Abstract
The development of normal occlusion requires eruptive migration of teeth from their developmental position in the jaw into a functional position within the oral cavity. This process involves significant and coordinated movement in an axial direction and appropriate eruption through the gingival tissues. The mechanisms regulating these developmental events are poorly understood, and teeth retain eruptive potential throughout their lifespan. In recent years, the use of mouse models has helped to elucidate some of the underlying molecular and biological mechanisms of mammalian tooth eruption. Here, we outline our current understanding of tooth eruption mechanisms and discuss their relevance in terms of known human disorders of tooth eruption.
Key points
-
Teeth in the human dentition retain the ability to erupt throughout life but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood.
-
Recent advances in our understanding of how teeth erupt are summarised.
-
Genetic disorders associated with failed eruption of the permanent dentition are discussed with clinical examples and supporting evidence for the biological basis of these conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The establishment of normal occlusion requires eruption of the teeth from their developmental position in the jaw bone into a functional position within the oral cavity. This process involves significant axial movement of the tooth, initiated at the right time and requiring both intra-osseous and intra-oral movement. We know that an intact dental follicle1,2 and normal osteoclast function3 are absolute requirements for tooth eruption to proceed normally, while, somewhat surprisingly, the periodontal ligament and root seem to be expendable.4 The gubernacular cord, which consists of vascular connective tissue and remnants of the dental lamina, has also been postulated to play an important role during eruption of the teeth, although the exact mechanism is not understood.5
Current thinking would suggest that the primary eruption mechanism is dependent upon asymmetric bone remodelling around the developing tooth germ; specifically, resorption in the coronal regions and deposition apically.6,7 However, the precise cellular mechanisms regulating this process in both health and disease are also only poorly understood. In recent years, our understanding of the tooth eruption process has improved, particularly the influence of signalling from the enamel organ and dental follicle of developing teeth, and the role of normal osteoclast function.1,2,3 Teeth in the permanent dentition most commonly fail to erupt due to idiopathic or pathological mechanical obstruction; however, failure in the eruptive mechanism itself can also occur8 and may affect one or a number of teeth in either dentition and can be partial or complete.
Several terms have been ascribed to different types of eruption failure affecting the human dentition. Primary retention of permanent teeth is an isolated condition associated with a localised failure of eruption and no other identifiable local or systemic involvement.8,9 Secondary retention involves the unexplained cessation of further eruption after a tooth has penetrated the oral mucosa.8,10Ankylosis can affect any tooth but would normally be diagnosed alongside a history of trauma or developmental pathology. The known association between eruption defects, and a small number of defined syndromic conditions and findings that non-syndromic eruption defects are often seen in families, suggests an important genetic component underlying failure of normal tooth eruption. Here, we discuss current knowledge of the molecular basis of tooth eruption and focus on two disorders of known genetic aetiology associated with disrupted human tooth eruption. We also discuss these conditions in the context of supportive biological evidence from mouse models.
The molecular biology of tooth eruption
It is now firmly established from experiments in mice that parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) is not only a key regulator of bone metabolism11 but also an essential molecular component of the tooth eruption pathway.12 PTHrP is a locally acting peptide released from the enamel organ and dental follicle, which acts through its G-protein-coupled parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R) to coordinate the complex process of root formation and eruption.13 PTHrP activity in the enamel organ epithelium is initially required for local osteoclast differentiation and alveolar bone resorption around the coronal region of the developing tooth to create an early pre-eruption pathway within the crypt of alveolar bone (Fig. 1). In mice lacking PTHrP function, the teeth remain covered in alveolar bone and fail to erupt; however, genetic restoration of PTHrP signalling in the enamel organ of these mice can rescue the eruption defect through re-establishment of this early eruption pathway.14
Normal tooth eruption requires more than just the formation of a pre-eruptive bony channel above the developing tooth and there is evidence that PTHrP signalling within the dental follicle is also essential for establishment of an intraosseous eruption pathway. PTHrP is strongly expressed in the mesenchymal-derived dental follicle and developing root surface of the tooth germ. Sophisticated cell lineage-tracing and loss-of-function studies in PTHrP+ mesenchymal progenitor cells has demonstrated that PTHrP-PTH1R within cell (autocrine) regulation is essential for maintaining appropriate cell fate during the process of tooth eruption.15 Specifically, PTHrP+ cells initially localise to the dental follicle but become progressively restricted to cementoblasts, periodontal ligament fibroblasts and osteoblasts within the bony crypt of the developing tooth. Local ablation of PTH1R function in PTHrP+ dental follicle cells before eruption produces a shift in cell fate within this cell population, away from cementoblasts (on the acellular cementum), periodontal ligament cells and alveolar osteoblasts, to a homogenous population of non-physiological cementoblast-like cells, which precociously form cellular cementum on the tooth root surface. This ectopic cementum seems to inhibit eruption, with two-thirds of first molar teeth failing to erupt in mice lacking PTH1R function in dental follicle cells, despite normal PTHrP signalling in the enamel organ.15
Osteoclasts themselves are ultimately derived from erythro-myeloid progenitor cells3 with their differentiation induced by colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) and coordinated through signalling between these osteoclast progenitors and local osteoblasts - specifically, induction by TNF-related receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) signalling and inhibition by osteoprotegerin (OPG). PTHrP promotes the expression of RANKL and downregulates OPG, activating osteoclasts and inducing bone resorption.3 In the developing tooth, the dental follicle also plays a key role in this process, releasing both CSF1 and PTHrP.9,16 A clear relationship therefore seems to exist between appropriate osteoclastogenesis, normal bone development and tooth eruption, with impaired development of functional osteoclasts leading to excessive levels of bone and cartilage mineralisation and osteopetrosis, a group of disorders associated with increased bone density and long associated with disrupted tooth eruption. Indeed, mice lacking function of key mediators of osteoclastogenesis have osteopetrosis and failure of tooth eruption.17,18,19
The molecular analysis of mesenchymal progenitor cell regulation during mouse molar tooth eruption has identified a putative list of potential genes involved in PTHrP-PTH1R signalling during tooth eruption. Gene ontology has revealed potential roles for gene pathways involved with biomineral tissue development, protein secretion, chemotaxis, inflammation and neuron projection development, emphasising the highly coordinated and complex mechanisms associated with tooth eruption.15 Collectively, it seems a wide range of processes are required to regulate tooth eruption, which highlights the need for comprehensive assays of gene variation in human subjects with tooth eruption anomalies.
Primary failure of eruption
The term primary failure of eruption (PFE) has been used to describe a relatively rare and isolated form of tooth eruption failure that predominantly affects the posterior teeth, which often partially erupt and then stop before they can achieve a functional occlusion.20 Comprehensive phenotypic analyses of PFE have characterised a variety of features associated with this condition (Table 1).20 Indeed, PFE has been further classified into three types based upon the essential clinical features21 (Fig. 2).
It has been known for some time that mutations in the PTH1R gene are a significant cause of autosomal dominant PFE in humans.22 Since the original discovery of a link between PFE and PTH1R function, more than 50 variants in this gene have been identified in association with PFE.23 However, PTH-related signalling currently remains the only known candidate pathway identified in primary eruption failure. The PTH1R ablation and cell fate alteration experiments in the mouse are interesting because they provide insight that is consistent with some of the key features associated with PFE; in particular, the ability of the tooth to establish an initial intra-osseous eruption pathway but then stop.12 Thus, in PFE, an initial eruption pathway is seemingly established through PTH1R function in the coronal enamel organ but subsequent movement towards the occlusal plane is disrupted through loss of receptor function in the dental follicle. PFE is difficult to manage clinically because the teeth generally respond to orthodontic traction with ankylosis and disruption to the remaining occlusion, often taking place with prolonged traction (Fig. 3). The local restoration of PTHrP signalling in the dental follicle of these teeth would therefore seem to be an interesting possible future strategy to encourage normal eruption of these teeth in association with orthodontic traction.
Clinical management of PFE is dependent upon severity and the extent to which the dentition is affected. Orthodontic traction will result in ankylosis; although, some limited tooth movement may be achievable before this takes place. For milder presentations of infraocclusion, a decision may be made to accept a lateral open bite or attempt limited movement to improve it. Alternatively, prosthodontic restoration can restore the affected tooth or teeth into occlusion. For moderate or more severe cases, surgical intervention using segmental osteotomy and immediate elastic traction24 or distraction osteogenesis25,26 to level the occlusal plane have been described. Affected teeth may also be extracted and either orthodontic space closure or prosthetic replacement considered.
Cleidocranial dysplasia
Cleidocranial dysplasia is an autosomal dominant skeletal dysplasia associated with defective bone ossification and severe dental anomalies; specifically, prolonged retention of the primary dentition, failure of eruption and multiple supernumerary teeth affecting the successional dentition27 (Table 1). The first permanent molars often erupt but eruption of the successional incisor and premolar dentition is highly variable. Mutations in the runt-related transcription factor RUNX2 have been identified as the cause of cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) in most cases.28,29 This gene encodes a transcription factor essential for the terminal differentiation of osteoblasts. Mice generated with targeted disruption in Runx2 have a complete absence of bone formation and they die at birth.30,31
The molecular mechanisms underlying the dental defects seen in CCD are also poorly understood; however, Runx2 is widely expressed in odontogenic mesenchyme and interestingly, tooth development arrests at the bud stage in Runx2 mutant mice.32,33,34,35 Investigating the supernumerary phenotype in humans has been compounded to some extent by the arrested tooth development seen in Runx2 mutant mice. However, there is some evidence that Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) signalling activity is required in odontogenic mesenchyme for the suppression of successional tooth formation and Runx2 may be involved in suppressing the activity of Wnt inhibitors in these regions as part of this process.36 This suggests that, in human tooth development, elevated Wnt signal levels in the mesenchymal component of the developing dentition might be the basis of continued successional tooth formation taking place in CCD subjects.
The eruption phenotype in CCD is also poorly understood,37 but in contrast to PFE, while affected teeth in CCD rarely demonstrate eruption into the oral cavity, they often respond well to the application of orthodontic traction (Fig. 4). Is the inherent bone phenotype seen in these patients responsible for the eruption defect or is there a more local mechanism associated with the teeth themselves? Certainly, the dental phenotypes are thought to be distinct and multiple supernumerary teeth are not the cause of the failed eruption that is often seen. RUNX2 is expressed in the dental follicle38 and there is evidence that mechanisms of bone formation and resorption are both impaired in the dental follicles of CCD patients through disrupted RANKL/RANK/OPG signalling.39,40 Runx2 heterozygous mutant mice have delayed tooth eruption and reduced numbers of osteoclasts, which suggests that impaired alveolar bone resorption is an important mechanism in CCD.41 Indeed, it has recently been demonstrated that RUNX2 can directly regulate osteoclastogenesis,37 despite earlier reports to the contrary.42
Conclusions
Understanding the biological basis of normal human tooth eruption mechanisms supports the accurate diagnosis of local and systemic eruption disorders and informs potential strategies to prevent or intercept these conditions. The continued identification of important loci and signalling pathways will aid these advancements and increasingly facilitate genetic testing, early diagnosis, and potentially preventive management of these conditions.
References
Marks S C Jr, Cahill D R. Experimental study in the dog of the non-active role of the tooth in the eruptive process. Arch Oral Biol 1984; 29: 311-322.
Cahill D R, Marks S C Jr. Tooth eruption: evidence for the central role of the dental follicle. J Oral Pathol 1980; 9: 189-200.
Jacome-Galarza C E, Percin G I, Muller J T et al. Developmental origin, functional maintenance and genetic rescue of osteoclasts. Nature 2019; 568: 541-545.
Kim T H, Bae C H, Lee J C et al. β-catenin is required in odontoblasts for tooth root formation. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 215-221.
Berkovitz B K B, Holland G R, Moxham B J. Oral Anatomy, Embryology and Histology. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Mosby International Ltd, 2009.
Marks S C Jr, Schroeder H E. Tooth eruption: theories and facts. Anat Rec 1996; 245: 374-393.
Wise G E, King G J. Mechanisms of tooth eruption and orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 414-434.
Raghoebar G M, Boering G, Vissink A, Stegenga B. Eruption disturbances of permanent molars: a review. J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20: 159-166.
Wise G E, Frazier-Bowers S, D'Souza R N. Cellular, molecular, and genetic determinants of tooth eruption. Crit Rev Oral Pathol Med 2002; 13: 323-334.
Raghoebar G M, Boering G, Vissink A. Clinical, radiographic and histological characteristics of secondary retention of permanent molars. J Dent 1991; 19: 164-170.
Chen T, Wang Y, Hao Z, Hu Y, Li J. Parathyroid hormone and its related peptides in bone metabolism. Biochem Pharmacol 2021; 192: 114669.
Richman J M. Shedding new light on the mysteries of tooth eruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116: 353-355.
Ono W, Sakagami N, Nishimori S, Ono N, Kronenberg H M. Parathyroid hormone receptor signalling in osterix-expressing mesenchymal progenitors is essential for tooth root formation. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 11277.
Philbrick W M, Dreyer B E, Nakchbandi I A, Karaplis A C. Parathyroid hormone-related protein is required for tooth eruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 11846-11851.
Takahashi A, Nagata M, Gupta A et al. Autocrine regulation of mesenchymal progenitor cell fates orchestrates tooth eruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116: 575-580.
Wise G E. Cellular and molecular basis of tooth eruption. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009; 12: 67-73.
Dougall W C, Glaccum M, Charrier K et al. RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 2412-2424.
Kong Y Y, Yoshida H, Sarosi I et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 1999; 397: 315-323.
Yoshida H, Hayashi S, Kunisada T et al. The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor gene. Nature 1990; 345: 442-444.
Proffit W R, Vig K W. Primary failure of eruption: a possible cause of posterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 173-190.
Frazier-Bowers S A, Koehler K E, Ackerman J L, Proffit W R. Primary failure of eruption: further characterization of a rare eruption disorder. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 578.
Decker E, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Fiebig B S et al. PTHR1 loss-of-function mutations in familial, nonsyndromic primary failure of tooth eruption. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 83: 781-786.
Hanisch M, Hanisch L, Kleinheinz J, Jung S. Primary failure of eruption (PFE): a systematic review. Head Face Med 2018; 14: 5.
Frazier-Bowers S A, Long S, Tucker M R. Primary failure of eruption and other eruption disorders - Considerations for management by the orthodontist and oral surgeon. Semin Orthod 2016; 22: 34-44.
Kater W M, Kawa D, Schäfer D, Toll D. Treatment of posterior open bite using distraction osteogenesis. J Clin Orthod 2004; 38: 501-504.
Susami T, Matsuzaki M, Ogihara Y et al. Segmental alveolar distraction for the correction of unilateral open-bite caused by multiple ankylosed teeth: a case report. J Orthod 2006; 33: 153-159.
Cobourne M T, Sharpe P T. Diseases of the tooth: the genetic and molecular basis of inherited anomalies affecting the dentition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2013; 2: 183-212.
Lee B, Thirunavukkarasu K, Zhou L. Missense mutations abolishing DNA binding of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor OSF2/CBFA1 in cleidocranial dysplasia. Nat Genet 1997; 16: 307-310.
Mundlos S, Otto F, Mundlos C et al. Mutations involving the transcription factor CBFA1 cause cleidocranial dysplasia. Cell 1997; 89: 773-779.
Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997; 89: 755-764.
Otto F, Thornell A P, Crompton T et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell 1997; 89: 765-771.
Aberg T, Cavender A, Gaikwad J S et al. Phenotypic changes in dentition of Runx2 homozygote-null mutant mice. J Histochem Cytochem 2004; 52: 131-139.
Aberg T, Wang X-P, Kim J-H et al. Runx2 mediates FGF signaling from epithelium to mesenchyme during tooth morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2004; 270: 76-93.
D'Souza R N, Aberg T, Gaikwad J et al. Cbfa1 is required for epithelial-mesenchymal interactions regulating tooth development in mice. Development 1999; 126: 2911-2920.
Wang X-P, Aberg T, James M J, Levanon D, Groner Y, Thesleff I. Runx2 (Cbfa1) inhibits Shh signaling in the lower but not upper molars of mouse embryos and prevents the budding of putative successional teeth. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 138-143.
Järvinen E, Shimomura-Kuroki J, Balic A, Jussila M, Thesleff I. Mesenchymal Wnt/beta-catenin signaling limits tooth number. Development 2018; DOI: 10.1242/dev.158048.
Xin Y, Liu Y, Liu D et al. New Function of RUNX2 in Regulating Osteoclast Differentiation via the AKT/NFATc1/CTSK Axis. Calcif Tissue Int 2020; 106: 553-566.
Morsczeck C. Gene expression of runx2, Osterix, c-fos, DLX-3, DLX-5, and MSX-2 in dental follicle cells during osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 2006; 78: 98-102.
Liu Y, Wang Y, Sun X et al. RUNX2 mutation reduces osteogenic differentiation of dental follicle cells in cleidocranial dysplasia. Mutagenesis 2018; 33: 203-214.
Sun X, Wang X, Zhang C et al. RUNX2 mutation impairs bone remodelling of dental follicle cells and periodontal ligament cells in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Mutagenesis 2016; 31: 677-685.
Yoda S, Suda N, Kitahara Y, Komori T, Ohyama K. Delayed tooth eruption and suppressed osteoclast number in the eruption pathway of heterozygous Runx2/Cbfa1 knockout mice. Arch Oral Biol 2004; 49: 435-442.
Faienza M F, Ventura A, Piacente L et al. Osteoclastogenic potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in cleidocranial dysplasia. Int J Med Sci 2014; 11: 356-364.
Grippaudo C, D'Apolito I, Cafiero C, Re A, Chiurazzi P, Frazier-Bowers S A. Validating clinical characteristic of primary failure of eruption (PFE) associated with PTH1R variants. Prog Orthod 2021; 22: 43.
Frazier-Bowers S A, Hendricks H M, Wright J T et al. Novel mutations in PTH1R associated with primary failure of eruption and osteoarthritis. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 134-139.
Pan C-Y, Tseng Y-C, Lan T-H, Chang H-P. Craniofacial features of cleidocranial dysplasia. J Dent Sci 2017; 12: 313-318.
Funding
Daniel Stonehouse-Smith is funded through a Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (MR/X001725/1). Catherine Liu is an NIHR funded Academic Clinical Fellow in Orthodontics. Maisa Seppala and Martyn T. Cobourne's research into the genetic basis of PFE is funded by the European Orthodontic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Daniel Stonehouse-Smith wrote the original draft, constructed figures, reviewed, and edited subsequent versions; Laura Ota, Jadbinder Seehra, Catherine Liu, Jerry Kwok and Maisa Seppala wrote the original draft and edited subsequent versions; Martyn T. Cobourne conceived the idea, wrote the original draft, constructed figures and edited subsequent versions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.© The Author(s) 2024.
About this article
Cite this article
Stonehouse-Smith, D., Ota, L., Seehra, J. et al. How do teeth erupt?. Br Dent J 237, 217–221 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-7609-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-7609-z