Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Considerations for importing live genetically modified mice from academic laboratories

Lab Animal volume 41, pages 167–170 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Genetically modified mice have been an invaluable tool for the study of gene function in an intact biological system. Researchers frequently obtain genetically modified mice from other academic institutions. This form of collaboration between laboratories comes with a unique set of challenges, and a clear set of guidelines for navigating the process has yet to be defined. The author provides suggestions for how to initiate an exchange of animal resources and steps for ensuring a successful collaboration. Both parties should be clear about their expectations. The importing lab should prepare in advance for potential animal health considerations and breeding and colony management strategies prior to importation. The number, gender, age and genotype of the imported animals should be confirmed as soon as possible by the importing lab. It is in the best interest of all parties to be courteous, forthright and thorough when sharing animal resources so that everyone can benefit from the resulting research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newman, M.E. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (suppl. 1), 5200–5205 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory, S.G. et al. A physical map of the mouse genome. Nature 418, 743–750 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan, C., Ye, C., Yang, X. & Gao, J. A review of current large-scale mouse knockout efforts. Genesis 48, 73–85 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon, J.W., Scangos, G.A., Plotkin, D.J., Barbosa, J.A. & Ruddle, F.H. Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7380–7384 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manis, J.P. Knock out, knock in, knock down—genetically manipulated mice and the Nobel Prize. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2426–2429 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krimpenfort, P. & Berns, A. Gene transfer into mammalian embryos. Hum. Reprod. 2, 333–339 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gama Sosa, M.A., De Gasperi, R. & Elder, G.A. Animal transgenesis: an overview. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 91–109 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ristevski, S. Making better transgenic models: conditional, temporal, and spatial approaches. Mol. Biotechnol. 29, 153–163 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Narayanan, K. & Chen, Q. Bacterial artificial chromosome mutagenesis using recombineering. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 971296 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohtsuka, M., Kimura, M., Tanaka, M. & Inoko, H. Recombinant DNA technologies for construction of precisely designed transgene constructs. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 10, 244–251 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Porteus, M. Design and testing of zinc finger nucleases for use in mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 435, 47–61 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Giraldo, P. & Montoliu, L. Size matters: use of YACs, BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res. 10, 83–103 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cermak, T. et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smalheiser, N.R., Perkins, G.A. & Jones, S. Guidelines for negotiating scientific collaboration. PLoS Biol. 3, e217 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Du, Y., Xie, W. & Liu, C. Strategies and considerations for distributing and recovering mouse lines. Methods Enzymol. 476, 37–52 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mook, D., Taylor, D.K. & Huerkamp, M.J. The rodent quarantine quagmire. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 472–474 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoeb, T.R. & Davis, J.K. Comment on: “Barrier facilities for transgenic rodents in academic centers—a two-edged sword”. Comp. Med. 53, 116–118 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon, J.W. Barrier facilities for transgenic rodents in academic centers—a two-edged sword. Comp. Med. 52, 397–402 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Littlefield, N.A., Harmon, J.R. & Campbell, H.M. Barrier animal facility operations for a large-scale chronic study (ED01 study). J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 3, 187–192 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahabir, E., Bauer, B. & Schmidt, J. Rodent and germplasm trafficking: risks of microbial contamination in a high-tech biomedical world. ILAR J. 49, 347–355 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weng, D.Y. et al. Promiscuous recombination of LoxP alleles during gametogenesis in cornea Cre driver mice. Mol. Vis. 14, 562–571 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitaker, J. et al. Effects of cage size and enrichment on reproductive performance and behavior in C57BL/6Tac mice. Lab Anim. (NY) 38, 24–34 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanderson, A.E., Multari, H.M., Lohmiller, J.J. & Boutin, S.R. Effect of cage-change frequency on rodent breeding performance. Lab Anim. (NY) 39, 177–182 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray, K.A. & Parker, N.J. Breeding genetically modified rodents: tips for tracking and troubleshooting reproductive performance. Lab Anim. (NY) 34, 36–41 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY

    Jennifer A. Tyson

Authors
  1. Jennifer A. Tyson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Tyson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tyson, J. Considerations for importing live genetically modified mice from academic laboratories. Lab Anim 41, 167–170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0612-167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0612-167

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing