Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Terbutaline Versus Oral Tocolytics for Treatment of Recurrent Preterm Labor in Twin Gestations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treating recurrent preterm labor with continuous subcutaneous terbutaline versus oral tocolytics in twin gestations.

STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective, matched-cohort design, twin pregnancies treated as outpatients with continuous subcutaneous terbutaline were identified from a perinatal database, then matched 1:1 by gestational age at recurrent preterm labor to those receiving oral tocolytics. There were 353 patients per treatment group. A cost model was used to compare antepartum hospital, nursery, and outpatient charges.

RESULTS: Infants of the subcutaneous terbutaline group had greater gestational age at delivery, higher birth weights, and less frequent neonatal intensive care unit admission. Charges for antepartum hospitalization and nursery were significantly less in the subcutaneous terbutaline group, while charges for outpatient services were less for the oral group. Mean total estimated charges were US$17,109 less for those receiving subcutaneous terbutaline.

CONCLUSION: Improved clinical outcomes and decreased nursery utilization suggest cost-effectiveness of outpatient continuous subcutaneous terbutaline versus oral tocolytics for the treatment of recurrent preterm labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ Births: Final Data for 1997. National Vital Statistics Reports vol. 47 no. 18 Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callahan TL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Greene MF, Crowley WF The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted reproduction techniques to their incidence N Engl J Med 1994 331 244–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levene MI, Wild J, Steer P Higher multiple births and the modern management of infertility in Britian Br J Obstet Gynecol 1992 146 862–868

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Callahan TL, Hall JE How low birth weight and gestational age contribute to increased inpatient costs for multiple births Inquiry 1997/1998 34 325–339

  5. Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 175 1047–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luke B The changing pattern of multiple births in the United States: maternal and infant characteristics, 1973–1990 Obstet Gynecol 1994 84 101–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luke B, Keith LG The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States J Reprod Med 1992 37 661–666

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Derom R, Derom C, Vlietinck R, Van Maele G, Van Den Berghe H Twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction: epidemiology, comparative perinatal morbidity and mortality J Perinat Med 1991 19 (Suppl 1) 229–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD. Comorbidities/Insurance/Discharges — Hospitalization in the United States 1997 http://www.ahrq.gov/gov/data/hcup/hcupnet

  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Special problems of multiple gestation ACOG Educational Bulletin 253 Washington, DC: ACOG 1998

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malone FD, Chelmow D, Athanassiou A, D'Alton ME Impact of gestational age at delivery on the economics of triplet pregnancy J Matern–Fetal Med 1999 8 256–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haas JS, Berman S, Goldberg AB, Lee LWK, Cook EF Prenatal hospitalization and compliance with guidelines for prenatal care Am J Public Health 1996 86 815–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott CL, Chavez GF, Atrash HK, Taylor DJ, Shah RS, Rowley D Hospitalizations for severe complications of pregnancy, 1987–1992 Obstet Gynecol 1997 90 225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality HCUP-3 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Release 3. Data, Documentation and Tools 1994 http://www.ahcpr.gov

  15. Rogowski J Measuring the cost of neonatal and perinatal care Pediatrics 1999 103 329–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berg G, Anderson RGG, Ryden G Beta-adrenergic receptors in human myometrium during pregnancy: changes in the number of receptors after beta-mimetic treatment Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985 85 313–317

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perry KG, Morrison JC, Rust OA, Sullivan CA, Martin RW, Naef RW Incidence of adverse cardiopulmonary effects with low-dose continuous terbutaline infusion Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 173 1273–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Allbert JR, Johnson C, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Gookin KS, Morrison JC Tocolysis for recurrent preterm labor using a continuous subcutaneous infusion pump J Reprod Med 1994 38 614–618

    Google Scholar 

  19. King JF, Grant A, Keirse MJNC, Chalmers I Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: an overview of the randomized controlled trials Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988 95 211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis R, Mercer BM, Salama M, Walsh MA, Sibai BM Oral terbutaline after parenteral tocolysis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 175 834–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rust OA, Bofill JA, Arriola RM, Andrew ME, Morrison JC The clinical efficacy of oral tocolytic therapy Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 175 838–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Gaudier FL, Delke I Efficacy of maintenance therapy after acute tocolysis: a meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999 181 484–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lam F, Gill PJ, Smith M, Kitzmiller JL, Katz M Use of subcutaneous terbutaline pump for long-term tocolysis Obstet Gynecol 1988 72 810–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam F, Gill PJ, Smith M, Kitzmiller JL, Katz M Comparison of portable subcutaneous terbutaline pump and oral terbutaline treatment for long-term tocolysis: a randomized clinical trial Eighth Annual Meeting, Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. Las Vegas, NV, February 1988, Abstract 400

  25. Lam F, Bergauer NK, Coleman SK, Stanziano GJ, Jacques D A comparison of gestational days gained with oral terbutaline versus continuous subcutaneous terbutaline in women with twin gestations J Perinatol 2000 20 408–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, F., Bergauer, N., Jacques, D. et al. Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Terbutaline Versus Oral Tocolytics for Treatment of Recurrent Preterm Labor in Twin Gestations. J Perinatol 21, 444–450 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210553

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210553

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links