Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

Cage-change interval preference in mice

Abstract

Before animal research facilities began using individually ventilated cage (IVC) systems for mice, cages were often changed one or more times per week. When using IVC systems, however, it is standard practice to change cages only once every 2–3 weeks. When deciding how often to change cages, personnel may consider the cost of labor needed to change the cage, as well as the cage type and bedding type, rather than animal preference or concern for animal well-being. The authors carried out a simple preference test in groups of mice. Mice were allowed to choose between an unsoiled cage and cages that had not been changed for 1 d, 7 d or 14 d. When evaluating where mice positioned their nests and the amount of time mice spent in the various cages, the authors found that the mice preferred the unsoiled cage. Younger mice (<150 d old) showed a stronger preference for the unsoiled cage than did older mice (>150 d old). Further studies are warranted to evaluate mice's preferences for cages changed at different intervals and to determine whether prolonging the interval between cage changes has any negative effects on mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 6th edn. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1985).

  2. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 7th edn. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  3. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals Vol. 1. 2nd edn. (eds. Olfert, E.D., Cross, B.M. & McWilliam, A.A.) (Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Canada, 1993).

  4. Reeb, C. et al. Microenvironment in ventilated animal cages with differing ventilation rates, mice populations, and frequency of bedding changes. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 37, 43–49 (1998).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reeb-Whittaker, C.K. et al. The impact of reduced frequency of cage changes on the health of mice housed in ventilated cages. Lab. Anim. 35, 58–73 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum, M.D., VandeWoude, S. & Johnson, T.E. Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 763–773 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Blom, H. Evaluation of Housing Conditions for Laboratory Mice and Rats, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sherwin, C.M. Preferences of laboratory mice for characteristics of soiling sites. Anim. Welf. 5, 283–288 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blom, H.J.M. et al. Description and validation of a preference test system to evaluate housing conditions for laboratory mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 35, 67–82 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Den Broek, F.A.R., Omtzight, C.M. & Beynen, A.C. Whisker trimming behaviour in A2G mice is not prevented by offering means of withdrawal from it. Lab. Anim. 27, 270–272 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Loo, P.L.P., van de Weerd, H.A., Van Zutphen, L.F. & Baumans, V. Preference for social contact versus environmental enrichment in male laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 38, 178–188 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherwin, C.M. Observations on the prevalence of nest-building in non-breeding TO strain mice and their use of two nesting materials. Lab. Anim. 31, 125–132 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olsson, I.A. & Dahlborn, K. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of 'environmental enrichment'. Lab. Anim. 36, 243–270 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers, D.C. et al. Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains. Behav Brain Res. 105, 207–217 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing and the Animal Welfare Institute for supporting this project. We also thank Dr. Kathy Baylis, Associate Professor, Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia for help with the statistical design and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Godbey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godbey, T., Gray, G. & Jeffery, D. Cage-change interval preference in mice. Lab Anim 40, 225–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0711-225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0711-225

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing