Abstract
THE basic mechanical process responsible for earthquakes and faulting is not known. The intuitive notion of frictional slip on faults between elastic crustal blocks cannot be reconciled with laboratory measurements of the strength of rocks1, field observations of heat flow2,3 and stress orientation4 around the San Andreas fault in California, and seismological estimates of the energy radiated by earthquakes5. The weakening of large faults by elevated pore-fluid pressure6 has been suggested as one solution to this paradox, but places severe constraints on the hydrological conditions of the faults concerned. Here I propose an alternative model for earthquake mechanics, in which the crust is treated as a system of many interlocking blocks divided by many faults7. The model combines this random granular structure with simple, deterministic mechanical interactions. Numerical simulations of the deformation of an aggregate of rough grains under compressive stress show earthquake-like elastodynamic failures without frictional heat production, and substantial rotation of stresses across shear zones, which mimics field observations. There remain problems of scale in comparing these simulations with nature, but a seismological test of the model may be possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byerlee, J. Pure appl. Geophys. 116, 615–626 (1976).
Lachenbruch, A. H. & Sass, J. H. J. geophys. Res. 85, 6185–6222 (1980).
Lachenbruch, A. H. & Sass, J. H. J. geophys. Res. 97, 4995–5015 (1992).
Zoback, M. D. et al. Science 238, 1105–1111 (1987).
Kanamori, H. A. Rev. Earth planet. Sci. 22, 207–237 (1994).
Rice, J. R. in Fault Mechanics and Transport Properties in Rocks (eds Evans, B. & Wong T.-F.) 475–503 (Academic, San Diego, 1992).
King, G. C. P. Pure appl. Geophys. 121, 761–814 (1983).
Cundall, P. A. & Strack, O. D. L. Geotechnique 29, 47–65 (1979).
Corkum, B. T. & Ting, J. M. Publication 86–11 (Dept of Civil Engng, Univ. Toronto, 1986).
Poschel, T. & Buchholtz, V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3963–3966 (1993).
Lockner, D. Int. J. Rock 30, 883–899 (1993).
Scott, D. R. Eos (abstr.) 75, 614 (1994).
Mora, P. & Place, D. Pure appl. Geophys. 143, 61–87 (1994).
Yoshida, T., Tatsuoka, F., Siddiquee, M. S. A., Kamegai, Y. & Park, C. S. in Localisation and Bifurcation Theory for Soils and Rocks (eds Chambon, R., Desrue, J. & Vardoulakis, I.) 165–179 (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1994).
Ord, A., Vardoulakis, I. & Kajewski, R. Int. J. Rock 28, 397–409 (1991).
Cundall, P. A. Ing. Arch. 59, 148–159 (1989).
Bardet, J.-P. & Proubet, J.-P. Geotechnique 41, 599–613 (1991).
Hobbs, B. E. & Ord, A. Ing. Arch. 59, 209–220 (1989).
Poliakov, A. N. B., Herrmann, H. J., Podladchikov, Y. Y. & Roux, S. Fractals 2, 567–581 (1994).
Rudnicki, J. W. & Rice, J. R. Int. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 23, 371–394 (1975).
Vardoulakis, I. Ing. Arch. 59, 106–113 (1989).
Muhlhaus, H. B. & Vardoulakis, I. Geotechnique 37, 271–283 (1987).
Massonnet, D. et al. Nature 364, 138–142 (1993).
Cundall, P. A. in Mechanics of Jointed and Faulted Rock (ed. Rossmanith, H.-P.) 11–18 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1990).
Streacy, S. J. & Sammis, C. G. Nature 353, 250–252 (1991).
Hickman, S. H. Rev. Geophys. Suppl. Ser. 29, 759–775 (1991).
Dieterich, J. H. Tectonophysics 211, 115–134 (1992).
Ohnaka, M. Tectonophysics 211, 149–178 (1992).
Heaton, T. H. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 64, 1–20 (1990).
Brune, J. N., Brown, S. & Johnson, P. A. Tectonophysics 218, 59–67 (1993).
Sammis, C. G. & Steacy, S. J. Pure appl. Geophys. 142, 777–794 (1994).
Abercrombie, R. & Leary, P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1511–1514 (1993).
Melosh, H. J. Nature 379, 601–606 (1996).
Sornette, A., Sornette, D. & Evesque, P. Nonlin. Process. Geophys. 1, 209–218 (1994).
Aki, K., Bouchon, M., Chouet, B. & Das, S. Ann. Geofis. XXX, 341 (1977).
Liu, C.-h. et al. Science 269, 513–515 (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, D. Seismicity and stress rotation in a granular model of the brittle crust. Nature 381, 592–595 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381592a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381592a0
This article is cited by
-
Syn-exhumation metasomatic glaucophane-phengite-quartz veins formed at moderate pressures: exploring the control of fO2 and bulk composition on nominally HP metamorphic assemblages
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2024)
-
Suitable rolling resistance model for quasi-static shear tests of non-spherical particles via discrete element method
Granular Matter (2018)
-
Numerical simulation of rock fracture using three-dimensional extended discrete element method
Earth, Planets and Space (2014)
-
Revealing the micromechanisms behind semi-solid metal deformation with time-resolved X-ray tomography
Nature Communications (2014)
-
A finite deformation method for discrete modeling: particle rotation and parameter calibration
Granular Matter (2009)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.