Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Insurance approval rates for collagenase clostridium histolyticum prior to discontinuation: a Canada-wide analysis

Abstract

Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCh), the first approved non-surgical treatment for Peyronie’s disease (PD), was withdrawn from the European, Canadian, and Asian markets due to poor demand and lack of government reimbursement options. We sought to assess insurance approval rates and usage of CCh across Canada to understand the factors that led to its withdrawal. Data on patients prescribed CCh for PD or Dupuytren’s contracture was obtained through collaboration with BioScript Solutions to assess the association of variables with insurance approval and prescription filling. We identified 3297 insurance coverage applications for Xiaflex® from April 2018 to June 2020. Of all applications for PD, 92.9% applications were approved while 7.1% were rejected. Despite the withdrawal of CCh from Canadian markets, coverage application approval rates for 2018, 2019, and 2020 were 86.5%, 90.1%, and 89.1%, respectively. Of 2921 approved applications, 88.8% prescriptions were filled. For the 376 rejected applications, 66.4% of prescriptions were filled. Overall, 90% of the cost of Xiaflex® was covered in Canada among those with extended health benefits, with an out-of-pocket expense of $210.4. Insurance coverage requests for Xiaflex® were approved at a high rate in Canada with approved patients being very likely to proceed with therapy, despite interprovincial variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from BioScript Solutions but restrictions apply to the availability of this data, which was used under license for the current study, and not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of BioScript Solutions.

References

  1. Mulhall JP, Creech SD, Boorjian SA, Ghaly S, Kim ED, Moty A, et al. Subjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2004;171:2350–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gholami SS, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Lin CS, Rajfer J, Lue TF. Peyronie’s disease: a review. J Urol. 2003;169:1234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Erol B, Oktar T, Tunc M, Tellaloglu S. A retrospective review of 307 men with Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2002;168:1075–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulhall JP, Schiff J, Guhring P. An analysis of the natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2006;175:2115–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bella AJ, Lee JC, Grober ED, Carrier S, Benard F, Brock GB. 2018 Canadian Urological Association guideline for Peyronie’s disease and congenital penile curvature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12:E197–209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. Peyronie’s disease: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2015;194:745–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJG, McMahon CG, Smith T, Tursi J, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of Peyronie disease in 2 large double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase 3 studies. J Urol. 2013;190:199–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellstrom WJG, Tue Nguyen HM, Alzweri L, Chung A, Virasoro R, Tapscott A, et al. Intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum causes meaningful improvement in men with Peyronie’s disease: results of a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol. 2019;201:777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paladin Labs Inc. Healthcare Professional Information regarding discontinuation of XIAFLEX®. 2020. https://www.dupuytrencanada.ca/DATA/MEDIA/2022/10/Xiaflex_Discontinuation_Notice_04302020.pdf.

  10. Mann U, Shiff B, Jain K, Flannigan R, Elterman D, Patel P. Canadian provider perspectives on collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease and the impact of its discontinuation. Int J Impot Res. 2021;34:599–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordon BH, Hofer MD, Hutchinson RC, Broderick GA, Lotan Y, Morey AF. Superior cost effectiveness of penile plication vs intralesional collagenase injection for treatment of Peyronie’s disease deformities. Urol Pract. 2017;4:118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harvey N, Pearce I. At what cost is collagenase clostridium histolyticum viable for treating Peyronie’s disease in a public healthcare system? Andrology. 2020;8:1304–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wymer K, Hebert K, Kohler T, Trost LW. MP65-05 Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, and penile traction therapy in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2019;201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000556917.78697.44.

  14. Gamidov S, Shatylko T, Gasanov N, Scherbakov D, Li K, Sukhikh G. Long-term outcomes of surgery for Peyronie’s disease: focus on patient satisfaction. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:332–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alom M, Sharma KL, Toussi A, Kohler T, Trost L. Efficacy of combined collagenase clostridium histolyticum and RestoreX penile traction therapy in men with Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2019;16:891–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flores S, Choi J, Alex B, Mulhall JP. Erectile dysfunction after plaque incision and grafting: Short-term assessment of incidence and predictors. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2031–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung E, Clendinning E, Lessard L, Brock G. Five-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2011;8:594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Punjani N, Nascimento B, Salter C, Miranda E, Terrier J, Taniguchi H, et al. Predictors of depression in men with Peyronie’s disease seeking evaluation. J Sex Med. 2021;18:783–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Psychological impact of Peyronie’s disease: a review. J Sex Med. 2013;10:653–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirazi M, Haghpanah AR, Badiee M, Afrasiabi MA, Haghpanah S. Effect of intralesional verapamil for treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41:467–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Russo GI, Milenkovic U, Hellstrom W, Levine LA, Ralph D, Albersen M. Clinical efficacy of injection and mechanical therapy for Peyronie’s disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2018;74:767–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stuntz M, Perlaky A, Des Vignes F, Kyriakides T, Glass D. The prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in the United States: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DC, BS, DSB, TS, RBB, MG, RF, and PP each contributed to the study design, manuscript drafting, approval of the final version, and agree to be accountable for the accuracy of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Premal Patel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

RF has received speaking honoraria and an education grant from Boston Scientific and speaking honoraria from Paladin Labs. PP is a consultant for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

Research ethics board approval as per TCPS2 was not required in this study as all data from BioScript Solutions is previously anonymized and no confidential patient information was accessible.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, D., Shiff, B., Bal, D.S. et al. Insurance approval rates for collagenase clostridium histolyticum prior to discontinuation: a Canada-wide analysis. Int J Impot Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00749-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00749-7

Search

Quick links