Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

The effect of housing and environmental enrichment on stereotyped behavior of adult vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops)

Abstract

Little information is available on the response of vervet monkeys to different housing conditions or on the suitability of enrichment devices or methods for vervet monkeys. In this study, the authors evaluated the occurrence of stereotyped behavior in adult vervet monkeys under various conditions of housing and enrichment. The variables included cage size, cage level (upper or lower), enrichment with a foraging log, enrichment with an exercise cage and presence of a mate. The authors first determined the incidence of stereotyped behavior in captive-bred, singly housed adult female and male vervet monkeys. They then exposed monkeys to different housing and enrichment situations and compared the incidence of stereotyped behavior among the monkeys. The authors found that more females than males engaged in stereotyped behavior and that females, on average, engaged in such behavior for longer periods of time than males. Stereotyped behavior was most often associated with a small, single cage. The average amount of observed stereotyped activity in monkeys housed in a small cage was significantly lower when the monkeys had access to either a foraging log or an exercise cage. Stereotyped behavior was also lower in female monkeys that were housed (either with a male or without a male) in a larger cage. The least amount of abnormal behavior was associated with the largest, most complex and enriched housing situation. Males and females housed in cages on the lower level of two-level housing engaged in more stereotyped behavior than did monkeys housed in the upper level, regardless of the presence or type of enrichment provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: The interior of the top section of a cage used in situations 4 and 5.
Figure 3: The interior of the top section of a cage used in situation 6.
Figure 4: The average percentage of the observation period that the female vervet monkeys in experiment 2 spent engaged in stereotyped behavior when exposed to the different housing situations.
Figure 5: The percentage of female vervet monkeys that engaged in stereotyped behavior during the observation period when exposed to different housing situations in experiment 2.
Figure 6: The average percentage of the observation period that the females in experiment 3 spent engaged in stereotyped behavior when exposed to the different housing situations.
Figure 7: The average percentage of the observation period that the males in experiment 3 spent engaged in stereotyped behavior when exposed to the different housing situations.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schein, M.W. & Hafez, E.S.E. The physical environment and behavior. in The Behaviour of Domestic Animals 2nd edn. (ed. Hafez, E.S.E.) 65–84 (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaumanns, W. General aspects of primate keeping and colony management. Primate Report 49, 47–53 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Novak, M.A., O'Neill, P. & Suomi, S.J. Adjustments and adaptations to indoor and outdoor environments: Continuity and change in young adult rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 28, 125–138 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant, C.E., Rupniak, N.M.J. & Iversen, S.D. Effects of different environmental enrichment devices on cage stereotypies and autoagression in captive cynomolgus monkeys. J. Med. Primatol. 17, 257–269 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erwin, J. & Deni, R. Strangers in a strange land: abnormal behaviors or abnormal environments. in Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Breeding Colonies, Laboratories, and Zoos. (eds. Erwin, J., Maple, T. & Mitchell, G.) 1–28 (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reinhardt, V. Refining the traditional housing and handling of laboratory rhesus macaques improves scientific methodology. Primate Report 49, 93–113 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bayne, K. et al. The reduction of abnormal behaviors in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board. Am. J. Primatol. 23, 23–35 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boccia, M.L. Long-term effects of a natural foraging task on aggression and stereotypies in socially housed pigtail macaques. Lab. Primate Newsletter 28, 18–19 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foster, J.W. Behavior of captive animals. in Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine (ed. Fowler, M.E.) 20–31 (WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fritz, J., Nash, L.T., Alford, P.L. & Bowen, J.A. Abnormal behaviors, with a special focus on rocking and reproductive competence in a large sample of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primatol. 27, 161–176 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessel, A. & Brent, L. The rehabilitation of captive baboons. J. Med. Primatol. 30, 71–80 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lutz, C.K. & Farrow, R.A. Foraging device for singly housed longtailed macaques does not reduce stereotypies. Contemp. Topics Lab. Anim. Sci. 35, 75–78 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Novak, M.A., Kinsey, J.H., Jorgensen, M.J. & Hazen, T.J. Effects of puzzle feeders on pathological behavior in individually housed rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 46, 213–227 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lutz, C.K., Davies, E.B., Ruggiero, A.M. & Suomi, S.J. Early predictors of self-biting in socially-housed rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Am. J. Primatol. 69, 584–590 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker, K.C. Straw and forage material ameliorate abnormal behavior in adult chimpanzees. Zoo Biol. 16, 225–236 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bloomstrand, M., Riddle, K., Alford, P.L. & Maple, T.L. Objective evaluation of a behavioral enrichment device for captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biol. 5, 293–300 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brent, L. & Long, K.E. The behavioral response of individually caged baboons to feeding enrichment and the standard diet: a preliminary report. Contemp. Topics Lab. Anim. Sci. 34, 65–69 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pyle, D.A. et al. Use of two food foraging devices by singly housed baboons. Lab. Primate Newsletter 35, 10–15 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenblum, L.A. & Andrews, M.W. Environmental enrichment and psychological well-being of nonhuman primates. in Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Biology and Management. (eds. Benett, B.T., Abee, C.R. & Henrickson, R.) 101–112 (Academic, San Diego, 1995).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris, H.G. & Edwards, A.J. Mirrors as environmental enrichment for African green monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 64, 459–467 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reinhardt, V. & Reinhardt, A. The monkey cave: the dark lower-row cage. Lab. Primate Newsletter 38, 8–9 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schapiro, S.J., Stavisky, R. & Hook, M. The lower-row cage may be dark but behavior does not appear to be affected. Lab. Primate Newsletter 39, 7–11 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. South African National Standard for The Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. SANS 10386 (South African Bureau of Standards, Pretoria, South Africa, 2008).

  24. Guidelines On Ethics For Medical Research: Use of Animals in Research and Training (South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa, 2004).

  25. Seier, J.V. & de Lange, P.W. A mobile cage facilitates periodic social contact and exercise for singly caged adult vervet monkeys. J. Med. Primatol. 25, 64–68 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Maki, S., Alford, P.L., Bloomsmith, M.A. & Franklin, J. Food puzzle device simulating termite fishing for captive chimpanzees. Am. J. Primatol. Suppl 1, 71–78 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Crockett, C.M., Bowers, C.L., Sackett, G.P. & Bowden, D.M. Urinary cortisol responses of longtailed macaques to five cage sizes, tethering, sedation and room change. Am. J. Primatol. 30, 55–74 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hook, M.A. et al. Inter-group variation in abnormal behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macacca mulatta). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76, 165–176 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Seier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seier, J., de Villiers, C., van Heerden, J. et al. The effect of housing and environmental enrichment on stereotyped behavior of adult vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Lab Anim 40, 218–224 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0711-218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0711-218

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing