The history of the fierce opposition met by Einstein's theory of relativity in the 1920s teaches us that public controversies about science are not necessarily settled by sound scientific reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Einstein, A. in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein Vol 10 (eds Buchwald, D. et al.) 271–272 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2006).
Daum, A. Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert (Oldenbourg, 1998).
Ziegler, J. H. Der grosse Welt- und Selbstbetrug der Physiker 92 (Weltformel-Verlag, 1931).
Ruckhaber, E. Die Relativitätstheorie widerlegt durch das Widerspruchsprinzip und die natürliche Erklärung des Michelsonversuchs 24 (Hillmann, 1922).
Letter from P. Lenard to E. Gehrcke, 6 November 1920 (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, 2005).
Jungnickel, C. & McCormmach, R. Intellectual Mastery of Nature: Theoretical physics from Ohm to Einstein (Univ. Chicago Press, 1986).
Hentschel, K. Interpretationen und Fehlinterpretationen der speziellen und der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Zeitgenossen Albert Einsteins (Birkhäuser, 1990).
Letter from A. Reuterdahl to S. Mohorovičić, 24 May 1923 (University of St. Thomas Archives, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wazeck, M. The truth phalanx. Nature Phys 11, 518–519 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3317
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3317
