Abstract
Several molecular patterns have been identified that recognize pattern recognition receptors. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are commonly used terminologies to classify molecules originating from pathogen and endogenous molecules, respectively, to heighten the immune response in sepsis. Herein, we focus on a subgroup of endogenous molecules that may be detected as foreign and similarly trigger immune signaling pathways. These chromatin-associated molecules, i.e., chromatin containing nuclear DNA and histones, extracellular RNA, mitochondrial DNA, telomeric repeat-containing RNA, DNA- or RNA-binding proteins, and extracellular traps, may be newly classified as chromatin-associated molecular patterns (CAMPs). Herein, we review the release of CAMPs from cells, their mechanism of action and downstream immune signaling pathways, and targeted therapeutic approaches to mitigate inflammation and tissue injury in inflammation and sepsis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
Extracellular nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and their associated molecules present distinct molecular patterns that activate immune cells.
-
Increased blood levels of CAMPs correlate with the severity of sepsis.
-
Extracellular TERRA could be a novel CAMP.
-
Targeting CAMPs with neutralizing antibodies, receptor inhibitors, and small molecule inhibitors attenuate inflammation in sepsis.
Open questions
-
Do extracellular histones and eCIRP exist in different post-translational forms?
-
Do epigenetic changes influence the release and functions of CAMPs?
-
Can glycoRNAs induce or regulate inflammation in sepsis?
-
Are ribosomes released to act as CAMPs in sepsis?
Introduction
Sepsis is a complex inflammatory disorder initiated by a dysregulated host immune response to infection [1]. In the United States, approximately 1.7 million adults are affected each year causing more than 250,000 deaths [2, 3]. The innate immune system is activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), triggering inflammation [4, 5]. Intracellular proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids originating from the nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria, and granules fall into the broad category of DAMPs [4, 6, 7]. PAMPs can be further separated into MAMPs and NAMPs, containing the molecular patterns derived from microbes and nematodes, respectively [8, 9]. In addition, lifestyle-associated inflammatory diseases and their corresponding molecular patterns (LAMPs) have been distinguished from conventional DAMPs [10]. Self-associated molecular patterns (SAMPs) maintain cellular homeostasis and regulate innate immune cells when they become activated [11]. To simplify this broad area of DAMPs, the molecules derived from the nucleus or molecules associated with chromatin can be designated as chromatin-associated molecular patterns (CAMPs). Thus, by name, CAMPs refer to chromatin made up of nucleosomes containing DNA and histones. However, several nucleic acids and proteins, i.e., mitochondrial DNA, cell-free (cf) RNAs, microRNAs, telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA), extracellular traps (ETs), and RNA- or DNA-binding proteins can also be included in this group, given their similar origins’ contribution to inflammation and organ dysfunction in sepsis. Increased levels of CAMPs, i.e., cfRNA, cfDNA, histones, extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (eCIRP), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and ETs in blood have been shown to correlate with disease severity in sepsis (Table 1) [12,13,14,15,16,17].
CAMPs are released from cells through active and passive release pathways. Among the active release processes, exosomal, lysosomal, and gasdermin D (GSDMD) pores (pre-pyroptotic) comprise the primary mechanisms for CAMP release while keeping cells alive [18,19,20,21]. By contrast, passive release mechanisms include secondary necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and NETosis [18, 22, 23]. In septic conditions, once released from cells, CAMPs recognize their receptors, i.e., Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), TLR2, TLR7, TLR9, receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1), CD24, and cytosolic DNA sensors absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) to activate immune cells, causing inflammation and tissue injury. [6, 7, 24,25,26] Conversely, neutralizing antibodies or antagonists against those receptors have been shown to attenuate CAMP-induced inflammation [6, 7]. In this review we will discuss molecules related to CAMPs, how CAMPs are released from cells during inflammation, and the signal transduction pathways involving CAMP-mediated inflammation in experimental and clinical sepsis (Fig. 1; Table 2). Finally, we will emphasize targeting CAMPs to abrogate inflammation in pre-clinical conditions (Fig. 2; Table 3).
Chromatin-associated molecular patterns (CAMPs)
Chromatin is a structural complex of DNA with various basic and acidic proteins. Histones are basic, positively charged proteins that associate with negatively charged DNA, thereby organizing DNA into structures called nucleosomes [27, 28]. A nucleosome consists of a 147 bp DNA sequence wrapped around a set of eight histones called an octamer. Each histone octamer consists of two copies of each of the histone proteins, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The linker histones, H1, sit on the ends of DNA, keeping DNA correctly wrapped with core histones [27, 28]. Chromatin’s primary function is to compress DNA into a compact unit that fits within the cell’s nucleus. Chromatin increases genome stability and hinders the enzymes needed for gene transcription [27,28,29]. The phenomena of chemical modifications of histones and DNA, called epigenetic marks, change chromatin structure and expose regulatory elements for transcription factors to bind and impact gene expression [29, 30]. Chromatin modifications link with various cell processes, including DNA replication, transcription, DNA repair, genetic recombination, and cell division [29,30,31]. Following stress, infection, injury, or other inflammatory stimuli, chromatin (and associated states of nucleic acids) are released from cells, acting as CAMPs to augment inflammation and tissue injury. CAMPs include but are not limited to extracellular DNA, histones, RNA, microRNA (miRNA), mitochondrial DNA, eCIRP, HMGB1, and ETs.
Extracellular DNA
During cell death, such as apoptosis, necrosis, or ETosis, DNA exits the cell. Extracellular or cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs), including pathogen-derived CpG, damaged cell-released nuclear or mitochondrial DNA, and ETs, have been reported to not only represent biomarkers of sepsis but also contribute to the length and severity of the inflammatory response in immune cells [32]. While bacterial DNA can activate the immune system through its CpG motifs, mammalian DNA is ordinarily inactive and only acquires activity once released extracellularly [32]. DNA can be associated with nuclear, cytoplasmic and serum proteins, which can promote its uptake intracellularly to stimulate internal DNA sensors [33].
The effect of DNA to serve as a CAMP necessitates the transfer of DNA from one cell to the extracellular space and then uptake into another cell [34]. There are various mechanisms by which DNA may then be recognized and trigger downstream signaling pathways that lead to inflammation. The three major receptors responsible for DNA-driven immune responses include toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) and cyclic-GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS). TLR9 is expressed on the endosomal membrane. It functions as a DNA receptor that specifically recognizes hypomethylated CpG motifs and induces type-I interferon (IFN) as well as other inflammatory genes [35]. The coupling mechanisms of cytosolic DNA to its downstream pro-inflammatory signaling cascades is multifold. Cytosolic DNA can drive the Nlrp3 inflammasome or PYHIN inflammasomes assembly and activation, including AIM2, and interferon-inducible protein 16 (IFI16). Upon inflammasome activation, DNA sensors recruit adaptors to activate caspase-1, leading to proteolytic cleavage and release of active forms of IL-1β and IL-18 [36, 37]. Perhaps most significant in cytosolic DNA sensing is the DNA-binding protein, cGAS. cGAS is responsible for recognizing self- verse other sources of chromatin (i.e., CAMPs) and initiating a robust response to their accumulation in the cytosol through activation of STING [38, 39]. Recent work has highlighted the integral role of cGAS in distinguishing sources of DNA. For example, the binding of nuclear chromatin to histones H2A and H2B, and through selective suppression of cytosolic cGAS through the cell cycle have been shown to prevent aberrant activation of cGAS [38, 40]. For non-self-DNA in the cGAS-STING pathway, DNA binding activates cytosolic cGAS to generate the second messenger cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which binds to the endoplasmic reticulum-localized adaptor protein STING. After activation, STING translocates to the Golgi and recruits kinases such as TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and IkB kinase (IKK) which phosphorylate interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and the NFkB inhibitor IkBα. TBK1 acts as a convergence point for multiple PRR-driven pathways in IRF3 phosphorylation and eventual transcriptional activation of type-I IFN and related genes. Notably, besides acting as an adaptor for DNA sensing, STING is also capable of acting as a direct sensor for secondary messenger molecules including cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) and cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP), thereby serving as a strong inducer of type-I IFN [33]. Other known DNA-binding proteins may similarly mediate DNA-induced type-I IFN and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. These DNA-binding proteins include DNA-dependent activator or IRFs (DAI) [41], RNA polymerase III [42], IFI16 [43], oligodeoxynucleotides (including DHX36 and DHX9) [44, 45], and DDX41 [46]. Finally, additional DNA binding proteins may be involved in cytosolic DNA sensing leading to production of type 3 interferon and IFNβ, including Ku70 and leucine-rich repeat in flightless-I interacting protein (LRRFIP1), respectively [47,48,49].
In human sepsis, plasma levels of cfDNA are elevated, and high plasma DNA is linked to increased mortality in sepsis [50]. Endogenous DNases comprise the first line of defense against DNA functioning as a CAMP. Studies of mice lacking these enzymes demonstrated overexpression of type-I IFNs in macrophages and led to embryonic lethality in mice in STING-dependent manner, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies targeted at DNA as a CAMP in sepsis [51]. Further, experimental models targeting components of these signaling pathways has been shown to have beneficial effect. For example, STING knockout mice were protected in CLP-induced sepsis through reduced coagulation [52]. Similarly, models utilizing mice deficient in AIM2 [53], TLR9 [54], TLR4 [55], IRF3 [56], and related proteins were protected in experimental sepsis models, suggesting further therapeutic potential. Other strategies have investigated the use of ~40 nm cationic nanoparticles (cNP) to scavenge cfDNA and inhibit the activation of primary monocytes [57]. In the context of sepsis, nucleic acid-binding nanoparticles (NABPs) aiding cfDNA clearance exhibited beneficial outcomes [58]. This suggests a different direction of nanomedicine in treating inflammatory pathologies, including sepsis [57, 58].
Mitochondrial DNA
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is another source of extracellular DNA that serves as a CAMP [59]. mtDNA released from the mitochondrial compartment to the cytoplasm sense intracellular DNA sensors to induce inflammation [60, 61]. Human mitochondria have evolved from endosymbiotic bacteria and thus may express molecules that resemble bacterial products [62]. Because of this resemblance, extracellular mtDNA whose CpG motifs are also unmethylated can serve as mediators of inflammation. As a result of cell death or cell activation, whole mitochondria (including proteins and DNA) can be released extracellularly in a process termed extrusion and thereafter elicit an immune response [63, 64]. mtDNA repair mechanisms are essential to cope with mtDNA damage. mtDNA degradation may contribute to the exaggerated innate immune response by fragmented mtDNA. Several components of the mtDNA replication machinery, such as DNA polymerase γ, helicase Twinkle, and exonuclease (EXOG, ENDOG, or MGME1), as well as a major DNA-packaging protein mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) play critical roles in maintaining mtDNA integrity [65].
Recent studies have further characterized the inflammatory cascade caused by mitochondrial extrusion, as it has been shown that mitochondria may act as a CAMP when released from cells undergoing necroptosis induced by TNFα [66]. For example, outside the cell, mtDNA causes mouse splenocytes to produce TNFα and bone marrow-derived macrophages to secrete IL-1β [59, 67]. mtDNA can stimulate various PRRs, including TLR9 [59, 67]. This endosomal receptor activates NF-κB- and IRF-mediated pro-inflammatory responses upon recognizing mtDNA and has been shown in animal models to induce inflammatory cytokine secretion by macrophages and neutrophil chemotaxis [68]. In addition to activation through TLR9, degraded intracellular mtDNA can also engage the cytosolic sensor, cGAS, and initiate STING signaling to trigger IFN responses [60, 69]. Furthermore, DNA has been shown to extend neutrophils lifespan. When stimulated with mtDNA, neutrophils have increased viability, which may contribute to excessive accumulation in tissues and initiate uncontrolled inflammation, causing poor outcomes in sepsis [70, 71]. Engulfment of released mitochondria has also been shown to alter macrophage production of cytokines and lead to dendritic cell maturation [34].
Extracellular traps
Extracellular traps (ETs) refer to the process of chromatin reduction, breakdown of the nuclear envelope, and subsequent disruption of the extracellular membrane due to reactive oxygen species, resulting in the release of DNA structures [72, 73]. The most widely studied form of ET release is by neutrophils, the contents of which herein are referred to as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). One pathway involving NET formation by PAMPs and DAMPs is the activation of peptidyl arginine deaminase 4 (PAD4) via the TLR4 receptor [6, 74]. However, aside from TLR4/PAD4 pathway, NET formation is also mediated by Rho activation, cell cycle protein cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) expression, and gasdermin D (GSDMD) pores [21, 75, 76]. Once released, various proteins can adhere to NETs, including CAMPs, such as histones, HMGB1, CIRP, myeloperoxidase (MPO), LL37, and over 30 components of primary and secondary granules, among which confer bactericidal activity [77,78,79].
ET’s role in maintaining host homeostasis is twofold. On the one hand, they can protect hosts from infectious diseases; however, on the other hand, they may cause pathologic alterations to induce tissue injury [6, 74]. During sepsis for example, neutrophil-endothelial cell interaction is crucial for promoting neutrophil infiltration into tissues; however, this interaction leads to increased NET formation [6, 74, 80]. Co-culture of neutrophils with endothelial cells has been shown to cause endothelial cell damage, which is attributed in part to excessive NETs, as NADPH oxidase inhibitors or DNase ameliorate endothelial dysfunction and cell damage [80]. NETs have been shown to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of various pro-inflammatory conditions, including the promotion of intravascular thrombosis in disseminated intravascular coagulation, which has been shown to increase the morbidity and mortality in sepsis [6, 74, 81]. In various murine models of acute lung injury (ALI), increased levels of NETs, as well as histones H3 and H4, were found in the bronchoalveolar fluid [6, 74]. Administration of extracellular histones contained in NETs has been shown to increase damage to alveolar epithelial cells and the magnitude of ALI [6, 82]. Recent discovery has also shown NET-associated RNA to be a physiologically significant component of NETs. Specifically, RNA-LL37 sensing, subsequent cytokine release and self-propagating NET formation was shown to contribute to disease exacerbation in the inflammatory condition of psoriasis [83]. Along with NETosis, enzymes are released and have detrimental effects in promoting inflammation. Neutrophil elastase, a key component of chromatin degranulation, has been shown to increase the permeability of alveolar epithelial cells, whereas inhibiting this enzyme is beneficial in animal models of inflammation and associated ALI [84]. Serine proteases have also been shown to break down surfactants which are involved in the clearance of inflammatory cells and residual inflammation after ALI [82]. Finally, NETs can bind to the cytosolic DNA sensor, cGAS. Macrophages phagocytose NETs, and subsequently intracellular NETs’ DNA activates cGAS and induces type-I IFN production as previously described [85].
Akin to neutrophils, although comparatively fewer reports are available, recent studies have revealed ET formation by other immune cells including eosinophils, basophils, and macrophages upon induction with various stimuli including PAMPs, DAMPs, and cytokines. These forms of ETosis similarly involve the pathways used for NETosis [73, 86, 87]. Granulocytes including eosinophils and basophils exhibit similar release mechanisms and contents as NETs. Extracellular DNA released from eosinophils, or eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs) have been shown to be triggered by clinically relevant allergens and amplify inflammation. Clinically, EETs have demonstrated to be elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and associated with asthma severity in patients and are likely involved in triggering of other immune responses [73, 87]. Basophil extracellular traps (BETs) contain mitochondrial DNA, granule proteins and proteases and are released upon cytokine priming and complement activation [88]. Noting that BETs have been found in both human and mouse inflamed tissues, it is conceivable that they also play a role in inflammatory conditions [88].
Finally, macrophage extracellular traps (METs), have also been shown to entrap and kill microbes [89,90,91]. METs contain nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, MPO, and lysozyme proteins similar to NETs, EETs, and BETs [91,92,93]. Although MET release has been demonstrated in murine primary macrophages and macrophage cell lines, the release and impact of METs in human conditions is largely underexplored, however similar to NETs, METs likely play a role in disease pathologies [91].
Strategies to address excessive ET formation have demonstrated therapeutic potential in acute inflammatory conditions. For one, inhibition of NETosis via PAD4 deficiency or inhibition reduces the release of extracellular DNA, resulting in improved outcomes in sepsis [94]. PAD4 inhibitors, similar to chloroquine and APC, are early inhibitors targeting NET formation. On the other hand, late inhibitors of NETs, such as DNase or anti-histone antibodies have also been explored and demonstrated therapeutic potential. [6, 74, 94,95,96]
Extracellular histones
Histones are cationic, intra-nuclear proteins that maintain the normal structure of chromatin [29,30,31]. In acute sterile organ injury, various toxic stimuli, including ischemic, traumatic, and hemorrhagic pathologies can result in cell death. Through this process and similar to DNA, histones and DNA-bound histones (nucleosomes) are released into the extracellular space by necrosis, apoptosis, and ETosis. Extracellular, DNA-free histones may be associated with histone chaperones or histone-associated factors to maintain their DNA-free form. Once in the extracellular space, histones (and related components) act as CAMPs, thereby promoting inflammation. Although Xu et al. demonstrated that intravenous injection of histones was lethal in mice [15], incredibly, little distinction has been made between the different forms of extracellular histones. This is in large part due to the limitations of available techniques to differentiate between free versus DNA-bound forms of histones. Importantly, the cytotoxicity and proinflammatory signaling induced by free histones compared to nucleosome-associated histones differ [97, 98].
Inflammatory phenomena of extracellular histones have been explored in various experimental conditions. For one, the toxic effect of histones has been demonstrated when added to endothelial cells [82, 97]. In experimental models of murine sepsis, in vivo studies have shown intravenously injected histones were lethal, whereas anti-histone antibodies reduced mortality [15]. Furthermore, sublethal doses of intravenously administered histones were pro-inflammatory, resulting in high levels of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10 in a TLR4-dependent manner [15]. In human sepsis, levels of histones are significantly increased [99], and consistent with experimental murine models, appear to cause cellular injury in a TLR4-dependent manner [15, 100].
Extracellular RNA
Extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) are a heterogeneous group of ribonucleic acids, including messenger (m), ribosomal (r), micro (mi), long non-coding (lnc), and circular (circ) RNAs. These RNAs can be released from cells into the extracellular space in free form, bound to proteins or phospholipids, or in association with extracellular vesicles (EVs) [101,102,103]. Analyses of EV-associated exRNAs revealed that miRNAs together with rRNAs comprise the most prevalent form of exRNA; however, by weight, rRNAs are the most abundant type in human plasma [104,105,106,107]. exRNAs associate with several proteins or ribonucleoprotein complexes and bind to high-density lipoproteins that protect them from degradation by extracellular RNases [108, 109]. More importantly, however, these protein interactions can impact the immunogenicity of exRNAs [109, 110]. Although in physiologic conditions only low levels of circulating exRNA can be detected in extracellular fluids, in acute states of cellular stress (such as in hypoxia, infection, and inflammation), the concentration of exRNAs is dramatically increased [107, 109, 111].
While different forms of exRNAs, including miRNAs and lncRNAs have been implicated in influencing inflammatory processes at different levels, recent work has revealed the influence of ribosomal exRNA as an important DAMP on cellular processes for leukocyte recruitment [101, 112]. For example, ribosomal exRNA may induce vascular hyper-permeability and vasogenic edema. This may be accomplished through activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 system, as well as through recruitment of leukocytes to the inflamed endothelium through M1-type polarization of inflammatory macrophages, or through exRNA serving as a pro-thrombotic cofactor thereby promoting thrombosis [101, 113]. In addition to sterile inflammation, exRNAs also augment the linking of bacteria to host cells, facilitating microbial invasion [114]. exRNAs function as CAMPs in a typical manner through recognition by membrane-bound PRRs including TLRs and RAGE as well as cytosolic receptors including retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), and melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 (MDA-5) [115, 116]. The binding of exRNAs by such PRRs leads to the induction of different signaling pathways, resulting in the activation of transcription factors like c-Jun-N-terminal kinase or NF-κB and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [117, 118]. Interestingly, ribosomal exRNAs fulfill several additional extracellular functions independent of recognition by PRRs, including the progression of cardiovascular diseases [101].
miRNAs are small endogenous non-coding RNAs that play a critical role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression by binding to complementary target mRNAs [119, 120]. miRNAs have been reported to affect immune processes, for example by inhibiting of NF-κB expression and modulating immune cell proliferation and differentiation [121]. Although the focus of miRNAs has revolved around their intracellular role, miRNAs have been readily found in the blood, with changes associated with acute physiologic stressors [105, 122, 123]. Many circulating miRNAs are bound to protective proteins (high-density lipoprotein and argonuate protein) or packaged into protective microvesicles (exosomes), as unbound miRNAs are rapidly degraded in the bloodstream [105, 108]. Compared to non-exosome associated miRNA, circulating miRNA found in exosomes are more likely modulated by stressor exposure. Stress-induced exosomal miRNA reductions have been correlated with increases in inflammatory proteins, thereby suggesting stress-modulated exosomes may be immune-stimulatory [105]. In a murine sepsis model, several miRNAs were found to be released into the blood via EVs. Compared to sham EVs, in septic EVs several miRNAs exhibited >1.5-fold increase. Specifically, these miRNAs included miR-126-3p, miR-122-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-145-5p, miR-26a-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-222-3p, and miR-181a-5p. Furthermore, septic EVs were proinflammatory and increased IL-6, TNFα, IL-1β, and MIP-2 production via TLR7- and MyD88-dependent pathways [122].
In human sepsis, it has been demonstrated that miR-182, miR-143, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-150, and miR-155 were dysregulated in septic patients, and downregulation of specific miRNAs correlated with increased inflammatory cytokine production and monocyte proliferation [123, 124]. However, recently Guerin et al. revealed an unconventional function of extracellular miRNA to neutralize the action of a CAMP, eCIRP, because CIRP has a housekeeping role in interacting with RNAs [125]. Extracellular miRNA 130b‐3p mimic inhibited eCIRP‐induced inflammation in experimental models of sepsis. Although the damaging effect of eRNA can be counteracted by endogenous circulating RNase1, under acute inflammatory states, only the administration of exogenous, non-toxic RNase1 provides an effective and safe therapeutic regimen. Thus, novel in vitro and in vivo strategies, including natural endonucleases or synthetic nucleic acid binding/neutralizing polymers as antagonists, have been explored and show promise in combatting the destructive nature of eRNA [126, 127].
TERRA, glycoRNAs, and extracellular ribosomes
Telomeres are the repetitive nucleotide regions found on chromosomal ends that protect DNA from decay. Telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA), a lncRNA transcribed from telomeres, has been identified as a telomere-associated regulator of chromosome end protection [128]. Thus, intracellularly, TERRA plays a crucial role in telomere length homeostasis. A recent study reported that TERRA can be found in extracellular fractions in mouse tumor and embryonic brain tissue, as well as in human cell cultures that may stimulate the innate immune response [129]. Cell-free TERRA (cfTERRA) is a shorter form (∼200 nucleotides) of cellular TERRA and copurifies with CD63- and CD83-positive exosome vesicles. cfTERRA can also be found as a complex with histone proteins. Incubation of cfTERRA containing exosomes with peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated the expression of TNFα, IL-6, and C-X-C chemokine 10 (CXCL10) [129]. Although these findings with extracellular TERRA implicate a novel extrinsic function in tumor microenvironments, elucidation of extracellular TERRA in sepsis will direct a novel pathophysiology of inflammatory diseases.
Recently, highly conserved small lncRNAs, named glycoRNAs, were discovered [130]. These RNAs bear N-glycans in their structural backbone that are highly sialylated and fucosylated. GlycoRNAs are present in multiple cell types on the cell surface. They can interact with anti-dsRNA antibodies and members of the sialic-acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) receptor family. Siglecs are expressed in various immune cells that recognize the sialic acid-containing ligands and initiate downstream signaling by activating Shp1 to negatively regulate TLR4 and B cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways [131]. Since glycoRNAs are exposed to the external environment of cells, their interaction with various proteins could be possible, pinpointing their novel role in the immune system. A recent study identified the presence of small ribosomal subunit 40 S by negative stain transmission electron microscopy and velocity sedimentation in sucrose gradients of concentrated extracellular fractions [112]. Improved understanding of extracellular ribosomes could possibly implicate them as damage-associated molecular patterns or subclassify them as CAMPs.
eCIRP
The RNA chaperone protein, CIRP, plays a critical role in upregulating the inflammatory cascade when released from cells as eCIRP in acute inflammatory conditions, including sepsis. Elevated plasma levels of eCIRP have been independently correlated with worse prognosis in human sepsis [20, 125]. Intracellular CIRP can be released outside the cell through various pathways. For one, CIRP can be released passively during necrotic cell death. In addition, in times of cellular stress, CIRP can be translocated from the nucleus to cytoplasmic stress granules and released extracellularly through exosome-mediated pathways, inflammasome-mediated GSDMD activation, pyroptosis, or necroptosis [18, 20]. Once released extracellularly, eCIRP recognizes its cognate receptor TLR4/MD2 complex expressed in several cell types, activating downstream NF-κB pathways and stimulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [20, 132]. eCIRP has also been shown to stimulate the Nlrp3 inflammasome, leading to caspase-1 activation and subsequent expression of IL-1β and IL-18 and pyroptosis [6, 7, 132]. In addition to increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, eCIRP has been shown to contribute to end-organ injury in sepsis and other acute inflammatory conditions [132].
In many cell types, including macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils, eCIRP has been demonstrated to act as a CAMP in the context of cellular activation, cytokine and chemokine production, and NET formation. For example, injection of recombinant mouse (rm) CIRP leads to ALI in mice via macrophage, neutrophil, and endothelial cell activation and cytokine production in the lungs [133]. Furthermore, beneficial outcomes have been demonstrated through CIRP inhibition by using newly identified antagonists, C23 and M3, targeting its binding to TLR4 and TREM-1, respectively, or in CIRP knockout mice in various murine models of acute inflammatory conditions [6, 7, 132, 134]. In sepsis, therapeutic potential has been demonstrated by using anti-CIRP antibodies or CIRP-derived inhibitory peptides (C23 and M3) to prolong survival and attenuate end-organ injury [6, 7, 132, 134].
HMGB1
The nuclear nonhistone chromatin-binding protein, HMGB1, plays a critical role in many intracellular functions, including the DNA replication and repair, regulation of transcriptional activity, and nucleosome formation [135]. When mobilized from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and then released extracellularly, HMGB1 becomes pro-inflammatory [14, 136]. The extracellular release of HMGB1 can occur actively through cytoplasmic vesicles or passively from necrotic cells (either alone or in complex with RNA, DNA, or nucleosomes) or through pyroptosis [14, 23, 136, 137]. Double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) induces inflammasome activation and subsequent release of HMGB1 [137].
Extracellular HMGB1 activates innate immune cells to propagate pro-inflammatory signaling cascades. This occurs through recruitment of neutrophils to the site of tissue injury and through HMGB1 binding of other PAMPs, (including DNA, LPS, and lipoteichoic acid), which serves to potentiate their inflammatory impact [6, 7, 136, 138]. Furthermore, HMGB1 has been shown to bind to numerous cell surface receptors, including RAGE, TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, and TREM-1 [6, 7]. Binding of HMGB1 to these receptors leads to the activation of macrophages and endothelial cells and downstream production of pro-inflammatory chemokines, cytokines, and endothelial adhesion molecules [6, 7]. HMGB1 is markedly elevated in human sepsis and is widely known as a late mediator of sepsis, leading to greater morbidity, and mortality [135, 139]. HMGB1 has been shown to significantly attenuate erythropoietin (EPO)-mediated phosphorylation of the JAK2/STAT5 and mTOR signaling pathways, contributing to the chronic phase of anemia of inflammation [140]. As released extracellular HMGB1 can induce considerable inflammation and has demonstrated to cause detrimental effects globally in various disease states [141], many therapeutic strategies have been employed, supporting that targeting HMBG1 can improve outcomes in sepsis (including neutralizing antibodies, HMGB1 antagonists, and small inhibitory peptides) [6, 7].
Detection of CAMPs in sepsis
Since CAMPs play a critical role in the immune response to infection, and elevated levels of CAMPs serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers in sepsis, assessment of CAMPs in biological fluids, i.e., the blood of experimental and clinical sepsis samples, is vital in determining the extent of the inflammation and tissue injury, monitoring disease progression, and elucidating potential treatment effects (Fig. 3). The levels of cfDNA in the plasma of sepsis patients are determined by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), quantitative PicoGreen fluorescence assay, and anti-dsDNA ELISA [142, 143]. Moreover, next-generation sequencing technology may be used to identify pathogens from cell-free plasma DNA of septic patients to overcome the shortcomings of traditional bacterial culture [144]. The presence of extracellular nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mtDNA in septic patients’ plasma are determined by qPCR using specific primers for nDNA and mtDNA [145]. Fragmented mtDNA in cells can be determined by staining cells with MitoTracker Red (mitochondria), TUNEL (fragmented DNA), and Hoechst (nucleus) [60]. Acknowledging that NETs contain DNA, citH3, and MPO, the plasma contents of NETs in sepsis and COVID-19 patients can be determined by PicoGreen fluorescence assay and ELISA by detecting citH3 and MPO using dsDNA Abs [146]. Immunohistochemistry can also be used to reveal NETs in lung samples, as was demonstrated in autopsy lung samples of COVID-19 patients to be exaggerated [147]. Circulating histones in septic patients’ sera are determined by ELISA [148]. Although it is tricky to distinguish the free verse nucleosomal histones, subtracting the values of DNA containing histones (determined by using dsDNA ELISA assays) from the values of total histones may indirectly provide amounts of free histones in the blood of septic patients. Extracellular RNA, especially the miRNA as free form or in EV contained form, are mainly detected by qPCR and microarray after isolating the total RNA from plasma samples [125, 149]. TERRA can be determined by RNA in situ hybridization assay [129]. Moreover, RNA-seq analyses revealed TERRA to be among the most highly represented transcripts in extracellular fractions extracted from normal and cancer patient blood plasma [129]. It has also been reported that cfTERRA can be identified by cyro-electron microscopy and ChIP assays [129]. The plasma levels of the DNA- and RNA-binding proteins HMGB1 and eCIRP in septic patients are measured by ELISA [20, 125, 150].
Scavenging CAMPs to regulate inflammation
CAMPs may be released passively from necrotic cells. Since inefficient clearance of apoptotic cells may lead to necrosis and augmented CAMP release, molecules that contribute to apoptotic cells’ phagocytic clearance may help reduce circulating CAMPs. Milk fat globule-EGF factor VIII (MFG-E8) plays a critical role in efferocytosis, and thus may be implicated in the regulation of CAMPs [151]. Intracellular DNase and nucleic acid-binding polymers (NABPs) have also been shown to play a pivotal role in the degradation of DNA in apoptotic cells or engulfed cells [58, 152]. Furthermore, other scavenging molecules, as have been described in their role for scavenging dead cells, debris, and DAMPs from the extracellular compartment, may also be implicated in the regulation and removal of CAMPs as means for ameliorating inflammation [58, 151].
Other therapeutic strategies to target CAMP-induced inflammation have been extensively studied, as depicted in Fig. 2 and summarized in Table 3. For example, the neutralization of cfDNA through DNase and scavenger-molecule based approaches have been utilized. Previously, NABPs have been shown to scavenge proinflammatory nucleic acids and modulate inflammation at injured sites [153]. Specifically, third generation polyamidoamine dendrimer (PAMAM-G3) is a widely studied NABP that has demonstrated ability to prevent TLR activation in target immune cells through scavenging nucleic acid and nucleic-acid proteins in a multitude of acute inflammatory disease states, including liver failure, influenza infection, and cancer metastasis. To address the limitation of unwanted, in vivo cytotoxic effects of PAMAM-G3, a mesoporous silica nanoparticle functionalized with polyethylenimine (MSN-PEI), a nucleic acid-biding nanoparticle (NABN), was synthesized with the intent of improving toxicity profiles. Novel synthesized nanoparticles have similarly demonstrated the ability to scavenge cfDNA and ameliorate septic injury in experimental models of sepsis, including cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) [58]. Thus, further nanoparticulate NABNs-based scavenging approaches may provide a promising future therapeutic avenue for addressing cfDNA in lethal inflammatory disorders, including sepsis.
A different strategy that has been investigated is the use of membrane-coated cartridges to scavenge dead cells, pathogens, or specifically DAMPs from circulation. Early employment of this technique utilized polymyxin B immobilized to a polystyrene-derived fiber to remove circulating LPS. Using this scavenger cartridge, blood if filtered outside the patient using an extracorporeal circuit, thereby detoxifying blood and removing nearly 90% of circulating LPS. This therapeutic strategy has been implemented in septic patients with little reported adverse events, however further studies are needed to determine true clinical efficacy in improving outcomes [154]. Utilizing a similar strategy, certain types of NABPs, e.g., PANAM-G3, beta-cyclodextrin-containing polycation (CDP) and hexadimethrine bromide (HDMBr), immobilized onto an electrospun microfiber mesh were capable of capturing and removing extracellular DNAs as well as HMGB1 from circulation. NABP-immobilized mesh also neutralized the ability of DAMPs generated by ex vivo cell culture or DAMPs circulating in the blood of trauma patients to stimulate multiple TLRs in vitro and in vivo [155]. Thus, therapeutic approaches utilizing membranes coated with CAMP-capturing polymers may be a promising strategy during hemofiltration, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) to scavenge CAMPs and ameliorate CAMP-induced inflammation in septic patients.
A broad variety of proteins can promote internalization of harmful molecules with subsequent pro- and anti-inflammatory impacts. Previously, it has been shown that HMGB1 can bind LPS and target macrophage internalization and delivery to lysosomes via the RAGE receptor. Although HMGB1 is permeabilized in the acidic environment of the lysosome, the impact of cytosolic LPS in this mechanism results in the activation of caspase-11, pyroptosis, and cell death in endotoxemia and bacterial sepsis [156]. DAMPs (such as HMGB1 and peroxiredoxins) are ligands for many other scavenger receptors that similarly promote internalization. For example, class A scavenger receptors (including MSR1) have been shown to facilitate macrophage internalization of HMGB1, but also that these receptors (MSR1 and MARCO) served as co-receptors for pro-inflammatory TLR4 signaling. In this same work, however, double scavenger receptor-(MSR1 and MARCO)-deficient mice still internalize HMGB1 efficiently, suggesting that other scavenger receptors or related molecules play a role in macrophage internalization [157]. On the other hand, it has been reported that clearance of DAMPs by class A scavenger receptors may provide anti-inflammatory impacts. For example, scavenger receptor-mediated clearance of DAMPs in a murine ischemic cerebral stroke model, largely mediated by MSR1, served to attenuate DAMP-mediated inflammatory signaling, thereby improving cerebral pathology [158]. Broadly, the role of class A scavenger receptors in inflammation is controversial, and likewise the resulting sequelae of this receptor-ligand interaction of scavenger receptors to DAMPs is not fully understood. Regardless, better understanding of these interactions and their relationship to the clearance of CAMPs in acute disease states may promote discovery of new therapeutic strategies in regulating CAMP-induced inflammation. Along with these scavenging mechanisms, a summary of methods for targeting CAMPs to attenuate inflammation and ALI in sepsis is shown in Fig. 3, and the preclinical evidence for each CAMP-specific therapeutic strategy is summarized in Table 3.
Conclusions and future directions
Sepsis is a multifactorial inflammatory disease condition whose pathophysiology is enigmatic. Distinguishing CAMPs from the broad area of DAMPs may establish the notion that the source/origin of DAMPs matters for the differential intensities of inflammation in sepsis, further directing source control to regulate the release of CAMPs during sepsis. Given that various infectious insults can contribute to the progression of inflammation to sepsis, elucidating the unique roles of CAMPs in other modes of inflammation, including sterile inflammation, bacterial and viral-based inflammation, and disease-specific inflammation, are worthy areas of continued research. Furthermore, the number of molecules considered to be DAMPs is increasing, as a recent study unveiled a myriad of intracellular molecules released during LPS stimulation of macrophages through active and pyroptotic pathways. Our approach of grouping DAMPs into the unique category of CAMPs will further stimulate the creation of other new subcategories based on the characteristics or size of released molecules. Studies on the release and functions of CAMPs are mainly focused on immune cells in terms of inducing cytokine production and cellular heterogeneity. Future studies focused on the role of CAMPs on non-immune cells may also reveal new directions on cell-type specific effects of CAMP release and their mode of action in sepsis.
Several post-translational forms of HMGB1 have been identified, relying on the extracellular environmental pH among other factors. Modified extracellular HMGB1 (the redox state of cysteines 23, 45, and 106) exhibit different functions compared to their parent form [7]. Future studies on whether other CAMPs (like eCIRP and histones) show similar post-translational modifications induced by external environments will be of great value. During transcription, several transcriptional factors bind to regulatory elements. As ETs or cfDNA are released, there is a possibility that these transcriptional factors may also be released along with bound DNA. Identification of extracellular transaction factors and their functions on the immune system may uncover greater understanding in the disease pathophysiology of sepsis. Furthermore, during inflammatory responses, epigenetic changes of DNA and histones in cells are altered. Epigenetically modified CAMPs may exhibit differential outcomes in sepsis pathophysiology. Finally, these identified CAMPs may interact with one another (and other proteins) to form complexes once released extracellularly, in addition to the crosstalk between their downstream signaling pathways. Regarding the interplay of CAMPs, it has previously been shown that targeting one CAMP could abrogate inflammation and tissue injury by inhibiting pro-inflammatory mediators and other CAMPs [20]– highlighting the importance of the interrelationship among various CAMPs in sepsis. As CAMP interactions may confer great inflammatory consequences, studying these interactions may provide new targets in preventing dangerous inflammatory cascades in sepsis. Unveiling the unique category of these important endogenous molecules, CAMPs, in sepsis defines the pathophysiology of inflammatory disease and provides new therapeutic avenues in preventing and treating uncontrolled inflammation.
Data availability
There are no experimental datasets given that this is a review article that is prepared based on a literature review.
References
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Jama. 2016;8:801–810.
Liu V, Escobar GJ, Greene JD, Soule J, Whippy A, Angus DC, et al. Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts. Jama. 2014;1:90–92.
Rhee C, Jones TM, Hamad Y, Pande A, Varon J, O’Brien C, et al. Prevalence, underlying causes, and preventability of sepsis-associated mortality in US acute care hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e187571.
Chen GY, Nuñez G. Sterile inflammation: Sensing and reacting to damage. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;12:826–837.
Medzhitov R. Inflammation 2010: New adventures of an old flame. Cell. 2010;6:771–776.
Denning NL, Aziz M, Gurien SD, Wang P. DAMPs and NETs in Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2019; 2536.
Zhou M, Aziz M, Wang P. Damage-associated molecular patterns as double-edged swords in sepsis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;15:1308–1323.
Denning NL, Prince JM. Neonatal intestinal dysbiosis in necrotizing enterocolitis. Mol Med. 2018;1:4.
Mendy B, Wang’ombe MW, Radakovic ZS, Holbein J, Ilyas M, Chopra D, et al. Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase NILR1 is required for induction of innate immunity to parasitic nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 2017;4:e1006284.
Zindel J, Kubes P. DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in Immunity and Sterile Inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15:493–518.
Weil JV, Byrne-Quinn E, Battock DJ, Grover RF, Chidsey CA. Forearm circulation in man at high altitude. Clin Sci. 1971;3:235–246.
Czaikoski PG, Mota JM, Nascimento DC, Sônego F, Castanheira FV, Melo PH, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps induce organ damage during experimental and clinical sepsis. PLoS One. 2016;2:e0148142.
Dwivedi DJ, Toltl LJ, Swystun LL, Pogue J, Liaw KL, Weitz JI, et al. Prognostic utility and characterization of cell-free DNA in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2012;4:R151.
Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat JM, Ombrellino M, Che J, et al. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. 1999;5425:248–251.
Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med. 2009;11:1318–1321.
Zechendorf E, O’Riordan CE, Stiehler L, Wischmeyer N, Chiazza F, Collotta D, et al. Ribonuclease 1 attenuates septic cardiomyopathy and cardiac apoptosis in a murine model of polymicrobial sepsis. JCI Insight.2020;5.
Zhou Y, Dong H, Zhong Y, Huang J, Lv J, Li J. The Cold-Inducible RNA-Binding Protein (CIRP) Level in Peripheral Blood Predicts Sepsis Outcome. PLoS One. 2015;9:e0137721.
Murao A, Aziz M, Wang H, Brenner M, Wang P. Release mechanisms of major DAMPs. Apoptosis. 2021;3-4:152–162.
Murao A, Tan C, Jha A, Wang P, Aziz M. Exosome-Mediated eCIRP Release From Macrophages to Induce Inflammation in Sepsis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:791648.
Qiang X, Yang WL, Wu R, Zhou M, Jacob A, Dong W, et al. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) triggers inflammatory responses in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis. Nat Med. 2013;11:1489–1495.
Sollberger G, Choidas A, Burn GL, Habenberger P, Di Lucrezia R, Kordes S, et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. 2018;3:eaar6689.
Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. 2013;2:209–223.
Volchuk A, Ye A, Chi L, Steinberg BE, Goldenberg NM. Indirect regulation of HMGB1 release by gasdermin D. Nat Commun. 2020;1:4561.
Kumari P, Russo AJ, Shivcharan S, Rathinam VA. AIM2 in health and disease: Inflammasome and beyond. Immunol Rev. 2020;1:83–95.
Sun L, Wu J, Du F, Chen X, Chen ZJ. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science. 2013;6121:786–791.
Zevini A, Olagnier D, Hiscott J. Crosstalk between Cytoplasmic RIG-I and STING Sensing Pathways. Trends Immunol. 2017;3:194–205.
Fischle W, Wang Y, Allis CD. Histone and chromatin cross-talk. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;2:172–183.
Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;5532:1074–1080.
Campos EI, Reinberg D. Histones: Annotating chromatin. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:559–99.
Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007;7143:425–432.
MacAlpine DM, Almouzni G. Chromatin and DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;8:a010207.
Pisetsky DS. The origin and properties of extracellular DNA: From PAMP to DAMP. Clin Immunol. 2012;1:32–40.
Decout A, Katz JD, Venkatraman S, Ablasser A. The cGAS-STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;9:548–569.
Magna M, Pisetsky DS. The Alarmin Properties of DNA and DNA-associated Nuclear Proteins. Clin Ther. 2016;5:1029–1041.
Uematsu S, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and Type I interferons. J Biol Chem. 2007;21:15319–15323.
Hornung V, Ablasser A, Charrel-Dennis M, Bauernfeind F, Horvath G, Caffrey DR, et al. AIM2 recognizes cytosolic dsDNA and forms a caspase-1-activating inflammasome with ASC. Nature. 2009;7237:514–518.
Kawai T, Akira S. The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. Int Immunol. 2009;4:317–337.
Li T, Huang T, Du M, Chen X, Du F, Ren J, et al. Phosphorylation and chromatin tethering prevent cGAS activation during mitosis. Science. 2021;371:eabc5386.
Motwani M, Pesiridis S, Fitzgerald KA. DNA sensing by the cGAS-STING pathway in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;11:657–674.
Pathare GR, Decout A, Glück S, Cavadini S, Makasheva K, Hovius R, et al. Structural mechanism of cGAS inhibition by the nucleosome. Nature. 2020;7835:668–672.
Takaoka A, Wang Z, Choi MK, Yanai H, Negishi H, Ban T, et al. DAI (DLM-1/ZBP1) is a cytosolic DNA sensor and an activator of innate immune response. Nature. 2007;448:501–5.
Chiu YH, Macmillan JB, Chen ZJ. RNA polymerase III detects cytosolic DNA and induces type I interferons through the RIG-I pathway. Cell. 2009;3:576–591.
Unterholzner L, Keating SE, Baran M, Horan KA, Jensen SB, Sharma S, et al. IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:997–1004.
Zhang Z, Kim T, Bao M, Facchinetti V, Jung SY, Ghaffari AA, et al. DDX1, DDX21, and DHX36 helicases form a complex with the adaptor molecule TRIF to sense dsRNA in dendritic cells. Immunity. 2011;6:866–878.
Zhang Z, Yuan B, Lu N, Facchinetti V, Liu YJ. DHX9 pairs with IPS-1 to sense double-stranded RNA in myeloid dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2011;9:4501–4508.
Parvatiyar K, Zhang Z, Teles RM, Ouyang S, Jiang Y, Iyer SS, et al. The helicase DDX41 recognizes the bacterial secondary messengers cyclic di-GMP and cyclic di-AMP to activate a type I interferon immune response. Nat Immunol. 2012;12:1155–1161.
Atianand MK, Fitzgerald KA. Molecular basis of DNA recognition in the immune system. J Immunol. 2013;5:1911–1918.
Yang P, An H, Liu X, Wen M, Zheng Y, Rui Y, et al. The cytosolic nucleic acid sensor LRRFIP1 mediates the production of type I interferon via a beta-catenin-dependent pathway. Nat Immunol. 2010;6:487–494.
Zhang X, Brann TW, Zhou M, Yang J, Oguariri RM, Lidie KB, et al. Cutting edge: Ku70 is a novel cytosolic DNA sensor that induces type III rather than type I IFN. J Immunol. 2011;8:4541–4545.
Rhodes A, Wort SJ, Thomas H, Collinson P, Bennett ED. Plasma DNA concentration as a predictor of mortality and sepsis in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;2:R60.
Ahn J, Gutman D, Saijo S, Barber GN. STING manifests self DNA-dependent inflammatory disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;47:19386–19391.
Zhang H, Zeng L, Xie M, Liu J, Zhou B, Wu R, et al. TMEM173 Drives Lethal Coagulation in Sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;4:556–570.e556.
Xie M, Yu Y, Kang R, Zhu S, Yang L, Zeng L, et al. PKM2-dependent glycolysis promotes NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation. Nat Commun.2016;7:1–3.
Plitas G, Burt BM, Nguyen HM, Bamboat ZM, DeMatteo RP. Toll-like receptor 9 inhibition reduces mortality in polymicrobial sepsis. J Exp Med. 2008;6:1277–1283.
Zhou D, Zhu Y, Ouyang MZ, Zhang M, Tang K, Niu CC, et al. Knockout of Toll-like receptor 4 improves survival and cardiac function in a murine model of severe sepsis. Mol Med Rep. 2018;4:5368–5375.
Goswami DG, Walker WE. Aged IRF3-KO Mice are Protected from Sepsis. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:5757–67.
Liang H, Peng B, Dong C, Liu L, Mao J, Wei S, et al. Cationic nanoparticle as an inhibitor of cell-free DNA-induced inflammation. Nat Commun. 2018;1:4291.
Dawulieti J, Sun M, Zhao Y, Shao D, Yan H, Lao YH, et al. Treatment of severe sepsis with nanoparticulate cell-free DNA scavengers. Sci Adv. 2020;22:eaay7148.
Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;7285:104–107.
Chen K, Cagliani J, Aziz M, Tan C, Brenner M, Wang P. Extracellular CIRP activates STING to exacerbate hemorrhagic shock. JCI Insight. 2021;6.
Riley JS, Tait SW. Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep. 2020;4:e49799.
Andersson SG, Zomorodipour A, Andersson JO, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Alsmark UC, Podowski RM, et al. The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature. 1998;6707:133–140.
Nakahira K, Hisata S, Choi AM. The roles of mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns in diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;17:1329–1350.
Yousefi S, Gold JA, Andina N, Lee JJ, Kelly AM, Kozlowski E, et al. Catapult-like release of mitochondrial DNA by eosinophils contributes to antibacterial defense. Nat Med. 2008;9:949–953.
Kazak L, Reyes A, Holt IJ. Minimizing the damage: Repair pathways keep mitochondrial DNA intact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;10:659–671.
Maeda A, Fadeel B. Mitochondria released by cells undergoing TNF-α-induced necroptosis act as danger signals. Cell Death Dis. 2014;7:e1312.
Collins LV, Hajizadeh S, Holme E, Jonsson IM, Tarkowski A. Endogenously oxidized mitochondrial DNA induces in vivo and in vitro inflammatory responses. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;6:995–1000.
Zhang JZ, Liu Z, Liu J, Ren JX, Sun TS. Mitochondrial DNA induces inflammation and increases TLR9/NF-κB expression in lung tissue. Int J Mol Med. 2014;4:817–824.
West AP, Khoury-Hanold W, Staron M, Tal MC, Pineda CM, Lang SM, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;7548:553–557.
Bhagirath VC, Dwivedi DJ, Liaw PC. Comparison of the proinflammatory and procoagulant properties of nuclear, mitochondrial, and bacterial DNA. Shock. 2015;3:265–271.
Brown KA, Brain SD, Pearson JD, Edgeworth JD, Lewis SM, Treacher DF. Neutrophils in development of multiple organ failure in sepsis. Lancet. 2006;9530:157–169.
Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;5663:1532–1535.
Yousefi S, Simon D, Stojkov D, Karsonova A, Karaulov A, Simon HU. In vivo evidence for extracellular DNA trap formation. Cell Death Dis. 2020;4:300.
Delgado-Rizo V, Martínez-Guzmán MA, Iñiguez-Gutierrez L, García-Orozco A, Alvarado-Navarro A, Fafutis-Morris M. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Its Implications in Inflammation: An Overview. Front Immunol. 2017;8:81.
Amulic B, Knackstedt SL, Abu Abed U, Deigendesch N, Harbort CJ, Caffrey BE, et al. Cell-Cycle Proteins Control Production of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Dev Cell. 2017;4:449–462.e445.
Murao A, Arif A, Brenner M, Denning NL, Jin H, Takizawa S, et al. Extracellular CIRP and TREM-1 axis promotes ICAM-1-Rho-mediated NETosis in sepsis. Faseb j. 2020;7:9771–9786.
Linders J, Madhi R, Rahman M, Mörgelin M, Regner S, Brenner M, et al. Extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein regulates neutrophil extracellular trap formation and tissue damage in acute pancreatitis. Lab Invest. 2020;12:1618–1630.
Peng HH, Liu YJ, Ojcius DM, Lee CM, Chen RH, Huang PR, et al. Mineral particles stimulate innate immunity through neutrophil extracellular traps containing HMGB1. Sci Rep. 2017;1:16628.
Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2009;10:e1000639.
Gupta AK, Joshi MB, Philippova M, Erne P, Hasler P, Hahn S, et al. Activated endothelial cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death. FEBS Lett. 2010;14:3193–3197.
McDonald B, Davis RP, Kim SJ, Tse M, Esmon CT, Kolaczkowska E, et al. Platelets and neutrophil extracellular traps collaborate to promote intravascular coagulation during sepsis in mice. Blood. 2017;10:1357–1367.
Silk E, Zhao H, Weng H, Ma D. The role of extracellular histone in organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017;5:e2812.
Herster F, Bittner Z, Archer NK, Dickhöfer S, Eisel D, Eigenbrod T, et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated RNA and LL37 enable self-amplifying inflammation in psoriasis. Nat Commun. 2020;1:105.
Bosmann M, Grailer JJ, Ruemmler R, Russkamp NF, Zetoune FS, Sarma JV, et al. Extracellular histones are essential effectors of C5aR- and C5L2-mediated tissue damage and inflammation in acute lung injury. Faseb j. 2013;12:5010–5021.
Apel F, Andreeva L, Knackstedt LS, Streeck R, Frese CK, Goosmann C, et al. The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS recognizes neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Signal. 2021;14:eaax7942.
Lee Y, Reilly B, Tan C, Wang P, Aziz M. Extracellular CIRP Induces Macrophage Extracellular Trap Formation Via Gasdermin D Activation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:780210.
Lu Y, Huang Y, Li J, Huang J, Zhang L, Feng J, et al. Eosinophil extracellular traps drive asthma progression through neuro-immune signals. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021;10:1060–1072.
Morshed M, Hlushchuk R, Simon D, Walls AF, Obata-Ninomiya K, Karasuyama H, et al. NADPH oxidase-independent formation of extracellular DNA traps by basophils. J Immunol. 2014;11:5314–5323.
Boe DM, Curtis BJ, Chen MM, Ippolito JA, Kovacs EJ. Extracellular traps and macrophages: new roles for the versatile phagocyte. J Leukoc Biol. 2015;6:1023–1035.
Chow OA, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Bright AT, Hensler ME, Zinkernagel AS, Cogen AL, et al. Statins enhance formation of phagocyte extracellular traps. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;5:445–454.
Doster RS, Rogers LM, Gaddy JA, Aronoff DM. Macrophage Extracellular Traps: A Scoping Review. J Innate Immun. 2018;1:3–13.
Aulik NA, Hellenbrand KM, Czuprynski CJ. Mannheimia haemolytica and its leukotoxin cause macrophage extracellular trap formation by bovine macrophages. Infect Immun. 2012;5:1923–1933.
Okubo K, Kurosawa M, Kamiya M, Urano Y, Suzuki A, Yamamoto K, et al. Macrophage extracellular trap formation promoted by platelet activation is a key mediator of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury. Nat Med. 2018;2:232–238.
Biron BM, Chung CS, Chen Y, Wilson Z, Fallon EA, Reichner JS, et al. PAD4 deficiency leads to decreased organ dysfunction and improved survival in a dual insult model of hemorrhagic shock and sepsis. J Immunol. 2018;5:1817–1828.
Lewis HD, Liddle J, Coote JE, Atkinson SJ, Barker MD, Bax BD, et al. Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;3:189–191.
Martinod K, Fuchs TA, Zitomersky NL, Wong SL, Demers M, Gallant M, et al. PAD4-deficiency does not affect bacteremia in polymicrobial sepsis and ameliorates endotoxemic shock. Blood. 2015;12:1948–1956.
Chen R, Kang R, Fan XG, Tang D. Release and activity of histone in diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2014;8:e1370.
Marsman G, Zeerleder S, Luken BM. Extracellular histones, cell-free DNA, or nucleosomes: differences in immunostimulation. Cell Death Dis. 2016;12:e2518.
Ekaney ML, Otto GP, Sossdorf M, Sponholz C, Boehringer M, Loesche W, et al. Impact of plasma histones in human sepsis and their contribution to cellular injury and inflammation. Crit Care. 2014;5:543.
Xu J, Zhang X, Monestier M, Esmon NL, Esmon CT. Extracellular histones are mediators of death through TLR2 and TLR4 in mouse fatal liver injury. J Immunol. 2011;5:2626–2631.
Preissner KT, Fischer S, Deindl E. Extracellular RNA as a Versatile DAMP and Alarm Signal That Influences Leukocyte Recruitment in Inflammation and Infection. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:619221.
Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;6:654–659.
Zernecke A, Bidzhekov K, Noels H, Shagdarsuren E, Gan L, Denecke B, et al. Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL12-dependent vascular protection. Sci Signal. 2009;100:ra81.
Danielson KM, Rubio R, Abderazzaq F, Das S, Wang YE. High Throughput Sequencing of Extracellular RNA from Human Plasma. PLoS One. 2017;1:e0164644.
Fleshner M, Crane CR. Exosomes, DAMPs and miRNA: Features of Stress Physiology and Immune Homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2017;10:768–776.
Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;4:423–433.
Zhou Z, Wu Q, Yan Z, Zheng H, Chen CJ, Liu Y, et al. Extracellular RNA in a single droplet of human serum reflects physiologic and disease states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;38:19200–19208.
Murao A, Brenner M, Aziz M, Wang P. Exosomes in Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2140.
O’Brien K, Breyne K, Ughetto S, Laurent LC, Breakefield XO. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;10:585–606.
Jaax ME, Krauel K, Marschall T, Brandt S, Gansler J, Fürll B, et al. Complex formation with nucleic acids and aptamers alters the antigenic properties of platelet factor 4. Blood. 2013;2:272–281.
Reithmair M, Buschmann D, Märte M, Kirchner B, Hagl D, Kaufmann I, et al. Cellular and extracellular miRNAs are blood-compartment-specific diagnostic targets in sepsis. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;10:2403–2411.
Tosar JP, Segovia M, Castellano M, Gámbaro F, Akiyama Y, Fagúndez P, et al. Fragmentation of extracellular ribosomes and tRNAs shapes the extracellular RNAome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;22:12874–12888.
Fischer S, Gerriets T, Wessels C, Walberer M, Kostin S, Stolz E, et al. Extracellular RNA mediates endothelial-cell permeability via vascular endothelial growth factor. Blood. 2007;7:2457–2465.
Zakrzewicz D, Bergmann S, Didiasova M, Giaimo BD, Borggrefe T, Mieth M, et al. Host-derived extracellular RNA promotes adhesion of Streptococcus pneumoniae to endothelial and epithelial cells. Sci Rep.2016;6:1–3.
Bertheloot D, Naumovski AL, Langhoff P, Horvath GL, Jin T, Xiao TS, et al. RAGE Enhances TLR Responses through Binding and Internalization of RNA. J Immunol. 2016;10:4118–4126.
Roers A, Hiller B, Hornung V. Recognition of Endogenous Nucleic Acids by the Innate Immune System. Immunity. 2016;4:739–754.
Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;4:783–801.
Brubaker SW, Bonham KS, Zanoni I, Kagan JC. Innate immune pattern recognition: A cell biological perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:257–90.
Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;2:281–297.
Lau NC, Lim LP, Weinstein EG, Bartel DP. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;5543:858–862.
Jude JA, Dileepan M, Subramanian S, Solway J, Panettieri RA Jr., Walseth TF, et al. miR-140-3p regulation of TNF-α-induced CD38 expression in human airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;5:L460–468.
Xu J, Feng Y, Jeyaram A, Jay SM, Zou L, Chao W. Circulating plasma extracellular vesicles from septic mice induce inflammation via MicroRNA- and TLR7-Dependent Mechanisms. J Immunol. 2018;11:3392–3400.
Zhou J, Chaudhry H, Zhong Y, Ali MM, Perkins LA, Owens WB, et al. Dysregulation in microRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of sepsis patients is associated with immunopathology. Cytokine. 2015;1:89–100.
Correia CN, Nalpas NC, McLoughlin KE, Browne JA, Gordon SV, MacHugh DE, et al. Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers of Infectious Disease. Front Immunol. 2017;8:118.
Gurien SD, Aziz M, Jin H, Wang H, He M, Al-Abed Y, et al. Extracellular microRNA 130b-3p inhibits eCIRP-induced inflammation. EMBO Rep. 2020;1:e48075.
Preissner KT, Herwald H. Extracellular nucleic acids in immunity and cardiovascular responses: between alert and disease. Thromb Haemost. 2017;7:1272–1282.
Thålin C, Hisada Y, Lundström S, Mackman N, Wallén H. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Villains and Targets in Arterial, Venous, and Cancer-Associated Thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;9:1724–1738.
Arnoult N, Van Beneden A, Decottignies A. Telomere length regulates TERRA levels through increased trimethylation of telomeric H3K9 and HP1α. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;9:948–956.
Wang Z, Deng Z, Dahmane N, Tsai K, Wang P, Williams DR, et al. Telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) constitutes a nucleoprotein component of extracellular inflammatory exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;46:E6293–6300.
Flynn RA, Pedram K, Malaker SA, Batista PJ, Smith BAH, Johnson AG, et al. Small RNAs are modified with N-glycans and displayed on the surface of living cells. Cell. 2021;12:3109–3124.e3122.
Royster W, Wang P, Aziz M. The Role of Siglec-G on Immune Cells in Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:621627.
Aziz M, Brenner M, Wang P. Extracellular CIRP (eCIRP) and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;1:133–146.
Yang WL, Sharma A, Wang Z, Li Z, Fan J, Wang P. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein causes endothelial dysfunction via activation of Nlrp3 inflammasome. Sci Rep.2016;6:1–10.
Denning NL, Aziz M, Murao A, Gurien SD, Ochani M, Prince JM, et al. Extracellular CIRP as an endogenous TREM-1 ligand to fuel inflammation in sepsis. JCI Insight. 2020;5.
Lotze MT, Tracey KJ. High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;4:331–342.
Yang H, Wang H, Czura CJ, Tracey KJ. The cytokine activity of HMGB1. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;1:1–8.
Lu B, Nakamura T, Inouye K, Li J, Tang Y, Lundbäck P, et al. Novel role of PKR in inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release. Nature. 2012;7413:670–674.
Qin S, Wang H, Yuan R, Li H, Ochani M, Ochani K, et al. Role of HMGB1 in apoptosis-mediated sepsis lethality. J Exp Med. 2006;7:1637–1642.
Angus DC, Yang L, Kong L, Kellum JA, Delude RL, Tracey KJ, et al. Circulating high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) concentrations are elevated in both uncomplicated pneumonia and pneumonia with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;4:1061–1067.
Dulmovits BM, Tang Y, Papoin J, He M, Li J, Yang H, et al. HMGB1-Mediated Restriction of EPO Signaling Contributes to Anemia of Inflammation. Blood. 2022;139:3181–93.
Diener KR, Al-Dasooqi N, Lousberg EL, Hayball JD. The multifunctional alarmin HMGB1 with roles in the pathophysiology of sepsis and cancer. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;7:443–450.l
Maruchi Y, Tsuda M, Mori H, Takenaka N, Gocho T, Huq MA, et al. Plasma myeloperoxidase-conjugated DNA level predicts outcomes and organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Crit Care. 2018;1:176.
Wang L, Guo W, Shen H, Guo J, Wen D, Yu Y, et al. Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing Technology for the Diagnosis of Sepsis in the ICU. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:487.
Grumaz S, Stevens P, Grumaz C, Decker SO, Weigand MA, Hofer S, et al. Next-generation sequencing diagnostics of bacteremia in septic patients. Genome Med. 2016;1:73.
Timmermans K, Kox M, Scheffer GJ, Pickkers P. Plasma Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Levels, and Markers of Inflammation, Shock, and Organ Damage in Patients with Septic Shock. Shock. 2016;6:607–612.
Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H, Gockman K, Zuo M, Madison JA, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight. 2020;5.
Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, Borczuk A, Cools-Lartigue J, Crawford JM, et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. 2020;217.
Li Y, Wan D, Luo X, Song T, Wang Y, Yu Q, et al. Circulating Histones in Sepsis: Potential Outcome Predictors and Therapeutic Targets. Front Immunol. 2021;12:650184.
Moldovan L, Batte KE, Trgovcich J, Wisler J, Marsh CB, Piper M. Methodological challenges in utilizing miRNAs as circulating biomarkers. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;3:371–390.
Yang H, Ochani M, Li J, Qiang X, Tanovic M, Harris HE, et al. Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high-mobility group box 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;1:296–301.
Aziz M, Jacob A, Matsuda A, Wang P. Review: milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 expression, function and plausible signal transduction in resolving inflammation. Apoptosis. 2011;11:1077–1086.
Zhou Z, Yu X. Phagosome maturation during the removal of apoptotic cells: receptors lead the way. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;10:474–485.
Pisetsky DS, Lee J, Leong KW, Sullenger BA. Nucleic acid-binding polymers as anti-inflammatory agents: reducing the danger of nuclear attack. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012;1:1–3.
Dellinger RP, Bagshaw SM, Antonelli M, Foster DM, Klein DJ, Marshall JC, et al. Effect of Targeted Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion on 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock and Elevated Endotoxin Level: The EUPHRATES Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2018;14:1455–1463.
Lee J, Jackman JG, Kwun J, Manook M, Moreno A, Elster EA, et al. Nucleic acid scavenging microfiber mesh inhibits trauma-induced inflammation and thrombosis. Biomaterials. 2017;120:94–102.
Deng M, Tang Y, Li W, Wang X, Zhang R, Zhang X, et al. The Endotoxin Delivery Protein HMGB1 Mediates Caspase-11-Dependent Lethality in Sepsis. Immunity. 2018;4:740–753.e747.
Komai K, Shichita T, Ito M, Kanamori M, Chikuma S, Yoshimura A. Role of scavenger receptors as damage-associated molecular pattern receptors in Toll-like receptor activation. Int Immunol. 2017;2:59–70.
Shichita T, Ito M, Morita R, Komai K, Noguchi Y, Ooboshi H, et al. MAFB prevents excess inflammation after ischemic stroke by accelerating clearance of damage signals through MSR1. Nat Med. 2017;6:723–732.
Hamaguchi S, Akeda Y, Yamamoto N, Seki M, Yamamoto K, Oishi K, et al. Origin of Circulating Free DNA in Sepsis: Analysis of the CLP Mouse Model. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:614518.
Lauková L, Bertolo EMJ, Zelinková M, Borbélyová V, Čonka J, Gaál Kovalčíková A, et al. Early Dynamics of Plasma Dna in a Mouse Model of Sepsis. Shock. 2019;2:257–263.
Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Cell-free DNA and outcome in sepsis. Crit Care. 2012;6:170.
Margraf S, Lögters T, Reipen J, Altrichter J, Scholz M, Windolf J. Neutrophil-derived circulating free DNA (cf-DNA/NETs): a potential prognostic marker for posttraumatic development of inflammatory second hit and sepsis. Shock. 2008;4:352–358.
Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;2:134–147.
Tanaka K, Koike Y, Shimura T, Okigami M, Ide S, Toiyama Y, et al. In vivo characterization of neutrophil extracellular traps in various organs of a murine sepsis model. PLoS One. 2014;11:e111888.
Li Y, Liu B, Fukudome EY, Lu J, Chong W, Jin G, et al. Identification of citrullinated histone H3 as a potential serum protein biomarker in a lethal model of lipopolysaccharide-induced shock. Surgery. 2011;3:442–451.
Wu SC, Yang JC, Rau CS, Chen YC, Lu TH, Lin MW, et al. Profiling circulating microRNA expression in experimental sepsis using cecal ligation and puncture. PLoS One. 2013;10:e77936.
Dumache R, Rogobete AF, Bedreag OH, Sarandan M, Cradigati AC, Papurica M, et al. Use of miRNAs as biomarkers in sepsis. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2015;2015:186716.
Lang CH, Silvis C, Deshpande N, Nystrom G, Frost RA. Endotoxin stimulates in vivo expression of inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, -6, and high-mobility-group protein-1 in skeletal muscle. Shock. 2003;6:538–546.
Sundén-Cullberg J, Norrby-Teglund A, Rouhiainen A, Rauvala H, Herman G, Tracey KJ, et al. Persistent elevation of high mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1) in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2005;3:564–573.
Wang Z, Lieberman PM. The crosstalk of telomere dysfunction and inflammation through cell-free TERRA containing exosomes. RNA Biol. 2016;8:690–695.
Gong T, Liu L, Jiang W, Zhou R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;2:95–112.
Li D, Wu M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;1:291.
Yu L, Liu P. Cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS: regulation, function, and human diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;1:170.
Ishikawa H, Barber GN. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. 2008;7213:674–678.
Sen GC, Sarkar SN. Transcriptional signaling by double-stranded RNA: role of TLR3. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;1:1–4.
Jounai N, Kobiyama K, Takeshita F, Ishii KJ. Recognition of damage-associated molecular patterns related to nucleic acids during inflammation and vaccination. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;2:168.
Rehwinkel J, Gack MU. RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;9:537–551.
Ford JW, McVicar DW. TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;1:38–46.
Lauková L, Konečná B, Bábíčková J, Wagnerová A, Melišková V, Vlková B, et al. Exogenous deoxyribonuclease has a protective effect in a mouse model of sepsis. Biomed Pharmacother.2017;93:8–16.
Liu F, Sheng S, Shao D, Xiao Y, Zhong Y, Zhou J, et al. A cationic metal-organic framework to scavenge cell-free DNA for severe sepsis management. Nano Lett. 2021;6:2461–2469.
Biron BM, Chung CS, O’Brien XM, Chen Y, Reichner JS, Ayala A. Cl-Amidine Prevents Histone 3 Citrullination and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation, and Improves Survival in a Murine Sepsis Model. J Innate Immun. 2017;1:22–32.
Luo L, Zhang S, Wang Y, Rahman M, Syk I, Zhang E, et al. Proinflammatory role of neutrophil extracellular traps in abdominal sepsis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;7:L586–596.
Meng W, Paunel-Görgülü A, Flohé S, Hoffmann A, Witte I, MacKenzie C, et al. Depletion of neutrophil extracellular traps in vivo results in hypersusceptibility to polymicrobial sepsis in mice. Crit Care. 2012;4:R137.
Liang Y, Pan B, Alam HB, Deng Q, Wang Y, Chen E, et al. Inhibition of peptidylarginine deiminase alleviates LPS-induced pulmonary dysfunction and improves survival in a mouse model of lethal endotoxemia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;833:432–40.
Li Y, Liu Z, Liu B, Zhao T, Chong W, Wang Y, et al. Citrullinated histone H3: a novel target for the treatment of sepsis. Surgery. 2014;2:229–234.
Li Y, Liu B, Fukudome EY, Kochanek AR, Finkelstein RA, Chong W, et al. Surviving lethal septic shock without fluid resuscitation in a rodent model. Surgery. 2010;2:246–254.
Zhao T, Li Y, Liu B, Liu Z, Chong W, Duan X, et al. Novel pharmacologic treatment attenuates septic shock and improves long-term survival. Surgery. 2013;2:206–213.
Denning NL, Yang WL, Hansen L, Prince J, Wang P. C23, an oligopeptide derived from cold-inducible RNA-binding protein, suppresses inflammation and reduces lung injury in neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;10:2053–2060.
Zhang F, Brenner M, Yang WL, Wang P. A cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP)-derived peptide attenuates inflammation and organ injury in septic mice. Sci Rep. 2018;1:3052.
McGinn JT, Aziz M, Zhang F, Yang WL, Nicastro JM, Coppa GF, et al. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein-derived peptide C23 attenuates inflammation and tissue injury in a murine model of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Surgery. 2018;6:1191–1197.
Denning NL, Aziz M, Ochani M, Prince JM, Wang P. Inhibition of a triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) with an extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (eCIRP)-derived peptide protects mice from intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Surgery. 2020;3:478–485.
Denning NL, Aziz M, Diao L, Prince JM, Wang P. Targeting the eCIRP/TREM-1 interaction with a small molecule inhibitor improves cardiac dysfunction in neonatal sepsis. Mol Med. 2020;1:121.
Grégoire M, Tadié JM, Uhel F, Gacouin A, Piau C, Bone N, et al. Frontline Science: HMGB1 induces neutrophil dysfunction in experimental sepsis and in patients who survive septic shock. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;6:1281–1287.
Stevens NE, Chapman MJ, Fraser CK, Kuchel TR, Hayball JD, Diener KR. Therapeutic targeting of HMGB1 during experimental sepsis modulates the inflammatory cytokine profile to one associated with improved clinical outcomes. Sci Rep. 2017;1:5850.
Gong W, Zheng Y, Chao F, Li Y, Xu Z, Huang G, et al. The anti-inflammatory activity of HMGB1 A box is enhanced when fused with C-terminal acidic tail. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;915234.
Ulloa L, Ochani M, Yang H, Tanovic M, Halperin D, Yang R, et al. Ethyl pyruvate prevents lethality in mice with established lethal sepsis and systemic inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;19:12351–12356.
Wang H, Liao H, Ochani M, Justiniani M, Lin X, Yang L, et al. Cholinergic agonists inhibit HMGB1 release and improve survival in experimental sepsis. Nat Med. 2004;11:1216–1221.
Yang M, Cao L, Xie M, Yu Y, Kang R, Yang L, et al. Chloroquine inhibits HMGB1 inflammatory signaling and protects mice from lethal sepsis. Biochem Pharm. 2013;3:410–418.
Lee W, Ku SK, Bae JS. Zingerone reduces HMGB1-mediated septic responses and improves survival in septic mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;329:202–11.
Kim YM, Kim HJ, Chang KC. Glycyrrhizin reduces HMGB1 secretion in lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 cells and endotoxemic mice by p38/Nrf2-dependent induction of HO-1. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;1:112–118.
Yang H, Wang H, Levine YA, Gunasekaran MK, Wang Y, Addorisio M, et al. Identification of CD163 as an antiinflammatory receptor for HMGB1-haptoglobin complexes. JCI Insight. 2016;1.
Chen G, Li J, Qiang X, Czura CJ, Ochani M, Ochani K, et al. Suppression of HMGB1 release by stearoyl lysophosphatidylcholine:an additional mechanism for its therapeutic effects in experimental sepsis. J Lipid Res. 2005;4:623–627.
Ye C, Choi JG, Abraham S, Wu H, Diaz D, Terreros D, et al. Human macrophage and dendritic cell-specific silencing of high-mobility group protein B1 ameliorates sepsis in a humanized mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;51:21052–21057.
Acknowledgements
MA is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01GM129633 and U01AI170018 and PW is supported by NIH grants R35GM118337, R01HL076179, R01AA028947, U01AI133655, and U01AI170018. We acknowledge the BioRender software service for figure preparation. We thank Dr. Chuyi Tan for assistance in literature review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CPN, MA outlined the topics of the draft. CPN, MA composed the manuscript. PW critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. MA, PW conceived the idea.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Francesca Pentimalli
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nofi, C.P., Wang, P. & Aziz, M. Chromatin-Associated Molecular Patterns (CAMPs) in sepsis. Cell Death Dis 13, 700 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05155-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05155-3
This article is cited by
-
Isoelectric trapping and discrimination of histones from plasma in a microfluidic device using dehydrated isoelectric gate
Microchimica Acta (2024)
-
Sesquiterpene from Artemisia argyi seed extracts: A new anti-acute peritonitis agent that suppresses the MAPK pathway and promotes autophagy
Inflammopharmacology (2023)