Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A quasar with z = 3.71 and limits on the number of more distant objects

Abstract

Spectroscopy of objects identified with radio sources from the Parkes Selected Regions has shown the compact, flat-spectrum source 1351–018 to be a quasar with redshift 3.71, the second most distant discovered to date. Compared with known quasars at such high redshifts, the object is optically very faint (B = 20.9), red in colour (B-R = 1.6) and is distinguishable photometrically from faint galaxies only by its relatively blue optical-infrared colour (R-K =2.1). In common with other high-redshift, radio-loud quasars, 1351–018 has weak emission lines when compared with objects selected optically through objective-prism or grism techniques. Moreover, weak-lined objects such as this may also be missed even by surveys using broad-band optical colours, which may help to explain why such searches have failed to find faint, high-redshift quasars. Because it is a member of a complete sample, 1351–018, in fact, confirms the recent suggestion1 that the quasar radio luminosity function declines for redshifts z>2. Extrapolation of the existing data predicts that the main Parkes Survey may contain about eight 8 flat-spectrum quasars with z>4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peacock, J. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 217, 601–631 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wall, J. V., Shimmins, A. J. & Merkelijn, K. J. Austr. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl. 19, 1–68 (1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Downes, A. J. B., Peacock, J. A., Savage, A. & Carrie, D. R. Mon. Nor. R. astr. Soc. 218, 31–62 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, B. A., Savage, A., Jauncey, D. L. & Wright, A. E. Astrophys. J. 260, L27–L29 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. McEwan, N. J., Browne, I. W. A. & Crowther, J. H. Mem. R. astr. Soc. 80, 1–59 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Savage, A., Bolton, J. G. & Trett, J. Austr. J. Phys. 35, 207–219 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lilly, S. J. & Longair, M. S. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 211, 833–855 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lilly, S. J., Longair, M. S. & Allington-Smith, J. R. Mon. Not. astr. Soc. 215, 37–57 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, A. E. Proc. 24th Liége Symp. 53–58 (University of Liége, 1983).

  10. Wills, D. & Lynds, R. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 36, 317–358 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hazard, C. & McMahon, R. Nature 314, 238–240 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shanks, T., Fong, R. & Boyle, B. J. Nature 303, 156–158 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koo, D. C. Proc. 24th Liége Symp., 240–244 (University of Liége, 1983).

  14. Avni, Y. & Bahcall, J. N. Astrophys. J. 235, 694–716 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hyland, A. R. & Alien, D. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 199, 943–952 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright, A. E., Abies, J. G. & Alien, D. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 205, 793–807 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunlop, J., Downes, A., Peacock, J. et al. A quasar with z = 3.71 and limits on the number of more distant objects. Nature 319, 564–567 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319564a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/319564a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing