Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Link between geomagnetic reversal paths and secular variation of the field over the past 5 Myr

Abstract

PALAEOMAGNETIC records provide information about the behaviour of the geomagnetic field during reversals1,2. Existing records are incompatible with transitional field configurations that are either entirely dipolar or entirely zonal (dependent only on latitude)3,4. Recent compilations5–8 have indicated that the transi-tional paths of virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) for the past few reversals are located preferentially within two antipodal longitudinal bands, suggesting that simple but non-zonal field configurations dominate during reversals. Here I point out that one of the longitudinal bands coincides with that expected from the reversal of a non-axial-dipole field exactly like that present today; the other requires only a sign change in the non-axial-dipole terms of today's field. Evidence for persistent non-zonal contributions to the field has generally9–13 (but not always14,13) been regarded as not statistically significant in the light of poor data distributions. I show here that a non-zonal bias, similar to that observed in reversal data, is evident in data on secular variation of the field over the past 5 Myr, even after normalization according to site locations. These results suggest that the time-averaged field does indeed contain persistent (but not constant) non-zonal contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogue, S. W. & Hoffman, K. A. Rev. Geophys. 25, 910–916 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clement, B. M. & Constable, C. G. Rev. Geophys. Suppl.: U.S. Nat. Rep. IUGG 1987–1990. 433–442 (1991).

  3. Hillhouse, J. & Cox, A. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 29, 51–64 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman, K. A. Science 196, 1329–1332 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clement, B. M. EOS 70, 1073 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clement, B. M. Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 104, 48–58 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trie, E. et al. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 65, 319–336 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laj, C., Mazaud, A., Weeks, R., Fuller, M. & Herrero-Bervera, E. Nature 351, 447 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coupland, D. H. & Van der Voo, R. J. geophys. Res. 85, 3529–3548 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merrill, R. T. & McElhinny, M. W. The Earth's Magnetic Field (Academic, London,1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, S. & Lilley, F. E. M. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 38, 797–806 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Merrill, R. T., McFadden, P. L. & McElhinny, M. W. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 64, 87–101 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider, D. A. & Kent, D. V. Rev. Geophys. 28, 71–96 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gubbins, D. J. geophys. Res. 93, 3413–3420 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Livermore, R. A., Vine, F. J. & Smith, A. G. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 73, 153–171 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shackleton, N. J., Berger, A. & Peltier, W. R. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 81, 251–261 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Constable, C. G. J. geophys. Res. 95, 4587–4596 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rochette, P. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 98, 33–39 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weeks, R. J., Fuller, M. & Williams, I. J. geophys. Res. 93, 11613–11620 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bloxham, J. & Gubbins, D. Nature 325, 509–511 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valet, J. P., Tucholka, P., Courtillot, V. & Meynadier, L. Nature 356, 400–407 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman, K. A. Nature 354, 273–277 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, S. thesis, Australian National Univ. (1983).

  24. McFadden, P. L., Merrill, R. T., McElhinny, M. W. & Lee, S. J. geophys. Res. 96, 3923–3934 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher, N. I., Lewis, T. & Embleton, B. J. J. Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constable, C. Link between geomagnetic reversal paths and secular variation of the field over the past 5 Myr. Nature 358, 230–233 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358230a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/358230a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing