Abstract
Background
Existing methods to estimate lifetime exposure to occupational carcinogenic agents could be improved.
Objective
We propose a new method to estimate the lifetime prevalence of exposure to occupational carcinogens using the example of painters and workers of the rubber industry in France.
Methods
From census, we calculated the proportion of painters and rubber industry workers using predefined occupational codes related to each occupation by sex and 10-year age group in 1982, 1990, 1999, 2007, and 2013. Using a beta-regression model, we obtained the yearly prevalence of exposure by 10-year age group over the period 1967–2007. We estimated the age- and sex-specific lifetime prevalence of exposure of the population in 2017 over 1967–2007, summing up the estimated prevalence of exposure for years 1967, 1977, 1987, 1997, and 2007 combined with a sex- and age-specific turnover factor. Corresponding population-attributable fractions were estimated for lung and bladder cancers in 2017.
Results
In 2017, we estimated that 5.6 and 0.2% of men in France had ever worked as a painter or in the rubber industry, respectively, during their working time. The lifetime prevalence of ever having worked as a painter or in the rubber industry was much lower in women: 1.8% and 0.1%, respectively. We estimated that 950 lung cancer and 40 bladder cancer cases were attributable to these occupations in 2017.
Significance
Based on accurate data and taking into account evolution of specific jobs over time, the proposed method provides good estimates of lifetime prevalence of exposure to occupational carcinogens. It could be applied in any other country with similar data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41370-020-00272-7/MediaObjects/41370_2020_272_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41370-020-00272-7/MediaObjects/41370_2020_272_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41370-020-00272-7/MediaObjects/41370_2020_272_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
The analysis was performed using R software, version 5.3.2. Codes are available upon request to the corresponding author.
References
Pearce N, Blair A, Vineis P, Ahrens W, Andersen A, Anto JM, et al. IARC monographs: 40 years of evaluating carcinogenic hazards to humans. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:507–14.
GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–724.
Boffetta P, Autier P, Boniol M, Boyle P, Hill C, Aurengo A, et al. An estimate of cancers attributable to occupational exposures in France. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:399–406.
Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, et al. The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:419–31.
Fritschi L, Driscoll T. Cancer due to occupation in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006;30:213–9.
Marant MC, Shield K, Vignat J, Baldi I, Charbotel B, Fervers B, et al. Cancers in France in 2015 attributable to occupational exposures. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019;222:22–9.
Nurminen M, Karjalainen A. Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27:161–213.
Rushton L, Bagga S, Bevan R, Brown TP, Cherrie JW, Holmes P, et al. Occupation and cancer in Britain. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1428–37.
Steenland K, Burnett C, Lalich N, Ward E, Hurrell J. Dying for work: the magnitude of US mortality from selected causes of death associated with occupation. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43:461–82.
Rushton L, Hutchings S, Brown T. The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:789–800.
Gilg Soit Gilg A, Houot M, Pilorget C. Estimation de la part de cancers attribuables à certaines expositions professionnelles en France. Utilisation des matrices emplois-expositions développées dans le cadre du programme Matgéné. Saint-Maurice: Santé Publique France; 2016.
Chemical agents and related occupations. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 100F. 2012.
Garras L, Prévot C, Conte V, Palmer G, Pilorget C. CAPS: Un outil d’aide au codage des emplois (professions et secteurs d’activité). Saint-Maurice; 2016. http://www.caps-france.fr.
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. Nomenclature d’activités française. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques; 2019. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2406147.
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. Nomenclature des professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques; 2017. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2406153.
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. Statistical operation: population estimates. Paris, France: Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques; 2018.
Zins M, Goldberg M. The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:1317–28.
Ferrari S, Cribari-Neto F. Beta regression or modeling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat. 2004;31:799–815.
Levin ML. The occurrence of lung cancer in man. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum. 1953;9:531–41.
Marant Micallef C, Shield KD, Baldi I, Charbotel B, Fervers B, Gilg Soit Ilg A, et al. Occupational exposures and cancer: a review of agents and relative risk estimates. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75:604–14.
Ferlay J, Evrik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Pineros M, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today.
Rushton L, Hutchings SJ, Fortunato L, Young C, Evans GS, Brown T, et al. Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:S3–7.
Creely KS, Cowie H, Van Tongeren M, Kromhout H, Tickner J, Cherrie JW. Trends in inhalation exposure–a review of the data in the published scientific literature. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51:665–78.
DARES. Les expositions aux produits cancérogènes en 2010. Report no. 054. DARES: Paris; 2013.
Hutchings SJ, Rushton L. Occupational cancer in Britain. Statistical methodology. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:S8–17.
Guha N, Merletti F, Steenland NK, Altieri A, Cogliano V, Straif K. Lung cancer risk in painters: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:303–12.
Guha N, Steenland NK, Merletti F, Altieri A, Cogliano V, Straif K. Bladder cancer risk in painters: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67:568–73.
Vlaanderen J, Taeger D, Wellman J, Keil U, Schuz J, Straif K. Extended cancer mortality follow-up of a German rubber industry cohort. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55:966–72.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the team of the CONSTANCES study (Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, and Stephen Goldberg) for sharing the individual data of the study, which have been crucial for the innovative aspect of this manuscript.
Funding
This project is funded by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational health and Safety (ANSES) for the project entitled “Estimation des prévalences d’exposition vie entière de la population française à des cancérogènes professionnels majeurs: une méthode innovante pour le calcul de la part de cancers attribuables aux expositions professionnelles” (Grant number: EST/2017/1/141—French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of ANSES with the support of the Cancer TMOI of the French National Alliance for Life and Health Sciences (AVIESAN)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marant Micallef, C., Paul, A., Charvat, H. et al. An innovative method to estimate lifetime prevalence of carcinogenic occupational circumstances: the example of painters and workers of the rubber manufacturing industry in France. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 31, 769–776 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-00272-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-00272-7
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Estimated number of cancers attributable to occupational exposures in France in 2017: an update using a new method for improved estimates
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2023)
-
Lifetime occupational exposure proportion estimation methods: a sensitivity analysis in the general population
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (2021)