Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The advantages and evolution of a morphological novelty

Abstract

THE role of selective agents in the origin of evolutionary novelties has been controversial1–3 and has remained outside the realm of experiments. Here we experimentally determine both the benefits of a single trait and the advantages accrued during the presumed sequence of evolutionary steps leading to the fully specialized structure. By comparison of red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra, L.), in which the mandibular crossing has been removed, with controls and with the related but less specialized pine siskin (Carduelis pinus Wilson), we show the advantage of the mandibular crossing in the extraction of seeds from partially closed conifer cones. We use the natural regrowth of the mandibles to mimic the evolution of mandibular crossing from an unspecialized ancestor, and use the relationship of foraging efficiency to mandibular regrowth to determine a scheme for its (gradual) evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frazzetta, T. H. Complex Adaptations in Evolving Populations (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd edn (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, S. J. et al. in Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates 403–433 (Wiley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griscom, L. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 41, 77–210 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newton, I. Finches (Collins, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tordoff, H. B. Condor 56, 346–358 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benkman, C. W. Wilson Bull. 99, 351–368 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benkman, C. W. Ibis 130, 288–293 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold, S. J. Am. Zool. 23, 347–361 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Emerson, S. B. & Arnold, S. J. in Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, 295–314 (Wiley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bock, W. J. & Wahlert, G. v. Evolution 19, 269–299 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. Foraging Theory (Princeton University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benkman, C. W. Ecol. Monogr. 57, 251–267 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benkman, C. W. Ornis Scandinavica 20, 65–68 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benkman, C. W. Auk 107, 376–386 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gabrielson, I. N. & Lincoln, F. C. Birds of Alaska (Stackpole, Harrisburg, PA, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Austin, O. L. U. S. nat. Mus. Bull. 237, 424–447 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, A. C., Zim, H. S. & Nelson, A. L. American Wildlife and Plants (Dover, New York, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walsberg, G. E. Avian Biology, Vol. 7 161–220 (Academic Press, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Raikow, R. J. Bull. Carnegie Mus. nat. Hist. 7, 1–43 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, J. A. & Johnson, N. K. Condor 88, 409–420 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tallman, D. A. & Zusi, R. L. Auk 101, 155–158 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benkman, C. W. Evolution 43, 1324–1330 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benkman, C., Lindholm, A. The advantages and evolution of a morphological novelty. Nature 349, 519–520 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349519a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349519a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing