Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal cancer and causes severe damage to human health. PRDX2 is a member of the peroxiredoxin family reported to have a high level of expression in colorectal cancer. However, the mechanisms by which PRDX2 promotes the proliferation of colorectal cancer are still unclear. Here, the results indicated that PRDX2 expression was upregulated in colorectal cancer and closely correlated with poor prognosis. Functionally, PRDX2 promoted the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells. Mechanistically, PRDX2 could bind RPL4, reducing the interaction between RPL4 and MDM2. These findings demonstrate that the oncogenic property of PRDX2 may be attributed to its regulation of the RPL4-MDM2-p53 pathway, leading to p53 ubiquitinated degradation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In 2018, approximately 1.8 million new colorectal cancer patients were diagnosed globally, and the disease caused 881,000 deaths. Colorectal cancer has a high morbidity and mortality rate, ranking third and second, respectively, among all cancers [1]. Data show that 521,490 cases of colorectal cancer emerged in China in 2018, causing 247,563 deaths [2]. Although significant progress has been made in diagnosis and treatment, long-term survival rates are still unsatisfactory [3].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the byproducts of cell metabolism [4, 5]. Elevated intercellular ROS levels can activate tumor-promoting signals, promote cell proliferation, enhance cell survival, and induce DNA damage [6]. Besides, ROS can also promote antitumor signals and induce tumor apoptosis [7]. Tumor cells usually express a high level of antioxidant proteins to maintain the redox balance. PRDX2 is a member of the peroxiredoxins (PRDXs) family that has been reported to have a high level of expression in many cancers, such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer [8,9,10]. Patients with high PRDX2 expression had a worse prognosis compared to those with low expression. However, the biological functions of PRDX2 in cancer have not been completely understood.
Posttranscriptional modification (PTM) is one of the mechanisms for adaption to rapid changes in the internal and external environments [11, 12]. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is the primary system responsible for protein degradation. The UPS controls many different cellular processes by selectively degrading proteins and plays a crucial role in regulating a wide range of cytological and physiological processes [13, 14]. Ubiquitin-ligase enzymes function sequentially via activation (E1), conjugation (E2), and ligation (E3) to catalyze the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to lysine residues on substrates [15]. Ubiquitination is a precisely controlled process. Deubiquitinating enzymes not only inhibit the ubiquitination process but also recycle ubiquitin molecules and proofread ubiquitin conjugates [15]. Thus, together with the ubiquitination system, they form an intricate network affecting almost all cell biological processes.
p53 is a critical tumor suppressor. It is a central mediator that controls cell proliferation and apoptosis [16, 17]. Activation of the p53 gene leads to the expression of many tumor suppressor genes, while mutations or deletions of the p53 gene cause disturbances in intracellular signaling pathways, uncontrolled cell growth, and apoptosis [18]. MDM2 is an E3 ubiquitin-ligase enzyme and is the primary negative regulator of the p53 protein. RING at the carboxyl terminus of MDM2 catalyzes the ubiquitination of p53 and leads to its degradation by the 26S proteasome [19,20,21].
In this study, we first investigated the relationship between PRDX2 and p53 in colorectal cancer. Here, we report that PRDX2 is a novel regulator of the RPL4-MDM2-p53 loop. Our findings provide novel insights into the role of PRDX2 in promoting colorectal cancer development and suggest that PRDX2 could be a promising target for colorectal cancer treatment.
Results
PRDX2 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer
To determine the mRNA expression of PRDX2 in colorectal cancer, we downloaded the GSE113513 and GSE10950 datasets deposited in the GEO database. In GSE113513 and GSE10950 datasets, bioinformatics analysis revealed that the PRDX2 mRNA level was significantly higher in the cancer tissues compared to the normal tissues (Fig. 1A, B). In the GEPIA database, we also found that PRDX2 expression was higher in most tumors than in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1C). In GSSE17537 and GSE12945, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with low expression of PRDX2 had a longer survival time than those with high expression (Fig. 1D, E). In the TCGA database, we found that PRDX2 expression was higher in READ and COAD tissues than in adjacent normal tissues. The expression of PRDX2 had no relationship with the p53 mutation state (Fig. 1F, G).
Silencing PRDX2 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation
To study the function of PRDX2 in colorectal cancer, GSEA analysis was applied in the GSE81429 dataset. GSEA analysis revealed that HALMARK_P53_PATHWAY, HALMARK_UNFOLDED_PROTREIN, HALLMARK_WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNALING, and the HALLMARK_APOPTOSIS gene sets were enriched in the low-PRDX2-expression group (Fig. 2A–D). The KEGG_OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION and KEGG_RIBOSOME gene sets were enriched in the high-PRDX2-expression group (Fig. 2E, F). To determine the effect of PRDX2 on cell proliferation, we checked cell proliferation with the CCK-8 experiment. Results showed that silencing PRDX2 markedly retarded the proliferation of HCT116 and LoVo cells (Fig. 3A). The colony formation experiment showed that the number of colonies in the shPRDX2 groups was much lower than that in the NC group (p < 0.05). An abnormal cell cycle is highly related to cancer mechanisms [22]. To check the effect of PRDX2 on the cell cycle, flow cytometry was used to analyze the changes. The results showed that the cell cycle was arrested in G1 phase in LoVo cells and that the cell cycle was significantly inhibited in G2/M phase in HCT116 cells. The protein p53 is an important cell cycle regulator that could arrest the cell cycle in both G1 and G2/M phases [16]. To determine whether the cell proliferation depends on the function of p53, siRNA targeting p53 was used to treat the cells in the shPRDX2 group. The CCK-8 assay revealed that cell proliferation was restored after the transfection of p53 siRNA, indicating that PRDX2-induced cell proliferation is p53-dependent.
Silencing PRDX2 induces p53 upregulation
To determine the correlation between PRDX2 and p53, we analyzed the two at the mRNA and protein levels. We verified the effect of PRDX2 knockdown on the p53 mRNA level by RT-PCR. We found that the p53 mRNA was not different between the shPRDX2 group and the NC group (Fig. 4A, B). To explore the correlation between PRDX2 and p53 at the protein level, western blotting was used to measure p53 expression. The data showed that the p53 protein in the shPRDX2 group was significantly higher than that in the NC group. Actinomycin (ActD) is an inducer of the nuclear protein response, which can increase the expression of p53. After ActD treatment for 0, 2, 4, and 8 h, whole-cell lysates were collected for western blot analysis. The level of p53 protein in the shPRDX2 group was significantly higher than that in the NC group (Fig. 4C, E). PRDX2 and p53 are negatively correlated at the protein level. To determine whether the half-life of p53 is affected by PRDX2, a cycloheximide (CHX) experiment was employed to verify the changes. After silencing PRDX2, the half-life of p53 extended significantly (Fig. 4D, F). The inhibitory activities of p53 were largely dependent on its nuclear subcellular localization. Hence, immunofluorescence was used to determine whether the upregulated p53 was distributed in the nucleus. Consistently, PRDX2 knockdown increased the fluorescence level of p53, and the upregulated p53 was mainly localized in the nucleus (Fig. 4G). Moreover, nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were fractionated and further confirmed the nuclear localization of the increased p53 (Supplementary Fig. 1A, B). The above results suggest that silencing PRDX2 does not change the mRNA level of p53 but upregulates the protein level by prolonging the half-life of p53.
PRDX2 induces the degradation of ubiquitinated p53
Proteasomal degradation is an essential process that regulates the protein homeostasis. To confirm whether p53 degradation occurs via proteasomal degradation, MG132 was used to inhibit the proteasome. Results showed that MG132 markedly increased p53 expression (Fig. 5A). p53 is a protein with a short half-life, undergoing rapid ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. To determine the effect of PRDX2 on total protein ubiquitination and p53 ubiquitination in cells, western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation were used to verify the changes. The results showed that silencing PRDX2 in HCT116 and LoVo cells did not alter the total protein ubiquitination level (Fig. 5C, E). However, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the ubiquitination of p53 was markedly reduced after PRDX2 knockdown (Fig. 5D, F). Many E3 ligases are involved in the degradation of p53 ubiquitin, among which MDM2 is the most critical one. To determine whether the degradation of p53 depends on MDM2, siRNA was used to knockdown MDM2. Results showed that p53 protein was significantly increased after siMDM2 transfection, indicating that PRDX2-induced p53 ubiquitination is MDM2-dependent (Fig. 5B).
PRDX2 disrupts the MDM2-RPL4 interaction by binding to RPL4
PRDX2 is an important ROS scavenger. To find whether ROS affects the expression of PRDX2, H2O2 was utilized to generate oxidative stress. Results showed that H2O2 did not change the PRDX2 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). To investigate whether p53 upregulation was affected by ROS, N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) was used to scavenge the intracellular ROS. Results showed that NAC did not abolish the p53 upregulation caused by PRDX2 knockdown. These data indicated that p53 upregulation is ROS-independent (Supplementary Fig. 1E, F). Therefore, there must be other mechanisms involved in the p53 regulation. Previous GSEA analysis revealed that the KEGG_RIBOSOME gene set was significantly enriched in the high-PRDX2-expression group (Fig. 2F). Many studies reported the relationship between RPLs-MDM2 and p53. Is there a relationship between PRDX2 and ribosomal proteins? To ascertain our hypothesis, we performed immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. The results showed that RPL4 could bind PRDX2. To confirm the results, we performed coimmunoprecipitation and GST-pulldown experiments. We found that RPL4 could bind PRDX2 in HCT116 and LoVo cells (Fig. 6A–C and Supplementary Fig. 1G). Immunofluorescence also revealed the colocalization of PRDX2 and RPL4 in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 6F). To confirm whether PRDX2 disrupts the binding of RPL4 and MDM2, we transfected pCMV-MDM2-Flag, pCMV-RPL4-Myc, and pCMV-PRDX2-Myc into HEK293T cells. The results showed that RPL4 could bind MDM2; however, after transfection with PRDX2, the binding of RPL4 and PRDX2 decreased (Fig. 6D). We transfected pCMV-p53-Flag, pCMV-Ub-HA, pCMV-RPL4-Myc, and pCMV-PRDX2-Myc into HEK293T cells to determine the mechanism. The results showed that the ubiquitination of p53 was significantly reduced after transfection with RPL4, and PRDX2 restored the p53 ubiquitination (Fig. 6E). These results suggest that PRDX2 may affect the MDM2-RPL4-p53 pathway by binding to RPL4, leading to increased p53 ubiquitination by MDM2.
Silencing PRDX2 inhibits xenograft tumor growth
To investigate whether PRDX2 plays an oncogenic role in vivo, we performed a xenograft tumor growth experiment by subcutaneously injecting shPRDX2-HCT116 and NC-HCT116 cells into the dorsal flank. The results showed the growth rate in the NC group was higher than that in the shPRDX2 group, and that the tumor volume in the NC group was markedly larger than that in the NC group (Fig. 7A–C). To further confirm the previous results, western blotting was used to check p53 and PRDX2 expression in xenograft tumor tissue. We found that shPRDX2 significantly increased p53 protein abundance (Fig. 6E). Accordingly, immunohistochemistry revealed that silencing PRDX2 reduces the proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 6D).
Discussion
Our previous study showed that PRDX2 is closely correlated with poor differentiation, advanced stage, lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer [8]. The prognosis of patients with higher PRDX2 expression is worse than that of patients with low expression [8]. These results suggest that PRDX2 plays an oncogenic role in colorectal cancer. In line with previous findings, we found that PRDX2 expression was upregulated in the GSE113513 and GSE10950 datasets. PRDX2 knockdown inhibited cancer cell growth, colony formation, and xenograft tumorigenesis derived from human colorectal cancer cells. Kang et al. reported that PRDX2 did not inhibit cell proliferation in RKO cells, which is not consistent with the above findings [23]. All these results indicate that PRDX2 plays a very complicated role in the occurrence and development of tumors. As a well-known tumor suppressor, p53 plays a vital role in cell cycle transformation [24]. When p53 is activated, the expression of many cycle-related proteins is downregulated, such as cyclin B1, cyclin A, CDK1, cyclin B2, and CDC20. The reduction in cycle-related protein expression can inhibit cell cycle transformation and induce tumor cell apoptosis [25,26,27,28]. p53 is one of the most commonly mutated genes, and p53 mutations can be found in 50% of colorectal cancer samples [29]. Both missense p53 mutations and loss of wild-type p53 can promote the occurrence and development of tumors. We found that silencing PRDX2 can significantly increase p53 protein expression. Besides, PRDX2 is reported to be upregulated in many other tumors, such as gastric cancer, and lung cancer, suggesting that PRDX2 may be a promising prognostic biomarker [8, 10].
Proteins are usually regulated by posttranslational modifications, of which ubiquitylation is the second most common only behind phosphorylation [30]. Protein ubiquitination dysregulation is one of the causes of colorectal cancer. von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene mutations have been found in 10% of colorectal cancer [31]. The VHL protein is a component of a protein complex that contains Elongin B/C, Cul2, and RBX1. This complex functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase which regulates the degradation of HIF1α [32, 33]. Mutations of VHL can cause HIF1α stabilization, inducing sustained tumor angiogenesis [31]. APC mutation stabilizes β-catenin which in turn leads to the activation of the Wnt signal pathway [34]. p53 is regulated by intricate posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, methylation, and glycosylation [35]. MDM2 ubiquitinates p53 via lysine-48-based polyubiquitination and is ultimately degraded by the 26S proteasome [36,37,38]. Single or lysine-63-based polyubiquitination can lead to p53 nuclear export and cytoplasmic relocation, ultimately leading to stabilization of p53 [39, 40]. In our study, CHX experiments revealed that the half-life of p53 increased in the shPRDX2 group. MG132 restored PRDX2-induced p53 degradation. Immunoprecipitation experiments showed PRDX2 increased p53 ubiquitination. These results suggested that PRDX2-induced colorectal cancer proliferation has a close relation with p53 ubiquitination dysregulation.
After silencing MDM2 with siRNA, the degradation of p53 was restored, suggesting that PRDX2-induced p53 reduction is MDM2-dependent. The RPL-MDM2-p53 pathway has been reported to regulate the expression of p53 [41,42,43,44]. The ribosomal protein response is usually activated under stress [45]. Ribosomal protein could bind to MDM2 [46, 47], which prevents the interaction between MDM2 and p53, causing decreased p53 ubiquitination and degradation [48]. Whether this pathway is regulated by other proteins remains largely elusive. Previous immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry experiments revealed that PRDX2 can bind RPL4 and many other proteins. The results of coimmunoprecipitation and GST-pulldown once again confirmed that PRDX2 and RPL4 exhibit specific binding in HCT116 and LoVo cells. Furthermore, we found that PRDX2 and RPL4 were colocalized in the nucleolus by immunofluorescence. The interaction between PRDX2 and RPL4 inhibited the binding of RPL4 and MDM2, relieved the functional inhibition of RPL4 on MDM2, led to the ubiquitination of p53, and promoted protein degradation. External stimuli such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can activate the ribosome response and increase p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [45]. However, in tumor cells with high PRDX2 expression, PRDX2 could bind to RPL4, resulting in decreased p53 levels. This may be a potential mechanism of PRDX2-dependent tumor proliferation or drug resistance [49]. Proteins are the real mediators of cellular activities; therefore, targeting proteins is a preferred choice for cancer-targeted therapy. Interfering with the interaction between PRDX2 and RPL4 may reverse the chemoresistance of tumor cells.
In summary, we found that PRDX2 is highly expressed in colorectal cancer tissues and can promote colorectal cancer cell proliferation. More importantly, we found that PRDX2 can bind RPL4, hindering the RPL4-MDM2 binding, and leading to p53 degradation (Fig. 7F), thereby promoting tumor proliferation. Strategies targeting PRDX2 may be developed as therapies for colorectal cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and antibodies
HCT116, LoVo, and human HEK293T cells were purchased from the Shanghai Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection (Shanghai, China). HEK293T and HCT116 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, NY, USA). LoVo cells were maintained in F12/DMEM (Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum. All the cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The sources of antibodies against the following proteins were as follows: PRDX2 (10545-2-AP,60202-1-Ig), RPL4 (11302-1-AP), P53 (10442-1-AP), MDM2 (19058-1-AP), GAPDH (10494-1-AP), Ubiquitin (10201-2-AP), ki67 (27309-1-AP), Flag (66008-3-Ig, 20543-1-AP), Myc (16286-1-AP, 60003-2-Ig) from Proteintech Group; HA (#3724), GST (#2624), PCNA (#13110S) from Cell Signaling Technology.
Cell viability assay
HCT116 cells and LoVo cell suspensions were seeded at a density of 3000 cells per well in 96-well plates. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, cell viability was measured every 24 h for 3 days using the Cell Counting Kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Each sample’s absorbance value was measured at 450 nm with a microplate reader (Infinite 2000 PRO, TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland).
Colony formation assay
HCT116 cells and LoVo cells were trypsinized and seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 500 cells per well and cultured until colonies were visible. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet blue solution (Beyotime, C0121) at room temperature for 30 min.
Cell cycle analysis
HCT116 cells and LoVo cells were trypsinized and fixed in 75% ice-cold ethanol for 24 h at 4 °C. The cells were washed with PBS twice and then incubated with 100 µl RNase A (0.1 mg/ml) at 37 °C for 20 min. Then, 2 µl propidium iodide was added to the suspension and incubated at 37 °C for another 20 min. The cell cycle was analyzed using a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, US).
siRNA, plasmids transfection, and lentivirus infection
siRNAs against p53 and MDM2 and a negative control siRNA were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). siRNAs (40 nM) were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of the siRNAs targeting p53 and MDM2 were GACTCCAGTGGTAATCTAC and AGGCAAATGTGCAATACCA, respectively. The expression vectors pCMV-p53-Flag, pCMV-PRDX2-Myc, pCMV-RPL4-Myc, pCMV-HA-Ub, and pCMV-MDM2-Flag were constructed in our laboratory. Lentiviruses silencing PRDX2 were constructed by GenePharma. HCT116 cells and LoVo cells were infected with lentiviruses according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Puromycin (2–6 µg/ml) was used for stable cell line selection. The sequences of the specific shRNA targeting PRDX2 were GTGAAGCTGTCGGACTACAAA (shPRDX2#1) and CCTTCGCCAGATCACTGTTAA (shPRDX2#2).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Slides were deparaffinized in xylene, then, heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer. The samples were incubated with primary antibodies against p53 or Ki67 at 4 °C overnight and then with secondary antibody at room temperature for 30 min. All immunostained images were obtained using a microscope.
Western blot analysis
Equal amounts of 20 µg of total protein were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and then the proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All PVDF membranes were blocked in skim milk for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. An ECL chemiluminescence system was used to visualize the immunoreactive bands.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA). RT-PCR was performed with Go-Taq (Promega, WI, USA), and β-Actin was amplified as an internal control. The sequences of the β-Actin primers were F: TCCTGTGGCATCCACGAAACT and R: GAAGCATTTGCGGTGGACGAT. The sequences of the p53 primers were F: ACCTATGGAAACTACTTCCTGAAA, R: CTGGCATTCTGGGAGCTTCA.
In vivo ubiquitination assay
The indicated plasmids were transfected into HEK293T cells. Before harvesting the protein, HEK293T cells were treated with 40 μM MG132 (Selleck, S2619) for 6 h. At 48 h after transfection, the cell lysate was incubated with anti-Flag beads (Bimake, B26101) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the anti-Flag beads were washed three times with 0.5% PBST. The immunocomplexes were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies.
Coimmunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed with NP40 (Beyotime, P0013F), and 1000 mg protein was incubated with the indicated antibodies at 4 °C for 4 h. Fifty microliters of Protein A/G Agarose beads (Beyotime, P2006) were then added to the samples, and the mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 2 h on a rocking platform. The beads were collected and washed three times with lysis buffer. The immunocomplexes were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies.
Immunofluorescence staining
HCT116 and LoVo cells were trypsinized and seeded on glass coverslips. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min followed by 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin, the fixed cells were incubated with the indicated primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the cells were washed with PBS solution three times and then incubated with secondary antibodies and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Beyotime, C1002) for nuclear staining.
Bioinformatics analysis
GSEA version 4.0.3 (Broad Institute, USA) was used to analyze the GEO datasets. The gene sets “h.all.v7.2.symbols.gmt” and “c2.cp.kegg.v7.2.symbols.gmt” were downloaded from the Molecular Signatures Database (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp) and used for the enrichment analysis. We selected 1000 permutations to calculate the normalized enrichment score (NES), normal p-value, and false discovery rate (FDR q-value).
GST-pulldown assay
The GST-PRDX2 fusion protein was expressed in BL21-DE3 Escherichia coli and was incubated with Glutathione-Sepharose beads (Beyotime, P2262) at 4 °C for 1 h to generate GST conjugates. HCT116 cell lysates were then incubated with the GST-conjugated beads at 4 °C overnight. The complexes were washed with lysis buffer four times, analyzed with western blot.
Nude mouse xenograft experiments
Six-week-old female nude mice were purchased and randomly allocated into NC and shPRDX2 group (five in each group). Xenografts were generated by subcutaneously injecting 5 × 106 HCT116-shPRDX2 and control cells into the dorsal flank. The tumors were observed and measured every 2 days. Tumor volumes were calculated by the following formula: ½ (L × W2).
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences in our data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.0 software. All in vitro experiments were independently performed at least three times. Student’s t-test or one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between groups. All data are presented as mean ± SD. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, Xu RH. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics? Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019;39:22.
Trepanier M, Minnella EM, Paradis T, Awasthi R, Kaneva P, Schwartzman K, et al. Improved disease-free survival after prehabilitation for colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2019;270:493–501.
Giorgio M, Trinei M, Migliaccio E, Pelicci PG. Hydrogen peroxide: a metabolic by-product or a common mediator of ageing signals? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:722–8.
Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:909–50.
Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019;25:101084.
Gao L, Loveless J, Shay C, Teng Y. Targeting ROS-mediated crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1260:1–12.
Peng L, Wang R, Shang J, Xiong Y, Fu Z. Peroxiredoxin 2 is associated with colorectal cancer progression and poor survival of patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8:15057–70.
Wang S, Chen Z, Zhu S, Lu H, Peng D, Soutto M, et al. PRDX2 protects against oxidative stress induced by H. pylori and promotes resistance to cisplatin in gastric cancer. Redox Biol. 2020;28:101319.
Chen Y, Yang S, Zhou H, Su D. PRDX2 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:8359860.
Williams CAC, Soufi A, Pollard SM. Post-translational modification of SOX family proteins: Key biochemical targets in cancer? Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;67:30–38.
Carubbi F, Alunno A, Gerli R, Giacomelli R. Post-translational modifications of proteins: novel insights in the autoimmune response in rheumatoid arthritis. Cells 2019;8: 657.
Song L, Luo ZQ. Post-translational regulation of ubiquitin signaling. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:1776–86.
Mani A, Gelmann EP. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in cancer. J Clin Oncol Oncol. 2005;23:4776–89.
Grabbe C, Husnjak K, Dikic I. The spatial and temporal organization of ubiquitin networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:295–307.
Engeland K. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:114–32.
Sui X, Jin L, Huang X, Geng S, He C, Hu X. p53 signaling and autophagy in cancer: a revolutionary strategy could be developed for cancer treatment. Autophagy. 2011;7:565–71.
Stiewe T, Haran TE. How mutations shape p53 interactions with the genome to promote tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2018;38:27–43.
Brooks CL, Gu W. p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond. Mol Cell. 2006;21:307–15.
Garcia-Cano J, Sanchez-Tena S, Sala-Gaston J, Figueras A, Vinals F, Bartrons R, et al. Regulation of the MDM2-p53 pathway by the ubiquitin ligase HERC2. Mol Oncol. 2020;14:69–86.
Zhou S, Lu J, Li Y, Chen C, Cai Y, Tan G, et al. MNAT1 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer and mediates p53 ubiquitin-degradation to promote colorectal cancer malignance. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:284.
Kastan MB, Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature. 2004;432:316–23.
Kang DH, Lee DJ, Lee S, Lee SY, Jun Y, Kim Y, et al. Interaction of tankyrase and peroxiredoxin II is indispensable for the survival of colorectal cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:40.
Vousden KH, Prives C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell. 2009;137:413–31.
Jackson MW, Agarwal MK, Yang J, Bruss P, Uchiumi T, Agarwal ML, et al. p130/p107/p105Rb-dependent transcriptional repression during DNA-damage-induced cell-cycle exit at G2. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1821–32.
Innocente SA, Abrahamson JL, Cogswell JP, Lee JM. p53 regulates a G2 checkpoint through cyclin B1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:2147–52.
Clifford B, Beljin M, Stark GR, Taylor WR. G2 arrest in response to topoisomerase II inhibitors: the role of p53. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4074–81.
Krause K, Wasner M, Reinhard W, Haugwitz U, Dohna CL, Mossner J, et al. The tumour suppressor protein p53 can repress transcription of cyclin B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:4410–8.
Shanmugam V, Ramanathan RK, Lavender NA, Sinari S, Chadha M, Liang WS. et al. et al.Whole genome sequencing reveals potential targets for therapy in patients with refractory KRAS mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Med Genomics. 2014;7:36.
Tay AP, Liang A, Wilkins MR, Pang CNI. Visualizing post-translational modifications in protein interaction networks using PTMOracle. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2019;66:e71.
Kuwai T, Kitadai Y, Tanaka S, Hiyama T, Tanimoto K, Chayama K. Mutation of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene in human colorectal carcinoma: association with cytoplasmic accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:149–53.
Lisztwan J, Imbert G, Wirbelauer C, Gstaiger M, Krek W. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein is a component of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1822–33.
Iwai K, Yamanaka K, Kamura T, Minato N, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, et al. Identification of the von Hippel-lindau tumor-suppressor protein as part of an active E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12436–41.
Miyoshi Y, Nagase H, Ando H, Horii A, Ichii S, Nakatsuru S, et al. Somatic mutations of the APC gene in colorectal tumors: mutation cluster region in the APC gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:229–33.
Chao CC. Mechanisms of p53 degradation. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;438:139–47.
Everett RD, Meredith M, Orr A, Cross A, Kathoria M, Parkinson J. A novel ubiquitin-specific protease is dynamically associated with the PML nuclear domain and binds to a herpesvirus regulatory protein. EMBO J. 1997;16:566–77.
Ringshausen I, O’Shea CC, Finch AJ, Swigart LB, Evan GI. Mdm2 is critically and continuously required to suppress lethal p53 activity in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:501–14.
Love IM, Grossman SR. It takes 15 to tango: making sense of the many ubiquitin ligases of p53. Genes Cancer. 2012;3:249–63.
Li M, Brooks CL, Wu-Baer F, Chen D, Baer R, Gu W. Mono- versus polyubiquitination: differential control of p53 fate by Mdm2. Science. 2003;302:1972–5.
Lee JT, Gu W. The multiple levels of regulation by p53 ubiquitination. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:86–92.
Zhang Y, Wolf GW, Bhat K, Jin A, Allio T, Burkhart WA, et al. Ribosomal protein L11 negatively regulates oncoprotein MDM2 and mediates a p53-dependent ribosomal-stress checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:8902–12.
Zhou X, Hao Q, Liao J, Zhang Q, Lu H. Ribosomal protein S14 unties the MDM2-p53 loop upon ribosomal stress. Oncogene. 2013;32:388–96.
Zhou X, Hao Q, Zhang Q, Liao JM, Ke JW, Liao P. et al. Ribosomal proteins L11 and L5 activate TAp73 by overcoming MDM2 inhibition. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:755–66.
BhatKP, Itahana K, Jin A, Zhang Y.Essential role of ribosomal protein L11 in mediating growth inhibition-induced p53 activation.EMBO J. 2004;23:2402–12.
Sun XX, Dai MS, Lu H.5-Fluorouracil activation of p53 involves an MDM2-ribosomal protein interaction.J Biol Chem. 2007;282:8052–9.
Warner JR, McIntosh KB. How common are extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins? Mol Cell. 2009;34:3–11.
Sun XX, Dai MS, Lu H. Mycophenolic acid activation of p53 requires ribosomal proteins L5 and L11. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12387–92.
Zhou X, Liao JM, Liao WJ, Lu H. Scission of the p53-MDM2 loop by ribosomal proteins. Genes Cancer. 2012;3:298–310.
Tian X, Dai S, Sun J, Jiang S, Sui C, Meng F, et al. Inhibition of MDM2 re-sensitizes rapamycin resistant renal cancer cells via the activation of p53. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39:2088–98.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Yin Hubin for his helpful suggestions to improve this paper.
Funding
The research project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81572319; Project recipient: F.Z.) and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. cstc2017jcyjAX0127; Project recipient: W.J.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.Y.W. designed and performed the main experiments. J.L.W. and H.R.Z. provided technical assistance for the main experiments. X.R.Z. and H.Z. performed all bioinformatics analyses. Y.J.L., J.G.Y., Q.C.D. and S.Q.H. discussed and interpreted the results. Z.X.F. wrote the manuscript with assistance from all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics statement
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chongqing Medical University Experimental Animal Center.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Z.-X. Xiao.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Wei, J., Zhang, H. et al. PRDX2 promotes the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells by increasing the ubiquitinated degradation of p53. Cell Death Dis 12, 605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03888-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03888-1
This article is cited by
-
The identification of hub genes associated with pure ground glass nodules using weighted gene co-expression network analysis
BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2024)
-
Comparative proteomics analysis in different stages of urothelial bladder cancer for identification of potential biomarkers: highlighted role for antioxidant activity
Clinical Proteomics (2023)
-
Complementary omics strategies to dissect p53 signaling networks under nutrient stress
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)