Abstract
The incidence of acute ischaemic stroke with mild neurological deficits (called mild ischaemic stroke [MIS]) is increasing, and studies show that a large percentage of untreated patients have poor long-term outcomes. Many physicians do not, however, routinely treat patients with MIS with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA)—the only thrombolytic therapy currently approved by the FDA. Here, we discuss the reasons why physicians do not treat patients with MIS and we review the studies published to date regarding the potential risks and benefits of administering rtPA in this patient population. We then provide our perspective on why patients with MIS should be treated with intravenous rtPA and we highlight the need for a randomized clinical trial to address treatment of MIS.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[No authors listed] Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1581–1587 (1995).
Lansberg, M. G., Bluhmki, E. & Thijs, V. N. Efficacy and safety of tissue plasminogen activator 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke: a metaanalysis. Stroke 40, 2438–2441 (2009).
IST-3 collaborative group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379, 2352–2363 (2012).
Dhamoon, M. S. et al. Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke 40, 2805–2811 (2009).
Kleindorfer, D. et al. The unchanging incidence and case-fatality of stroke in the 1990s: a population-based study. Stroke 37, 2473–2478 (2006).
Jauch, E. C. et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 44, 870–947 (2013).
Smith, E. E. et al. Outcomes in mild or rapidly improving stroke not treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator: findings from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Stroke 42, 3110–3115 (2011).
Diener, H. C. et al. NXY-059 for the treatment of acute stroke: pooled analysis of the SAINT I and II Trials. Stroke 39, 1751–1758 (2008).
Hill, M. D. et al. The albumin in acute stroke trial (ALIAS); design and methodology. Int. J. Stroke 2, 214–219 (2007).
Pancioli, A. M. et al. The combined approach to lysis utilizing eptifibatide and rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke: the CLEAR stroke trial. Stroke 39, 3268–3276 (2008).
Yamaguchi, T. et al. Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of onset: Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial (J-ACT). Stroke 37, 1810–1815 (2006).
Chernyshev, O. Y. et al. Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemia. Neurology 74, 1340–1345 (2010).
Tsivgoulis, G. et al. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: a 6-year, single-care center study and a pooled analysis of reported series. Stroke 42, 1771–1774 (2011).
Katzan, I. L. et al. Utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Arch. Neurol. 61, 346–350 (2004).
Cocho, D. et al. Reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 64, 719–720 (2005).
Fischer, U. et al. What is a minor stroke? Stroke 41, 661–666 (2010).
Khatri, P. et al. Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Int. J. Stroke 3, 130–137 (2008).
Barber, P. A., Zhang, J., Demchuk, A. M., Hill, M. D. & Buchan, A. M. Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility. Neurology 56, 1015–1020 (2001).
Smith, E. E. et al. Poor outcomes in patients who do not receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator because of mild or improving ischemic stroke. Stroke 36, 2497–2499 (2005).
Nedeltchev, K. et al. Outcome of stroke with mild or rapidly improving symptoms. Stroke 38, 2531–2535 (2007).
Rajajee, V. et al. Early MRI and outcomes of untreated patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke. Neurology 67, 980–984 (2006).
Hassan, A. E. et al. Does mild deficit for patients with stroke justify the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator? J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 19, 1116–1120 (2010).
Martin-Schild, S. et al. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke. Ann. Emerg. Med. 57, 42–45 (2011).
Edwards, D. F., Hahn, M., Baum, C. & Dromerick, A. W. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 15, 151–157 (2006).
National Institute of Neurological Disorders Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for minor strokes: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study experience. Ann. Emerg. Med. 46, 243–252 (2005).
Baumann, C. R. et al. Good outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis despite regressing neurological symptoms. Stroke 37, 1332–1333 (2006).
Hassan, A. E., Hassanzadeh, B., Tohidi, V. & Kirmani, J. F. Very mild stroke patients benefit from intravenous tissue plasminogen activator without increase of intracranial hemorrhage. South Med. J. 103, 398–402 (2010).
Steffenhagen, N., Hill, M. D., Poppe, A. Y., Buchan, A. M. & Coutts, S. B. Should you thrombolyse all or any stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale scores < or = 5? Cerebrovasc. Dis. 28, 201–202 (2009).
Kohrmann, M. et al. Safety and outcome after thrombolysis in stroke patients with mild symptoms. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 27, 160–166 (2009).
Khatri, P. et al. Ninety-day outcome rates of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with mild ischemic stroke. Stroke 43, 560–562 (2012).
Shobha, N., Fang, J. & Hill, M. D. Do lacunar strokes benefit from thrombolysis? Evidence from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Int. J. Stroke http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949201200932.x.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the SPOTRIAS P50 NS 044227 grant and the NIH Training Grant: 5 T32 NS0077412-12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W. R. Guerrero researched the data for the article. W. R. Guerrero and S. I. Savitz contributed equally to discussion of content, writing the article and review/editing of the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guerrero, W., Savitz, S. Mild acute ischaemic stroke—the case for thrombolytic therapy. Nat Rev Neurol 9, 653–656 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.174
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.174
This article is cited by
-
Comparisons of outcomes in stroke subtypes after intravenous thrombolysis
SpringerPlus (2016)