Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cerebrovascular malformations

Seizure risk with AVMs—medical vs interventional management

Controversy exists over the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. A recent study suggests that, irrespective of clinical presentation, invasive treatment has no benefit over conservative management with regard to risk of seizure. Whether eradication is superior to medical management alone for those with seizures, headache and/or haemorrhage remains unsettled.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Stapf, C. et al. The New York Islands AVM Study: design, study progress, and initial results. Stroke 34, E29–E33 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Josephson, C. B. et al. Seizure risk with AVM treatment or conservative management: prospective, population-based study. Neurology 79, 500–507 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ondra, S. L., Troupp, H., George, E. D. & Schwab, K. The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J. Neurosurg. 73, 387–391 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stapf, C. et al. Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 66, 1350–1355 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcin, B. et al. Epileptic seizures at initial presentation in patients with brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 78, 626–631 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wedderburn C. J. et al. Outcome after interventional or conservative management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 7, 223–230 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartmann, A. et al. Determinants of neurological outcome after surgery for brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke 31, 2361–2364 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H. et al. Comparison of 2 approaches for determining the natural history risk of brain arteriovenous malformation rupture. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171, 1317–1322 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. van Beijnum J. et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306, 2011–2019 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Aneurysms. The ARUBA Trial [online], (2012).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohr, J. Seizure risk with AVMs—medical vs interventional management. Nat Rev Neurol 8, 535–536 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.195

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.195

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing