Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Interventional cardiology

Hand me your radial artery to protect your kidney

Vuurmans et al. have reported that, among 69,214 patients who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, transradial access was associated with a lower incidence of chronic kidney disease than the femoral approach. We discuss the importance of kidney injury following these procedures, and the potential protective mechanisms of transradial access.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Vuurmans, T. et al. Chronic kidney injury in patients after cardiac catheterisation or percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of radial and femoral approaches (from the British Columbia Cardiac and Renal Registries). Heart 96, 1538–1542 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rihal, C. S. et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 105, 2259–2264 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gruberg, L. et al. Acute renal failure requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 52, 409–416 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tumlin, J. et al. Pathophysiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 98, 14K–20K (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jolly, S. S., Amlani, S., Hamon, M., Yusuf, S. & Mehta, S. R. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am. Heart J. 157, 132–140 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scolari, F. & Ravani, P. Atheroembolic renal disease. Lancet 375, 1650–1660 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramirez, G., O'Neill, W. M. Jr, Lambert, R. & Bloomer, H. A. Cholesterol embolization: a complication of angiography. Arch. Intern. Med. 138, 1430–1432 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehran, R. et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44, 1393–1399 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eikelboom, J. W. et al. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 114, 774–782 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chase, A. J. et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 94, 1019–1025 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giora Weisz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisz, G., Leon, M. Hand me your radial artery to protect your kidney. Nat Rev Cardiol 7, 674–675 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.158

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.158

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing