Abstract
Ultimately, seismotectonic studies seek to provide ways of assessing the timing, magnitude and spatial extent of future earthquakes. Ample observations document the spatial variability in interseismic coupling, defined as a degree of locking of a fault during the period of stress build-up between seismic events: fully or nearly locked fault patches are often surrounded by aseismically creeping areas. However, it is unclear how these observations could help assess future earthquakes. Here we simulate spontaneous seismic and aseismic fault slip with a fully dynamic numerical model. Our simulations establish the dependence of earthquake rupture patterns and interseismic coupling on spatial variations of fault friction. We consider the long-term evolution of slip on a model fault where two seismogenic, locked segments are separated by an aseismically slipping patch where rupture is impeded. We find that the probability for a large earthquake to break through the rupture-impeding patch is correlated with the interseismic coupling averaged over this patch. In addition, the probability that an earthquake breaks through the rupture-impeding patch and interseismic coupling are both related to fault friction properties through a single non-dimensional parameter. Our study opens the possibility of predicting seismic rupture patterns that a fault system can produce on the basis of observations of its interseismic coupling, and suggests that regions of low interseismic coupling may reveal permanent barriers to large earthquakes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shimazaki, K. & Nakata, T. Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 279–282 (1980).
Schwartz, D. P. & Coppersmith, K. J. Fault behaviour and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5681–5698 (1984).
Schwartz, S. Y. Noncharacteristic behavior and complex recurrence of large subduction zone earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 23111–23125 (1999).
Murray, J. & Segall, P. Testing time-predictable earthquake recurrence by direct measurement of strain accumulation and release. Nature 419, 287–291 (2002).
Weldon, R., Fumal, T. & Biasi, G. Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: What a long recurrence record tells us about how faults works. GSA Today 14, 4–10 (2004).
Konca, O. A. et al. Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence. Nature 456, 631–635 (2008).
Thatcher, W. Order and diversity in the modes of Circum-Pacific earthquake recurrence. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 2609–2623 (1990).
Sieh, K. et al. Earthquake supercycles inferred from sea-level changes recorded in the corals of west Sumatra. Science 322, 1674–1678 (2008).
Kanamori, H. & McNally, K. C. Variable rupture mode of the subduction zone along the Ecuador–Colombia coast. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1241–1253 (1982).
Rundle, J. B., Kanamori, H. & McNally, K. C. An inhomogeneous fault model for gaps, asperities, barriers and seismicity migration. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 10219–10231 (1987).
Cochard, A. & Madariaga, R. Complexity of seismicity due to highly rate-dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 25321–25336 (1996).
Ariyoshi, K. et al. Character of slip and stress due to interaction between fault segments along the dip direction of a subduction zone. J. Geodyn. 48, 55–67 (2009).
Wesnousky, S. G. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures. Nature 444, 358–360 (2006).
Freymueller, J. T., Cohen, S. C. & Fletcher, H. J. Spatial variations in present-day deformation, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and their implications. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 8079–8101 (2000).
Igarashi, T., Matsuzawa, T. & Hasegawa, A. Repeating earthquakes and interplate aseismic slip in the northeastern Japan subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2249 (2003).
Chlieh, M., Avouac, J-P., Sieh, K., Natawidjaja, D. H. & Galetzka, J. Heterogeneous coupling of the Sumatran megathrust constrained by geodetic and paleogeodetic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B05305 (2008).
Moreno, M. S., Klotz, J., Melnick, D., Echtler, H. & Bataille, K. Active faulting and heterogeneous deformation across a megathrust segment boundary from GPS data, south central Chile (36∘–39∘ S). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q12024 (2008).
Hashimoto, C., Noda, A., Sagiya, T. & Matsu’ura, M. Interplate seismogenic zones along the Kuril–Japan trench inferred from GPS data inversion. Nature Geosci. 2, 141–144 (2009).
Perfettini, H. et al. Aseismic and seismic slip on the megathrust offshore southern Peru revealed by geodetic strain. Nature (in the press).
Yamanaka, Y. & Kikuchi, M. Asperity map along the subduction zone in northeastern Japan inferred from regional seismic data. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B07307 (2004).
Ito, T., Yoshioka, S. & Miyazaki, S. Interplate coupling in northeast Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 176, 117–130 (2000).
Hsu, Y-J. et al. Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias–Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra. Science 312, 1921–1926 (2006).
Miyazaki, S., Segall, P., Fukuda, J. & Kato, T. Space time distribution of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake: Implications for variations in fault zone frictional properties. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L06623 (2004).
Baba, T., Hirata, K., Hori, T. & Sakaguchi, H. Offshore geodetic data conducive to the estimation of the afterslip distribution following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 241, 281–292 (2006).
Johanson, I. A., Fielding, E. J., Rolandone, F. & Bürgmann, R. Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 269–282 (2006).
Rubin, A. M., Gillard, D. & Got, J-L. Streaks of microearthquakes along creeping faults. Nature 400, 635–641 (1999).
Bourouis, S. & Bernard, P. Evidence for coupled seismic and aseismic fault slip during water injection in the geothermal site of Soultz (France), and implications for seismogenic transients. Geophys. J. Int. 169, 723–732 (2007).
Dieterich, J. H. Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick–slip. J. Geophys. Res. 116, 790–806 (1978).
Ruina, A. L. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 10359–10370 (1983).
Blanpied, M. L., Lockner, D. A. & Byerlee, J. D. Frictional slip of granite at hydrothermal conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13045–13064 (1995).
Marone, C. Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 26, 643–696 (1998).
Dieterich, J. H. Applications of rate- and state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence. Treat. Geophys. 4, 107–129 (2007).
Tse, S. & Rice, J. R. Crustal earthquake instability in relation to the depth variation of frictional slip properties. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 9452–9472 (1986).
Rice, J. R. & Ruina, A. L. Stability of steady frictional slipping. J. Appl. Mech. 50, 343–349 (1983).
Ben-Zion, Y. & Rice, J. R. Slip patterns and earthquake populations along different classes of faults in elastic solids. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 12959–12983 (1995).
Tullis, T. E. Rock friction and its implications for earthquake prediction examined via models of Parkfield earthquakes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93, 3803–3810 (1996).
Lapusta, N., Rice, J., Ben-Zion, Y. & Zheng, G. Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23765–23789 (2000).
Hori, T., Kato, N., Hirahara, K., Baba, T. & Kaneda, Y. A numerical simulation of earthquake cycles along the Nankai trough, southwest Japan: Lateral variation in frictional property due to slab geometry controls the nucleation position. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 228, 215–226 (2004).
Rice, J. R. Spatio-temporal complexity of slip on a fault. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 9885–9907 (1993).
Boatwright, J. & Cocco, M. Frictional constraints on crustal faulting. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 13895–13909 (1996).
Chen, T. & Lapusta, N. Scaling of small repeating earthquakes explained by interaction of seismic and aseismic slip in a rate and state fault model. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B01311 (2009).
Suito, H. & Freymueller, J. T. A viscoelastic and afterslip postseismic deformation model for the 1964 Alaska earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B11404 (2009).
Christensen, D. H. & Beck, S. L. The rupture process and tectonic implications of the great 1964 Prince William sound earthquake. Pure Appl. Geophys. 142, 29–53 (1994).
Sladen, A. et al. Source model of the 2007 Mw 8.0 Pisco, Peru earthquake—implications for seismogenic behavior of subduction megathrusts. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B02405 (2010).
Lapusta, N. & Liu, Y. Three-dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B09303 (2009).
Tinti, E., Spudich, P. & Cocco, M. Earthquake fracture energy inferred from kinematic rupture models on extended faults. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B12303 (2005).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant EAR 0548277) and Caltech Tectonics Observatory. This is Caltech Tectonics Observatory contribution no 130. Numerical simulations for this study were carried out on the CITerra Dell cluster at the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences of the California Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.K. designed the study, carried out and analysed the numerical experiments and wrote the paper. J-P.A. and N.L. analysed the numerical experiments and contributed to the concept development. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 496 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie (MOV 1662 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaneko, Y., Avouac, JP. & Lapusta, N. Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling. Nature Geosci 3, 363–369 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo843
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo843
This article is cited by
-
A review on slow earthquakes in the Japan Trench
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2023)
-
Diverse slip behaviour of velocity-weakening fault barriers
Nature Geoscience (2023)
-
Simulation of great earthquakes along the Nankai Trough: reproduction of event history, slip areas of the Showa Tonankai and Nankai earthquakes, heterogeneous slip-deficit rates, and long-term slow slip events
Earth, Planets and Space (2022)
-
Probing the seismic cycle timing with coseismic twisting of subduction margins
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Numerical Modelling of Lithospheric Block-and-Fault Dynamics: What Did We Learn About Large Earthquake Occurrences and Their Frequency?
Surveys in Geophysics (2022)