Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens

Abstract

IN a small proportion of bird species (<3%), offspring delay their dispersal beyond the time when they are reproductively capable, remain on their natal territory, and usually assist the resident breeders, normally their parents, to raise other young1–3. This pattern of social organization and care-giving behaviour, most frequently termed cooperative breeding, is controversial with respect to why offspring delay their dispersal2–8. In this study we investigate the interaction between habitat limitation, habitat quality, and sex ratio in influencing dispersal decisions in a population of superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). We show that every non-breeding male (31 of 32; 96.9%) given the opportunity, dispersed and bred. The sex ratio was male-biased and although males did not disperse into vacant but previously occupied territories in the absence of females, the reintroduction of females prompted dispersals. Our data suggest that young males delay their dispersal in response to a limited number of mates and secondarily to habitat limitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skutch, A. F. Auk 52, 257–273 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emlen, S. T. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 305–339 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, J. L. Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds: Ecology and Evolution (Princeton University, Princeton, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J. L. Am. Zool. 14, 63–80 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koenig, W. D. & Pitelka, F. A. in Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (eds Alexander, R. D. & Tinkle, D. W.) 261–280 (Chiron, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emlen, S. T. Am. Nat. 119, 29–39 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stacey, P. B. & Ligon, J. D. Am. Nat. 130, 654–676 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stacey, P. B. & Ligon, J. D. Am. Nat. (in the press).

  9. Schodde, R. The Fairy-Wrens (Lansdowne, Melbourne, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rowley, I. Emu 64, 251–297 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooker, M. G., Rowley, I., Adams, M. & Baverstock, P. R. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 191–200 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nias, R. C. Emu 84, 178–180 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Selander, R. K. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 74, 1–224 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pruett-Jones, S., Lewis, M. Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature 348, 541–542 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/348541a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/348541a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing