Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Reply to: Is there a role of radial rigidity in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction? by Ku JH, Song YS, Kim ME, Lee NK and Park YH

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 13, pages 363–364 (2001)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ku JH, Song YS, Kime ME, Lee NK, Park YH. . Is there a role of radial rigidity in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction? Int J Impot Res 2001 13, 200–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Udelson D, Goldstein I. . Letter to the Editor: Reply to editorial Comments on ‘Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity…’. Int J Impot Res 2000 12, 3–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen RP, Smolev JK, Engel RM, Brendler CB. . Comparison of RigiScan and formal nocturnal penile tumescence testing in the evaluation of erectile rigidity. J Urol 1993 149, 1265–1268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Udelson D, Park K, Sadeghi-Najed H, Salimpour P, Krane RJ, Goldstein I. . Axial penile buckling vs RigiScan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why RigiScan does not predict functional erections in individual patients. Int J Impot Res 1999 11, 327–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine LA. . Editorial comment. Axial penile buckling vs RigiScan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why RigiScan does not predict functional erections in individual patients. Int J Impot Res 1999 11, 337–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Timm C. . Editorial comment. Axial penile buckling vs RigiScan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why RigiScan does not predict functional erections in individual patients. Int J Impot Res 1999 11, 338–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Udelson D et al.. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part II—Clinical implications of penile buckling. Int J Impot Res 1998 10, 25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Udelson D et al.. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part III—Clinical considerations of penile hemodynamic and rigidity erectile responses. Int J Impot Res 1998 10, 89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Udelson D et al.. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part I—Clinical implications of penile tissue mechanical properties. Int J Impot Res 1998 10, 15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karacan I, Salis PJ, Williams RL. . The role of the sleep laboratory in the diagnosis and treatment of impotence. In: Williams, Karacan and Frazier, eds. Sleep disorders, diagnosis and treatment. John Wiley: New York 1978 353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

    D Udelson & I Goldstein

  2. Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, MA, USA

    D Udelson

Authors
  1. D Udelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I Goldstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Udelson, D., Goldstein, I. Reply to: Is there a role of radial rigidity in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction? by Ku JH, Song YS, Kim ME, Lee NK and Park YH. Int J Impot Res 13, 363–364 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900788

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900788

Search

Advanced search

Quick links