Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Signal clipping by the rod output synapse

Abstract

The properties of synapses between retinal neurons make an essential contribution to early visual processing. Light produces a graded hyperpolarization in photoreceptors, up to 25 mV in amplitude1, and it is conventionally assumed that all of this response range is available for coding visual information. We report here, however, that the rod output synapse rectifies strongly, so that only potential changes within 5 m V of the rod dark potential are transmitted effectively to postsynaptic horizontal cells. This finding is consistent with the voltage-dependence of the calcium current presumed to control neurotransmitter release from rods2. It suggests functional roles for the strong electrical coupling of adjacent rods3 and the weak electrical coupling of adjacent rods and cones4. The existence of photoreceptor coupling resolves the apparent paradox that rods have a 25 mV response range, while signals greater than 5 mV in amplitude are clipped during synaptic transmission. We predict that the strengths of rod-rod and rod-cone coupling are quantitatively linked to the relationship between the rod response range and the synapse operating range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Bader, C. R., MacLeish, P. R. & Schwartz, E. A. Proc. natn. Acad. ScL U.S.A. 75, 3507–3511 (1978). 2. Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D. & Schwartz, E. A. J. Physiol., Lond. 331, 253–284 (1982). 3. Attwell, D. & Wilson, M. /. Physiol., Lond. 309, 287–315 (1980). 4. Attwell, D., Wilson, M. & Wu, S. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 352, 703–737 (1984). 5. Hanani, M. & Vallerga, S. 7. Physiol., Lond. 298, 397–405 (1980). 6. Marshall, L. M. & Werblin, F. S. 7. Physiol., Lond. 279, 321–346 (1978). 7. Attwell, D. Q. 7. exp. Physiol. 71, 497–536 (1986). 8. Shiells, R. A., Falk, G. & Naghshineh, S, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 227, 121–135 (1986). 9. Custer, N. V. 7. comp. Neurol. 151, 35–56 (1973). 10. Falk, G. & Fatt, P. Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VII/1 (ed. Dartnall, H. J. A.) 235–239 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1972). 11. Lamb, T. D. & Simon, E. J. 7 Physiol., Lond. 263, 257–286 (1971). 12. Baylor, D. A., Lamb, T. D. & Yau, K. W. 7. Physiol., Lond. 288, 589–611 (1979). 13. Attwell, D., Werblin, F. S. & Wilson, M. 7. Physiol., Lond. 328, 259–283 (1982). 14. Werblin, F. S. 7 Physiol, Lond. 280, 449–470 (1978). 15. Normann, R. A. & Perlman, I. 7 Physiol., Lond. 286, 509–524 (1979). 16. Attwell, D., Wilson, M. & Wu, S. M. Brain Res. 343, 79–88 (1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Attwell, D., Borges, S., Wu, S. et al. Signal clipping by the rod output synapse. Nature 328, 522–524 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/328522a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/328522a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing