linked through Eq. 6b. If one ML (\({\theta }_{O-{upd}}=1\)) of *Oupd corresponds to a transferred charge of \({Q}_{0}=\,\)420 µC/mol we find that \(m\) linearly correlates with the *Oupd induced shift in binding energies of the reactants and products of the rds, corroborating our experimental observations.
Now, we can estimate what change in binding energy of *OO or *OOH would reflect the experimentally determined energy interaction parameter (\(m \, \approx \, 10\) cm2/mC). Assuming α = 0.5, results in 0.21 eV/ML which is somewhat lower than from our DFT calculations (0.8 – 1 eV/ML), which implies the transition state for O2 activation depends weakly on O-upd coverage. However, other effects may play important roles in the electronic effect on the ORR47,59,60,64,65, such as changes in intermediate coverages affecting available free sites, interactions between the *Oupd and the liquid water layer or hydronium ions; requiring further investigation. The experimentally determined interaction parameter can consequently assist in the identification of such effects. Interestingly, the O-upd charge is stabilized by the presence of O-upd species, apparent from the delayed onset (up to 50 mV) of the reduction peak in Fig. 7a, while the binding energy of the supposed *Oupd itself is weakened. Overall, the observed behavior on Pt, likely applies to other catalyst systems, as linear adsorbate-adsorbate interaction models are prevalent in micro-kinetic modeling and is considered in, e.g., the Temkin and Fowler-Guggenheim adsorption isotherms.
The oxygen evolution reaction
The principles of the presented kinetic analysis of the ORR should also apply to the OER case. First, one must determine the O-upd charge during the OER. At potentials before the onset of the OER, the oxidation/reduction (anodic/cathodic branch) O-upd charges are balanced until 1600 mV (Fig. 7a), suggesting that the entire pseudocapacitive contribution is captured by the O-upd and the double layer charge. During the OER, the oxidation charge includes the electron transfer to oxidize water to molecular oxygen. However, due to the rotation of the electrode at 1600 rpm in Ar-saturation, the molecular oxygen is rapidly removed from the Pt surface. Due to the absence of oxygen during the cathodic scan, the reduction charge must equal the O-upd charge formed in the anodic scan. In connection, the high scan rate of 500 mV/s limits the oxygen production and formation of stronger oxides during the OER, so that the metallic platinum surface remains the same as during our investigation of the ORR. Since the O-upd charge is only reduced at potentials <1100 mV during the cathodic OER scan, the present O-upd charge is only dependent on its upper vertex potential and otherwise constant. This allows collecting the background corrected OER currents at the same potential but different O-upd charges, displayed in Fig. 7b. The resulting plot is of the same kind as the one used to extract the Tafel kinetics for the ORR in Fig. 3e. However, while the graphs are close to being linear with respect to the logarithmic current, they exhibit a slight curvature, meaning that the interaction parameter \(m\) is not constant with O-upd coverage. While in the case of the ORR, the relevant O-upd charge is less than one monolayer equivalent of oxygen (<420 µC/cm2), in the OER case, the O-upd charge is greater than two equivalent monolayers of oxygen. It is reasonable that the effect of the O-upd charge on the OER kinetics is not any longer linear at such high oxygen coverages. The interaction parameter for each potential branch lies between −5 and −10 cm2/mC, close to the one found for the ORR, see Fig. 5a–c. The negative curvature suggests that at increasing O-upd coverages, the marginal effects on the OER kinetics become less negative. Even with a constant interaction parameter, obtaining a Tafel plot for the ORR is not feasible since it would require an extrapolation over 9 times the range of the known values to \({Q}_{O-{upd}}=0\) µC/cm2. However, since the O-upd charge, in contrast to the ORR, is constant in the cathodic scan direction, one can determine the Tafel slope to be around 100 mV/decade (Inset in Fig. 7c). This value is somewhat lower than for the ORR, but sufficiently close to be considered the same within a mechanistic discussion. Setting the interaction parameter to \(m\) = −8 cm2/mC and using the exchange current density obtained for the ORR (\({i}_{0}=\) 13 µA/cm2), we observe a very close match to the measured OER currents, including the characteristic hysteresis between the anodic and cathodic scan (Fig. 7c): During the anodic scan the O-upd coverage increases, causing a reduction in the observed OER compared to its expected value from its intrinsic activity. On the cathodic scan the O-upd remains constant during the OER, meaning that for any given potential below the vertex potential, the O-upd coverage is higher causing the reduction in the apparent OER activity in the cathodic scan.
A great concern is the relatively high scan rates chosen in determining the OER currents: Depending on the rate of the studied electrochemical reaction, it may not be at a kinetic steady state as its rate constant may be too small to follow the potential sweep, and one would observe an increase in currents for a given potential when the scan rate is decreased. However, like in the analysis of the ORR, the OER currents decrease when the scan rate is decreased (see Fig. S1h). The decrease stems from the increased formation of the O-upd species, analogue to the ORR case. When this effect is accounted for, the OER currents recorded at 200 mV/s and 500 mV/s match, demonstrating that the OER, even at these relatively high scan rates, is still kinetically in steady state. All things considered, first, the nature of the potentiodynamically formed O-upd charge appears to be the same in the potential range from 600 mV to 2000 mV indicating that it is not a trivial intermediate of the OER. Secondly, due to the absence of noticeable electrochemical features past 900 mV (associated with <0.5 ML *O), there is no distinct upper bound of *O on the Pt surface, meaning that increasing positive potentials overcome associated energetic penalties. At lower scan rates or during potentiostatic operation, this is likely not the case anymore (Fig. S1e) and other, stronger oxide species form. Before the onset of the OER, bisulfate was desorbed39, and the results are virtually identical in sulfuric and perchloric acid electrolytes (Fig. S1i). Consequently, for Pt(pc) surfaces, the ORR and OER kinetics can phenomenologically be described by a single rate equation (Eq. 7). Such a description suggests that the electronic effect of the O-upd on the transition state of the rds of both the ORR and OER is the same, hence both reactions likely share the same transition state and are opposite directions of the same reaction path.
When no specifically adsorbing species are present on the surface, \({i}_{0}^{*}\) equals \({i}_{0}\). An overview of the unified ORR/OER kinetics is displayed in Fig. 8a. The H-upd coverage was extended into the HER region using potential step experiments, a method adopted from66 to show the similarities between the HER/HOR and H-upd region with the ORR/OER and O-upd region. During the absence of O-upd current in the cathodic scan direction and corrected by the double layer capacitance, the scans cross the potential axis at around 1229 mV. This supports that the thermodynamic reversible potential of the ORR/OER is the relevant value in their kinetic description rather than the measured open circuit potentials (900–1000 mV). While our results are conclusive on various kinds of platinum surfaces, it is unclear if they can be transferred to other relevant metallic or oxide surfaces, such as that of iridium oxide67. Figure 8c depicts an scheme summarizing the relevant species on a Pt(111) slab: The *O of the O-upd would occupy the high coordinated hollow sites (bridge sites on Pt(100)) or subsurface vacancies and can be seen as a spectator. The intermediate *O of the reaction pathway and the specific adsorbates68,69 responsible for a blocking effect would exist on the more exposed, low coordinated, top sites surrounded by a water adsorption layer. Therefore, species such as *O would then fulfill different roles, depending on which binding site they are found. However, despite tremendous efforts by the scientific community, it is not certain how *OH and *O manifest themselves and lead to their ascribed electrochemical features. While the efforts to complete the picture on the atomic level continue, e.g., by ins-situ Raman spectroscopy34,70,71 and molecular dynamic simulations64, the study of the electrochemical effects of the elusive O-upd species can be carried out independently, as demonstrated in this contribution.
In this work, we presented an experimental method to extract the intrinsic ORR kinetics on polycrystalline platinum surfaces in acidic media, irrespective of scan rate and scan direction. For this, we distinguished between stronger oxides that are not the subject of this study, and weaker oxygen species, called the O-upd. We could successfully separate the effects of the O-upd from the kinetics and found that the ORR follows the Tafel kinetics handsomely. We measured a Tafel slope of about 120 mV/decade, suggesting that one electron is transferred during the rate-determining step in agreement with mechanistic models with an exchange current density determined in the Tafel region of 13 ± 4 µA/cm2, a substantial step towards a mechanistic description of the ORR/OER. We show that our method delivers consistent results on both less well and highly rearranged polycrystalline platinum, on platinum alloys, in the presence of bisulfate, and on supported Pt nanoparticles. The negative effect of the O-upd seems to stem from weakening the binding energies of the ORR/OER intermediates, altering potential kinetic and thermodynamic barriers for O2 activation. Our experimental findings are in good agreement with density functional theory calculations showing that surface and subsurface oxygen atoms weaken binding of the ORR/OER intermediates. The ORR activity on Pt(pc) at 900 mV is ~7 mA/cm2 when accounting for the O-upd effect, over 3-fold higher than the commonly reported 2 mA/cm2. This effect may explain some of the discrepancy between expectations and experiments regarding the Volcano relationship of ORR catalysts. Due to the difference between the Tafel slope on Pt(111) and on Pt(pc), our analysis substantiates limits in transferring the ORR kinetics on model surfaces to applied platinum-based catalysts. With these results, we argue that the RDE half-cell protocol must be expanded to determine the intrinsic ORR kinetics for effective screening and development of Pt-based catalysts and for providing more accurate kinetic data to inform computational methods that are commonly performed on metallic rather than oxidized surfaces. Using an analogous analysis for the OER reveals that the ORR/OER can be described by the same rate equation with nearly identical parameters and the same negative effect of the O-upd, suggesting a deeper mechanistic connection. Finally, we propose that *O has different roles depending on the binding site where it occurs. We conjecture that high-coordinated, strong binding sites are responsible for the O-upd, low-coordinated, weak binding sites are responsible for the kinetic activity. Since the reduction of the O-upd species during a cathodic scan is the main driving force behind catalyst degradation, a reduction in the O-upd formation and its interaction with reaction intermediates holds the key to both improved ORR kinetics and catalyst stability. Arguably, an ORR catalyst with a sufficiently reduced O-upd formation could be more stable and more catalytically active despite an intrinsically lower exchange current density.
Methods
Electrochemistry
The electrochemical measurements were carried out in a three-electrode setup consisting of a platinum counter electrode, an electrolytically charged reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), and a PTFE-embedded working electrode or interchangeable platinum (alloy) crystal (Ø = 5 mm) in an in-house designed glass cell (Fig. S1a). The supported catalyst measurements were performed with a glassy carbon electrode instead on which 10 gPt/cm2 of Pt/C (40% mass loading) was deposited. The electrode was mounted on a PINE rotator and the electrochemical measurements were performed with a BioLogic VSP potentiostat. All potentials in this work are given vs RHE and are iR-compensated. All specific current and capacitance values are given per electrochemical active surface area determined by the CO displacement technique. All measured ORR currents were recorded in oxygen at 1600 rpm, background corrected by subtracting currents for the corresponding CV in argon at 0 rpm, and mass transport corrected using the Koutecký–Levich equation. Each set of kinetic parameters is calculated from on average 3.9 sets of scan rates. At each scan rate 5–9 pairs of CVs and LSVs in argon and oxygen were recorded for a total of over 500 individual CVs/LSVs in this work. In between each individual measurement, the electrode was reset by cycling up to the maximum potential of the respective measurement series at 500 mV/s. Current values on the exchangeable discs had to be leak-corrected at lower scan rates in some cases. The detailed experimental procedures, the raw data, the cleanliness criteria, and further information on the protocols and data treatment can be found in the SI.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
The XPS analysis was performed using a Thermo ScientificExcalab 250Xi XPS instrument equipped with an Al-Kα source (1486.6 eV). The binding energy was calibrated with the Au 4 f peak at 84.0 eV measured prior to the analyzed samples. Pt 4 f, O 1 s, and survey spectra were recorded. Pt 4 f and O 1 s spectra were deconvoluted using CasaXPS software using Shirley-type background correction. Pt 4 f peaks were fitted using an asymmetric peak-shape (LA(1.2,85,70)).
Powder diffraction (XRD)
Powder diffraction data were collected using a Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer equipped with a 9 kW rotating anode. Bragg-Brentano geometry was used (Cu-Kα radiation) with a position-sensitive detector (D/TEX250). Data were collected 20°−90° in 2 θ with a step size of 0.02° in 2 θ. Unit cell parameters were determined from Rietveld refinement.
Computational details
All geometry optimization on Platinum surfaces were performed using the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP)72,73 with the projector augmented wave method74 and Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation was used for the exchange-correlation functional75. The non-spin polarized DFT simulations were performed on Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces in the super-cell approach using a five-layer Pt slab in which two bottom layers are fixed at the calculated bulk positions and the top three layers are allowed to relax. The plane-wave cutoff was set to 400 eV and the convergence criterion for structure relaxation is that the force acting on each atom becomes <0.01 eV/Å. Monkhorst-Pack meshes of 4 x 4 x 1 were used for the slab simulation. We enforced a 15 Å vacuum over the top layer of the slabs to avoid any interaction between the periodic structures. The bulk Pt(FCC) lattice constant was found to be 3.92 Å and it agrees with the experimental value76. We investigated five different configurations of oxygen coverage on Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces namely 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1 monolayer (ML). The initial structure for the run was obtained by relaxing and optimizing the defect-free structure of Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces. For Pt(100) surfaces the oxygen atoms on the bridge site are most energetically favorable56 for oxygen atom adsorption so we stick with the bridge site for Pt(100) for our entire calculations. On the other hand, the hollow site is most energetically favorable for Pt(111) surfaces for the oxygen atoms adsorption. We calculated binding energies of *O, *OH, *OOH, and *O2 on all the possible sites including atop, and bridge sites on the five configurations of oxygen coverage on Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces. All the optimized structures and energies used in this study are shown in the SI.
Data availability
The experimental and computational data generated in this study have been deposited in the FigShare database https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591966.
References
Nesselberger, M. et al. The particle size effect on the oxygen reduction reaction activity of Pt catalysts: influence of electrolyte and relation to single crystal models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17428–17433 (2011).
Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B. & Wagner, F. T. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 56, 9–35 (2005).
MarkovicÂ, N. M. et al. Surface science studies of model fuel cell electrocatalysts. Surface Sci. Rep. 45, 117–229 (2002).
Solla-Gullón, J., Rodríguez, P., Herrero, E., Aldaz, A. & Feliu, J. M. Surface characterization of platinum electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 1359–1373 (2008).
Luo, M. & Koper, M. T. M. A kinetic descriptor for the electrolyte effect on the oxygen reduction kinetics on Pt(111). Nat. Catal. 5, 615–623 (2022).
Climent, V. & Feliu, J. M. Thirty years of platinum single crystal electrochemistry. J. Solid State Electrochem. 15, 1297–1315 (2011).
Fabbri, E. & Schmidt, T. J. Oxygen evolution reaction—the enigma in water electrolysis. ACS Catal. 8, 9765–9774 (2018).
Strasser, P. et al. Lattice-strain control of the activity in dealloyed core-shell fuel cell catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2, 454–460 (2010).
Stephens, I. E. L., Bondarenko, A. S., Grønbjerg, U., Rossmeisl, J. & Chorkendorff, I. Understanding the electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on platinum and its alloys. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6744–6762 (2012).
Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).
Hansen, H. A., Viswanathan, V. & Nørskov, J. K. Unifying kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of 2 e – and 4 e – reduction of oxygen on metal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 6706–6718 (2014).
Favaro, M. et al. Elucidating the alkaline oxygen evolution reaction mechanism on platinum. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11634–11643 (2017).
Hong, W. T. et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1404–1427 (2015).
Giordano, L. et al. pH dependence of OER activity of oxides: current and future perspectives. Catal. Today 262, 2–10 (2016).
Viswanathan, V., Hansen, H. A., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. Universality in oxygen reduction electrocatalysis on metal surfaces. ACS Catal. 2, 1654–1660 (2012).
Kocha, S. Best practices and benchmark activities for ORR measurements by the rotating disk electrode technique. NREL Doe 1, 215–218 (2014).
Mayrhofer, K. J. J. et al. Measurement of oxygen reduction activities via the rotating disc electrode method: from Pt model surfaces to carbon-supported high surface area catalysts. Electrochim. Acta 53, 3181–3188 (2008).
Chen, G. et al. Evaluation of oxygen reduction activity by the thin-film rotating disk electrode methodology: the effects of potentiodynamic parameters. Electrocatalysis 7, 305–316 (2016).
Wang, J. X., Markovic, N. M. & Adzic, R. R. Kinetic analysis of oxygen reduction on Pt(111) in acid solutions: intrinsic kinetic parameters and anion adsorption effects. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 4127–4133 (2004).
Chen, W. et al. Origins of high onset overpotential of oxygen reduction reaction at Pt-based electrocatalysts: a mini review. Electrochem. Commun. 96, 71–76 (2018).
Markovic, N. M., Schmidt, T. J., Stamenkovic, V. & Ross, P. N. Oxygen reduction reaction on Pt and Pt bimetallic surfaces: a selective review. Fuel Cells 1, 105–116 (2001).
Gómez-Marín, A. M., Feliu, J. M. & Ticianelli, E. Oxygen reduction on platinum surfaces in acid media: experimental evidence of a CECE/DISP initial reaction path. ACS Catal. 9, 2238–2251 (2019).
Gómez-Marín, A. M. & Feliu, J. M. New insights into the oxygen reduction reaction mechanism on Pt (111): a detailed electrochemical study. ChemSusChem 6, 1091–1100 (2013).
Kuzume, A., Herrero, E. & Feliu, J. M. Oxygen reduction on stepped platinum surfaces in acidic media. J. Electroanal. Chem. 599, 333–343 (2007).
María Escudero-Escribano et al. Tuning the activity of Pt alloy electrocatalysts by means of the lanthanide contraction. Science 352, 73–76 (2016).
Bu, L. et al. Biaxially strained PtPb/Pt core/shell nanoplate boosts oxygen reduction catalysis. Science 354, 1410 (2016).
Chen, C. et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014).
Stamenkovic, V. R. et al. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315, 493–497 (2007).
Xia, Y.-F. et al. How to appropriately assess the oxygen reduction reaction activity of platinum group metal catalysts with rotating disk electrode. iScience 24, 103024 (2021).
Aaronson, B. D. B. et al. Pseudo-single-crystal electrochemistry on polycrystalline electrodes: Visualizing activity at grains and grain boundaries on platinum for the Fe 2+/Fe3+ redox reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3873–3880 (2013).
Lopes, P. P. et al. Relationships between atomic level surface structure and stability/activity of platinum surface atoms in aqueous environments. ACS Catal. 6, 2536–2544 (2016).
Climent, V., Gómez, R., Orts, J. M. & Feliu, J. M. Thermodynamic analysis of the temperature dependence of OH adsorption on Pt(111) and Pt(100) electrodes in acidic media in the absence of specific anion adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 11344–11351 (2006).
Van Der Geest, M. E., Dangerfield, N. J. & Harrington, D. A. An ac voltammetry study of Pt oxide growth. J. Electroanal. Chem. 420, 89–100 (1997).
Rizo, R. et al. Investigating the presence of adsorbed species on Pt steps at low potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2550 (2022).
Deng, Y.-J., Arenz, M. & Wiberg, G. K. H. Equilibrium coverage of OH ad in correlation with platinum catalyzed fuel cell reactions in HClO 4. Electrochem. Commun. 53, 41–44 (2015).
Angerstein-Kozlowska, H., Conway, B. E. & Sharp, W. B. A. The real condition of electrochemically oxidized platinum surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 43, 9–36 (1973).
Marković, N. M., Gasteiger, H. A., Grgur, B. N. & Ross, P. N. Oxygen reduction reaction on Pt(111): effects of bromide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 467, 157–163 (1999).
Orts, J. M., Gomez, R., Feliu, J. M., Aldaz, A. & Clavilier, J. Nature of Br adlayers on Pt(111) single-crystal surfaces. Voltammetric, charge displacement, and ex situ STM experiments. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 2334–2344 (1996).
Kolics, A. & Wieckowski, A. Adsorption of bisulfate and sulfate anions on a Pt(111) electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 2588 (2001).
Topalov, A. A. et al. Towards a comprehensive understanding of platinum dissolution in acidic media. Chem. Sci. 5, 631–638 (2014).
Mukerjee, S. Role of structural and electronic properties of Pt and Pt alloys on electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 1409 (1995).
Stamenkovic, V. et al. Changing the activity of electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction by tuning the surface electronic structure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 2897–2901 (2006).
Mayrhofer, K. J. J. et al. The impact of geometric and surface electronic properties of Pt-catalysts on the particle size effect in electrocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 14433–14440 (2005).
Kinoshita, K. Particle size effects for oxygen reduction on highly dispersed platinum in acid electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 845 (1990).
Björling, A., Ahlberg, E. & Feliu, J. M. Kinetics of surface modification induced by submonolayer electrochemical oxygen adsorption on Pt(1 1 1). Electrochem. Commun. 12, 359–361 (2010).
Markovic, N., Gasteiger, H. & Ross, P. N. Kinetics of oxygen reduction on Pt (h k l) electrodes: implications for the crystallite size effect with supported Pt electrocatalysts. J. Electrochem Soc. 144, 1591–1597 (1997).
Casalongue, H. S. et al. Direct observation of the oxygenated species during oxygen reduction on a platinum fuel cell cathode. Nat. Commun. 4, 2817 (2013).
Liu, Y., Mathias, M. & Zhang, J. Measurement of platinum oxide coverage in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 13, B1 (2010).
Subramanian, N. P., Greszler, T. A., Zhang, J., Gu, W. & Makharia, R. Pt-oxide cCoverage-dependent oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, B531 (2012).
Masuda, T., Sonsudin, F., Singh, P. R., Naohara, H. & Uosaki, K. Potential-dependent adsorption and desorption of perfluorosulfonated ionomer on a platinum electrode surface probed by electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance and atomic force microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 15704–15709 (2013).
Ohma, A., Fushinobu, K. & Okazaki, K. Influence of Nafion® film on oxygen reduction reaction and hydrogen peroxide formation on Pt electrode for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta 55, 8829–8838 (2010).
Pinaud, B. A., Bonakdarpour, A., Daniel, L., Sharman, J. & Wilkinson, D. P. Key considerations for high current fuel cell catalyst testing in an electrochemical half-cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, F321–F327 (2017).
Inaba, M. et al. Benchmarking high surface area electrocatalysts in a gas diffusion electrode: measurement of oxygen reduction activities under realistic conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 988–994 (2018).
Perez-Alonso, F. J. et al. The effect of size on the oxygen electroreduction activity of mass-selected platinum nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 4641–4643 (2012).
Jennings, P. C., Lysgaard, S., Hansen, H. A. & Vegge, T. Decoupling strain and ligand effects in ternary nanoparticles for improved ORR electrocatalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 24737–24745 (2016).
Gu, Z. & Balbuena, P. B. Absorption of atomic oxygen into subsurfaces of Pt(100) and Pt(111): density functional theory study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111, 9877–9883 (2007).
Xu, J., Xie, W., Han, Y. & Hu, P. Atomistic insights into the oxidation of flat and stepped platinum surfaces using large-scale machine learning potential-based grand-canonical monte carlo. ACS Catal. 12, 14812–14824 (2022).
Eslamibidgoli, M. J. & Eikerling, M. H. Atomistic mechanism of Pt extraction at oxidized surfaces: insights from DFT. Electrocatalysis 7, 345–354 (2016).
Fuchs, T. et al. Structure dependency of the atomic-scale mechanisms of platinum electro-oxidation and dissolution. Nat. Catal. 3, 754–761 (2020).
Jacobse, L. et al. Electrochemical oxidation of Pt(111) beyond the place-exchange model. Electrochim. Acta 407, 139881 (2022).
Mou, T., Han, X., Zhu, H. & Xin, H. Machine learning of lateral adsorbate interactions in surface reaction kinetics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 36, 100825 (2022).
Miller, S. D. & Kitchin, J. R. Relating the coverage dependence of oxygen adsorption on Au and Pt fcc(111) surfaces through adsorbate-induced surface electronic structure effects. Surf. Sci. 603, 794–801 (2009).
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 37–46 (2009).
Cheng, T. et al. Mechanism and kinetics of the electrocatalytic reaction responsible for the high cost of hydrogen fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 2666–2673 (2017).
Ruge, M. et al. Electrochemical oxidation of smooth and nanoscale rough Pt(111): an in situ surface X-ray scattering study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, H608–H614 (2017).
Strmcnik, D., Tripkovic, D., van der Vliet, D., Stamenkovic, V. & Marković, N. M. Adsorption of hydrogen on Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces and its role in the HOR. Electrochem. Commun. 10, 1602–1605 (2008).
Nong, H. N. et al. Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nature 587, 408–413 (2020).
Farrell, H. H. The coadsorption of I and Cl on Pt(111). Surf. Sci. Lett. 100, 613–625 (1980).
Bittner, A. M., Wintterlin, J., Beran, B. & Ertl, G. Bromine adsorption on Pt(111), (100), and (110)—an STM study in air and in electrolyte. Surf. Sci. 335, 291–299 (1995).
Huang, Y.-F., Kooyman, P. J. & Koper, M. T. M. Intermediate stages of electrochemical oxidation of single-crystalline platinum revealed by in situ Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12440 (2016).
Dong, J.-C. et al. In situ Raman spectroscopic evidence for oxygen reduction reaction intermediates at platinum single-crystal surfaces. Nat. Energy 4, 60–67 (2018).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Branger, V., Pelosin, V., Badawi, K. F. & Goudeau, P. Study of the mechanical and microstructural state of platinum thin films. Thin Solid Films 275, 22–24 (1996).
Stamenkovic, V. R., Mun, B. S., Mayrhofer, K. J. J., Ross, P. N. & Markovic, N. M. Effect of surface composition on electronic structure, stability, and electrocatalytic properties of Pt-transition metal alloys: Pt-skin versus Pt-skeleton surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8813–8819 (2006).
Stamenković, V., Schmidt, T. J., Ross, P. N. & Marković, N. M. Surface composition effects in electrocatalysis: kinetics of oxygen reduction on well-defined Pt 3 Ni and Pt 3 Co alloy surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 11970–11979 (2002).
Li, D. et al. Functional links between Pt single crystal morphology and nanoparticles with different size and shape: the oxygen reduction reaction case. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 4061–4069 (2014).
Wang, C. et al. Monodisperse Pt3Co nanoparticles as a catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction: size-dependent activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 113, 19365–19368 (2009).
Wang, X., Zhao, Z., Sun, P. & Li, F. One-step synthesis of supported high-index faceted platinum-cobalt nanocatalysts for an enhanced oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 5077–5082 (2020).
Carpenter, M. K., Moylan, T. E., Kukreja, R. S., Atwan, M. H. & Tessema, M. M. Solvothermal synthesis of platinum a n for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8535–8542 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Poul Norby for his assistance in the XRD measurements of the platinum alloy crystals and to Mikkel Rykær Kraglund for his assistance in the XPS measurements. This work was supported by a research grant (36275, B.A.B.) from VILLUM FONDEN and the Carlsberg Foundation (CF19-0304, H.A.H).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.A.B. conceptualized the study, performed the electrochemical measurements, and analyzed the data. Y.K. performed the computational studies. F.L.B. performed the XPS measurements and analysis. H.A.H. supervised the computational studies. B.A.B., J.H. and H.A.H. wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Victor Climent and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brandes, B.A., Krishnan, Y., Buchauer, F.L. et al. Unifying the ORR and OER with surface oxygen and extracting their intrinsic activities on platinum. Nat Commun 15, 7336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51605-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51605-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.