Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Stem cell proliferative history in tissue revealed by temporal halogenated thymidine analog discrimination

Abstract

Detection of proliferating cells based on bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and determination of phenotype by immunofluorescence labeling are standard approaches for studying stem and progenitor cell populations in developing and adult tissue as well as in histopathology studies. We describe incorporation of different halogenated thymidine analogs for temporal discrimination of cell cycle in the rat. With equimolar delivery, these analogs are suitable for quantitative histological studies including assessment of the regulation of proliferation, clonal analysis and simultaneous profiling of cell phenotype relative to proliferative history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Proliferative history of individual cells revealed by temporal discrimination of equimolar IdU and CldU delivery.
Figure 2: Combined detection of cell proliferative history with lineage commitment.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rakic, P. Science 183, 425–427 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi, T., Nowakowski, R.S. & Caviness, V.S., Jr. J. Neurocytol. 21, 185–197 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson, P.S. et al. Nat. Med. 4, 1313–1317 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Magavi, S.S., Leavitt, B.R. & Macklis, J.D. Nature 405, 951–955 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun, K.M. et al. Development 130, 5241–5255 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aten, J.A. et al. Histochem. J. 24, 251–259 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manders, E.E.M. et al. J. Cell Sci. 103, 857–862 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, H. et al. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1415–1425 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Maslov, A.Y., Barone, T.A., Plunkett, R.J. & Pruitt, S.C. J. Neurosci. 24, 1726–1733 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Coskun, V. & Luskin, M.B. J. Neurosci. Res. 69, 795–802 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson, D.A. Methods 18, 493–507 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson, D.A. in Quantitative Methods in Neuroscience (eds. Evans, S.M., Janson, A.M. & Nyengaard, J.R.) 85–114 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health AG20047.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A Peterson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical detection can discriminate between CldU and IdU. (PDF 5294 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Immunohistochemistry for CldU and IdU detects an equivalent population of proliferating cells, but only with equimolar delivery of the halogenated thymidine analogs. (PDF 4767 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Temporal separation of CldU and IdU administration permits the determination of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferative history. (PDF 3317 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vega, C., Peterson, D. Stem cell proliferative history in tissue revealed by temporal halogenated thymidine analog discrimination. Nat Methods 2, 167–169 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth741

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing