Abstract
We evaluated exposure-relevant selection bias within the framework of a study on personal air pollution exposure, using traffic data as exposure proxy. Based on random samples of 3000 (Basel) and 2532 (Helsinki) persons, 50 and 250 subjects, respectively, were recruited for direct monitoring and 250 (Basel, Helsinki) for indirect monitoring. In Basel, participants of direct monitoring as compared to non-participants were more likely to live at streets with low traffic volume (49% below 1st quartile vs. 27%). Adjusted for sex, age and nationality, an increase of 100 cars per hour was associated with 14% less participation (odds ratio (OR): 0.861; 95% CI: 0.731, 1.007). Although in Helsinki, traffic volume was neither significantly related to participation in direct nor indirect monitoring, the point estimates indicate a tendency to decreased participation with increasing traffic intensity at home. We conclude that selection bias regarding exposure-relevant characteristics is likely to occur when recruiting participants for studies including demanding personal exposure assessment. Correction for factors routinely collected may not fully account for exposure-relevant bias. This is of particular importance when using exposure data for modelling population exposure distributions, whereas in epidemiological studies, a reduced range of exposure must not a priori distort the exposure-response relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
OGLESBY, L., ROTKO, T., KRÜTLI, P. et al. Personal exposure assessment studies may suffer from exposure-relevant selection bias. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 10, 251–266 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500088
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500088
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Measuring the impact of pollution on property prices in Madrid: objective versus subjective pollution indicators in spatial models
Journal of Geographical Systems (2013)
-
Indoor time–microenvironment–activity patterns in seven regions of Europe
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2007)
-
The EXPOLIS study: implications for exposure research and environmental policy in Europe
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2004)