Abstract
Ultrasound exposure (USE) in the presence of microbubbles (MCB) (e.g. contrast agents used to enhance ultrasound imaging) increases plasmid transfection efficiency in vitro by several orders of magnitude. Formation of short-lived pores in the plasma membrane (‘sonoporation’), up to 100 nm in effective diameter lasting a few seconds, is implicated as the dominant mechanism, associated with acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound enhanced gene transfer (UEGT) has also been successfully achieved in vivo, with reports of spatially restricted and therapeutically relevant levels of transgene expression. Loading MCB with nucleic acids and/or disease-targeting ligands may further improve the efficiency and specificity of UEGT such that clinical testing becomes a realistic prospect.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liang HD, Lu QL, Xue SA, Halliwell M, Kodama T, Cosgrove DO et al. Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1523–1529.
Michel MS, Erben P, Trojan L, Schaaf A, Kiknavelidze K, Knoll T et al. Acoustic energy: a new transfection method for cancer of the prostate, cancer of the bladder and benign kidney cells. Anticancer Res 2004; 24: 2303–2308.
Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH . Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: kinetics of plasmid internalization and gene expression. J Control Release 2005; 104: 203–211.
Akowuah EF, Gray C, Lawrie A, Sheridan PJ, Su CH, Bettinger T et al. Ultrasound-mediated delivery of TIMP-3 plasmid DNA into saphenous vein leads to increased lumen size in a porcine interposition graft model. Gene Therapy 2005; 12: 1154–1157.
Zhou QH, Miller DL, Carlisle RC, Seymour LW, Oupicky D . Ultrasound-enhanced transfection activity of HPMA-stabilized DNA polyplexes with prolonged plasma circulation. J Control Release 2005; 106: 416–427.
Rahim AA, Taylor SL, Bush NL, Ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD . Spatial and acoustic pressure dependence of microbubble-mediated gene delivery targeted using focused ultrasound. J Gene Med 2006; 8: 1347–1357.
Rahim AA, Taylor SL, Bush NL, Ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD . Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1269–1279.
Fischer AJ, Stanke JJ, Omar G, Askwith CC, Burry RW . Ultrasound-mediated gene transfer into neuronal cells. J Biotechnol 2006; 122: 393–411.
Guo DP, Li XY, Sun P, Tang YB, Chen XY, Chen Q et al. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction improves the low density lipoprotein receptor gene expression in HepG2 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 343: 470–474.
Feril Jr LB, Kondo T, Zhao QL, Ogawa R, Tachibana K, Kudo N et al. Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 331–337.
Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S . Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature 2003; 423: 153–156.
Sundaram J, Mellein BR, Mitragotri S . An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophys J 2003; 84: 3087–3101.
Brujan EA . The role of cavitation microjets in the therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 381–387.
Deng CX, Sieling F, Pan H, Cui J . Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 519–526.
Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR . Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 527–538.
Brujan EA, Ikeda T, Matsumoto Y . Jet formation and shock wave emission during collapse of ultrasound-induced cavitation bubbles and their role in the therapeutic applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 4797–4809.
Duvshani-Eshet M, Machluf M . Therapeutic ultrasound optimization for gene delivery: a key factor achieving nuclear DNA localization. J Control Release 2005; 108: 513–528.
Hauff P, Seemann S, Reszka R, Schultze-Mosgau M, Reinhardt M, Buzasi T et al. Evaluation of gas-filled microparticles and sonoporation as gene delivery system: feasibility study in rodent tumor models. Radiology 2005; 236: 572–578.
Kinoshita M, Hynynen K . A novel method for the intracellular delivery of siRNA using microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 335: 393–399.
Pan H, Zhou Y, Izadnegahdar O, Cui J, Deng CX . Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 849–856.
Larina IV, Evers BM, Esenaliev RO . Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation. Anticancer Res 2005; 25: 149–156.
Duvshani-Eshet M, Baruch L, Kesselman E, Shimoni E, Machluf M . Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene Therapy 2006; 13: 163–172.
Duvshani-Eshet M, Adam D, Machluf M . The effects of albumin-coated microbubbles in DNA delivery mediated by therapeutic ultrasound. J Control Release 2006; 112: 156–166.
Hallow DM, Mahajan AD, McCutchen TE, Prausnitz MR . Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1111–1122.
Juffermans L, Dijkmans PA, Musters RJ, Visser CA, Kamp O . Transient permeabilization of cell membranes by ultrasound-exposed microbubbles is related to formation of hydrogen peroxide. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H1595–H1601.
Kagiya G, Ogawa R, Tabuchi Y, Feril Jr LB, Nozaki T, Fukuda S et al. Expression of heme oxygenase-1 due to intracellular reactive oxygen species induced by ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 2006; 13: 388–396.
Khanna S, Hudson B, Pepper CJ, Amso NN, Coakley WT . Fluorescein isothiocynate-dextran uptake by Chinese hamster ovary cells in a 1.5 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in the presence of contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 289–295.
Kodama T, Tomita Y, Koshiyama K, Blomley MJ . Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 905–914.
Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR . Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 915–924.
van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release 2006; 112: 149–155.
O'Brien Jr WD . Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93: 212–255.
Kimmel E . Cavitation bioeffects. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 105–161.
Klibanov AL . Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 354–362.
Liu Y, Miyoshi H, Nakamura M . Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery. J Control Release 2006; 114: 89–99.
Pislaru SV, Pislaru C, Kinnick RR, Singh R, Gulati R, Greenleaf JF et al. Optimization of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer: comparison of contrast agents and ultrasound modalities. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1690–1698.
Guo DP, Li XY, Sun P, Wang ZG, Chen XY, Chen Q et al. Ultrasound/microbubble enhances foreign gene expression in ECV304 cells and murine myocardium. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2004; 36: 824–831.
Sakakima Y, Hayashi S, Yagi Y, Hayakawa A, Tachibana K, Nakao A . Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. Cancer Gene Ther 2005; 12: 884–889.
Forsberg F, Shi WT, Merritt CR, Dai Q, Solcova M, Goldberg BB . On the usefulness of the mechanical index displayed on clinical ultrasound scanners for predicting contrast microbubble destruction. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 443–450.
Forsberg F, Merton DA, Goldberg BB . In vivo destruction of ultrasound contrast microbubbles is independent of the mechanical index. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 143–144.
van Wamel A, Bouakaz A, Versluis M, de Jong N . Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1255–1258.
Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH . Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release 2005; 104: 213–222.
Korosoglou G, Hardt SE, Bekeredjian R, Jenne J, Konstantin M, Hagenmueller M et al. Ultrasound exposure can increase the membrane permeability of human neutrophil granulocytes containing microbubbles without causing complete cell destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 297–303.
Kodama T, Tan PH, Offiah I, Partridge T, Cook T, George AJ et al. Delivery of oligodeoxynucleotides into human saphenous veins and the adjunct effect of ultrasound and microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1683–1691.
Postema M, van Wamel A, Lancee CT, de Jong N . Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 827–840.
Postema M, van Wamel A, ten Cate FJ, de Jong N . High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Med Phys 2005; 32: 3707–3711.
Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, Wyllie D, Kiss-Toth E, Qwarnstrom EE et al. Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1453–1461.
Wei W, Zheng-zhong B, Yong-jie W, Qing-wu Z, Ya-lin M . Bioeffects of low-frequency ultrasonic gene delivery and safety on cell membrane permeability control. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 1569–1582.
Azuma H, Tomita N, Kaneda Y, Koike H, Ogihara T, Katsuoka Y et al. Transfection of NFkappaB-decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using efficient ultrasound-mediated gene transfer into donor kidneys prolonged survival of rat renal allografts. Gene Therapy 2003; 10: 415–425.
Bekeredjian R, Chen S, Frenkel PA, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV . Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction can repeatedly direct highly specific plasmid expression to the heart. Circulation 2003; 108: 1022–1026.
Chen S, Shohet RV, Bekeredjian R, Frenkel P, Grayburn PA . Optimization of ultrasound parameters for cardiac gene delivery of adenoviral or plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 301–308.
Christiansen JP, French BA, Klibanov AL, Kaul S, Lindner JR . Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1759–1767.
Lan HY, Mu W, Tomita N, Huang XR, Li JH, Zhu HJ et al. Inhibition of renal fibrosis by gene transfer of inducible Smad7 using ultrasound-microbubble system in rat UUO model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1535–1548.
Li T, Tachibana K, Kuroki M, Kuroki M . Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice – initial results. Radiology 2003; 229: 423–428.
Lu QL, Liang HD, Partridge T, Blomley MJ . Microbubble ultrasound improves the efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage. Gene Therapy 2003; 10: 396–405.
Kondo I, Ohmori K, Oshita A, Takeuchi H, Fuke S, Shinomiya K et al. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer: the first demonstration of myocardial transfer of a ‘functional’ gene using ultrasonic microbubble destruction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 644–653.
Zhigang W, Zhiyu L, Haitao R, Hong R, Qunxia Z, Ailong H et al. Ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction enhances VEGF gene delivery to the infarcted myocardium in rats. Clin Imaging 2004; 28: 395–398.
Hou CC, Wang W, Huang XR, Fu P, Chen TH, Sheikh-Hamad D et al. Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated gene transfer of inducible Smad7 blocks transforming growth factor-beta signaling and fibrosis in rat remnant kidney. Am J Pathol 2005; 166: 761–771.
Koike H, Tomita N, Azuma H, Taniyama Y, Yamasaki K, Kunugiza Y et al. An efficient gene transfer method mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney. J Gene Med 2005; 7: 108–116.
Korpanty G, Chen S, Shohet RV, Ding J, Yang B, Frenkel PA et al. Targeting of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis to rat myocardium using ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles. Gene Therapy 2005; 12: 1305–1312.
Tsunoda S, Mazda O, Oda Y, Iida Y, Akabame S, Kishida T et al. Sonoporation using microbubble BR14 promotes pDNA/siRNA transduction to murine heart. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 336: 118–127.
Wang X, Liang HD, Dong B, Lu QL, Blomley MJ . Gene transfer with microbubble ultrasound and plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle of mice: comparison between commercially available microbubble contrast agents. Radiology 2005; 237: 224–229.
Zhang Q, Wang Z, Ran H, Fu X, Li X, Zheng Y et al. Enhanced gene delivery into skeletal muscles with ultrasound and microbubble techniques. Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 363–367.
Hashiya N, Aoki M, Tachibana K, Taniyama Y, Yamasaki K, Hiraoka K et al. Local delivery of E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using ultrasound with microbubble agent (Optison) inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 317: 508–514.
Inagaki H, Suzuki J, Ogawa M, Taniyama Y, Morishita R, Isobe M . Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated NF-kappaB decoy transfection attenuates neointimal formation after arterial injury in mice. J Vasc Res 2006; 43: 12–18.
Shimamura M, Sato N, Taniyama Y, Yamamoto S, Endoh M, Kurinami H et al. Development of efficient plasmid DNA transfer into adult rat central nervous system using microbubble-enhanced ultrasound. Gene Therapy 2004; 11: 1532–1539.
Manome Y, Nakayama N, Nakayama K, Furuhata H . Insonation facilitates plasmid DNA transfection into the central nervous system and microbubbles enhance the effect. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 693–702.
Nishida K, Doita M, Takada T, Kakutani K, Miyamoto H, Shimomura T et al. Sustained transgene expression in intervertebral disc cells in vivo mediated by microbubble-enhanced ultrasound gene therapy. Spine 2006; 31: 1415–1419.
Dittmar KM, Xie J, Hunter F, Trimble C, Bur M, Frenkel V et al. Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound enhances systemic administration of naked DNA in squamous cell carcinoma model: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 235: 541–546.
Chen S, Ding JH, Bekeredjian R, Yang BZ, Shohet RV, Johnston SA et al. Efficient gene delivery to pancreatic islets with ultrasonic microbubble destruction technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 8469–8474.
Miao CH, Brayman AA, Loeb KR, Ye P, Zhou L, Mourad P et al. Ultrasound enhances gene delivery of human factor IX plasmid. Hum Gene Ther 2005; 16: 893–905.
Vancraeynest D, Havaux X, Pouleur AC, Pasquet A, Gerber B, Beauloye C et al. Myocardial delivery of colloid nanoparticles using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 237–245.
Imada T, Tatsumi T, Mori Y, Nishiue T, Yoshida M, Masaki H et al. Targeted delivery of bone marrow mononuclear cells by ultrasound destruction of microbubbles induces both angiogenesis and arteriogenesis response. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 2128–2134.
Zen K, Okigaki M, Hosokawa Y, Adachi Y, Nozawa Y, Takamiya M et al. Myocardium-targeted delivery of endothelial progenitor cells by ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction improves cardiac function via an angiogenic response. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006; 40: 799–809.
Miller DL, Song J . Tumor growth reduction and DNA transfer by cavitation-enhanced high-intensity focused ultrasound in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 887–893.
Jakobsen JA, Oyen R, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK . Safety of ultrasound contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 941–945.
Paliwal S, Mitragotri S . Ultrasound-induced cavitation: applications in drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2006; 3: 713–726.
Ter Haar G . Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93: 111–129.
Lentacker I, De Geest BG, Vandenbroucke RE, Peeters L, Demeester J, De Smedt SC et al. Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA. Langmuir 2006; 22: 7273–7278.
Feril Jr LB, Ogawa R, Kobayashi H, Kikuchi H, Kondo T . Ultrasound enhances liposome-mediated gene transfection. Ultrason Sonochem 2005; 12: 489–493.
Howard CM, Forsberg F, Minimo C, Liu JB, Merton DA, Claudio PP . Ultrasound guided site specific gene delivery system using adenoviral vectors and commercial ultrasound contrast agents. J Cell Physiol 2006; 209: 413–421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, C., Bettinger, T. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Ultrasound for gene transfer. Gene Ther 14, 465–475 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302925
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302925
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Effect of 1-MHz ultrasound on the proinflammatory interleukin-6 secretion in human keratinocytes
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Polyprenol-Based Lipofecting Agents for In Vivo Delivery of Therapeutic DNA to Treat Hypertensive Rats
Biochemical Genetics (2021)
-
Local anesthesia enhanced with increasing high-frequency ultrasound intensity
Drug Delivery and Translational Research (2020)
-
Ultrasound delivery of Surface Enhanced InfraRed Absorption active gold-nanoprobes into fibroblast cells: a biological study via Synchrotron-based InfraRed microanalysis at single cell level
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Differential effects on membrane permeability and viability of human keratinocyte cells undergoing very low intensity megasonic fields
Scientific Reports (2017)