Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Two decades of exposure assessment studies on chromate production waste in Jersey City, New Jersey—what we have learned about exposure characterization and its value to public health and remediation

Abstract

During much of the twentieth century, Jersey City, New Jersey was the leading center of chromate production in the United States. Chromate production produced huge volumes of chromium ore-processing residue containing many parts per million of hexavalent chromium. Starting in the 1990s, we undertook a series of studies to identify exposed populations, sources and pathways of exposure and the effectiveness of remediation activities in Jersey City. These studies revealed the effectiveness and success of the remediation activities. The sequence of studies presented here, builds on the lessons learned from each preceding study and illustrates how these studies advanced the field of exposure science in important ways, including the use of household dust as a measure of exposure to contaminants originating in the outdoor environment; development of effective and reproducible dust sampling; use of household dust to track temporal changes in exposure; understanding of the spatial relationship between sources of passive outdoor particulate emissions and residential exposure; use of focused biomonitoring to assess exposure under conditions of large inter-individual variability; and utility of linking environmental monitoring and biomonitoring. For chromium, the studies have demonstrated the use of Cr+6-specific analytical methods for measuring low concentrations of Cr+6 in household dust and understanding of the occurrence of Cr+6 in the background residential environment. We strongly recommend that environmental and public health agencies evaluate sites for their potential for off-site exposure and apply these tools in cases with significant potential as appropriate. This approach is especially important when contamination is widespread and/or a large population is potentially exposed. In such cases, these tools should be used to identify, characterize and then reduce the exposure to the off-site as well as on-site population. Importantly, these tools can be used in a demonstrable and quantifiable manner to provide both clarity and closure to concerned stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CMSP:

Chromium Medical Surveillance Program

COPR:

chromium ore-processing residue

EOHSI:

The Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute

NJDEP:

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

References

  1. Burke T, Fagliano J, Goldoft M, Hazen RE, Iglewicz R, McKee T . Chromite ore processing residue in Hudson County, New Jersey. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 92: 131–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gochfeld M . Setting the research agenda for chromium risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 922: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. USEPA. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). 2010 accessed at: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/subst/0144.htm 11/4/2010.

  4. Stern AH . A quantitative assessment of the carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium by the oral route and its relevance to human exposure. Environ Res 2010; 110: 798–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stern AH, Bagdon RE, Hazen RE, Marzulli FN . Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium. J Toxicol Environ Health 1993; 40: 613–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes AL, Wise SS, Sandwick SJ, Wise JP . The clastogenic effects of chronic exposure to particulate and soluble Cr(VI) in human lung cells. Mutat Res 2006; 610: 8–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langård S . Role of chemical species and exposure characteristics in cancer among persons occupationally exposed to chromium compounds. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19 (Suppl 1): 81–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. USPHS (US Public Health Service) Gafafer WM (ed.) Health of workers in chromate producing industry. U.S. Public Health Service, Pub No 192: Washington, D.C.. 1953.

  9. Bartlett RJ . Chromium cycling in soils and water: links, gaps, and methods. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 92: 17–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz SA . The analytical biochemistry of chromium. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 29: 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lioy PJ, Freeman NC, Wainman T, Stern AH, Boesch R, Howell T et al Microenvironmental analysis of residential exposure to chromium-laden wastes in and around New Jersey homes. Risk Anal 1992; 12: 287–299 Erratum in: Risk Anal 12: 463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lioy PJ . The analysis of total human exposure for exposure assessment: a multi-discipline science for examining human contact with contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 1990; 24: 938–945.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. NRC (National Research Council). Human exposure assessment for airborne pollutants: advances and opportunities. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.. 1991.

  14. Lioy PJ, Wainman T, Weisel C . A wipe sampler for the quantitative measurement of dust on smooth surfaces: laboratory performance studies. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1993; 3: 315–330.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lioy PJ . Exposure science: a view of the past and milestones for the future. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 1081–1090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stern AH, Freeman NC, Pleban P, Boesch RR, Wainman T, Howell T et al Residential exposure to chromium waste—urine biological monitoring in conjunction with environmental exposure monitoring. Environ Res 1992; 58: 147–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitsa V, Lioy PJ, Chow JC, Watson JG, Shupack S, Howell T et al Particle-size distribution of chromium: total and hexavalent chromium in inspirable, thoracic, and respirable soil particles from contaminated sites in New Jersey. Aerosol Sci Technol 1992; 17: 213–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman NC, Wainman T, Lioy PJ, Stern AH, Shupack SI . The effect of remediation of chromium waste sites on chromium levels in urine of children living in the surrounding neighborhood. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1995; 45: 604–614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lioy PJ, Burke T . Superfund: Is it safe to go home? J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2010; 20: 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fagliano JA, Savrin J, Udasin II, Gochfeld M . Community exposure and medical screening near chromium waste sites in New Jersey. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1997; 26: S13–S22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman NC, Hore P, Black K, Jimenez M, Sheldon L, Tulve N et al Contributions of children's activities to pesticide hand loadings following residential pesticide application. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005; 15: 81–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rhoads GG, Ettinger AS, Weisel CP, Buckley TJ, Goldman KD, Adgate J et al The effect of dust lead control on blood lead in toddlers: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 551–555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freeman NC, Stern AH, Lioy PJ . Exposure to chromium dust from homes in a Chromium Surveillance Project. Arch Environ Health 1997; 52: 213–219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stern AH, Fagliano JA, Savrin JE, Freeman NC, Lioy PJ . The association of chromium in household dust with urinary chromium in residences adjacent to chromate production waste sites. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 10: 833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reed K, Jimenez M, Freeman NCG, Lioy PJ . Quantification of children’s hand and mouthing activities through a videotaping methodology. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1999; 9: 513–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lanphear BP, Roughmann KJ . Pathways of lead exposure in urban children. Environ Res 1997; 74: 67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeman NC, Lioy PJ, Stern AH . Reduction in residential chromium following site remediation. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2000; 50: 948–953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stern AH, Yu CH, Black K, Lin L, Lioy PJ, Gochfeld M et al Hexavalent chromium in house dust—a comparison between an area with historic contamination from chromate production and background locations. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 4993–4998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Draft Toxicological Profile for Chromium. 2008. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp7.pdf (accessed 7 January 2011).

  30. Ruetze M, Schmitt U, Noack D, Kruse S . Untersuchungen zur mOglichen Beteiligung chromathaltiger Holzbeizen an der Entstehung von Adenokarzinomen in der NaseHolz als Roh- und Werkstoffs. 1994; 52: 87–93.

  31. Lioy PJ, Freeman NCG, Millette JR . Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization. Environ Health Perspect 2002; 110: 969–983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ott WR, Steinemann AC, Wallace LA (eds.). Exposure Analysis. CRC-Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research discussed in this manuscript is derived from a number of research projects that started in the early 1990s, with the most recent projects funded by the NJ DEP, contract no. SR06-027 for Phase I, and contract no. SR08-016 for Phase II. In addition, PJL and MG are funded under the NIEHS CEED, 2P30ES005022-21780309. We also wish to thank the many community residents and members of the municipal government who assisted us throughout this 20-year effort. Finally, we wish to dedicate this work to Dr. Natalie Freeman who passed away in 2010. It was her insights on the behavior and activities of the residents that made the major conclusions much more plausible and reduced uncertainties in post-study remediation activities. Funding: The series of studies described in this review were supported by contracts with the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.

Disclaimer

This paper does not necessarily reflect the policies of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan H Stern.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, A., Gochfeld, M. & Lioy, P. Two decades of exposure assessment studies on chromate production waste in Jersey City, New Jersey—what we have learned about exposure characterization and its value to public health and remediation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23, 2–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.100

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links